Influence of Coil Geometry on Intra-Aneurysmal Packing Density: Evaluation of a New Primary Wind Technology

Introduction: This prospective randomized double-blinded in-vitro study was conducted to determine the relative Packing Density (PD) of the new Deltapaq coil (Micrus Endovascular) as compared to Micrus’s conventional filling CHE (Helipaq) and finishing CFS (Ultipaq) coils. Methods: Two physicians in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vascular and endovascular surgery 2010-05, Vol.44 (4), p.289-293
Hauptverfasser: Quasar Grunwald, Iris, Molyneux, Andrew, Kühn, Anna Luisa, Watson, Dave, Byrne, James V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: This prospective randomized double-blinded in-vitro study was conducted to determine the relative Packing Density (PD) of the new Deltapaq coil (Micrus Endovascular) as compared to Micrus’s conventional filling CHE (Helipaq) and finishing CFS (Ultipaq) coils. Methods: Two physicians independently deployed the coils under fluoroscopy into a 4mm berry shaped glass aneurysm. Each coil tested was a 4mm × 35cm coil specially made for this study. Physicians and observer were blinded as to the type of coil. Five samples per group, per operator, were deployed. Results: mean PD were 36.6% (Helipaq), 37.9% (Ultipaq) and 40.4% (Deltapaq). Two-sample T-test showed a significantly higher PD of Deltapaq versus Helipaq (p < 0.022). Discussion: Higher coil PD and better neck coverage may provide an increased biomechanical stability and may potentially reduce the recanalization rate of aneurysms. Conclusion: The new Deltapaq coil may have the potential to achieve higher packing densities in the treatment of aneurysms.
ISSN:1538-5744
1938-9116
DOI:10.1177/1538574410363916