Breast cancer in Latin America: Experts perceptions compared with medical care standards
Abstract Background The BCRF II study presents a systematic review of the norms, recommendations and guidelines that are considered medical care standards (MCS) for breast cancer in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Three key questions from the BCRF I survey data on early detection and diag...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Breast (Edinburgh) 2010-02, Vol.19 (1), p.50-54 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 54 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 50 |
container_title | Breast (Edinburgh) |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Cazap, E Buzaid, A Garbino, C de la Garza, J Orlandi, F Schwartsmann, G Vallejos, C Guercovich, A Breitbart, G |
description | Abstract Background The BCRF II study presents a systematic review of the norms, recommendations and guidelines that are considered medical care standards (MCS) for breast cancer in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Three key questions from the BCRF I survey data on early detection and diagnosis are presented to identify implementation practice patterns related to MCS. Methods Information related to MCS was requested from governmental health authorities, cancer institutes, and national scientific and professional societies in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Documents received were reviewed by breast cancer experts from each respective country. Three key survey questions from the BCRF I survey on early detection and diagnosis were reprocessed to provide information related to implementation practice of existing MCS. Results: All countries included in the BCRF II study had medical care standards (MCS) whether published by governmental authorities, national professional or scientific associations, cancer institutes, or adoption of international MCS. Experts reported different practice patterns at a Country level versus a Center level. Overall, 85% of the experts reported that less than 50% of the women with no symptoms undergo a mammography at the Country level compared to 43% at the Center level. For diagnostic suspicion of breast cancer, 80% of experts considered the diagnostic suspicion at a Country level to come from the patient compared to 50% at a Center level. About 30% of patients waited for more than 3 months for a diagnosis at the Country level compared to 7% at the Center level. Conclusion All the Latin America and Caribbean countries in the study reported the use of similar MCS for breast cancer care. The reported difference between care practiced at a Country level versus a Center level suggests the challenge is not in generating new MCS, but in implementing policies and control mechanisms for compliance with existing MCS, guaranteeing their applicability to all populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.breast.2009.10.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733953045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960977609001490</els_id><sourcerecordid>733953045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-843e22dfd717be013b17d00303c627f4f8f199a812bb045a782043bf351c62183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVIaTZpv0EouuXk7UiyLbmHQhLSNLCQQ1roTcjSmGjrf5W0afPtK2cXCrn0MoLhvTea3xByzmDNgNUft-s2oIlpzQGa3FoDY0dkxSrBCwEKjskKmhqKRsr6hJzGuIUsFLV6S05Y05SVkmpFfly9hFBrRouB-pFuTMr1csDgrflEb_7MGFKkuVqck5_GSO00zCago799eqQDuqzsc0RAGpMZnQkuviNvOtNHfH94z8j3Lzffrr8Wm_vbu-vLTWHLmqdClQI5d52TTLYITLRMOgABwtZcdmWnuvxZoxhvWygrIxWHUrSdqFgWMCXOyMU-dw7Trx3GpAcfLfa9GXHaRS2FaCqRrVlZ7pU2TDEG7PQc_GDCs2agF6R6q_dI9YJ06Wak2fbhMGDX5lX_mQ4Ms-DzXoB5zSePQUfrMeN0PqBN2k3-fxNeB9jejwvTn_iMcTvtwpgRaqYj16AflrMuV4UGgJUNiL81bJ2S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733953045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast cancer in Latin America: Experts perceptions compared with medical care standards</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Cazap, E ; Buzaid, A ; Garbino, C ; de la Garza, J ; Orlandi, F ; Schwartsmann, G ; Vallejos, C ; Guercovich, A ; Breitbart, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Cazap, E ; Buzaid, A ; Garbino, C ; de la Garza, J ; Orlandi, F ; Schwartsmann, G ; Vallejos, C ; Guercovich, A ; Breitbart, G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The BCRF II study presents a systematic review of the norms, recommendations and guidelines that are considered medical care standards (MCS) for breast cancer in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Three key questions from the BCRF I survey data on early detection and diagnosis are presented to identify implementation practice patterns related to MCS. Methods Information related to MCS was requested from governmental health authorities, cancer institutes, and national scientific and professional societies in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Documents received were reviewed by breast cancer experts from each respective country. Three key survey questions from the BCRF I survey on early detection and diagnosis were reprocessed to provide information related to implementation practice of existing MCS. Results: All countries included in the BCRF II study had medical care standards (MCS) whether published by governmental authorities, national professional or scientific associations, cancer institutes, or adoption of international MCS. Experts reported different practice patterns at a Country level versus a Center level. Overall, 85% of the experts reported that less than 50% of the women with no symptoms undergo a mammography at the Country level compared to 43% at the Center level. For diagnostic suspicion of breast cancer, 80% of experts considered the diagnostic suspicion at a Country level to come from the patient compared to 50% at a Center level. About 30% of patients waited for more than 3 months for a diagnosis at the Country level compared to 7% at the Center level. Conclusion All the Latin America and Caribbean countries in the study reported the use of similar MCS for breast cancer care. The reported difference between care practiced at a Country level versus a Center level suggests the challenge is not in generating new MCS, but in implementing policies and control mechanisms for compliance with existing MCS, guaranteeing their applicability to all populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9776</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2009.10.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19945878</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Caribbean Region - epidemiology ; Developing countries ; Expert survey ; Female ; Health Plan Implementation - organization & administration ; Health Plan Implementation - standards ; Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration ; Health Services Accessibility - standards ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Latin America ; Latin America - epidemiology ; Male ; Mass Screening - organization & administration ; Mass Screening - standards ; Medical care standards ; Medical Oncology - organization & administration ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - organization & administration ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Women's Health ; Women's Health Services - organization & administration ; Women's Health Services - standards]]></subject><ispartof>Breast (Edinburgh), 2010-02, Vol.19 (1), p.50-54</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-843e22dfd717be013b17d00303c627f4f8f199a812bb045a782043bf351c62183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-843e22dfd717be013b17d00303c627f4f8f199a812bb045a782043bf351c62183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2009.10.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19945878$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cazap, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzaid, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbino, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Garza, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlandi, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartsmann, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallejos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guercovich, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitbart, G</creatorcontrib><title>Breast cancer in Latin America: Experts perceptions compared with medical care standards</title><title>Breast (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The BCRF II study presents a systematic review of the norms, recommendations and guidelines that are considered medical care standards (MCS) for breast cancer in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Three key questions from the BCRF I survey data on early detection and diagnosis are presented to identify implementation practice patterns related to MCS. Methods Information related to MCS was requested from governmental health authorities, cancer institutes, and national scientific and professional societies in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Documents received were reviewed by breast cancer experts from each respective country. Three key survey questions from the BCRF I survey on early detection and diagnosis were reprocessed to provide information related to implementation practice of existing MCS. Results: All countries included in the BCRF II study had medical care standards (MCS) whether published by governmental authorities, national professional or scientific associations, cancer institutes, or adoption of international MCS. Experts reported different practice patterns at a Country level versus a Center level. Overall, 85% of the experts reported that less than 50% of the women with no symptoms undergo a mammography at the Country level compared to 43% at the Center level. For diagnostic suspicion of breast cancer, 80% of experts considered the diagnostic suspicion at a Country level to come from the patient compared to 50% at a Center level. About 30% of patients waited for more than 3 months for a diagnosis at the Country level compared to 7% at the Center level. Conclusion All the Latin America and Caribbean countries in the study reported the use of similar MCS for breast cancer care. The reported difference between care practiced at a Country level versus a Center level suggests the challenge is not in generating new MCS, but in implementing policies and control mechanisms for compliance with existing MCS, guaranteeing their applicability to all populations.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Caribbean Region - epidemiology</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Expert survey</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Plan Implementation - organization & administration</subject><subject>Health Plan Implementation - standards</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - standards</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Latin America</subject><subject>Latin America - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - organization & administration</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Medical care standards</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - organization & administration</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Women's Health</subject><subject>Women's Health Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Women's Health Services - standards</subject><issn>0960-9776</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVIaTZpv0EouuXk7UiyLbmHQhLSNLCQQ1roTcjSmGjrf5W0afPtK2cXCrn0MoLhvTea3xByzmDNgNUft-s2oIlpzQGa3FoDY0dkxSrBCwEKjskKmhqKRsr6hJzGuIUsFLV6S05Y05SVkmpFfly9hFBrRouB-pFuTMr1csDgrflEb_7MGFKkuVqck5_GSO00zCago799eqQDuqzsc0RAGpMZnQkuviNvOtNHfH94z8j3Lzffrr8Wm_vbu-vLTWHLmqdClQI5d52TTLYITLRMOgABwtZcdmWnuvxZoxhvWygrIxWHUrSdqFgWMCXOyMU-dw7Trx3GpAcfLfa9GXHaRS2FaCqRrVlZ7pU2TDEG7PQc_GDCs2agF6R6q_dI9YJ06Wak2fbhMGDX5lX_mQ4Ms-DzXoB5zSePQUfrMeN0PqBN2k3-fxNeB9jejwvTn_iMcTvtwpgRaqYj16AflrMuV4UGgJUNiL81bJ2S</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Cazap, E</creator><creator>Buzaid, A</creator><creator>Garbino, C</creator><creator>de la Garza, J</creator><creator>Orlandi, F</creator><creator>Schwartsmann, G</creator><creator>Vallejos, C</creator><creator>Guercovich, A</creator><creator>Breitbart, G</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Breast cancer in Latin America: Experts perceptions compared with medical care standards</title><author>Cazap, E ; Buzaid, A ; Garbino, C ; de la Garza, J ; Orlandi, F ; Schwartsmann, G ; Vallejos, C ; Guercovich, A ; Breitbart, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-843e22dfd717be013b17d00303c627f4f8f199a812bb045a782043bf351c62183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Caribbean Region - epidemiology</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Expert survey</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Plan Implementation - organization & administration</topic><topic>Health Plan Implementation - standards</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - standards</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Latin America</topic><topic>Latin America - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - organization & administration</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Medical care standards</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - organization & administration</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Women's Health</topic><topic>Women's Health Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Women's Health Services - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cazap, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzaid, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbino, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Garza, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlandi, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartsmann, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallejos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guercovich, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitbart, G</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cazap, E</au><au>Buzaid, A</au><au>Garbino, C</au><au>de la Garza, J</au><au>Orlandi, F</au><au>Schwartsmann, G</au><au>Vallejos, C</au><au>Guercovich, A</au><au>Breitbart, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast cancer in Latin America: Experts perceptions compared with medical care standards</atitle><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>50</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>50-54</pages><issn>0960-9776</issn><eissn>1532-3080</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The BCRF II study presents a systematic review of the norms, recommendations and guidelines that are considered medical care standards (MCS) for breast cancer in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Three key questions from the BCRF I survey data on early detection and diagnosis are presented to identify implementation practice patterns related to MCS. Methods Information related to MCS was requested from governmental health authorities, cancer institutes, and national scientific and professional societies in 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Documents received were reviewed by breast cancer experts from each respective country. Three key survey questions from the BCRF I survey on early detection and diagnosis were reprocessed to provide information related to implementation practice of existing MCS. Results: All countries included in the BCRF II study had medical care standards (MCS) whether published by governmental authorities, national professional or scientific associations, cancer institutes, or adoption of international MCS. Experts reported different practice patterns at a Country level versus a Center level. Overall, 85% of the experts reported that less than 50% of the women with no symptoms undergo a mammography at the Country level compared to 43% at the Center level. For diagnostic suspicion of breast cancer, 80% of experts considered the diagnostic suspicion at a Country level to come from the patient compared to 50% at a Center level. About 30% of patients waited for more than 3 months for a diagnosis at the Country level compared to 7% at the Center level. Conclusion All the Latin America and Caribbean countries in the study reported the use of similar MCS for breast cancer care. The reported difference between care practiced at a Country level versus a Center level suggests the challenge is not in generating new MCS, but in implementing policies and control mechanisms for compliance with existing MCS, guaranteeing their applicability to all populations.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19945878</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.breast.2009.10.011</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-9776 |
ispartof | Breast (Edinburgh), 2010-02, Vol.19 (1), p.50-54 |
issn | 0960-9776 1532-3080 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733953045 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology Breast Neoplasms - therapy Caribbean Region - epidemiology Developing countries Expert survey Female Health Plan Implementation - organization & administration Health Plan Implementation - standards Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration Health Services Accessibility - standards Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Latin America Latin America - epidemiology Male Mass Screening - organization & administration Mass Screening - standards Medical care standards Medical Oncology - organization & administration Practice Guidelines as Topic Quality Indicators, Health Care - organization & administration Socioeconomic Factors Women's Health Women's Health Services - organization & administration Women's Health Services - standards |
title | Breast cancer in Latin America: Experts perceptions compared with medical care standards |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20cancer%20in%20Latin%20America:%20Experts%20perceptions%20compared%20with%20medical%20care%20standards&rft.jtitle=Breast%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=Cazap,%20E&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=50-54&rft.issn=0960-9776&rft.eissn=1532-3080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.breast.2009.10.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733953045%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733953045&rft_id=info:pmid/19945878&rft_els_id=S0960977609001490&rfr_iscdi=true |