Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy

Background Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2010-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1092-1098
Hauptverfasser: Salinas, Gustavo, Saavedra, Lil, Agurto, Hellen, Quispe, Rosa, Ramírez, Edwin, Grande, José, Tamayo, Juan, Sánchez, Victoria, Málaga, Daniel, Marks, Jeffrey M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1098
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1092
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 24
creator Salinas, Gustavo
Saavedra, Lil
Agurto, Hellen
Quispe, Rosa
Ramírez, Edwin
Grande, José
Tamayo, Juan
Sánchez, Victoria
Málaga, Daniel
Marks, Jeffrey M.
description Background Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity may further reduce the invasiveness of surgery by either diminishing or avoiding abdominal incisions. Several orifice routes to the abdominal cavity have been described: transgastric, transvaginal, transvesical, and transcolonic. Although most experiences with the porcine model showed the possibility of these approaches, few surgeons reported experiences with humans. The authors present their complete early experience with transgastric (TG) and transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomies in human beings. Methods Thirty-nine patients (4 males and 35 females) underwent hybrid NOTES procedures from January 2007 to January 2009. The mean age was 46 years (range = 19–83). The body mass index ranged from 20 to 41 and ASA was I–II. Transgastric (TG) cholecystectomy was performed in 27 patients and 12 patients had a transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomy. Results The mean operative time was 140 min. Although operative times were slightly shorter in the TG group 005B137 ± 34.6 min (range = 75–195)] compared to the TV route [147 ± 31.5 min (range = 95–220)], there were no significant differences between the two groups ( p  = 0.5, Mann–Whitney U test). Patients were started on liquids within 1 h and discharged 2 h later, except the last 11 TG patients, who went home 24 h later because of enrollment in a separate protocol. An overall 20% morbidity rate and no mortality were found. The complication rates for the TG and TV groups were 18% (5/27) and 25% (3/12), respectively, which was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.6, χ 2 test). Seventy-five percent of complications (6/8) occurred the first year and 25% (2/8) during the second year of our experience. Conclusion Transgastric and transvaginal cholecystectomies are feasible. Although these NOTES procedures were laparoscopically assisted and current flexible endoscopes were used, it seems possible that major intra-abdominal surgeries may one day be performed without skin incisions. However, a learning curve is mandatory and, although there were no major bile duct injuries, there were NOTES-related complications. These trends toward incisionless surgery demand coordinated research in an interdisciplinary setting involving both surgeons
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733925835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733925835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9edec098bce75b290bf40220e3e840bd87bb68035583cd5440195196cac6ffa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtL3UAUgAdp0evVH-CmhELpKnrmlcwsi9haENy46WqYTE6ukTyucxIx_96RGyoUupkDc77z-hi74HDJAcorAlCFygFsDqWUeXnENlxJkQvBzSe2ASshF6VVJ-yU6AkSbrk-ZifcWluWWm3YnxsfuyXD1z3GFoeAWTtkj3Pv07tUsa2zKfqBdp6m2IbMD-vHi9-1g-8yHOqRwrhPufA4dhgWmjBMY7-csc-N7wjP17hlDz9vHq5v87v7X7-vf9zlQQFMucUaA1hTBSx1JSxUjQIhACUaBVVtyqoqDEitjQy1Vgq41dwWwYeiabzcsu-Htvs4Ps9Ik-tbCth1fsBxJpe8WJFqdSK__kM-jXNMR5AT3KqiUNYmiB-gEEeiiI3bx7b3cXEc3Lt0d5DuknT3Lj0N2LIva-O56rH-qFgtJ-DbCngKvmuSwNDSX04IU2hpTOLEgaOUGnYYPzb8__Q3IbWaeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219466499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Salinas, Gustavo ; Saavedra, Lil ; Agurto, Hellen ; Quispe, Rosa ; Ramírez, Edwin ; Grande, José ; Tamayo, Juan ; Sánchez, Victoria ; Málaga, Daniel ; Marks, Jeffrey M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Gustavo ; Saavedra, Lil ; Agurto, Hellen ; Quispe, Rosa ; Ramírez, Edwin ; Grande, José ; Tamayo, Juan ; Sánchez, Victoria ; Málaga, Daniel ; Marks, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity may further reduce the invasiveness of surgery by either diminishing or avoiding abdominal incisions. Several orifice routes to the abdominal cavity have been described: transgastric, transvaginal, transvesical, and transcolonic. Although most experiences with the porcine model showed the possibility of these approaches, few surgeons reported experiences with humans. The authors present their complete early experience with transgastric (TG) and transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomies in human beings. Methods Thirty-nine patients (4 males and 35 females) underwent hybrid NOTES procedures from January 2007 to January 2009. The mean age was 46 years (range = 19–83). The body mass index ranged from 20 to 41 and ASA was I–II. Transgastric (TG) cholecystectomy was performed in 27 patients and 12 patients had a transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomy. Results The mean operative time was 140 min. Although operative times were slightly shorter in the TG group 005B137 ± 34.6 min (range = 75–195)] compared to the TV route [147 ± 31.5 min (range = 95–220)], there were no significant differences between the two groups ( p  = 0.5, Mann–Whitney U test). Patients were started on liquids within 1 h and discharged 2 h later, except the last 11 TG patients, who went home 24 h later because of enrollment in a separate protocol. An overall 20% morbidity rate and no mortality were found. The complication rates for the TG and TV groups were 18% (5/27) and 25% (3/12), respectively, which was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.6, χ 2 test). Seventy-five percent of complications (6/8) occurred the first year and 25% (2/8) during the second year of our experience. Conclusion Transgastric and transvaginal cholecystectomies are feasible. Although these NOTES procedures were laparoscopically assisted and current flexible endoscopes were used, it seems possible that major intra-abdominal surgeries may one day be performed without skin incisions. However, a learning curve is mandatory and, although there were no major bile duct injuries, there were NOTES-related complications. These trends toward incisionless surgery demand coordinated research in an interdisciplinary setting involving both surgeons and device manufacturers to further define appropriate indications, contraindications, and applications for natural-orifice surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19997754</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SUREEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gallbladder ; Gallstones - diagnosis ; Gallstones - surgery ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Polyps - diagnosis ; Polyps - surgery ; Proctology ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; Vagina ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2010-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1092-1098</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9edec098bce75b290bf40220e3e840bd87bb68035583cd5440195196cac6ffa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9edec098bce75b290bf40220e3e840bd87bb68035583cd5440195196cac6ffa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27902,27903,41466,42535,51296</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22865388$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19997754$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saavedra, Lil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agurto, Hellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quispe, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamayo, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Málaga, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><title>Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity may further reduce the invasiveness of surgery by either diminishing or avoiding abdominal incisions. Several orifice routes to the abdominal cavity have been described: transgastric, transvaginal, transvesical, and transcolonic. Although most experiences with the porcine model showed the possibility of these approaches, few surgeons reported experiences with humans. The authors present their complete early experience with transgastric (TG) and transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomies in human beings. Methods Thirty-nine patients (4 males and 35 females) underwent hybrid NOTES procedures from January 2007 to January 2009. The mean age was 46 years (range = 19–83). The body mass index ranged from 20 to 41 and ASA was I–II. Transgastric (TG) cholecystectomy was performed in 27 patients and 12 patients had a transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomy. Results The mean operative time was 140 min. Although operative times were slightly shorter in the TG group 005B137 ± 34.6 min (range = 75–195)] compared to the TV route [147 ± 31.5 min (range = 95–220)], there were no significant differences between the two groups ( p  = 0.5, Mann–Whitney U test). Patients were started on liquids within 1 h and discharged 2 h later, except the last 11 TG patients, who went home 24 h later because of enrollment in a separate protocol. An overall 20% morbidity rate and no mortality were found. The complication rates for the TG and TV groups were 18% (5/27) and 25% (3/12), respectively, which was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.6, χ 2 test). Seventy-five percent of complications (6/8) occurred the first year and 25% (2/8) during the second year of our experience. Conclusion Transgastric and transvaginal cholecystectomies are feasible. Although these NOTES procedures were laparoscopically assisted and current flexible endoscopes were used, it seems possible that major intra-abdominal surgeries may one day be performed without skin incisions. However, a learning curve is mandatory and, although there were no major bile duct injuries, there were NOTES-related complications. These trends toward incisionless surgery demand coordinated research in an interdisciplinary setting involving both surgeons and device manufacturers to further define appropriate indications, contraindications, and applications for natural-orifice surgery.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gallbladder</subject><subject>Gallstones - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gallstones - surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtL3UAUgAdp0evVH-CmhELpKnrmlcwsi9haENy46WqYTE6ukTyucxIx_96RGyoUupkDc77z-hi74HDJAcorAlCFygFsDqWUeXnENlxJkQvBzSe2ASshF6VVJ-yU6AkSbrk-ZifcWluWWm3YnxsfuyXD1z3GFoeAWTtkj3Pv07tUsa2zKfqBdp6m2IbMD-vHi9-1g-8yHOqRwrhPufA4dhgWmjBMY7-csc-N7wjP17hlDz9vHq5v87v7X7-vf9zlQQFMucUaA1hTBSx1JSxUjQIhACUaBVVtyqoqDEitjQy1Vgq41dwWwYeiabzcsu-Htvs4Ps9Ik-tbCth1fsBxJpe8WJFqdSK__kM-jXNMR5AT3KqiUNYmiB-gEEeiiI3bx7b3cXEc3Lt0d5DuknT3Lj0N2LIva-O56rH-qFgtJ-DbCngKvmuSwNDSX04IU2hpTOLEgaOUGnYYPzb8__Q3IbWaeA</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Salinas, Gustavo</creator><creator>Saavedra, Lil</creator><creator>Agurto, Hellen</creator><creator>Quispe, Rosa</creator><creator>Ramírez, Edwin</creator><creator>Grande, José</creator><creator>Tamayo, Juan</creator><creator>Sánchez, Victoria</creator><creator>Málaga, Daniel</creator><creator>Marks, Jeffrey M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy</title><author>Salinas, Gustavo ; Saavedra, Lil ; Agurto, Hellen ; Quispe, Rosa ; Ramírez, Edwin ; Grande, José ; Tamayo, Juan ; Sánchez, Victoria ; Málaga, Daniel ; Marks, Jeffrey M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-9edec098bce75b290bf40220e3e840bd87bb68035583cd5440195196cac6ffa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gallbladder</topic><topic>Gallstones - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gallstones - surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saavedra, Lil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agurto, Hellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quispe, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamayo, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Málaga, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salinas, Gustavo</au><au>Saavedra, Lil</au><au>Agurto, Hellen</au><au>Quispe, Rosa</au><au>Ramírez, Edwin</au><au>Grande, José</au><au>Tamayo, Juan</au><au>Sánchez, Victoria</au><au>Málaga, Daniel</au><au>Marks, Jeffrey M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1092</spage><epage>1098</epage><pages>1092-1098</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><coden>SUREEX</coden><abstract>Background Abdominal procedures have been performed for a long time through the anterior abdominal wall. Since the first reports in the 1980s, laparoscopy has become the standard for cholecystectomy, with many advantages over open procedures. Now a natural-orifice approach to the peritoneal cavity may further reduce the invasiveness of surgery by either diminishing or avoiding abdominal incisions. Several orifice routes to the abdominal cavity have been described: transgastric, transvaginal, transvesical, and transcolonic. Although most experiences with the porcine model showed the possibility of these approaches, few surgeons reported experiences with humans. The authors present their complete early experience with transgastric (TG) and transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomies in human beings. Methods Thirty-nine patients (4 males and 35 females) underwent hybrid NOTES procedures from January 2007 to January 2009. The mean age was 46 years (range = 19–83). The body mass index ranged from 20 to 41 and ASA was I–II. Transgastric (TG) cholecystectomy was performed in 27 patients and 12 patients had a transvaginal (TV) cholecystectomy. Results The mean operative time was 140 min. Although operative times were slightly shorter in the TG group 005B137 ± 34.6 min (range = 75–195)] compared to the TV route [147 ± 31.5 min (range = 95–220)], there were no significant differences between the two groups ( p  = 0.5, Mann–Whitney U test). Patients were started on liquids within 1 h and discharged 2 h later, except the last 11 TG patients, who went home 24 h later because of enrollment in a separate protocol. An overall 20% morbidity rate and no mortality were found. The complication rates for the TG and TV groups were 18% (5/27) and 25% (3/12), respectively, which was not statistically significant ( p  = 0.6, χ 2 test). Seventy-five percent of complications (6/8) occurred the first year and 25% (2/8) during the second year of our experience. Conclusion Transgastric and transvaginal cholecystectomies are feasible. Although these NOTES procedures were laparoscopically assisted and current flexible endoscopes were used, it seems possible that major intra-abdominal surgeries may one day be performed without skin incisions. However, a learning curve is mandatory and, although there were no major bile duct injuries, there were NOTES-related complications. These trends toward incisionless surgery demand coordinated research in an interdisciplinary setting involving both surgeons and device manufacturers to further define appropriate indications, contraindications, and applications for natural-orifice surgery.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19997754</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2010-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1092-1098
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733925835
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods
Digestive system. Abdomen
Endoscopy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gallbladder
Gallstones - diagnosis
Gallstones - surgery
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Hepatology
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Polyps - diagnosis
Polyps - surgery
Proctology
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Retrospective Studies
Stomach
Surgery
Time Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Vagina
Young Adult
title Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T09%3A22%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20experience%20in%20human%20hybrid%20transgastric%20and%20transvaginal%20endoscopic%20cholecystectomy&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Salinas,%20Gustavo&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1092&rft.epage=1098&rft.pages=1092-1098&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft.coden=SUREEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-009-0733-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733925835%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219466499&rft_id=info:pmid/19997754&rfr_iscdi=true