Negative capsule endoscopy without subsequent enteroscopy does not predict lower long-term rebleeding rates in patients with obscure GI bleeding

Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) is now widely accepted as a first-line diagnostic modality for obscure GI bleeding (OGIB). However, the clinical implications of negative results of CE studies remain unclear. Objective To investigate long-term (>1 year) outcomes for patients undergoing CE for OG...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2010-05, Vol.71 (6), p.990-997
Hauptverfasser: Park, Jae Jun, MD, Cheon, Jae Hee, MD, PhD, Kim, Hee Man, MD, Park, Hyeun Sung, MD, Moon, Chang Mo, MD, Lee, Jin Ha, MD, Hong, Sung Pil, MD, PhD, Kim, Tae Il, MD, PhD, Kim, Won Ho, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 997
container_issue 6
container_start_page 990
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 71
creator Park, Jae Jun, MD
Cheon, Jae Hee, MD, PhD
Kim, Hee Man, MD
Park, Hyeun Sung, MD
Moon, Chang Mo, MD
Lee, Jin Ha, MD
Hong, Sung Pil, MD, PhD
Kim, Tae Il, MD, PhD
Kim, Won Ho, MD, PhD
description Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) is now widely accepted as a first-line diagnostic modality for obscure GI bleeding (OGIB). However, the clinical implications of negative results of CE studies remain unclear. Objective To investigate long-term (>1 year) outcomes for patients undergoing CE for OGIB and to identify risk factors associated with rebleeding. Design and Setting Retrospective study in a tertiary care hospital. Methods A total of 57 consecutive patients who had undergone CE for OGIB were enrolled and their pre- and post-CE clinical data were collected. Specific treatments were defined as treatments directly aimed at presumed bleeding causes including hemostasis and disease-specific medical therapy, whereas nonspecific treatments were defined as symptomatic treatments for anemia. Results Of the 57 patients, the indication for CE was obscure-overt bleeding in 46 patients and obscure-occult bleeding in 11 patients. Among 51 patients for whom long-term data were available, significant (P2) lesions were found in 23 (45.1%) patients. The overall rebleeding rate was 35.3% during a median follow-up duration of 31.7 months (range 12.8-58.0 months). There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative rebleeding rate between patients with positive and negative CE results (34.8% vs 35.7%, respectively; P = .989). However, specific treatments after CE (hazard ratio, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.013-0.980; P = .043) significantly decreased rebleeding. Limitations Small number of patients, retrospective study design. Conclusions The rebleeding rate for patients with OGIB and negative CE results was substantial, indicating that these patients should be closely observed. However, specific treatment after CE significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent bleeding.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733944418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0016510709028636</els_id><sourcerecordid>733944418</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-62ec10fdc3294e8bd10d218171fd0179f933bc0f1a3854440f3ec2fea47d7b963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks9u1DAQxi0EokvhAbggXxCnBP_JxrGQkKoKSqUKDsDZcuzJ4iUbB9tptW_BIzPLbkHiwMVzmN83nvlmCHnOWc0Zb19v602AWjCmay5qDA_IijOtqlYp_ZCsGELVmjN1Rp7kvGWMdULyx-RMMMkaqcWK_PwIG1vCLVBn57yMQGHyMbs47-ldKN_iUmhe-gw_FpgKJgukU9pHyHSKhc4JfHCFjvEOEr7TpkJqRxP0I2Bq2tBkC8JhojN-hkXy7-I09tktCejVNb1Hn5JHgx0zPDvFc_L1_bsvlx-qm09X15cXN5VrpCpVK8BxNngnhW6g6z1nXvCOKz54xpUetJS9YwO3sls3TcMGCU4MYBvlVa9beU5eHevOKeJsuZhdyA7G0U4Ql2yUlBp1vEOSH0mHk-cEg5lT2Nm0N5yZwx7M1uAezGEPhguDATUvTtWXfgf-j-LeeARengCbnR2HZCcX8l9OKL1u20Obb44coBe3AZLJDg106FUCV4yP4b9tvP1H7cYwBfzwO-whb-OSJjTZcJNRYD4fDuZwL0wz0bWylb8Asqm9lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733944418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Negative capsule endoscopy without subsequent enteroscopy does not predict lower long-term rebleeding rates in patients with obscure GI bleeding</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Park, Jae Jun, MD ; Cheon, Jae Hee, MD, PhD ; Kim, Hee Man, MD ; Park, Hyeun Sung, MD ; Moon, Chang Mo, MD ; Lee, Jin Ha, MD ; Hong, Sung Pil, MD, PhD ; Kim, Tae Il, MD, PhD ; Kim, Won Ho, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Jae Jun, MD ; Cheon, Jae Hee, MD, PhD ; Kim, Hee Man, MD ; Park, Hyeun Sung, MD ; Moon, Chang Mo, MD ; Lee, Jin Ha, MD ; Hong, Sung Pil, MD, PhD ; Kim, Tae Il, MD, PhD ; Kim, Won Ho, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) is now widely accepted as a first-line diagnostic modality for obscure GI bleeding (OGIB). However, the clinical implications of negative results of CE studies remain unclear. Objective To investigate long-term (&gt;1 year) outcomes for patients undergoing CE for OGIB and to identify risk factors associated with rebleeding. Design and Setting Retrospective study in a tertiary care hospital. Methods A total of 57 consecutive patients who had undergone CE for OGIB were enrolled and their pre- and post-CE clinical data were collected. Specific treatments were defined as treatments directly aimed at presumed bleeding causes including hemostasis and disease-specific medical therapy, whereas nonspecific treatments were defined as symptomatic treatments for anemia. Results Of the 57 patients, the indication for CE was obscure-overt bleeding in 46 patients and obscure-occult bleeding in 11 patients. Among 51 patients for whom long-term data were available, significant (P2) lesions were found in 23 (45.1%) patients. The overall rebleeding rate was 35.3% during a median follow-up duration of 31.7 months (range 12.8-58.0 months). There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative rebleeding rate between patients with positive and negative CE results (34.8% vs 35.7%, respectively; P = .989). However, specific treatments after CE (hazard ratio, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.013-0.980; P = .043) significantly decreased rebleeding. Limitations Small number of patients, retrospective study design. Conclusions The rebleeding rate for patients with OGIB and negative CE results was substantial, indicating that these patients should be closely observed. However, specific treatment after CE significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent bleeding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20304392</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maryland heights, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Capsule Endoscopy ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Female ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-05, Vol.71 (6), p.990-997</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-62ec10fdc3294e8bd10d218171fd0179f933bc0f1a3854440f3ec2fea47d7b963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-62ec10fdc3294e8bd10d218171fd0179f933bc0f1a3854440f3ec2fea47d7b963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510709028636$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22795666$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20304392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Jae Jun, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheon, Jae Hee, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hee Man, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyeun Sung, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Chang Mo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jin Ha, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Sung Pil, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Il, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won Ho, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Negative capsule endoscopy without subsequent enteroscopy does not predict lower long-term rebleeding rates in patients with obscure GI bleeding</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) is now widely accepted as a first-line diagnostic modality for obscure GI bleeding (OGIB). However, the clinical implications of negative results of CE studies remain unclear. Objective To investigate long-term (&gt;1 year) outcomes for patients undergoing CE for OGIB and to identify risk factors associated with rebleeding. Design and Setting Retrospective study in a tertiary care hospital. Methods A total of 57 consecutive patients who had undergone CE for OGIB were enrolled and their pre- and post-CE clinical data were collected. Specific treatments were defined as treatments directly aimed at presumed bleeding causes including hemostasis and disease-specific medical therapy, whereas nonspecific treatments were defined as symptomatic treatments for anemia. Results Of the 57 patients, the indication for CE was obscure-overt bleeding in 46 patients and obscure-occult bleeding in 11 patients. Among 51 patients for whom long-term data were available, significant (P2) lesions were found in 23 (45.1%) patients. The overall rebleeding rate was 35.3% during a median follow-up duration of 31.7 months (range 12.8-58.0 months). There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative rebleeding rate between patients with positive and negative CE results (34.8% vs 35.7%, respectively; P = .989). However, specific treatments after CE (hazard ratio, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.013-0.980; P = .043) significantly decreased rebleeding. Limitations Small number of patients, retrospective study design. Conclusions The rebleeding rate for patients with OGIB and negative CE results was substantial, indicating that these patients should be closely observed. However, specific treatment after CE significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent bleeding.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopy</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks9u1DAQxi0EokvhAbggXxCnBP_JxrGQkKoKSqUKDsDZcuzJ4iUbB9tptW_BIzPLbkHiwMVzmN83nvlmCHnOWc0Zb19v602AWjCmay5qDA_IijOtqlYp_ZCsGELVmjN1Rp7kvGWMdULyx-RMMMkaqcWK_PwIG1vCLVBn57yMQGHyMbs47-ldKN_iUmhe-gw_FpgKJgukU9pHyHSKhc4JfHCFjvEOEr7TpkJqRxP0I2Bq2tBkC8JhojN-hkXy7-I09tktCejVNb1Hn5JHgx0zPDvFc_L1_bsvlx-qm09X15cXN5VrpCpVK8BxNngnhW6g6z1nXvCOKz54xpUetJS9YwO3sls3TcMGCU4MYBvlVa9beU5eHevOKeJsuZhdyA7G0U4Ql2yUlBp1vEOSH0mHk-cEg5lT2Nm0N5yZwx7M1uAezGEPhguDATUvTtWXfgf-j-LeeARengCbnR2HZCcX8l9OKL1u20Obb44coBe3AZLJDg106FUCV4yP4b9tvP1H7cYwBfzwO-whb-OSJjTZcJNRYD4fDuZwL0wz0bWylb8Asqm9lg</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Park, Jae Jun, MD</creator><creator>Cheon, Jae Hee, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Hee Man, MD</creator><creator>Park, Hyeun Sung, MD</creator><creator>Moon, Chang Mo, MD</creator><creator>Lee, Jin Ha, MD</creator><creator>Hong, Sung Pil, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Tae Il, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Won Ho, MD, PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Negative capsule endoscopy without subsequent enteroscopy does not predict lower long-term rebleeding rates in patients with obscure GI bleeding</title><author>Park, Jae Jun, MD ; Cheon, Jae Hee, MD, PhD ; Kim, Hee Man, MD ; Park, Hyeun Sung, MD ; Moon, Chang Mo, MD ; Lee, Jin Ha, MD ; Hong, Sung Pil, MD, PhD ; Kim, Tae Il, MD, PhD ; Kim, Won Ho, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-62ec10fdc3294e8bd10d218171fd0179f933bc0f1a3854440f3ec2fea47d7b963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopy</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Jae Jun, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheon, Jae Hee, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hee Man, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyeun Sung, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Chang Mo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jin Ha, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Sung Pil, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Il, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won Ho, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Jae Jun, MD</au><au>Cheon, Jae Hee, MD, PhD</au><au>Kim, Hee Man, MD</au><au>Park, Hyeun Sung, MD</au><au>Moon, Chang Mo, MD</au><au>Lee, Jin Ha, MD</au><au>Hong, Sung Pil, MD, PhD</au><au>Kim, Tae Il, MD, PhD</au><au>Kim, Won Ho, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Negative capsule endoscopy without subsequent enteroscopy does not predict lower long-term rebleeding rates in patients with obscure GI bleeding</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>990</spage><epage>997</epage><pages>990-997</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) is now widely accepted as a first-line diagnostic modality for obscure GI bleeding (OGIB). However, the clinical implications of negative results of CE studies remain unclear. Objective To investigate long-term (&gt;1 year) outcomes for patients undergoing CE for OGIB and to identify risk factors associated with rebleeding. Design and Setting Retrospective study in a tertiary care hospital. Methods A total of 57 consecutive patients who had undergone CE for OGIB were enrolled and their pre- and post-CE clinical data were collected. Specific treatments were defined as treatments directly aimed at presumed bleeding causes including hemostasis and disease-specific medical therapy, whereas nonspecific treatments were defined as symptomatic treatments for anemia. Results Of the 57 patients, the indication for CE was obscure-overt bleeding in 46 patients and obscure-occult bleeding in 11 patients. Among 51 patients for whom long-term data were available, significant (P2) lesions were found in 23 (45.1%) patients. The overall rebleeding rate was 35.3% during a median follow-up duration of 31.7 months (range 12.8-58.0 months). There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative rebleeding rate between patients with positive and negative CE results (34.8% vs 35.7%, respectively; P = .989). However, specific treatments after CE (hazard ratio, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.013-0.980; P = .043) significantly decreased rebleeding. Limitations Small number of patients, retrospective study design. Conclusions The rebleeding rate for patients with OGIB and negative CE results was substantial, indicating that these patients should be closely observed. However, specific treatment after CE significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent bleeding.</abstract><cop>Maryland heights, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>20304392</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.009</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-05, Vol.71 (6), p.990-997
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733944418
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Capsule Endoscopy
Digestive system. Abdomen
Endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Female
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Other diseases. Semiology
Predictive Value of Tests
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Time Factors
title Negative capsule endoscopy without subsequent enteroscopy does not predict lower long-term rebleeding rates in patients with obscure GI bleeding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T18%3A26%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Negative%20capsule%20endoscopy%20without%20subsequent%20enteroscopy%20does%20not%20predict%20lower%20long-term%20rebleeding%20rates%20in%20patients%20with%20obscure%20GI%20bleeding&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Park,%20Jae%20Jun,%20MD&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=990&rft.epage=997&rft.pages=990-997&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733944418%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733944418&rft_id=info:pmid/20304392&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0016510709028636&rfr_iscdi=true