A repurposed tool: the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note

Medical Education 2010: 44 : 298–305 Context  Doctors have used the subjective–objective–assessment–plan (SOAP) note format to organise data about patient problems and create plans to address each of them. We retooled this into the ‘Programme Evaluation SOAP Note’, which serves to broaden the clinic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical education 2010-03, Vol.44 (3), p.298-305
Hauptverfasser: Reznich, Christopher B, Wagner, Dianne P, Noel, Mary M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 305
container_issue 3
container_start_page 298
container_title Medical education
container_volume 44
creator Reznich, Christopher B
Wagner, Dianne P
Noel, Mary M
description Medical Education 2010: 44 : 298–305 Context  Doctors have used the subjective–objective–assessment–plan (SOAP) note format to organise data about patient problems and create plans to address each of them. We retooled this into the ‘Programme Evaluation SOAP Note’, which serves to broaden the clinician faculty member’s perspective on programme evaluation to include the curriculum and the system, as well as students. Methods  The SOAP Note was chosen as the method for data recording because of its familiarity to clinician‐educators and its strengths as a representation of a clinical problem‐solving process with elements analogous to educational programme evaluation. We pilot‐tested the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note to organise faculty members' interpretations of integrated student performances during the Year 3 patient care skills objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Results  Eight community clerkship directors and lead clerkship faculty members participated as observers in the 2007 gateway examination and completed the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note. Problems with the curriculum and system far outnumbered problems identified with students. Conclusions  Using the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note, clerkship leaders developed expanded lists of ‘differential diagnoses’ that could explain possible learner performance inadequacies in terms of system, curriculum and learner problems. This has informed programme improvement efforts currently underway. We plan to continue using the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note for ongoing programme improvement.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03600.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733952830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733952830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-df716ed670015bf9977eb8007111ee8e6db54c67d6e0ebcea42f4e66f00c77cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtP4zAQhy20CMrjX1jlstpTwjh27GQPK1VseUg8KvGS9mI5zgTSTequnUD570loKVd8sSV_85uZj5CAQkT7czSLKBNJGGcxi2KALAImAKLlFhltPr6RETBIQ6AUdsme9zMAkAlPd8huDJxzEHREknHgcNG5hfVYBK219a-gfcJg6uyj002DweRZ151uKzsPbq7H0-DKtnhAtktdezxc3_vk7mRye3wWXlyfnh-PL0LDmYSwKCUVWAgJQJO8zDIpMU_7KfodEFMURZ5wI2QhEDA3qHlcchSiBDBSmpLtk5-r3IWz_zv0rWoqb7Cu9Rxt55VkLEvilEFPpivSOOu9w1ItXNVo96ooqMGZmqlBjRrUqMGZenemln3p93WTLm-w2BR-SOqBH2tAe6Pr0um5qfwnF3PoVxtm-L3iXqoaX788gLqc_Lkbnn1AuAqofIvLTYB2_5SQTCbq4epUndyLs-lflqopewNLT5UG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733952830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A repurposed tool: the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Reznich, Christopher B ; Wagner, Dianne P ; Noel, Mary M</creator><creatorcontrib>Reznich, Christopher B ; Wagner, Dianne P ; Noel, Mary M</creatorcontrib><description>Medical Education 2010: 44 : 298–305 Context  Doctors have used the subjective–objective–assessment–plan (SOAP) note format to organise data about patient problems and create plans to address each of them. We retooled this into the ‘Programme Evaluation SOAP Note’, which serves to broaden the clinician faculty member’s perspective on programme evaluation to include the curriculum and the system, as well as students. Methods  The SOAP Note was chosen as the method for data recording because of its familiarity to clinician‐educators and its strengths as a representation of a clinical problem‐solving process with elements analogous to educational programme evaluation. We pilot‐tested the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note to organise faculty members' interpretations of integrated student performances during the Year 3 patient care skills objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Results  Eight community clerkship directors and lead clerkship faculty members participated as observers in the 2007 gateway examination and completed the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note. Problems with the curriculum and system far outnumbered problems identified with students. Conclusions  Using the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note, clerkship leaders developed expanded lists of ‘differential diagnoses’ that could explain possible learner performance inadequacies in terms of system, curriculum and learner problems. This has informed programme improvement efforts currently underway. We plan to continue using the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note for ongoing programme improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03600.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20444061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Competence ; Curriculum - standards ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate - standards ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Health participants ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Pilot Projects ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2010-03, Vol.44 (3), p.298-305</ispartof><rights>Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-df716ed670015bf9977eb8007111ee8e6db54c67d6e0ebcea42f4e66f00c77cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-df716ed670015bf9977eb8007111ee8e6db54c67d6e0ebcea42f4e66f00c77cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2923.2009.03600.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2923.2009.03600.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22409970$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20444061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reznich, Christopher B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Dianne P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noel, Mary M</creatorcontrib><title>A repurposed tool: the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Medical Education 2010: 44 : 298–305 Context  Doctors have used the subjective–objective–assessment–plan (SOAP) note format to organise data about patient problems and create plans to address each of them. We retooled this into the ‘Programme Evaluation SOAP Note’, which serves to broaden the clinician faculty member’s perspective on programme evaluation to include the curriculum and the system, as well as students. Methods  The SOAP Note was chosen as the method for data recording because of its familiarity to clinician‐educators and its strengths as a representation of a clinical problem‐solving process with elements analogous to educational programme evaluation. We pilot‐tested the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note to organise faculty members' interpretations of integrated student performances during the Year 3 patient care skills objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Results  Eight community clerkship directors and lead clerkship faculty members participated as observers in the 2007 gateway examination and completed the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note. Problems with the curriculum and system far outnumbered problems identified with students. Conclusions  Using the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note, clerkship leaders developed expanded lists of ‘differential diagnoses’ that could explain possible learner performance inadequacies in terms of system, curriculum and learner problems. This has informed programme improvement efforts currently underway. We plan to continue using the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note for ongoing programme improvement.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Curriculum - standards</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - standards</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtP4zAQhy20CMrjX1jlstpTwjh27GQPK1VseUg8KvGS9mI5zgTSTequnUD570loKVd8sSV_85uZj5CAQkT7czSLKBNJGGcxi2KALAImAKLlFhltPr6RETBIQ6AUdsme9zMAkAlPd8huDJxzEHREknHgcNG5hfVYBK219a-gfcJg6uyj002DweRZ151uKzsPbq7H0-DKtnhAtktdezxc3_vk7mRye3wWXlyfnh-PL0LDmYSwKCUVWAgJQJO8zDIpMU_7KfodEFMURZ5wI2QhEDA3qHlcchSiBDBSmpLtk5-r3IWz_zv0rWoqb7Cu9Rxt55VkLEvilEFPpivSOOu9w1ItXNVo96ooqMGZmqlBjRrUqMGZenemln3p93WTLm-w2BR-SOqBH2tAe6Pr0um5qfwnF3PoVxtm-L3iXqoaX788gLqc_Lkbnn1AuAqofIvLTYB2_5SQTCbq4epUndyLs-lflqopewNLT5UG</recordid><startdate>201003</startdate><enddate>201003</enddate><creator>Reznich, Christopher B</creator><creator>Wagner, Dianne P</creator><creator>Noel, Mary M</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201003</creationdate><title>A repurposed tool: the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note</title><author>Reznich, Christopher B ; Wagner, Dianne P ; Noel, Mary M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-df716ed670015bf9977eb8007111ee8e6db54c67d6e0ebcea42f4e66f00c77cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Curriculum - standards</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - standards</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reznich, Christopher B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Dianne P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noel, Mary M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reznich, Christopher B</au><au>Wagner, Dianne P</au><au>Noel, Mary M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A repurposed tool: the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2010-03</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>298-305</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Medical Education 2010: 44 : 298–305 Context  Doctors have used the subjective–objective–assessment–plan (SOAP) note format to organise data about patient problems and create plans to address each of them. We retooled this into the ‘Programme Evaluation SOAP Note’, which serves to broaden the clinician faculty member’s perspective on programme evaluation to include the curriculum and the system, as well as students. Methods  The SOAP Note was chosen as the method for data recording because of its familiarity to clinician‐educators and its strengths as a representation of a clinical problem‐solving process with elements analogous to educational programme evaluation. We pilot‐tested the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note to organise faculty members' interpretations of integrated student performances during the Year 3 patient care skills objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Results  Eight community clerkship directors and lead clerkship faculty members participated as observers in the 2007 gateway examination and completed the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note. Problems with the curriculum and system far outnumbered problems identified with students. Conclusions  Using the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note, clerkship leaders developed expanded lists of ‘differential diagnoses’ that could explain possible learner performance inadequacies in terms of system, curriculum and learner problems. This has informed programme improvement efforts currently underway. We plan to continue using the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note for ongoing programme improvement.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20444061</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03600.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-0110
ispartof Medical education, 2010-03, Vol.44 (3), p.298-305
issn 0308-0110
1365-2923
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733952830
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Education Source
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Clinical Competence
Curriculum - standards
Education, Medical, Undergraduate - standards
Educational Measurement - methods
Health participants
Humans
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Pilot Projects
Program Evaluation - methods
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
title A repurposed tool: the Programme Evaluation SOAP Note
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A15%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20repurposed%20tool:%20the%20Programme%20Evaluation%20SOAP%20Note&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Reznich,%20Christopher%20B&rft.date=2010-03&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=298-305&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03600.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733952830%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733952830&rft_id=info:pmid/20444061&rfr_iscdi=true