Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis?

To investigate the clinical and laboratory outcomes both objectively and subjectively in nasal polyposis patients with or without comorbidity (CoM; asthma and allergy). Thirty-three nasal polyposis patients (13 women and 20 men) were included into the study. Their mean age was 39.23 +/- 9.13 years....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.71-74
Hauptverfasser: Akarcay, Mustafa, Ekici, Nur, Miman, Murat C, Firat, Yezdan, Bayindir, Tuba, Selimoglu, Erol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 74
container_issue 1
container_start_page 71
container_title The Journal of craniofacial surgery
container_volume 21
creator Akarcay, Mustafa
Ekici, Nur
Miman, Murat C
Firat, Yezdan
Bayindir, Tuba
Selimoglu, Erol
description To investigate the clinical and laboratory outcomes both objectively and subjectively in nasal polyposis patients with or without comorbidity (CoM; asthma and allergy). Thirty-three nasal polyposis patients (13 women and 20 men) were included into the study. Their mean age was 39.23 +/- 9.13 years. CoM(+) and CoM(-) nasal polyposis patients were compared with each other. Evaluations contained endoscopic nasal examination, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, visual analog scale score of nasal blockage, olfactory function score, respiratory function test, skin prick tests, and paranasal sinus computed tomography. Recovery was statistically significant in all observed evaluations for endoscopic and radiologic staging, nasal obstruction, and sense of smell compared with the first evaluation in all patients regardless of the subgroups. Although objective measurements of respiratory functions did not show any change, clinical improvement was detected in CoM(+) patients with a decrease of need to their antiasthmatic medical treatment. Results of CoM(+) patients led to no statistical difference when compared with CoM(-) subgroup. When applying predefined nasal polyposis treatment protocol, the polyp patients with CoMs do not need close follow-up compared to the patients without CoMs.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c3b785
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733940023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733940023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-17a2bb97f204856063a05f88823f698952fbd4a8106b7bf10c9afdc15e27e08b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gUhunrZOks0mexKpn1DwUPW6JNkEUnY3Ndkt9N-70tqDp5mB95lhHoSuCcwJlOJutVjNQQNhlhFJDNNC8hM0JZwVGROMno495GVGqeATdJHSGoASQotzNKEAggLlU_T1GLAJbYja1773NmHfuWawnbE46LU1vd9arLoap-E4RmvC1sYdjqofieBwp5Jq8CY0u01IPt1fojOnmmSvDnWGPp-fPhav2fL95W3xsMwMg6LPiFBU61I4CrnkBRRMAXdSSspcUcqSU6frXEkChRbaETClcrUh3FJhQWo2Q7f7vZsYvgeb-qr1ydimUZ0NQ6oEY2U-_s3GZL5PmhhSitZVm-hbFXcVgepXaDUKrf4LHbGbw4FBt7Y-Qn8G2Q_NC3L3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733940023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Akarcay, Mustafa ; Ekici, Nur ; Miman, Murat C ; Firat, Yezdan ; Bayindir, Tuba ; Selimoglu, Erol</creator><creatorcontrib>Akarcay, Mustafa ; Ekici, Nur ; Miman, Murat C ; Firat, Yezdan ; Bayindir, Tuba ; Selimoglu, Erol</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the clinical and laboratory outcomes both objectively and subjectively in nasal polyposis patients with or without comorbidity (CoM; asthma and allergy). Thirty-three nasal polyposis patients (13 women and 20 men) were included into the study. Their mean age was 39.23 +/- 9.13 years. CoM(+) and CoM(-) nasal polyposis patients were compared with each other. Evaluations contained endoscopic nasal examination, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, visual analog scale score of nasal blockage, olfactory function score, respiratory function test, skin prick tests, and paranasal sinus computed tomography. Recovery was statistically significant in all observed evaluations for endoscopic and radiologic staging, nasal obstruction, and sense of smell compared with the first evaluation in all patients regardless of the subgroups. Although objective measurements of respiratory functions did not show any change, clinical improvement was detected in CoM(+) patients with a decrease of need to their antiasthmatic medical treatment. Results of CoM(+) patients led to no statistical difference when compared with CoM(-) subgroup. When applying predefined nasal polyposis treatment protocol, the polyp patients with CoMs do not need close follow-up compared to the patients without CoMs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-2275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c3b785</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20072025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Asthma - complications ; Comorbidity ; Dentistry ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity - complications ; Male ; Nasal Obstruction - etiology ; Nasal Polyps - complications ; Nasal Polyps - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Respiratory Function Tests ; Rhinomanometry ; Risk Factors ; Skin Tests ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.71-74</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-17a2bb97f204856063a05f88823f698952fbd4a8106b7bf10c9afdc15e27e08b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-17a2bb97f204856063a05f88823f698952fbd4a8106b7bf10c9afdc15e27e08b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20072025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akarcay, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekici, Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miman, Murat C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firat, Yezdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayindir, Tuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selimoglu, Erol</creatorcontrib><title>Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis?</title><title>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><description>To investigate the clinical and laboratory outcomes both objectively and subjectively in nasal polyposis patients with or without comorbidity (CoM; asthma and allergy). Thirty-three nasal polyposis patients (13 women and 20 men) were included into the study. Their mean age was 39.23 +/- 9.13 years. CoM(+) and CoM(-) nasal polyposis patients were compared with each other. Evaluations contained endoscopic nasal examination, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, visual analog scale score of nasal blockage, olfactory function score, respiratory function test, skin prick tests, and paranasal sinus computed tomography. Recovery was statistically significant in all observed evaluations for endoscopic and radiologic staging, nasal obstruction, and sense of smell compared with the first evaluation in all patients regardless of the subgroups. Although objective measurements of respiratory functions did not show any change, clinical improvement was detected in CoM(+) patients with a decrease of need to their antiasthmatic medical treatment. Results of CoM(+) patients led to no statistical difference when compared with CoM(-) subgroup. When applying predefined nasal polyposis treatment protocol, the polyp patients with CoMs do not need close follow-up compared to the patients without CoMs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asthma - complications</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - complications</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nasal Obstruction - etiology</subject><subject>Nasal Polyps - complications</subject><subject>Nasal Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Respiratory Function Tests</subject><subject>Rhinomanometry</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Skin Tests</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1049-2275</issn><issn>1536-3732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gUhunrZOks0mexKpn1DwUPW6JNkEUnY3Ndkt9N-70tqDp5mB95lhHoSuCcwJlOJutVjNQQNhlhFJDNNC8hM0JZwVGROMno495GVGqeATdJHSGoASQotzNKEAggLlU_T1GLAJbYja1773NmHfuWawnbE46LU1vd9arLoap-E4RmvC1sYdjqofieBwp5Jq8CY0u01IPt1fojOnmmSvDnWGPp-fPhav2fL95W3xsMwMg6LPiFBU61I4CrnkBRRMAXdSSspcUcqSU6frXEkChRbaETClcrUh3FJhQWo2Q7f7vZsYvgeb-qr1ydimUZ0NQ6oEY2U-_s3GZL5PmhhSitZVm-hbFXcVgepXaDUKrf4LHbGbw4FBt7Y-Qn8G2Q_NC3L3</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Akarcay, Mustafa</creator><creator>Ekici, Nur</creator><creator>Miman, Murat C</creator><creator>Firat, Yezdan</creator><creator>Bayindir, Tuba</creator><creator>Selimoglu, Erol</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis?</title><author>Akarcay, Mustafa ; Ekici, Nur ; Miman, Murat C ; Firat, Yezdan ; Bayindir, Tuba ; Selimoglu, Erol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-17a2bb97f204856063a05f88823f698952fbd4a8106b7bf10c9afdc15e27e08b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asthma - complications</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - complications</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nasal Obstruction - etiology</topic><topic>Nasal Polyps - complications</topic><topic>Nasal Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Respiratory Function Tests</topic><topic>Rhinomanometry</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Skin Tests</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akarcay, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekici, Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miman, Murat C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firat, Yezdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayindir, Tuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selimoglu, Erol</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akarcay, Mustafa</au><au>Ekici, Nur</au><au>Miman, Murat C</au><au>Firat, Yezdan</au><au>Bayindir, Tuba</au><au>Selimoglu, Erol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>71-74</pages><issn>1049-2275</issn><eissn>1536-3732</eissn><abstract>To investigate the clinical and laboratory outcomes both objectively and subjectively in nasal polyposis patients with or without comorbidity (CoM; asthma and allergy). Thirty-three nasal polyposis patients (13 women and 20 men) were included into the study. Their mean age was 39.23 +/- 9.13 years. CoM(+) and CoM(-) nasal polyposis patients were compared with each other. Evaluations contained endoscopic nasal examination, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, visual analog scale score of nasal blockage, olfactory function score, respiratory function test, skin prick tests, and paranasal sinus computed tomography. Recovery was statistically significant in all observed evaluations for endoscopic and radiologic staging, nasal obstruction, and sense of smell compared with the first evaluation in all patients regardless of the subgroups. Although objective measurements of respiratory functions did not show any change, clinical improvement was detected in CoM(+) patients with a decrease of need to their antiasthmatic medical treatment. Results of CoM(+) patients led to no statistical difference when compared with CoM(-) subgroup. When applying predefined nasal polyposis treatment protocol, the polyp patients with CoMs do not need close follow-up compared to the patients without CoMs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>20072025</pmid><doi>10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c3b785</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-2275
ispartof The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.71-74
issn 1049-2275
1536-3732
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733940023
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Asthma - complications
Comorbidity
Dentistry
Endoscopy
Female
Humans
Hypersensitivity - complications
Male
Nasal Obstruction - etiology
Nasal Polyps - complications
Nasal Polyps - surgery
Prospective Studies
Respiratory Function Tests
Rhinomanometry
Risk Factors
Skin Tests
Statistics, Nonparametric
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
title Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T07%3A42%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20comorbidities%20influence%20objective%20and%20subjective%20recovery%20rates%20of%20nasal%20polyposis?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20craniofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Akarcay,%20Mustafa&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=71-74&rft.issn=1049-2275&rft.eissn=1536-3732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c3b785&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733940023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733940023&rft_id=info:pmid/20072025&rfr_iscdi=true