Measuring patient satisfaction in the Pharmacy Specialty Immunization Clinic: a pharmacist-run immunization clinic at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System
Objective The aim was to measure patient satisfaction with the Pharmacy Specialty Immunization Clinic (PSIC), a pharmacist‐run vaccination clinic. Methods Patient satisfaction was measured using a non‐validated instrument containing 10 items with a five‐point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, not...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The International journal of pharmacy practice 2010-04, Vol.18 (2), p.100-107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 107 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 100 |
container_title | The International journal of pharmacy practice |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Bounthavong, Mark Christopher, Melissa L. D. Mendes, Margaret A. S. Foster, Emerald B. Johns, Scott T. Lim, Lesley Rubin, Lisa M. Patel, Jignesh J. Stewart, Anthony G. |
description | Objective The aim was to measure patient satisfaction with the Pharmacy Specialty Immunization Clinic (PSIC), a pharmacist‐run vaccination clinic.
Methods Patient satisfaction was measured using a non‐validated instrument containing 10 items with a five‐point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, not sure, disagree and strongly disagree). Patients who were seen at the PSIC and who received at least one vaccination were eligible to take part in the patient satisfaction survey. Priority index, a method used to identify areas where limited resources can be used to maximize patient satisfaction, was calculated for the different items of the instrument to determine areas for quality improvement. This study was conducted at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS).
Key findings A total of 188 (55.1%) out of 341 patients who received at least one vaccine in the PSIC completed the survey. Prior to any encounter with the PSIC, patients perceived that the VASDHS was doing a good job providing vaccinations (92.5% answered agree or strongly agree). This perception continued when asked about overall satisfaction after receiving vaccination through the PSIC (86.9% answered agree or strongly agree). When asked about the time the pharmacist spent with the patient, nearly all answered that the pharmacist spent as much time as necessary (97.8% answered agree or strongly agree). Patient satisfaction with pharmacist counselling was equally well received and reflected good communication between patient and pharmacist (97.8% answered agree or strongly agree). In regard to pharmacist competency, 98.9% (n= 184) of patients agreed that pharmacists in the PSIC administered vaccinations appropriately. Priority index identified access to the vaccine as an area where performance‐improvement efforts should be committed to improve patient satisfaction.
Conclusions Patients perceived good overall satisfaction with the pharmacist‐run immunization clinic in terms of professionalism and access to vaccination. Priority index identified access to vaccination as a focus for future quality improvement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1211/ijpp.18.02.0005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733948352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733948352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2940-f39781c90600e135c63dc2b21a5080230c9ecc4f2f5de6f3c4e5562d3b42213a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtvEzEUBWALgWhoWbND3rGa9Noez4NdSWkTSGmkFFhajnOncZkXtkcw_KD-zk4ypWLH6m6-cyz5EPKGwZRxxk7tXdtOWTYFPgUA-YxMOMQ8SlkaPycTyBMWpUnKjsgr7-8AeCKz9CU5GlDMGMsn5P4Kte-crW9pq4PFOlA_XF9oE2xTU1vTsEO62mlXadPTdYvG6jL0dFFVXW3_6AOblba25j3VtB2l9SFy3ZD_V5mDojocOr9hQKdrT8-KQlvn6VrX9NzibUPnODyxM9ohXfc-YHVCXhS69Pj68R6Trxcfb2bzaHl9uZidLSPD8xiiQuRpxkwOCQAyIU0itoZvONMSMuACTI7GxAUv5BaTQpgYpUz4VmxizpnQ4pi8G3tb1_zs0AdVWW-wLHWNTedVKkQeZ0LyQZ6O0rjGe4eFap2ttOsVA7XfRu23USxTwNV-myHx9rG721S4ffJ_xxhAPIJftsT-f31q8Wm1YgBDLBpjw5_j76eYdj9UkopUqu9fLtWH-dXNxefVUknxALzqrXM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733948352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring patient satisfaction in the Pharmacy Specialty Immunization Clinic: a pharmacist-run immunization clinic at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Bounthavong, Mark ; Christopher, Melissa L. D. ; Mendes, Margaret A. S. ; Foster, Emerald B. ; Johns, Scott T. ; Lim, Lesley ; Rubin, Lisa M. ; Patel, Jignesh J. ; Stewart, Anthony G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bounthavong, Mark ; Christopher, Melissa L. D. ; Mendes, Margaret A. S. ; Foster, Emerald B. ; Johns, Scott T. ; Lim, Lesley ; Rubin, Lisa M. ; Patel, Jignesh J. ; Stewart, Anthony G.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The aim was to measure patient satisfaction with the Pharmacy Specialty Immunization Clinic (PSIC), a pharmacist‐run vaccination clinic.
Methods Patient satisfaction was measured using a non‐validated instrument containing 10 items with a five‐point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, not sure, disagree and strongly disagree). Patients who were seen at the PSIC and who received at least one vaccination were eligible to take part in the patient satisfaction survey. Priority index, a method used to identify areas where limited resources can be used to maximize patient satisfaction, was calculated for the different items of the instrument to determine areas for quality improvement. This study was conducted at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS).
Key findings A total of 188 (55.1%) out of 341 patients who received at least one vaccine in the PSIC completed the survey. Prior to any encounter with the PSIC, patients perceived that the VASDHS was doing a good job providing vaccinations (92.5% answered agree or strongly agree). This perception continued when asked about overall satisfaction after receiving vaccination through the PSIC (86.9% answered agree or strongly agree). When asked about the time the pharmacist spent with the patient, nearly all answered that the pharmacist spent as much time as necessary (97.8% answered agree or strongly agree). Patient satisfaction with pharmacist counselling was equally well received and reflected good communication between patient and pharmacist (97.8% answered agree or strongly agree). In regard to pharmacist competency, 98.9% (n= 184) of patients agreed that pharmacists in the PSIC administered vaccinations appropriately. Priority index identified access to the vaccine as an area where performance‐improvement efforts should be committed to improve patient satisfaction.
Conclusions Patients perceived good overall satisfaction with the pharmacist‐run immunization clinic in terms of professionalism and access to vaccination. Priority index identified access to vaccination as a focus for future quality improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-7671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-7174</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1211/ijpp.18.02.0005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20441119</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ambulatory Care Facilities ; Clinical Competence ; Data Collection ; Female ; Health Services Accessibility ; herpes zoster ; Humans ; immunization ; Immunization Programs - organization & administration ; Immunization Programs - standards ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Education as Topic - methods ; Patient Education as Topic - standards ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pharmaceutical Services - organization & administration ; Pharmaceutical Services - standards ; Pharmacists - organization & administration ; Pharmacists - standards ; pharmacy ; satisfaction ; United States ; United States Department of Veterans Affairs ; vaccination ; veterans</subject><ispartof>The International journal of pharmacy practice, 2010-04, Vol.18 (2), p.100-107</ispartof><rights>2010 Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2940-f39781c90600e135c63dc2b21a5080230c9ecc4f2f5de6f3c4e5562d3b42213a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2940-f39781c90600e135c63dc2b21a5080230c9ecc4f2f5de6f3c4e5562d3b42213a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1211%2Fijpp.18.02.0005$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1211%2Fijpp.18.02.0005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20441119$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bounthavong, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, Melissa L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Margaret A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Emerald B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns, Scott T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Jignesh J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Anthony G.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring patient satisfaction in the Pharmacy Specialty Immunization Clinic: a pharmacist-run immunization clinic at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System</title><title>The International journal of pharmacy practice</title><addtitle>Int J Pharm Pract</addtitle><description>Objective The aim was to measure patient satisfaction with the Pharmacy Specialty Immunization Clinic (PSIC), a pharmacist‐run vaccination clinic.
Methods Patient satisfaction was measured using a non‐validated instrument containing 10 items with a five‐point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, not sure, disagree and strongly disagree). Patients who were seen at the PSIC and who received at least one vaccination were eligible to take part in the patient satisfaction survey. Priority index, a method used to identify areas where limited resources can be used to maximize patient satisfaction, was calculated for the different items of the instrument to determine areas for quality improvement. This study was conducted at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS).
Key findings A total of 188 (55.1%) out of 341 patients who received at least one vaccine in the PSIC completed the survey. Prior to any encounter with the PSIC, patients perceived that the VASDHS was doing a good job providing vaccinations (92.5% answered agree or strongly agree). This perception continued when asked about overall satisfaction after receiving vaccination through the PSIC (86.9% answered agree or strongly agree). When asked about the time the pharmacist spent with the patient, nearly all answered that the pharmacist spent as much time as necessary (97.8% answered agree or strongly agree). Patient satisfaction with pharmacist counselling was equally well received and reflected good communication between patient and pharmacist (97.8% answered agree or strongly agree). In regard to pharmacist competency, 98.9% (n= 184) of patients agreed that pharmacists in the PSIC administered vaccinations appropriately. Priority index identified access to the vaccine as an area where performance‐improvement efforts should be committed to improve patient satisfaction.
Conclusions Patients perceived good overall satisfaction with the pharmacist‐run immunization clinic in terms of professionalism and access to vaccination. Priority index identified access to vaccination as a focus for future quality improvement.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>herpes zoster</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunization</subject><subject>Immunization Programs - organization & administration</subject><subject>Immunization Programs - standards</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Services - standards</subject><subject>Pharmacists - organization & administration</subject><subject>Pharmacists - standards</subject><subject>pharmacy</subject><subject>satisfaction</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Department of Veterans Affairs</subject><subject>vaccination</subject><subject>veterans</subject><issn>0961-7671</issn><issn>2042-7174</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtvEzEUBWALgWhoWbND3rGa9Noez4NdSWkTSGmkFFhajnOncZkXtkcw_KD-zk4ypWLH6m6-cyz5EPKGwZRxxk7tXdtOWTYFPgUA-YxMOMQ8SlkaPycTyBMWpUnKjsgr7-8AeCKz9CU5GlDMGMsn5P4Kte-crW9pq4PFOlA_XF9oE2xTU1vTsEO62mlXadPTdYvG6jL0dFFVXW3_6AOblba25j3VtB2l9SFy3ZD_V5mDojocOr9hQKdrT8-KQlvn6VrX9NzibUPnODyxM9ohXfc-YHVCXhS69Pj68R6Trxcfb2bzaHl9uZidLSPD8xiiQuRpxkwOCQAyIU0itoZvONMSMuACTI7GxAUv5BaTQpgYpUz4VmxizpnQ4pi8G3tb1_zs0AdVWW-wLHWNTedVKkQeZ0LyQZ6O0rjGe4eFap2ttOsVA7XfRu23USxTwNV-myHx9rG721S4ffJ_xxhAPIJftsT-f31q8Wm1YgBDLBpjw5_j76eYdj9UkopUqu9fLtWH-dXNxefVUknxALzqrXM</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Bounthavong, Mark</creator><creator>Christopher, Melissa L. D.</creator><creator>Mendes, Margaret A. S.</creator><creator>Foster, Emerald B.</creator><creator>Johns, Scott T.</creator><creator>Lim, Lesley</creator><creator>Rubin, Lisa M.</creator><creator>Patel, Jignesh J.</creator><creator>Stewart, Anthony G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Measuring patient satisfaction in the Pharmacy Specialty Immunization Clinic: a pharmacist-run immunization clinic at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System</title><author>Bounthavong, Mark ; Christopher, Melissa L. D. ; Mendes, Margaret A. S. ; Foster, Emerald B. ; Johns, Scott T. ; Lim, Lesley ; Rubin, Lisa M. ; Patel, Jignesh J. ; Stewart, Anthony G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2940-f39781c90600e135c63dc2b21a5080230c9ecc4f2f5de6f3c4e5562d3b42213a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>herpes zoster</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunization</topic><topic>Immunization Programs - organization & administration</topic><topic>Immunization Programs - standards</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Services - standards</topic><topic>Pharmacists - organization & administration</topic><topic>Pharmacists - standards</topic><topic>pharmacy</topic><topic>satisfaction</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Department of Veterans Affairs</topic><topic>vaccination</topic><topic>veterans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bounthavong, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, Melissa L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Margaret A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Emerald B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns, Scott T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Jignesh J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Anthony G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The International journal of pharmacy practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bounthavong, Mark</au><au>Christopher, Melissa L. D.</au><au>Mendes, Margaret A. S.</au><au>Foster, Emerald B.</au><au>Johns, Scott T.</au><au>Lim, Lesley</au><au>Rubin, Lisa M.</au><au>Patel, Jignesh J.</au><au>Stewart, Anthony G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring patient satisfaction in the Pharmacy Specialty Immunization Clinic: a pharmacist-run immunization clinic at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of pharmacy practice</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pharm Pract</addtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>100-107</pages><issn>0961-7671</issn><eissn>2042-7174</eissn><abstract>Objective The aim was to measure patient satisfaction with the Pharmacy Specialty Immunization Clinic (PSIC), a pharmacist‐run vaccination clinic.
Methods Patient satisfaction was measured using a non‐validated instrument containing 10 items with a five‐point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, not sure, disagree and strongly disagree). Patients who were seen at the PSIC and who received at least one vaccination were eligible to take part in the patient satisfaction survey. Priority index, a method used to identify areas where limited resources can be used to maximize patient satisfaction, was calculated for the different items of the instrument to determine areas for quality improvement. This study was conducted at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS).
Key findings A total of 188 (55.1%) out of 341 patients who received at least one vaccine in the PSIC completed the survey. Prior to any encounter with the PSIC, patients perceived that the VASDHS was doing a good job providing vaccinations (92.5% answered agree or strongly agree). This perception continued when asked about overall satisfaction after receiving vaccination through the PSIC (86.9% answered agree or strongly agree). When asked about the time the pharmacist spent with the patient, nearly all answered that the pharmacist spent as much time as necessary (97.8% answered agree or strongly agree). Patient satisfaction with pharmacist counselling was equally well received and reflected good communication between patient and pharmacist (97.8% answered agree or strongly agree). In regard to pharmacist competency, 98.9% (n= 184) of patients agreed that pharmacists in the PSIC administered vaccinations appropriately. Priority index identified access to the vaccine as an area where performance‐improvement efforts should be committed to improve patient satisfaction.
Conclusions Patients perceived good overall satisfaction with the pharmacist‐run immunization clinic in terms of professionalism and access to vaccination. Priority index identified access to vaccination as a focus for future quality improvement.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20441119</pmid><doi>10.1211/ijpp.18.02.0005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0961-7671 |
ispartof | The International journal of pharmacy practice, 2010-04, Vol.18 (2), p.100-107 |
issn | 0961-7671 2042-7174 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733948352 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Ambulatory Care Facilities Clinical Competence Data Collection Female Health Services Accessibility herpes zoster Humans immunization Immunization Programs - organization & administration Immunization Programs - standards Male Middle Aged Patient Education as Topic - methods Patient Education as Topic - standards Patient Satisfaction Pharmaceutical Services - organization & administration Pharmaceutical Services - standards Pharmacists - organization & administration Pharmacists - standards pharmacy satisfaction United States United States Department of Veterans Affairs vaccination veterans |
title | Measuring patient satisfaction in the Pharmacy Specialty Immunization Clinic: a pharmacist-run immunization clinic at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T01%3A02%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20patient%20satisfaction%20in%20the%20Pharmacy%20Specialty%20Immunization%20Clinic:%20a%20pharmacist-run%20immunization%20clinic%20at%20the%20Veterans%20Affairs%20San%20Diego%20Healthcare%20System&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20pharmacy%20practice&rft.au=Bounthavong,%20Mark&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=100-107&rft.issn=0961-7671&rft.eissn=2042-7174&rft_id=info:doi/10.1211/ijpp.18.02.0005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733948352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733948352&rft_id=info:pmid/20441119&rfr_iscdi=true |