Household and food shopping environments: do they play a role in socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption? A multilevel study among Dutch adults

Background:Fruit and vegetables are protective of a number of chronic diseases; however, their intakes have been shown to vary by socioeconomic position (SEP). Household and food shopping environmental factors are thought to contribute to these differences. To determine whether household and food sh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2009-02, Vol.63 (2), p.113-120
Hauptverfasser: Giskes, K, van Lenthe, F J, Kamphuis, C B M, Huisman, M, Brug, J, Mackenbach, J P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 120
container_issue 2
container_start_page 113
container_title Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)
container_volume 63
creator Giskes, K
van Lenthe, F J
Kamphuis, C B M
Huisman, M
Brug, J
Mackenbach, J P
description Background:Fruit and vegetables are protective of a number of chronic diseases; however, their intakes have been shown to vary by socioeconomic position (SEP). Household and food shopping environmental factors are thought to contribute to these differences. To determine whether household and food shopping environmental factors are associated with fruit and vegetable (FV) intakes, and contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in FV consumption.Methods:Cross-sectional data were obtained by a postal questionnaire among 4333 adults (23–85 years) living in 168 neighbourhoods in the south-eastern Netherlands. Participants agreed/disagreed with a number of statements about the characteristics of their household and food shopping environments, including access, prices and quality. Education was used to characterise socioeconomic position (SEP). Main outcome measures were whether or not participants consumed fruit or vegetables on a daily basis. Multilevel logistic regression models examined between-area variance in FV consumption and associations between characteristics of the household and food shopping environments and FV consumption.Results:Only a few household and food shopping environmental factors were significantly associated with fruit and vegetable consumption, and their prevalence was low. Participants who perceived FV to be expensive were more likely to consume them. There were significant socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption (ORs of not consuming fruit and vegetables were 4.26 and 5.47 among the lowest-educated groups for fruit and vegetables, respectively); however, these were not explained by any household or food shopping environmental factors.Conclusions:Improving access to FV in the household and food shopping environments will only make a small contribution to improving population consumption levels, and may only have a limited effect in reducing socioeconomic inequalities in their consumption.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/jech.2008.078352
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733917794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20720897</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20720897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b494t-ed9dc2f078284c69affc5accae12a34488f376d0508db0cbdb39191d9493093e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9vFCEYxidGY2v17kVDYowHMysMs8vgxTTrn9ps9FBtjBfCwDtdVgamwGzcD-T3lO1sqvHiCcLzex7gfYriMcEzQuji1QbUelZh3Mwwa-i8ulMck5rhsmK0uVscY1LTEuP5t6PiQYwbnLes4veLI9I0mDDOjotfZ36MsPZWI-k06rzXKK79MBh3hcBtTfCuB5fia6Q9SmvYocHKHZIoeAvIOBS9Mh6Ud743Kh_A9SitSQbiXu3CaNJN9BauIMk2mzIbx35Ixrs36BT1o03GwhYsimnUObv3-fK3Y1JrJHVW48PiXidthEeH9aT4-v7dl-VZufr84ePydFW2Na9TCZprVXV5FlVTqwWXXafmUikJpJK0rpumo2yh8Rw3usWq1S3lhBPNa04xp0BPihdT7hD89Qgxid5EBdZKB3lOgtFsYIzXmXz2D7nxY3D5cWIPVAuKMckUnigVfIwBOjEE08uwEwSLfYNi36DYNyimBrPl6SF4bHvQfwyHyjLw_ADIqKTtgnTKxFuuwpw3lOHMPZm4TUw-_KWzCjc3OeWkm5jg560uww-xYJTNxafLpbg4v7j8fo5Xgmb-5cS3_eb_3_gNxMLN_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779263001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Household and food shopping environments: do they play a role in socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption? A multilevel study among Dutch adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Giskes, K ; van Lenthe, F J ; Kamphuis, C B M ; Huisman, M ; Brug, J ; Mackenbach, J P</creator><creatorcontrib>Giskes, K ; van Lenthe, F J ; Kamphuis, C B M ; Huisman, M ; Brug, J ; Mackenbach, J P</creatorcontrib><description>Background:Fruit and vegetables are protective of a number of chronic diseases; however, their intakes have been shown to vary by socioeconomic position (SEP). Household and food shopping environmental factors are thought to contribute to these differences. To determine whether household and food shopping environmental factors are associated with fruit and vegetable (FV) intakes, and contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in FV consumption.Methods:Cross-sectional data were obtained by a postal questionnaire among 4333 adults (23–85 years) living in 168 neighbourhoods in the south-eastern Netherlands. Participants agreed/disagreed with a number of statements about the characteristics of their household and food shopping environments, including access, prices and quality. Education was used to characterise socioeconomic position (SEP). Main outcome measures were whether or not participants consumed fruit or vegetables on a daily basis. Multilevel logistic regression models examined between-area variance in FV consumption and associations between characteristics of the household and food shopping environments and FV consumption.Results:Only a few household and food shopping environmental factors were significantly associated with fruit and vegetable consumption, and their prevalence was low. Participants who perceived FV to be expensive were more likely to consume them. There were significant socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption (ORs of not consuming fruit and vegetables were 4.26 and 5.47 among the lowest-educated groups for fruit and vegetables, respectively); however, these were not explained by any household or food shopping environmental factors.Conclusions:Improving access to FV in the household and food shopping environments will only make a small contribution to improving population consumption levels, and may only have a limited effect in reducing socioeconomic inequalities in their consumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-2738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech.2008.078352</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18801797</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECHDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Commerce - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Consumption ; Educational Status ; Environment ; Environmental education ; Environmental factors ; Epidemiologic Methods ; Feeding Behavior ; Food ; Food procurement ; Food Supply - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Fruit ; Fruits ; General aspects ; Health behavior ; Household food consumption ; Households ; Humans ; Influence ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Neighborhoods ; Netherlands ; Nutrition ; Population ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Research reports ; Response rates ; Retail stores ; Sex Factors ; Shopping ; Social Class ; Socioeconomics ; Studies ; Vegetables ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2009-02, Vol.63 (2), p.113-120</ispartof><rights>2009 the BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2009 2009 the BMJ Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b494t-ed9dc2f078284c69affc5accae12a34488f376d0508db0cbdb39191d9493093e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/63/2/113.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/63/2/113.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,803,3196,23571,27924,27925,58017,58250,77472,77503</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20998370$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18801797$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giskes, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lenthe, F J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamphuis, C B M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisman, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brug, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenbach, J P</creatorcontrib><title>Household and food shopping environments: do they play a role in socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption? A multilevel study among Dutch adults</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><description>Background:Fruit and vegetables are protective of a number of chronic diseases; however, their intakes have been shown to vary by socioeconomic position (SEP). Household and food shopping environmental factors are thought to contribute to these differences. To determine whether household and food shopping environmental factors are associated with fruit and vegetable (FV) intakes, and contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in FV consumption.Methods:Cross-sectional data were obtained by a postal questionnaire among 4333 adults (23–85 years) living in 168 neighbourhoods in the south-eastern Netherlands. Participants agreed/disagreed with a number of statements about the characteristics of their household and food shopping environments, including access, prices and quality. Education was used to characterise socioeconomic position (SEP). Main outcome measures were whether or not participants consumed fruit or vegetables on a daily basis. Multilevel logistic regression models examined between-area variance in FV consumption and associations between characteristics of the household and food shopping environments and FV consumption.Results:Only a few household and food shopping environmental factors were significantly associated with fruit and vegetable consumption, and their prevalence was low. Participants who perceived FV to be expensive were more likely to consume them. There were significant socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption (ORs of not consuming fruit and vegetables were 4.26 and 5.47 among the lowest-educated groups for fruit and vegetables, respectively); however, these were not explained by any household or food shopping environmental factors.Conclusions:Improving access to FV in the household and food shopping environments will only make a small contribution to improving population consumption levels, and may only have a limited effect in reducing socioeconomic inequalities in their consumption.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Commerce - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental education</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Methods</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food procurement</subject><subject>Food Supply - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Fruit</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Household food consumption</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Research reports</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Shopping</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0143-005X</issn><issn>1470-2738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9vFCEYxidGY2v17kVDYowHMysMs8vgxTTrn9ps9FBtjBfCwDtdVgamwGzcD-T3lO1sqvHiCcLzex7gfYriMcEzQuji1QbUelZh3Mwwa-i8ulMck5rhsmK0uVscY1LTEuP5t6PiQYwbnLes4veLI9I0mDDOjotfZ36MsPZWI-k06rzXKK79MBh3hcBtTfCuB5fia6Q9SmvYocHKHZIoeAvIOBS9Mh6Ud743Kh_A9SitSQbiXu3CaNJN9BauIMk2mzIbx35Ixrs36BT1o03GwhYsimnUObv3-fK3Y1JrJHVW48PiXidthEeH9aT4-v7dl-VZufr84ePydFW2Na9TCZprVXV5FlVTqwWXXafmUikJpJK0rpumo2yh8Rw3usWq1S3lhBPNa04xp0BPihdT7hD89Qgxid5EBdZKB3lOgtFsYIzXmXz2D7nxY3D5cWIPVAuKMckUnigVfIwBOjEE08uwEwSLfYNi36DYNyimBrPl6SF4bHvQfwyHyjLw_ADIqKTtgnTKxFuuwpw3lOHMPZm4TUw-_KWzCjc3OeWkm5jg560uww-xYJTNxafLpbg4v7j8fo5Xgmb-5cS3_eb_3_gNxMLN_w</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Giskes, K</creator><creator>van Lenthe, F J</creator><creator>Kamphuis, C B M</creator><creator>Huisman, M</creator><creator>Brug, J</creator><creator>Mackenbach, J P</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Household and food shopping environments: do they play a role in socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption? A multilevel study among Dutch adults</title><author>Giskes, K ; van Lenthe, F J ; Kamphuis, C B M ; Huisman, M ; Brug, J ; Mackenbach, J P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b494t-ed9dc2f078284c69affc5accae12a34488f376d0508db0cbdb39191d9493093e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Commerce - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental education</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Methods</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food procurement</topic><topic>Food Supply - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Fruit</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Household food consumption</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Research reports</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Shopping</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giskes, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lenthe, F J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamphuis, C B M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisman, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brug, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenbach, J P</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giskes, K</au><au>van Lenthe, F J</au><au>Kamphuis, C B M</au><au>Huisman, M</au><au>Brug, J</au><au>Mackenbach, J P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Household and food shopping environments: do they play a role in socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption? A multilevel study among Dutch adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>113-120</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><eissn>1470-2738</eissn><coden>JECHDR</coden><abstract>Background:Fruit and vegetables are protective of a number of chronic diseases; however, their intakes have been shown to vary by socioeconomic position (SEP). Household and food shopping environmental factors are thought to contribute to these differences. To determine whether household and food shopping environmental factors are associated with fruit and vegetable (FV) intakes, and contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in FV consumption.Methods:Cross-sectional data were obtained by a postal questionnaire among 4333 adults (23–85 years) living in 168 neighbourhoods in the south-eastern Netherlands. Participants agreed/disagreed with a number of statements about the characteristics of their household and food shopping environments, including access, prices and quality. Education was used to characterise socioeconomic position (SEP). Main outcome measures were whether or not participants consumed fruit or vegetables on a daily basis. Multilevel logistic regression models examined between-area variance in FV consumption and associations between characteristics of the household and food shopping environments and FV consumption.Results:Only a few household and food shopping environmental factors were significantly associated with fruit and vegetable consumption, and their prevalence was low. Participants who perceived FV to be expensive were more likely to consume them. There were significant socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption (ORs of not consuming fruit and vegetables were 4.26 and 5.47 among the lowest-educated groups for fruit and vegetables, respectively); however, these were not explained by any household or food shopping environmental factors.Conclusions:Improving access to FV in the household and food shopping environments will only make a small contribution to improving population consumption levels, and may only have a limited effect in reducing socioeconomic inequalities in their consumption.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>18801797</pmid><doi>10.1136/jech.2008.078352</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-005X
ispartof Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2009-02, Vol.63 (2), p.113-120
issn 0143-005X
1470-2738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733917794
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; JSTOR
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Commerce - statistics & numerical data
Consumption
Educational Status
Environment
Environmental education
Environmental factors
Epidemiologic Methods
Feeding Behavior
Food
Food procurement
Food Supply - statistics & numerical data
Fruit
Fruits
General aspects
Health behavior
Household food consumption
Households
Humans
Influence
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Neighborhoods
Netherlands
Nutrition
Population
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Research reports
Response rates
Retail stores
Sex Factors
Shopping
Social Class
Socioeconomics
Studies
Vegetables
Young Adult
title Household and food shopping environments: do they play a role in socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption? A multilevel study among Dutch adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A23%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Household%20and%20food%20shopping%20environments:%20do%20they%20play%20a%20role%20in%20socioeconomic%20inequalities%20in%20fruit%20and%20vegetable%20consumption?%20A%20multilevel%20study%20among%20Dutch%20adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=Giskes,%20K&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=113-120&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft.eissn=1470-2738&rft.coden=JECHDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech.2008.078352&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20720897%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779263001&rft_id=info:pmid/18801797&rft_jstor_id=20720897&rfr_iscdi=true