Feasibility and effectiveness of the NEST13+ as a screening tool for advanced illness care needs
A comprehensive whole-person approach might improve processes and outcomes of care for patients with cancer. To assess the ability of NEST13+ (Needs of a social nature; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction), a screening and assessment tool, to identify social, emotional, physi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of palliative medicine 2010-02, Vol.13 (2), p.161-169 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A comprehensive whole-person approach might improve processes and outcomes of care for patients with cancer.
To assess the ability of NEST13+ (Needs of a social nature; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction), a screening and assessment tool, to identify social, emotional, physical, and care-system needs and to improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients in tertiary care.
A controlled trial involving 451 patients hospitalized for cancer care at a comprehensive cancer center.
Patients responded to 13 screening questions regarding possible care needs. When an individual response exceeded threshold levels, additional in-depth questions for the relevant need were asked. For patients in the intervention arm, clinical recommendations for each dimension of need were generated based on a previously developed NEST-response-driven menu, and were reported to the clinical team.
Documented needs, clinician response, patient perception of goals alignment, and overall quality of palliative care.
Using the NEST13+ tool in the clinical setting facilitated greater documentation of illness-related needs than routine clinical assessment. Improvement in secondary outcomes was attenuated: changes in the clinician response were modest; changes in outcomes were not significant.
The NEST13+ tool facilitated identification of a wider range of important needs than traditional evaluation, while care outcomes were not improved. Traditional evaluation may need improvement. Future trials of the NEST13+ should focus on more intensive clinician-directed interventions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1096-6218 1557-7740 |
DOI: | 10.1089/jpm.2009.0170 |