Feasibility and effectiveness of the NEST13+ as a screening tool for advanced illness care needs

A comprehensive whole-person approach might improve processes and outcomes of care for patients with cancer. To assess the ability of NEST13+ (Needs of a social nature; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction), a screening and assessment tool, to identify social, emotional, physi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of palliative medicine 2010-02, Vol.13 (2), p.161-169
Hauptverfasser: Scandrett, Karen G, Reitschuler-Cross, Eva B, Nelson, Lauren, Sanger, J Alex, Feigon, Maia, Boyd, Elizabeth, Chang, Chih-Hung, Paice, Judith A, Hauser, Joshua M, Chamkin, Alexey, Balfour, Paul, Stolbunov, Alexei, Bennett, Charles L, Emanuel, Linda L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A comprehensive whole-person approach might improve processes and outcomes of care for patients with cancer. To assess the ability of NEST13+ (Needs of a social nature; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction), a screening and assessment tool, to identify social, emotional, physical, and care-system needs and to improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients in tertiary care. A controlled trial involving 451 patients hospitalized for cancer care at a comprehensive cancer center. Patients responded to 13 screening questions regarding possible care needs. When an individual response exceeded threshold levels, additional in-depth questions for the relevant need were asked. For patients in the intervention arm, clinical recommendations for each dimension of need were generated based on a previously developed NEST-response-driven menu, and were reported to the clinical team. Documented needs, clinician response, patient perception of goals alignment, and overall quality of palliative care. Using the NEST13+ tool in the clinical setting facilitated greater documentation of illness-related needs than routine clinical assessment. Improvement in secondary outcomes was attenuated: changes in the clinician response were modest; changes in outcomes were not significant. The NEST13+ tool facilitated identification of a wider range of important needs than traditional evaluation, while care outcomes were not improved. Traditional evaluation may need improvement. Future trials of the NEST13+ should focus on more intensive clinician-directed interventions.
ISSN:1096-6218
1557-7740
DOI:10.1089/jpm.2009.0170