Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients
In the management of patients with acute cerebral disturbances, it is essential to determine precisely the degree of impaired consciousness. In order to secure the accuracy of observations, one must use a reliable coma scale. We have evaluated the Edinburgh 2 coma scale (E2CS) and explored the relat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurosurgery 1992-12, Vol.31 (6), p.1023-1029, Article 1023 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1029 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1023 |
container_title | Neurosurgery |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Sugiura, K Fukuya, R Kunimoto, K Endoh, S Tachisawa, T Muraoka, K |
description | In the management of patients with acute cerebral disturbances, it is essential to determine precisely the degree of impaired consciousness. In order to secure the accuracy of observations, one must use a reliable coma scale. We have evaluated the Edinburgh 2 coma scale (E2CS) and explored the relationship between levels of the E2CS and the final outcome. Case notes and observation charts of the past 7 years were reviewed, covering neurosurgical operations on 406 patients, in each of whom the postoperative course was evaluated periodically by the E2CS and the outcome was determined by the Glasgow outcome scale. By matching the outcome with each level of impaired consciousness, about 22,000 pairs of data were obtained. In order to quantify the morbidity rate, different stages of the Glasgow outcome scale were rated from 100 through 0, arbitrarily. It was proved that levels of the E2CS were arranged in the correct order in respect to both mortality and morbidity rates. It was shown at the same time that each level has different prognostic significance and that the distance between each level is not identical. The recommendation is made to separate the levels on a chart not by an ordinal number but by the distance calculated on the basis of either mortality or morbidity rates. This will make it possible to get a rough estimate of the patients' prognoses by simply looking at a daily clinical chart. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1227/00006123-199212000-00006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73392701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73392701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-3ec5c5756cbdb6a2deadfe287f56cbad2b4fefc3feaf5b3fa21ac9a90b283e6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMlKBDEQDaLouHyCkJO31iy9XgQZVxhUGAVvTXW6opF0tyZpwb83s6jgxbqEenlL8QihnB1zIYoTFifnQia8qgQXcUuW0AaZ8EykScpStkkmjKdlIqv8aYfsev_KGM_Totwm2zwtmORyQsLcPPdGGwW9Qjpoem60Rod9oDP8QOsXWHhBetGavhnd8wsVdDp0QOcKLNIpWDVaCNhS7YZuSb0bgxq6pdstjm7wURYDLL2HYKKz3ydbGqzHg_W7Rx4vLx6m18ns7upmejZLlCzykEhUmcqKLFdN2-QgWoRWoygLvYCgFU2qUSupEXTWSA2Cg6qgYo0oJeat3CNHK983N7yP6EPdGa_QWuhxGH1dSFmJgvFILFdEFa_1DnX95kwH7rPmrF4UXn8XXv8UvoKi9HCdMTYdtr_CVcPx__SPtTIh9jD0wYGx_wd8AdRJkMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73392701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sugiura, K ; Fukuya, R ; Kunimoto, K ; Endoh, S ; Tachisawa, T ; Muraoka, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Sugiura, K ; Fukuya, R ; Kunimoto, K ; Endoh, S ; Tachisawa, T ; Muraoka, K</creatorcontrib><description>In the management of patients with acute cerebral disturbances, it is essential to determine precisely the degree of impaired consciousness. In order to secure the accuracy of observations, one must use a reliable coma scale. We have evaluated the Edinburgh 2 coma scale (E2CS) and explored the relationship between levels of the E2CS and the final outcome. Case notes and observation charts of the past 7 years were reviewed, covering neurosurgical operations on 406 patients, in each of whom the postoperative course was evaluated periodically by the E2CS and the outcome was determined by the Glasgow outcome scale. By matching the outcome with each level of impaired consciousness, about 22,000 pairs of data were obtained. In order to quantify the morbidity rate, different stages of the Glasgow outcome scale were rated from 100 through 0, arbitrarily. It was proved that levels of the E2CS were arranged in the correct order in respect to both mortality and morbidity rates. It was shown at the same time that each level has different prognostic significance and that the distance between each level is not identical. The recommendation is made to separate the levels on a chart not by an ordinal number but by the distance calculated on the basis of either mortality or morbidity rates. This will make it possible to get a rough estimate of the patients' prognoses by simply looking at a daily clinical chart.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-396X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199212000-00006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1470313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality ; Brain Diseases - mortality ; Brain Diseases - surgery ; Brain Injuries - mortality ; Brain Injuries - surgery ; Brain Neoplasms - mortality ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Coma - mortality ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glasgow Coma Scale ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neurologic Examination ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Severity of Illness Index ; Survival Rate ; Trauma Severity Indices</subject><ispartof>Neurosurgery, 1992-12, Vol.31 (6), p.1023-1029, Article 1023</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-3ec5c5756cbdb6a2deadfe287f56cbad2b4fefc3feaf5b3fa21ac9a90b283e6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-3ec5c5756cbdb6a2deadfe287f56cbad2b4fefc3feaf5b3fa21ac9a90b283e6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1470313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sugiura, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuya, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunimoto, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endoh, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachisawa, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraoka, K</creatorcontrib><title>Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients</title><title>Neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Neurosurgery</addtitle><description>In the management of patients with acute cerebral disturbances, it is essential to determine precisely the degree of impaired consciousness. In order to secure the accuracy of observations, one must use a reliable coma scale. We have evaluated the Edinburgh 2 coma scale (E2CS) and explored the relationship between levels of the E2CS and the final outcome. Case notes and observation charts of the past 7 years were reviewed, covering neurosurgical operations on 406 patients, in each of whom the postoperative course was evaluated periodically by the E2CS and the outcome was determined by the Glasgow outcome scale. By matching the outcome with each level of impaired consciousness, about 22,000 pairs of data were obtained. In order to quantify the morbidity rate, different stages of the Glasgow outcome scale were rated from 100 through 0, arbitrarily. It was proved that levels of the E2CS were arranged in the correct order in respect to both mortality and morbidity rates. It was shown at the same time that each level has different prognostic significance and that the distance between each level is not identical. The recommendation is made to separate the levels on a chart not by an ordinal number but by the distance calculated on the basis of either mortality or morbidity rates. This will make it possible to get a rough estimate of the patients' prognoses by simply looking at a daily clinical chart.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Coma - mortality</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glasgow Coma Scale</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurologic Examination</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Trauma Severity Indices</subject><issn>0148-396X</issn><issn>1524-4040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMlKBDEQDaLouHyCkJO31iy9XgQZVxhUGAVvTXW6opF0tyZpwb83s6jgxbqEenlL8QihnB1zIYoTFifnQia8qgQXcUuW0AaZ8EykScpStkkmjKdlIqv8aYfsev_KGM_Totwm2zwtmORyQsLcPPdGGwW9Qjpoem60Rod9oDP8QOsXWHhBetGavhnd8wsVdDp0QOcKLNIpWDVaCNhS7YZuSb0bgxq6pdstjm7wURYDLL2HYKKz3ydbGqzHg_W7Rx4vLx6m18ns7upmejZLlCzykEhUmcqKLFdN2-QgWoRWoygLvYCgFU2qUSupEXTWSA2Cg6qgYo0oJeat3CNHK983N7yP6EPdGa_QWuhxGH1dSFmJgvFILFdEFa_1DnX95kwH7rPmrF4UXn8XXv8UvoKi9HCdMTYdtr_CVcPx__SPtTIh9jD0wYGx_wd8AdRJkMY</recordid><startdate>19921201</startdate><enddate>19921201</enddate><creator>Sugiura, K</creator><creator>Fukuya, R</creator><creator>Kunimoto, K</creator><creator>Endoh, S</creator><creator>Tachisawa, T</creator><creator>Muraoka, K</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19921201</creationdate><title>Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients</title><author>Sugiura, K ; Fukuya, R ; Kunimoto, K ; Endoh, S ; Tachisawa, T ; Muraoka, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-3ec5c5756cbdb6a2deadfe287f56cbad2b4fefc3feaf5b3fa21ac9a90b283e6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Coma - mortality</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glasgow Coma Scale</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurologic Examination</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Trauma Severity Indices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sugiura, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuya, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunimoto, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endoh, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachisawa, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraoka, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sugiura, K</au><au>Fukuya, R</au><au>Kunimoto, K</au><au>Endoh, S</au><au>Tachisawa, T</au><au>Muraoka, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients</atitle><jtitle>Neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosurgery</addtitle><date>1992-12-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1023</spage><epage>1029</epage><pages>1023-1029</pages><artnum>1023</artnum><issn>0148-396X</issn><eissn>1524-4040</eissn><abstract>In the management of patients with acute cerebral disturbances, it is essential to determine precisely the degree of impaired consciousness. In order to secure the accuracy of observations, one must use a reliable coma scale. We have evaluated the Edinburgh 2 coma scale (E2CS) and explored the relationship between levels of the E2CS and the final outcome. Case notes and observation charts of the past 7 years were reviewed, covering neurosurgical operations on 406 patients, in each of whom the postoperative course was evaluated periodically by the E2CS and the outcome was determined by the Glasgow outcome scale. By matching the outcome with each level of impaired consciousness, about 22,000 pairs of data were obtained. In order to quantify the morbidity rate, different stages of the Glasgow outcome scale were rated from 100 through 0, arbitrarily. It was proved that levels of the E2CS were arranged in the correct order in respect to both mortality and morbidity rates. It was shown at the same time that each level has different prognostic significance and that the distance between each level is not identical. The recommendation is made to separate the levels on a chart not by an ordinal number but by the distance calculated on the basis of either mortality or morbidity rates. This will make it possible to get a rough estimate of the patients' prognoses by simply looking at a daily clinical chart.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>1470313</pmid><doi>10.1227/00006123-199212000-00006</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-396X |
ispartof | Neurosurgery, 1992-12, Vol.31 (6), p.1023-1029, Article 1023 |
issn | 0148-396X 1524-4040 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73392701 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality Brain Diseases - mortality Brain Diseases - surgery Brain Injuries - mortality Brain Injuries - surgery Brain Neoplasms - mortality Brain Neoplasms - surgery Child Child, Preschool Coma - mortality Disability Evaluation Female Follow-Up Studies Glasgow Coma Scale Humans Male Middle Aged Neurologic Examination Postoperative Complications - mortality Severity of Illness Index Survival Rate Trauma Severity Indices |
title | Significance of Different Levels of the Edinburgh 2 Coma Scale Calculated from the Outcome of Neurosurgical Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A04%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Significance%20of%20Different%20Levels%20of%20the%20Edinburgh%202%20Coma%20Scale%20Calculated%20from%20the%20Outcome%20of%20Neurosurgical%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Neurosurgery&rft.au=Sugiura,%20K&rft.date=1992-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1023&rft.epage=1029&rft.pages=1023-1029&rft.artnum=1023&rft.issn=0148-396X&rft.eissn=1524-4040&rft_id=info:doi/10.1227/00006123-199212000-00006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73392701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73392701&rft_id=info:pmid/1470313&rfr_iscdi=true |