Repetition of the rapid antigen test in initially negative supposed streptococcal pharyngitis is not necessary in adults
Summary Aims: To determine whether the repetition of the rapid antigen detection test (RADT) in patients, with a high suspicion of presenting pharyngitis by group A β‐haemolytic streptococci (GABHS), with a previously negative test improves the validity of the test. Methods: Two hundred and twenty...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of clinical practice (Esher) 2009-09, Vol.63 (9), p.1340-1344 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
Aims: To determine whether the repetition of the rapid antigen detection test (RADT) in patients, with a high suspicion of presenting pharyngitis by group A β‐haemolytic streptococci (GABHS), with a previously negative test improves the validity of the test.
Methods: Two hundred and twenty‐two patients aged 14 years or more with acute pharyngitis and two or more Centor criteria – tonsillar exudates, fever, tenderness in the lymph glands and/or absence of cough – were consecutively recruited. In all patients, a pharyngotonsillar sample was obtained with two swabs, one for the RADT (OSOM® Strep A Genzyme test, Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA, USA) and the other was sent to the Department of Microbiology for culture. In patients with a negative RADT, the determination was repeated. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were determined.
Results: Cultures were positive for GABHS in 55 patients (24.8%). Three false‐negatives and 14 false‐positives were observed by comparing the rapid test with throat culture, achieving a sensitivity of 94.5% and a specificity of 91.6%. Positive and negative predictive values were 78.8% and 98.1% respectively. Taking the second determination in the negative cases into account, the results were 96.4%, 91.6%, 79.1% and 98.7% respectively.
Conclusions: The negative predictive value achieved with the RADT determination was very high. Repetition of the test only slightly improved this percentage, making repetition of this test unnecessary. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1368-5031 1742-1241 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02048.x |