Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis?
To investigate the clinical and laboratory outcomes both objectively and subjectively in nasal polyposis patients with or without comorbidity (CoM; asthma and allergy). Thirty-three nasal polyposis patients (13 women and 20 men) were included into the study. Their mean age was 39.23 +/- 9.13 years....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.71-74 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 74 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 71 |
container_title | The Journal of craniofacial surgery |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Akarcay, Mustafa Ekici, Nur Miman, Murat C Firat, Yezdan Bayindir, Tuba Selimoglu, Erol |
description | To investigate the clinical and laboratory outcomes both objectively and subjectively in nasal polyposis patients with or without comorbidity (CoM; asthma and allergy).
Thirty-three nasal polyposis patients (13 women and 20 men) were included into the study. Their mean age was 39.23 +/- 9.13 years. CoM(+) and CoM(-) nasal polyposis patients were compared with each other. Evaluations contained endoscopic nasal examination, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, visual analog scale score of nasal blockage, olfactory function score, respiratory function test, skin prick tests, and paranasal sinus computed tomography.
Recovery was statistically significant in all observed evaluations for endoscopic and radiologic staging, nasal obstruction, and sense of smell compared with the first evaluation in all patients regardless of the subgroups. Although objective measurements of respiratory functions did not show any change, clinical improvement was detected in CoM(+) patients with a decrease of need to their antiasthmatic medical treatment.
Results of CoM(+) patients led to no statistical difference when compared with CoM(-) subgroup. When applying predefined nasal polyposis treatment protocol, the polyp patients with CoMs do not need close follow-up compared to the patients without CoMs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c3b785 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733940023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733940023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-17a2bb97f204856063a05f88823f698952fbd4a8106b7bf10c9afdc15e27e08b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gUhunrZOks0mexKpn1DwUPW6JNkEUnY3Ndkt9N-70tqDp5mB95lhHoSuCcwJlOJutVjNQQNhlhFJDNNC8hM0JZwVGROMno495GVGqeATdJHSGoASQotzNKEAggLlU_T1GLAJbYja1773NmHfuWawnbE46LU1vd9arLoap-E4RmvC1sYdjqofieBwp5Jq8CY0u01IPt1fojOnmmSvDnWGPp-fPhav2fL95W3xsMwMg6LPiFBU61I4CrnkBRRMAXdSSspcUcqSU6frXEkChRbaETClcrUh3FJhQWo2Q7f7vZsYvgeb-qr1ydimUZ0NQ6oEY2U-_s3GZL5PmhhSitZVm-hbFXcVgepXaDUKrf4LHbGbw4FBt7Y-Qn8G2Q_NC3L3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733940023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Akarcay, Mustafa ; Ekici, Nur ; Miman, Murat C ; Firat, Yezdan ; Bayindir, Tuba ; Selimoglu, Erol</creator><creatorcontrib>Akarcay, Mustafa ; Ekici, Nur ; Miman, Murat C ; Firat, Yezdan ; Bayindir, Tuba ; Selimoglu, Erol</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the clinical and laboratory outcomes both objectively and subjectively in nasal polyposis patients with or without comorbidity (CoM; asthma and allergy).
Thirty-three nasal polyposis patients (13 women and 20 men) were included into the study. Their mean age was 39.23 +/- 9.13 years. CoM(+) and CoM(-) nasal polyposis patients were compared with each other. Evaluations contained endoscopic nasal examination, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, visual analog scale score of nasal blockage, olfactory function score, respiratory function test, skin prick tests, and paranasal sinus computed tomography.
Recovery was statistically significant in all observed evaluations for endoscopic and radiologic staging, nasal obstruction, and sense of smell compared with the first evaluation in all patients regardless of the subgroups. Although objective measurements of respiratory functions did not show any change, clinical improvement was detected in CoM(+) patients with a decrease of need to their antiasthmatic medical treatment.
Results of CoM(+) patients led to no statistical difference when compared with CoM(-) subgroup. When applying predefined nasal polyposis treatment protocol, the polyp patients with CoMs do not need close follow-up compared to the patients without CoMs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-2275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c3b785</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20072025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Asthma - complications ; Comorbidity ; Dentistry ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity - complications ; Male ; Nasal Obstruction - etiology ; Nasal Polyps - complications ; Nasal Polyps - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Respiratory Function Tests ; Rhinomanometry ; Risk Factors ; Skin Tests ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.71-74</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-17a2bb97f204856063a05f88823f698952fbd4a8106b7bf10c9afdc15e27e08b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-17a2bb97f204856063a05f88823f698952fbd4a8106b7bf10c9afdc15e27e08b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20072025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akarcay, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekici, Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miman, Murat C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firat, Yezdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayindir, Tuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selimoglu, Erol</creatorcontrib><title>Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis?</title><title>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><description>To investigate the clinical and laboratory outcomes both objectively and subjectively in nasal polyposis patients with or without comorbidity (CoM; asthma and allergy).
Thirty-three nasal polyposis patients (13 women and 20 men) were included into the study. Their mean age was 39.23 +/- 9.13 years. CoM(+) and CoM(-) nasal polyposis patients were compared with each other. Evaluations contained endoscopic nasal examination, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, visual analog scale score of nasal blockage, olfactory function score, respiratory function test, skin prick tests, and paranasal sinus computed tomography.
Recovery was statistically significant in all observed evaluations for endoscopic and radiologic staging, nasal obstruction, and sense of smell compared with the first evaluation in all patients regardless of the subgroups. Although objective measurements of respiratory functions did not show any change, clinical improvement was detected in CoM(+) patients with a decrease of need to their antiasthmatic medical treatment.
Results of CoM(+) patients led to no statistical difference when compared with CoM(-) subgroup. When applying predefined nasal polyposis treatment protocol, the polyp patients with CoMs do not need close follow-up compared to the patients without CoMs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asthma - complications</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - complications</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nasal Obstruction - etiology</subject><subject>Nasal Polyps - complications</subject><subject>Nasal Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Respiratory Function Tests</subject><subject>Rhinomanometry</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Skin Tests</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1049-2275</issn><issn>1536-3732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gUhunrZOks0mexKpn1DwUPW6JNkEUnY3Ndkt9N-70tqDp5mB95lhHoSuCcwJlOJutVjNQQNhlhFJDNNC8hM0JZwVGROMno495GVGqeATdJHSGoASQotzNKEAggLlU_T1GLAJbYja1773NmHfuWawnbE46LU1vd9arLoap-E4RmvC1sYdjqofieBwp5Jq8CY0u01IPt1fojOnmmSvDnWGPp-fPhav2fL95W3xsMwMg6LPiFBU61I4CrnkBRRMAXdSSspcUcqSU6frXEkChRbaETClcrUh3FJhQWo2Q7f7vZsYvgeb-qr1ydimUZ0NQ6oEY2U-_s3GZL5PmhhSitZVm-hbFXcVgepXaDUKrf4LHbGbw4FBt7Y-Qn8G2Q_NC3L3</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Akarcay, Mustafa</creator><creator>Ekici, Nur</creator><creator>Miman, Murat C</creator><creator>Firat, Yezdan</creator><creator>Bayindir, Tuba</creator><creator>Selimoglu, Erol</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis?</title><author>Akarcay, Mustafa ; Ekici, Nur ; Miman, Murat C ; Firat, Yezdan ; Bayindir, Tuba ; Selimoglu, Erol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-17a2bb97f204856063a05f88823f698952fbd4a8106b7bf10c9afdc15e27e08b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asthma - complications</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - complications</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nasal Obstruction - etiology</topic><topic>Nasal Polyps - complications</topic><topic>Nasal Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Respiratory Function Tests</topic><topic>Rhinomanometry</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Skin Tests</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akarcay, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekici, Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miman, Murat C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firat, Yezdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayindir, Tuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selimoglu, Erol</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akarcay, Mustafa</au><au>Ekici, Nur</au><au>Miman, Murat C</au><au>Firat, Yezdan</au><au>Bayindir, Tuba</au><au>Selimoglu, Erol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>71-74</pages><issn>1049-2275</issn><eissn>1536-3732</eissn><abstract>To investigate the clinical and laboratory outcomes both objectively and subjectively in nasal polyposis patients with or without comorbidity (CoM; asthma and allergy).
Thirty-three nasal polyposis patients (13 women and 20 men) were included into the study. Their mean age was 39.23 +/- 9.13 years. CoM(+) and CoM(-) nasal polyposis patients were compared with each other. Evaluations contained endoscopic nasal examination, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, visual analog scale score of nasal blockage, olfactory function score, respiratory function test, skin prick tests, and paranasal sinus computed tomography.
Recovery was statistically significant in all observed evaluations for endoscopic and radiologic staging, nasal obstruction, and sense of smell compared with the first evaluation in all patients regardless of the subgroups. Although objective measurements of respiratory functions did not show any change, clinical improvement was detected in CoM(+) patients with a decrease of need to their antiasthmatic medical treatment.
Results of CoM(+) patients led to no statistical difference when compared with CoM(-) subgroup. When applying predefined nasal polyposis treatment protocol, the polyp patients with CoMs do not need close follow-up compared to the patients without CoMs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>20072025</pmid><doi>10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c3b785</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-2275 |
ispartof | The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.71-74 |
issn | 1049-2275 1536-3732 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733940023 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Asthma - complications Comorbidity Dentistry Endoscopy Female Humans Hypersensitivity - complications Male Nasal Obstruction - etiology Nasal Polyps - complications Nasal Polyps - surgery Prospective Studies Respiratory Function Tests Rhinomanometry Risk Factors Skin Tests Statistics, Nonparametric Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment Outcome |
title | Do comorbidities influence objective and subjective recovery rates of nasal polyposis? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T07%3A42%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20comorbidities%20influence%20objective%20and%20subjective%20recovery%20rates%20of%20nasal%20polyposis?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20craniofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Akarcay,%20Mustafa&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=71-74&rft.issn=1049-2275&rft.eissn=1536-3732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c3b785&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733940023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733940023&rft_id=info:pmid/20072025&rfr_iscdi=true |