Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy
Background Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2010-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1092-1098 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1098 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1092 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Salinas, Gustavo Saavedra, Lil Agurto, Hellen Quispe, Rosa Ramírez, Edwin Grande, José Tamayo, Juan Sánchez, Victoria Málaga, Daniel Marks, Jeffrey M. |
description | Background
Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity may further reduce the invasiveness of surgery by either diminishing or avoiding abdominal incisions. Several orifice routes to the abdominal cavity have been described: transgastric, transvaginal, transvesical, and transcolonic. Although most experiences with the porcine model showed the possibility of these approaches, few surgeons reported experiences with humans. The authors present their complete early experience with transgastric (TG) and transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomies in human beings.
Methods
Thirty-nine patients (4 males and 35 females) underwent hybrid NOTES procedures from January 2007 to January 2009. The mean age was 46 years (range = 19–83). The body mass index ranged from 20 to 41 and ASA was I–II. Transgastric (TG) cholecystectomy was performed in 27 patients and 12 patients had a transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomy.
Results
The mean operative time was 140 min. Although operative times were slightly shorter in the TG group 005B137 ± 34.6 min (range = 75–195)] compared to the TV route [147 ± 31.5 min (range = 95–220)], there were no significant differences between the two groups (
p
= 0.5, Mann–Whitney
U
test). Patients were started on liquids within 1 h and discharged 2 h later, except the last 11 TG patients, who went home 24 h later because of enrollment in a separate protocol. An overall 20% morbidity rate and no mortality were found. The complication rates for the TG and TV groups were 18% (5/27) and 25% (3/12), respectively, which was not statistically significant (
p
= 0.6, χ
2
test). Seventy-five percent of complications (6/8) occurred the first year and 25% (2/8) during the second year of our experience.
Conclusion
Transgastric and transvaginal cholecystectomies are feasible. Although these NOTES procedures were laparoscopically assisted and current flexible endoscopes were used, it seems possible that major intra-abdominal surgeries may one day be performed without skin incisions. However, a learning curve is mandatory and, although there were no major bile duct injuries, there were NOTES-related complications. These trends toward incisionless surgery demand coordinated research in an interdisciplinary setting involving both surgeons |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733925835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733925835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9edec098bce75b290bf40220e3e840bd87bb68035583cd5440195196cac6ffa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtL3UAUgAdp0evVH-CmhELpKnrmlcwsi9haENy46WqYTE6ukTyucxIx_96RGyoUupkDc77z-hi74HDJAcorAlCFygFsDqWUeXnENlxJkQvBzSe2ASshF6VVJ-yU6AkSbrk-ZifcWluWWm3YnxsfuyXD1z3GFoeAWTtkj3Pv07tUsa2zKfqBdp6m2IbMD-vHi9-1g-8yHOqRwrhPufA4dhgWmjBMY7-csc-N7wjP17hlDz9vHq5v87v7X7-vf9zlQQFMucUaA1hTBSx1JSxUjQIhACUaBVVtyqoqDEitjQy1Vgq41dwWwYeiabzcsu-Htvs4Ps9Ik-tbCth1fsBxJpe8WJFqdSK__kM-jXNMR5AT3KqiUNYmiB-gEEeiiI3bx7b3cXEc3Lt0d5DuknT3Lj0N2LIva-O56rH-qFgtJ-DbCngKvmuSwNDSX04IU2hpTOLEgaOUGnYYPzb8__Q3IbWaeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219466499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Salinas, Gustavo ; Saavedra, Lil ; Agurto, Hellen ; Quispe, Rosa ; Ramírez, Edwin ; Grande, José ; Tamayo, Juan ; Sánchez, Victoria ; Málaga, Daniel ; Marks, Jeffrey M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Gustavo ; Saavedra, Lil ; Agurto, Hellen ; Quispe, Rosa ; Ramírez, Edwin ; Grande, José ; Tamayo, Juan ; Sánchez, Victoria ; Málaga, Daniel ; Marks, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity may further reduce the invasiveness of surgery by either diminishing or avoiding abdominal incisions. Several orifice routes to the abdominal cavity have been described: transgastric, transvaginal, transvesical, and transcolonic. Although most experiences with the porcine model showed the possibility of these approaches, few surgeons reported experiences with humans. The authors present their complete early experience with transgastric (TG) and transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomies in human beings.
Methods
Thirty-nine patients (4 males and 35 females) underwent hybrid NOTES procedures from January 2007 to January 2009. The mean age was 46 years (range = 19–83). The body mass index ranged from 20 to 41 and ASA was I–II. Transgastric (TG) cholecystectomy was performed in 27 patients and 12 patients had a transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomy.
Results
The mean operative time was 140 min. Although operative times were slightly shorter in the TG group 005B137 ± 34.6 min (range = 75–195)] compared to the TV route [147 ± 31.5 min (range = 95–220)], there were no significant differences between the two groups (
p
= 0.5, Mann–Whitney
U
test). Patients were started on liquids within 1 h and discharged 2 h later, except the last 11 TG patients, who went home 24 h later because of enrollment in a separate protocol. An overall 20% morbidity rate and no mortality were found. The complication rates for the TG and TV groups were 18% (5/27) and 25% (3/12), respectively, which was not statistically significant (
p
= 0.6, χ
2
test). Seventy-five percent of complications (6/8) occurred the first year and 25% (2/8) during the second year of our experience.
Conclusion
Transgastric and transvaginal cholecystectomies are feasible. Although these NOTES procedures were laparoscopically assisted and current flexible endoscopes were used, it seems possible that major intra-abdominal surgeries may one day be performed without skin incisions. However, a learning curve is mandatory and, although there were no major bile duct injuries, there were NOTES-related complications. These trends toward incisionless surgery demand coordinated research in an interdisciplinary setting involving both surgeons and device manufacturers to further define appropriate indications, contraindications, and applications for natural-orifice surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19997754</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SUREEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gallbladder ; Gallstones - diagnosis ; Gallstones - surgery ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Polyps - diagnosis ; Polyps - surgery ; Proctology ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; Vagina ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2010-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1092-1098</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9edec098bce75b290bf40220e3e840bd87bb68035583cd5440195196cac6ffa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9edec098bce75b290bf40220e3e840bd87bb68035583cd5440195196cac6ffa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27902,27903,41466,42535,51296</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22865388$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19997754$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saavedra, Lil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agurto, Hellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quispe, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamayo, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Málaga, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><title>Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity may further reduce the invasiveness of surgery by either diminishing or avoiding abdominal incisions. Several orifice routes to the abdominal cavity have been described: transgastric, transvaginal, transvesical, and transcolonic. Although most experiences with the porcine model showed the possibility of these approaches, few surgeons reported experiences with humans. The authors present their complete early experience with transgastric (TG) and transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomies in human beings.
Methods
Thirty-nine patients (4 males and 35 females) underwent hybrid NOTES procedures from January 2007 to January 2009. The mean age was 46 years (range = 19–83). The body mass index ranged from 20 to 41 and ASA was I–II. Transgastric (TG) cholecystectomy was performed in 27 patients and 12 patients had a transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomy.
Results
The mean operative time was 140 min. Although operative times were slightly shorter in the TG group 005B137 ± 34.6 min (range = 75–195)] compared to the TV route [147 ± 31.5 min (range = 95–220)], there were no significant differences between the two groups (
p
= 0.5, Mann–Whitney
U
test). Patients were started on liquids within 1 h and discharged 2 h later, except the last 11 TG patients, who went home 24 h later because of enrollment in a separate protocol. An overall 20% morbidity rate and no mortality were found. The complication rates for the TG and TV groups were 18% (5/27) and 25% (3/12), respectively, which was not statistically significant (
p
= 0.6, χ
2
test). Seventy-five percent of complications (6/8) occurred the first year and 25% (2/8) during the second year of our experience.
Conclusion
Transgastric and transvaginal cholecystectomies are feasible. Although these NOTES procedures were laparoscopically assisted and current flexible endoscopes were used, it seems possible that major intra-abdominal surgeries may one day be performed without skin incisions. However, a learning curve is mandatory and, although there were no major bile duct injuries, there were NOTES-related complications. These trends toward incisionless surgery demand coordinated research in an interdisciplinary setting involving both surgeons and device manufacturers to further define appropriate indications, contraindications, and applications for natural-orifice surgery.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gallbladder</subject><subject>Gallstones - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gallstones - surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtL3UAUgAdp0evVH-CmhELpKnrmlcwsi9haENy46WqYTE6ukTyucxIx_96RGyoUupkDc77z-hi74HDJAcorAlCFygFsDqWUeXnENlxJkQvBzSe2ASshF6VVJ-yU6AkSbrk-ZifcWluWWm3YnxsfuyXD1z3GFoeAWTtkj3Pv07tUsa2zKfqBdp6m2IbMD-vHi9-1g-8yHOqRwrhPufA4dhgWmjBMY7-csc-N7wjP17hlDz9vHq5v87v7X7-vf9zlQQFMucUaA1hTBSx1JSxUjQIhACUaBVVtyqoqDEitjQy1Vgq41dwWwYeiabzcsu-Htvs4Ps9Ik-tbCth1fsBxJpe8WJFqdSK__kM-jXNMR5AT3KqiUNYmiB-gEEeiiI3bx7b3cXEc3Lt0d5DuknT3Lj0N2LIva-O56rH-qFgtJ-DbCngKvmuSwNDSX04IU2hpTOLEgaOUGnYYPzb8__Q3IbWaeA</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Salinas, Gustavo</creator><creator>Saavedra, Lil</creator><creator>Agurto, Hellen</creator><creator>Quispe, Rosa</creator><creator>Ramírez, Edwin</creator><creator>Grande, José</creator><creator>Tamayo, Juan</creator><creator>Sánchez, Victoria</creator><creator>Málaga, Daniel</creator><creator>Marks, Jeffrey M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy</title><author>Salinas, Gustavo ; Saavedra, Lil ; Agurto, Hellen ; Quispe, Rosa ; Ramírez, Edwin ; Grande, José ; Tamayo, Juan ; Sánchez, Victoria ; Málaga, Daniel ; Marks, Jeffrey M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9edec098bce75b290bf40220e3e840bd87bb68035583cd5440195196cac6ffa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gallbladder</topic><topic>Gallstones - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gallstones - surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saavedra, Lil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agurto, Hellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quispe, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamayo, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Málaga, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salinas, Gustavo</au><au>Saavedra, Lil</au><au>Agurto, Hellen</au><au>Quispe, Rosa</au><au>Ramírez, Edwin</au><au>Grande, José</au><au>Tamayo, Juan</au><au>Sánchez, Victoria</au><au>Málaga, Daniel</au><au>Marks, Jeffrey M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1092</spage><epage>1098</epage><pages>1092-1098</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><coden>SUREEX</coden><abstract>Background
Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity may further reduce the invasiveness of surgery by either diminishing or avoiding abdominal incisions. Several orifice routes to the abdominal cavity have been described: transgastric, transvaginal, transvesical, and transcolonic. Although most experiences with the porcine model showed the possibility of these approaches, few surgeons reported experiences with humans. The authors present their complete early experience with transgastric (TG) and transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomies in human beings.
Methods
Thirty-nine patients (4 males and 35 females) underwent hybrid NOTES procedures from January 2007 to January 2009. The mean age was 46 years (range = 19–83). The body mass index ranged from 20 to 41 and ASA was I–II. Transgastric (TG) cholecystectomy was performed in 27 patients and 12 patients had a transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomy.
Results
The mean operative time was 140 min. Although operative times were slightly shorter in the TG group 005B137 ± 34.6 min (range = 75–195)] compared to the TV route [147 ± 31.5 min (range = 95–220)], there were no significant differences between the two groups (
p
= 0.5, Mann–Whitney
U
test). Patients were started on liquids within 1 h and discharged 2 h later, except the last 11 TG patients, who went home 24 h later because of enrollment in a separate protocol. An overall 20% morbidity rate and no mortality were found. The complication rates for the TG and TV groups were 18% (5/27) and 25% (3/12), respectively, which was not statistically significant (
p
= 0.6, χ
2
test). Seventy-five percent of complications (6/8) occurred the first year and 25% (2/8) during the second year of our experience.
Conclusion
Transgastric and transvaginal cholecystectomies are feasible. Although these NOTES procedures were laparoscopically assisted and current flexible endoscopes were used, it seems possible that major intra-abdominal surgeries may one day be performed without skin incisions. However, a learning curve is mandatory and, although there were no major bile duct injuries, there were NOTES-related complications. These trends toward incisionless surgery demand coordinated research in an interdisciplinary setting involving both surgeons and device manufacturers to further define appropriate indications, contraindications, and applications for natural-orifice surgery.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19997754</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2010-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1092-1098 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733925835 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods Digestive system. Abdomen Endoscopy Female Follow-Up Studies Gallbladder Gallstones - diagnosis Gallstones - surgery Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Miscellaneous Polyps - diagnosis Polyps - surgery Proctology Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Retrospective Studies Stomach Surgery Time Factors Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment Outcome Vagina Young Adult |
title | Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T09%3A22%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20experience%20in%20human%20hybrid%20transgastric%20and%20transvaginal%20endoscopic%20cholecystectomy&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Salinas,%20Gustavo&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1092&rft.epage=1098&rft.pages=1092-1098&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft.coden=SUREEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733925835%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219466499&rft_id=info:pmid/19997754&rfr_iscdi=true |