Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients

In the management of patients with acute cerebral disturbances, it is essential to determine precisely the degree of impaired consciousness. In order to secure the accuracy of observations, one must use a reliable coma scale. We have evaluated the Edinburgh 2 coma scale (E2CS) and explored the relat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurosurgery 1992-12, Vol.31 (6), p.1023-1029, Article 1023
Hauptverfasser: Sugiura, K, Fukuya, R, Kunimoto, K, Endoh, S, Tachisawa, T, Muraoka, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1029
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1023
container_title Neurosurgery
container_volume 31
creator Sugiura, K
Fukuya, R
Kunimoto, K
Endoh, S
Tachisawa, T
Muraoka, K
description In the management of patients with acute cerebral disturbances, it is essential to determine precisely the degree of impaired consciousness. In order to secure the accuracy of observations, one must use a reliable coma scale. We have evaluated the Edinburgh 2 coma scale (E2CS) and explored the relationship between levels of the E2CS and the final outcome. Case notes and observation charts of the past 7 years were reviewed, covering neurosurgical operations on 406 patients, in each of whom the postoperative course was evaluated periodically by the E2CS and the outcome was determined by the Glasgow outcome scale. By matching the outcome with each level of impaired consciousness, about 22,000 pairs of data were obtained. In order to quantify the morbidity rate, different stages of the Glasgow outcome scale were rated from 100 through 0, arbitrarily. It was proved that levels of the E2CS were arranged in the correct order in respect to both mortality and morbidity rates. It was shown at the same time that each level has different prognostic significance and that the distance between each level is not identical. The recommendation is made to separate the levels on a chart not by an ordinal number but by the distance calculated on the basis of either mortality or morbidity rates. This will make it possible to get a rough estimate of the patients' prognoses by simply looking at a daily clinical chart.
doi_str_mv 10.1227/00006123-199212000-00006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73392701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73392701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-3ec5c5756cbdb6a2deadfe287f56cbad2b4fefc3feaf5b3fa21ac9a90b283e6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMlKBDEQDaLouHyCkJO31iy9XgQZVxhUGAVvTXW6opF0tyZpwb83s6jgxbqEenlL8QihnB1zIYoTFifnQia8qgQXcUuW0AaZ8EykScpStkkmjKdlIqv8aYfsev_KGM_Totwm2zwtmORyQsLcPPdGGwW9Qjpoem60Rod9oDP8QOsXWHhBetGavhnd8wsVdDp0QOcKLNIpWDVaCNhS7YZuSb0bgxq6pdstjm7wURYDLL2HYKKz3ydbGqzHg_W7Rx4vLx6m18ns7upmejZLlCzykEhUmcqKLFdN2-QgWoRWoygLvYCgFU2qUSupEXTWSA2Cg6qgYo0oJeat3CNHK983N7yP6EPdGa_QWuhxGH1dSFmJgvFILFdEFa_1DnX95kwH7rPmrF4UXn8XXv8UvoKi9HCdMTYdtr_CVcPx__SPtTIh9jD0wYGx_wd8AdRJkMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73392701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sugiura, K ; Fukuya, R ; Kunimoto, K ; Endoh, S ; Tachisawa, T ; Muraoka, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Sugiura, K ; Fukuya, R ; Kunimoto, K ; Endoh, S ; Tachisawa, T ; Muraoka, K</creatorcontrib><description>In the management of patients with acute cerebral disturbances, it is essential to determine precisely the degree of impaired consciousness. In order to secure the accuracy of observations, one must use a reliable coma scale. We have evaluated the Edinburgh 2 coma scale (E2CS) and explored the relationship between levels of the E2CS and the final outcome. Case notes and observation charts of the past 7 years were reviewed, covering neurosurgical operations on 406 patients, in each of whom the postoperative course was evaluated periodically by the E2CS and the outcome was determined by the Glasgow outcome scale. By matching the outcome with each level of impaired consciousness, about 22,000 pairs of data were obtained. In order to quantify the morbidity rate, different stages of the Glasgow outcome scale were rated from 100 through 0, arbitrarily. It was proved that levels of the E2CS were arranged in the correct order in respect to both mortality and morbidity rates. It was shown at the same time that each level has different prognostic significance and that the distance between each level is not identical. The recommendation is made to separate the levels on a chart not by an ordinal number but by the distance calculated on the basis of either mortality or morbidity rates. This will make it possible to get a rough estimate of the patients' prognoses by simply looking at a daily clinical chart.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-396X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199212000-00006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1470313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality ; Brain Diseases - mortality ; Brain Diseases - surgery ; Brain Injuries - mortality ; Brain Injuries - surgery ; Brain Neoplasms - mortality ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Coma - mortality ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glasgow Coma Scale ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neurologic Examination ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Severity of Illness Index ; Survival Rate ; Trauma Severity Indices</subject><ispartof>Neurosurgery, 1992-12, Vol.31 (6), p.1023-1029, Article 1023</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-3ec5c5756cbdb6a2deadfe287f56cbad2b4fefc3feaf5b3fa21ac9a90b283e6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-3ec5c5756cbdb6a2deadfe287f56cbad2b4fefc3feaf5b3fa21ac9a90b283e6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1470313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sugiura, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuya, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunimoto, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endoh, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachisawa, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraoka, K</creatorcontrib><title>Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients</title><title>Neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Neurosurgery</addtitle><description>In the management of patients with acute cerebral disturbances, it is essential to determine precisely the degree of impaired consciousness. In order to secure the accuracy of observations, one must use a reliable coma scale. We have evaluated the Edinburgh 2 coma scale (E2CS) and explored the relationship between levels of the E2CS and the final outcome. Case notes and observation charts of the past 7 years were reviewed, covering neurosurgical operations on 406 patients, in each of whom the postoperative course was evaluated periodically by the E2CS and the outcome was determined by the Glasgow outcome scale. By matching the outcome with each level of impaired consciousness, about 22,000 pairs of data were obtained. In order to quantify the morbidity rate, different stages of the Glasgow outcome scale were rated from 100 through 0, arbitrarily. It was proved that levels of the E2CS were arranged in the correct order in respect to both mortality and morbidity rates. It was shown at the same time that each level has different prognostic significance and that the distance between each level is not identical. The recommendation is made to separate the levels on a chart not by an ordinal number but by the distance calculated on the basis of either mortality or morbidity rates. This will make it possible to get a rough estimate of the patients' prognoses by simply looking at a daily clinical chart.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Coma - mortality</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glasgow Coma Scale</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurologic Examination</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Trauma Severity Indices</subject><issn>0148-396X</issn><issn>1524-4040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMlKBDEQDaLouHyCkJO31iy9XgQZVxhUGAVvTXW6opF0tyZpwb83s6jgxbqEenlL8QihnB1zIYoTFifnQia8qgQXcUuW0AaZ8EykScpStkkmjKdlIqv8aYfsev_KGM_Totwm2zwtmORyQsLcPPdGGwW9Qjpoem60Rod9oDP8QOsXWHhBetGavhnd8wsVdDp0QOcKLNIpWDVaCNhS7YZuSb0bgxq6pdstjm7wURYDLL2HYKKz3ydbGqzHg_W7Rx4vLx6m18ns7upmejZLlCzykEhUmcqKLFdN2-QgWoRWoygLvYCgFU2qUSupEXTWSA2Cg6qgYo0oJeat3CNHK983N7yP6EPdGa_QWuhxGH1dSFmJgvFILFdEFa_1DnX95kwH7rPmrF4UXn8XXv8UvoKi9HCdMTYdtr_CVcPx__SPtTIh9jD0wYGx_wd8AdRJkMY</recordid><startdate>19921201</startdate><enddate>19921201</enddate><creator>Sugiura, K</creator><creator>Fukuya, R</creator><creator>Kunimoto, K</creator><creator>Endoh, S</creator><creator>Tachisawa, T</creator><creator>Muraoka, K</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19921201</creationdate><title>Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients</title><author>Sugiura, K ; Fukuya, R ; Kunimoto, K ; Endoh, S ; Tachisawa, T ; Muraoka, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-3ec5c5756cbdb6a2deadfe287f56cbad2b4fefc3feaf5b3fa21ac9a90b283e6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Coma - mortality</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glasgow Coma Scale</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurologic Examination</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Trauma Severity Indices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sugiura, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuya, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunimoto, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endoh, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachisawa, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraoka, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sugiura, K</au><au>Fukuya, R</au><au>Kunimoto, K</au><au>Endoh, S</au><au>Tachisawa, T</au><au>Muraoka, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients</atitle><jtitle>Neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosurgery</addtitle><date>1992-12-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1023</spage><epage>1029</epage><pages>1023-1029</pages><artnum>1023</artnum><issn>0148-396X</issn><eissn>1524-4040</eissn><abstract>In the management of patients with acute cerebral disturbances, it is essential to determine precisely the degree of impaired consciousness. In order to secure the accuracy of observations, one must use a reliable coma scale. We have evaluated the Edinburgh 2 coma scale (E2CS) and explored the relationship between levels of the E2CS and the final outcome. Case notes and observation charts of the past 7 years were reviewed, covering neurosurgical operations on 406 patients, in each of whom the postoperative course was evaluated periodically by the E2CS and the outcome was determined by the Glasgow outcome scale. By matching the outcome with each level of impaired consciousness, about 22,000 pairs of data were obtained. In order to quantify the morbidity rate, different stages of the Glasgow outcome scale were rated from 100 through 0, arbitrarily. It was proved that levels of the E2CS were arranged in the correct order in respect to both mortality and morbidity rates. It was shown at the same time that each level has different prognostic significance and that the distance between each level is not identical. The recommendation is made to separate the levels on a chart not by an ordinal number but by the distance calculated on the basis of either mortality or morbidity rates. This will make it possible to get a rough estimate of the patients' prognoses by simply looking at a daily clinical chart.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>1470313</pmid><doi>10.1227/00006123-199212000-00006</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-396X
ispartof Neurosurgery, 1992-12, Vol.31 (6), p.1023-1029, Article 1023
issn 0148-396X
1524-4040
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73392701
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality
Brain Diseases - mortality
Brain Diseases - surgery
Brain Injuries - mortality
Brain Injuries - surgery
Brain Neoplasms - mortality
Brain Neoplasms - surgery
Child
Child, Preschool
Coma - mortality
Disability Evaluation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glasgow Coma Scale
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neurologic Examination
Postoperative Complications - mortality
Severity of Illness Index
Survival Rate
Trauma Severity Indices
title Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A04%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Significance%20of%20Different%20Levels%20of%20the%20Edinburgh%202%20Coma%20Scale%20Calculated%20from%20the%20Outcome%20of%20Neurosurgical%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Neurosurgery&rft.au=Sugiura,%20K&rft.date=1992-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1023&rft.epage=1029&rft.pages=1023-1029&rft.artnum=1023&rft.issn=0148-396X&rft.eissn=1524-4040&rft_id=info:doi/10.1227/00006123-199212000-00006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73392701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73392701&rft_id=info:pmid/1470313&rfr_iscdi=true