Osteoinduction in Umbilical Cord- and Palate Periosteum-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Adult abdominoplasty (AA) fat is an ideal source for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) because it is discarded after surgery, abundant, and easy to harvest. Children however, do not have the same abundant quantities of fat as adults, nor are they likely to undergo a procedure during which fat is routine...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of plastic surgery 2010-05, Vol.64 (5), p.605-609 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 609 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 605 |
container_title | Annals of plastic surgery |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | CABALLERO, Montserrat REED, Courtney R MADAN, Gitanjali VAN AALST, John A |
description | Adult abdominoplasty (AA) fat is an ideal source for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) because it is discarded after surgery, abundant, and easy to harvest. Children however, do not have the same abundant quantities of fat as adults, nor are they likely to undergo a procedure during which fat is routinely discarded. Hence, finding an alternate source for MSCs in children is a reasonable strategy. Two such sources are the palate periosteum (PP) and the umbilical cord (UC). Advantages for PP as a source of MSCs are accessibility during palate repair, ease of harvest, and minimal risk to the patient. The UC, like AA, is a discarded tissue, with a theoretically unlimited supply, which can be harvested in children with craniofacial bone abnormalities in advance of reconstructive procedures. Our objective in this study is to characterize MSCs from 3 sources (AA, PP, and UC) by surface marker prevalence, and to assess osteoinductive capability. Institutional review board approval was obtained for harvest of AA, PP, and UC. The presence of MSCs was determined using immunostaining and flow cytometry for cell surface markers CD73, CD90, CD105, and SSEA-4. Osteogenesis was induced using osteogenic medium. Osteoinduction was evaluated using Alizarin red staining, and real-time polymerase chain reaction for bone morphogenetic protein-2, alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin at 7, 14, and 21 days. MSCs from AA, PP, and UC all stained positive for CD73, CD90, CD105, and SSEA-4. Flow cytometry demonstrated significant differences in expression of CD90 and SSEA-4 but similar values for CD73 and CD105. Following osteoinduction, MSCs from all sources stained positive for calcium deposition. In UC MSCs, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction demonstrated greater elevation in bone morphogenetic protein-2 and alkaline phosphatase mRNA beginning at day 7 and extending to day 21. Osteocalcin mRNA levels were comparable for all 3 sources of MSCs. For children with craniofacial bone defects, UC-derived MSCs may be ideal for tissue engineered bone: temporally, the UC can be harvested in advance of surgical timing for the need for bone, is readily available, easy to harvest, and leads to osteoinduction that is more robust than either AA or PP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/sap.0b013e3181ce3929 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733901000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733901000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-c80c689977c597f84dccd26bfbb4b232044b727d797fa4d41656efbc606841093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gUhuxKvU2UN2N5elHkFpodbbsKfgSg41mwh9e1daFbyagfn-meFD6BzDFEMuroPaTEEDpo5iiY2jOckP0BhnlKdUgDxEY8BMpgIYHaGTEN4BMJGMH6MRAZpnErIxel2E3rW-sYPpfdskvknWtfaVN6pK5m1n00Q1NlmqSvUuWbrOtzEw1OlNbD-dTZ5dcI1529aRX_WuTuauqsIpOipVFdzZvk7Q-u72Zf6QPi3uH-ezp9QwIH1qJBgu81wIk-WilMwaYwnXpdZME0qAMS2IsCIOFbMM84y7UhsOXLJogU7Q1W7vpms_Bhf6ovbBxA9U49ohFILSHDAARJLtSNO1IXSuLDadr1W3LTAU30KL1WxZ_BcaYxf7A4Ounf0N_RiMwOUeUCE6KzvVGB_-OCKI5JH-AlShfxU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733901000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Osteoinduction in Umbilical Cord- and Palate Periosteum-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>CABALLERO, Montserrat ; REED, Courtney R ; MADAN, Gitanjali ; VAN AALST, John A</creator><creatorcontrib>CABALLERO, Montserrat ; REED, Courtney R ; MADAN, Gitanjali ; VAN AALST, John A</creatorcontrib><description>Adult abdominoplasty (AA) fat is an ideal source for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) because it is discarded after surgery, abundant, and easy to harvest. Children however, do not have the same abundant quantities of fat as adults, nor are they likely to undergo a procedure during which fat is routinely discarded. Hence, finding an alternate source for MSCs in children is a reasonable strategy. Two such sources are the palate periosteum (PP) and the umbilical cord (UC). Advantages for PP as a source of MSCs are accessibility during palate repair, ease of harvest, and minimal risk to the patient. The UC, like AA, is a discarded tissue, with a theoretically unlimited supply, which can be harvested in children with craniofacial bone abnormalities in advance of reconstructive procedures. Our objective in this study is to characterize MSCs from 3 sources (AA, PP, and UC) by surface marker prevalence, and to assess osteoinductive capability. Institutional review board approval was obtained for harvest of AA, PP, and UC. The presence of MSCs was determined using immunostaining and flow cytometry for cell surface markers CD73, CD90, CD105, and SSEA-4. Osteogenesis was induced using osteogenic medium. Osteoinduction was evaluated using Alizarin red staining, and real-time polymerase chain reaction for bone morphogenetic protein-2, alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin at 7, 14, and 21 days. MSCs from AA, PP, and UC all stained positive for CD73, CD90, CD105, and SSEA-4. Flow cytometry demonstrated significant differences in expression of CD90 and SSEA-4 but similar values for CD73 and CD105. Following osteoinduction, MSCs from all sources stained positive for calcium deposition. In UC MSCs, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction demonstrated greater elevation in bone morphogenetic protein-2 and alkaline phosphatase mRNA beginning at day 7 and extending to day 21. Osteocalcin mRNA levels were comparable for all 3 sources of MSCs. For children with craniofacial bone defects, UC-derived MSCs may be ideal for tissue engineered bone: temporally, the UC can be harvested in advance of surgical timing for the need for bone, is readily available, easy to harvest, and leads to osteoinduction that is more robust than either AA or PP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/sap.0b013e3181ce3929</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20395805</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCSD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Flow Cytometry ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - cytology ; Osteogenesis ; Palate - cytology ; Periosteum - cytology ; Phenotype ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Staining and Labeling ; Subcutaneous Fat, Abdominal - cytology ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Umbilical Cord - cytology</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2010-05, Vol.64 (5), p.605-609</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-c80c689977c597f84dccd26bfbb4b232044b727d797fa4d41656efbc606841093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-c80c689977c597f84dccd26bfbb4b232044b727d797fa4d41656efbc606841093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22728620$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20395805$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CABALLERO, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REED, Courtney R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MADAN, Gitanjali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN AALST, John A</creatorcontrib><title>Osteoinduction in Umbilical Cord- and Palate Periosteum-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Adult abdominoplasty (AA) fat is an ideal source for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) because it is discarded after surgery, abundant, and easy to harvest. Children however, do not have the same abundant quantities of fat as adults, nor are they likely to undergo a procedure during which fat is routinely discarded. Hence, finding an alternate source for MSCs in children is a reasonable strategy. Two such sources are the palate periosteum (PP) and the umbilical cord (UC). Advantages for PP as a source of MSCs are accessibility during palate repair, ease of harvest, and minimal risk to the patient. The UC, like AA, is a discarded tissue, with a theoretically unlimited supply, which can be harvested in children with craniofacial bone abnormalities in advance of reconstructive procedures. Our objective in this study is to characterize MSCs from 3 sources (AA, PP, and UC) by surface marker prevalence, and to assess osteoinductive capability. Institutional review board approval was obtained for harvest of AA, PP, and UC. The presence of MSCs was determined using immunostaining and flow cytometry for cell surface markers CD73, CD90, CD105, and SSEA-4. Osteogenesis was induced using osteogenic medium. Osteoinduction was evaluated using Alizarin red staining, and real-time polymerase chain reaction for bone morphogenetic protein-2, alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin at 7, 14, and 21 days. MSCs from AA, PP, and UC all stained positive for CD73, CD90, CD105, and SSEA-4. Flow cytometry demonstrated significant differences in expression of CD90 and SSEA-4 but similar values for CD73 and CD105. Following osteoinduction, MSCs from all sources stained positive for calcium deposition. In UC MSCs, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction demonstrated greater elevation in bone morphogenetic protein-2 and alkaline phosphatase mRNA beginning at day 7 and extending to day 21. Osteocalcin mRNA levels were comparable for all 3 sources of MSCs. For children with craniofacial bone defects, UC-derived MSCs may be ideal for tissue engineered bone: temporally, the UC can be harvested in advance of surgical timing for the need for bone, is readily available, easy to harvest, and leads to osteoinduction that is more robust than either AA or PP.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>Palate - cytology</subject><subject>Periosteum - cytology</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling</subject><subject>Subcutaneous Fat, Abdominal - cytology</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Umbilical Cord - cytology</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gUhuxKvU2UN2N5elHkFpodbbsKfgSg41mwh9e1daFbyagfn-meFD6BzDFEMuroPaTEEDpo5iiY2jOckP0BhnlKdUgDxEY8BMpgIYHaGTEN4BMJGMH6MRAZpnErIxel2E3rW-sYPpfdskvknWtfaVN6pK5m1n00Q1NlmqSvUuWbrOtzEw1OlNbD-dTZ5dcI1529aRX_WuTuauqsIpOipVFdzZvk7Q-u72Zf6QPi3uH-ezp9QwIH1qJBgu81wIk-WilMwaYwnXpdZME0qAMS2IsCIOFbMM84y7UhsOXLJogU7Q1W7vpms_Bhf6ovbBxA9U49ohFILSHDAARJLtSNO1IXSuLDadr1W3LTAU30KL1WxZ_BcaYxf7A4Ounf0N_RiMwOUeUCE6KzvVGB_-OCKI5JH-AlShfxU</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>CABALLERO, Montserrat</creator><creator>REED, Courtney R</creator><creator>MADAN, Gitanjali</creator><creator>VAN AALST, John A</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Osteoinduction in Umbilical Cord- and Palate Periosteum-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</title><author>CABALLERO, Montserrat ; REED, Courtney R ; MADAN, Gitanjali ; VAN AALST, John A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-c80c689977c597f84dccd26bfbb4b232044b727d797fa4d41656efbc606841093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>Palate - cytology</topic><topic>Periosteum - cytology</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling</topic><topic>Subcutaneous Fat, Abdominal - cytology</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Umbilical Cord - cytology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CABALLERO, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REED, Courtney R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MADAN, Gitanjali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN AALST, John A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CABALLERO, Montserrat</au><au>REED, Courtney R</au><au>MADAN, Gitanjali</au><au>VAN AALST, John A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Osteoinduction in Umbilical Cord- and Palate Periosteum-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>605</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>605-609</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><coden>APCSD4</coden><abstract>Adult abdominoplasty (AA) fat is an ideal source for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) because it is discarded after surgery, abundant, and easy to harvest. Children however, do not have the same abundant quantities of fat as adults, nor are they likely to undergo a procedure during which fat is routinely discarded. Hence, finding an alternate source for MSCs in children is a reasonable strategy. Two such sources are the palate periosteum (PP) and the umbilical cord (UC). Advantages for PP as a source of MSCs are accessibility during palate repair, ease of harvest, and minimal risk to the patient. The UC, like AA, is a discarded tissue, with a theoretically unlimited supply, which can be harvested in children with craniofacial bone abnormalities in advance of reconstructive procedures. Our objective in this study is to characterize MSCs from 3 sources (AA, PP, and UC) by surface marker prevalence, and to assess osteoinductive capability. Institutional review board approval was obtained for harvest of AA, PP, and UC. The presence of MSCs was determined using immunostaining and flow cytometry for cell surface markers CD73, CD90, CD105, and SSEA-4. Osteogenesis was induced using osteogenic medium. Osteoinduction was evaluated using Alizarin red staining, and real-time polymerase chain reaction for bone morphogenetic protein-2, alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin at 7, 14, and 21 days. MSCs from AA, PP, and UC all stained positive for CD73, CD90, CD105, and SSEA-4. Flow cytometry demonstrated significant differences in expression of CD90 and SSEA-4 but similar values for CD73 and CD105. Following osteoinduction, MSCs from all sources stained positive for calcium deposition. In UC MSCs, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction demonstrated greater elevation in bone morphogenetic protein-2 and alkaline phosphatase mRNA beginning at day 7 and extending to day 21. Osteocalcin mRNA levels were comparable for all 3 sources of MSCs. For children with craniofacial bone defects, UC-derived MSCs may be ideal for tissue engineered bone: temporally, the UC can be harvested in advance of surgical timing for the need for bone, is readily available, easy to harvest, and leads to osteoinduction that is more robust than either AA or PP.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>20395805</pmid><doi>10.1097/sap.0b013e3181ce3929</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-7043 |
ispartof | Annals of plastic surgery, 2010-05, Vol.64 (5), p.605-609 |
issn | 0148-7043 1536-3708 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733901000 |
source | Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers - analysis Flow Cytometry Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect Humans Medical sciences Mesenchymal Stromal Cells - cytology Osteogenesis Palate - cytology Periosteum - cytology Phenotype Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Staining and Labeling Subcutaneous Fat, Abdominal - cytology Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Umbilical Cord - cytology |
title | Osteoinduction in Umbilical Cord- and Palate Periosteum-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A47%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Osteoinduction%20in%20Umbilical%20Cord-%20and%20Palate%20Periosteum-Derived%20Mesenchymal%20Stem%20Cells&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=CABALLERO,%20Montserrat&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=605-609&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft.coden=APCSD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/sap.0b013e3181ce3929&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733901000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733901000&rft_id=info:pmid/20395805&rfr_iscdi=true |