Airflow efficacy of ballpoint pen tubes: a consideration for use in bystander cricothyrotomy

ObjectiveTo examine the suitability of commonly available ballpoint pens as a substitute emergency tracheostomy tube.Methodscommonly available ballpoint pens were examined and compared against two standard cricothyroidotomy sets. The pens were evaluated for dimensions, speed of construction of a tem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Emergency medicine journal : EMJ 2010-04, Vol.27 (4), p.317-320
Hauptverfasser: Owens, David, Greenwood, Ben, Galley, Alistair, Tomkinson, Alun, Woolley, Sarah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 320
container_issue 4
container_start_page 317
container_title Emergency medicine journal : EMJ
container_volume 27
creator Owens, David
Greenwood, Ben
Galley, Alistair
Tomkinson, Alun
Woolley, Sarah
description ObjectiveTo examine the suitability of commonly available ballpoint pens as a substitute emergency tracheostomy tube.Methodscommonly available ballpoint pens were examined and compared against two standard cricothyroidotomy sets. The pens were evaluated for dimensions, speed of construction of a temporary tracheostomy tube and airway resistance with differing flow rates.ResultsInternal diameters of the pens varied considerably. Time taken to construct a temporary tube ranged from 3 to 170 s, and in the majority of pens the airway resistance increased dramatically as the airflow rate increased.ConclusionContrary to popular belief, the majority of ballpoint pens appear unsuitable for use as a substitute tracheostomy tube. In this study only two pens fulfilled the criteria for use: the Baron retractable ballpoint and the BIC soft feel Jumbo.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/emj.2008.069294
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733880315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4018041321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-6748f04823373caee90f41e36b4698d572cf5874a7110cf0a14b05425536306a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMuLFDEQh4Mo7kPP3iTgQVjo2Urn7W0Z36568XERQjqTYMbuzpik0f7v7aXXOXjxVAX11a-KD6FHBDaEUHHph_2mBVAbELrV7A46JUy2DbSE3j32wE_QWSl7AMI1U_fRSQtUcaHpKfp2FXPo0y_sQ4jOuhmngDvb94cUx4oPfsR16nx5hi12aSxx57OtMY04pIyn4nEccTeXasdlgl2OLtXvc041DfMDdC_YvviHt_UcfX754tP2dXP98dWb7dV101EtayMkUwGYaimV1FnvNQRGPBUdE1rtuGxd4EoyKwkBF8AS1gFnLedUUBCWnqOna-4hp5-TL9UMsTjf93b0aSpGUqoUUMIX8sk_5D5NeVyeM0QqAK2Ulgt1uVIup1KyD-aQ42DzbAiYG-9m8W5uvJvV-7Lx-DZ36ga_O_J_RS9AswKxVP_7OLf5hxGSSm4-fNmat8-37-Frq827hb9Y-W659L_rfwBjEpkY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780098897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Airflow efficacy of ballpoint pen tubes: a consideration for use in bystander cricothyrotomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Owens, David ; Greenwood, Ben ; Galley, Alistair ; Tomkinson, Alun ; Woolley, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Owens, David ; Greenwood, Ben ; Galley, Alistair ; Tomkinson, Alun ; Woolley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveTo examine the suitability of commonly available ballpoint pens as a substitute emergency tracheostomy tube.Methodscommonly available ballpoint pens were examined and compared against two standard cricothyroidotomy sets. The pens were evaluated for dimensions, speed of construction of a temporary tracheostomy tube and airway resistance with differing flow rates.ResultsInternal diameters of the pens varied considerably. Time taken to construct a temporary tube ranged from 3 to 170 s, and in the majority of pens the airway resistance increased dramatically as the airflow rate increased.ConclusionContrary to popular belief, the majority of ballpoint pens appear unsuitable for use as a substitute tracheostomy tube. In this study only two pens fulfilled the criteria for use: the Baron retractable ballpoint and the BIC soft feel Jumbo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-0205</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-0213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/emj.2008.069294</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20385693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident &amp; Emergency Medicine</publisher><subject>Airway ; Airway management ; Airway Obstruction - prevention &amp; control ; Airway Resistance ; ballpoint pens ; Construction ; cricothyroidotomy ; Emergencies ; emergency ; emergency care system ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Laryngeal Muscles - injuries ; Medical equipment ; nursing ; Ostomy ; Pens &amp; pencils ; prehospital ; prehospital care ; Studies ; temporary ; Time Factors ; Tracheostomy - instrumentation ; Tracheostomy - methods ; trauma ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2010-04, Vol.27 (4), p.317-320</ispartof><rights>2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited For permission to use, (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2009 (c) 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited For permission to use, (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-6748f04823373caee90f41e36b4698d572cf5874a7110cf0a14b05425536306a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-6748f04823373caee90f41e36b4698d572cf5874a7110cf0a14b05425536306a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://emj.bmj.com/content/27/4/317.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://emj.bmj.com/content/27/4/317.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20385693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Owens, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galley, Alistair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomkinson, Alun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>Airflow efficacy of ballpoint pen tubes: a consideration for use in bystander cricothyrotomy</title><title>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</title><addtitle>Emerg Med J</addtitle><description>ObjectiveTo examine the suitability of commonly available ballpoint pens as a substitute emergency tracheostomy tube.Methodscommonly available ballpoint pens were examined and compared against two standard cricothyroidotomy sets. The pens were evaluated for dimensions, speed of construction of a temporary tracheostomy tube and airway resistance with differing flow rates.ResultsInternal diameters of the pens varied considerably. Time taken to construct a temporary tube ranged from 3 to 170 s, and in the majority of pens the airway resistance increased dramatically as the airflow rate increased.ConclusionContrary to popular belief, the majority of ballpoint pens appear unsuitable for use as a substitute tracheostomy tube. In this study only two pens fulfilled the criteria for use: the Baron retractable ballpoint and the BIC soft feel Jumbo.</description><subject>Airway</subject><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Airway Obstruction - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Airway Resistance</subject><subject>ballpoint pens</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>cricothyroidotomy</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>emergency</subject><subject>emergency care system</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngeal Muscles - injuries</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>nursing</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Pens &amp; pencils</subject><subject>prehospital</subject><subject>prehospital care</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>temporary</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tracheostomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tracheostomy - methods</subject><subject>trauma</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>1472-0205</issn><issn>1472-0213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMuLFDEQh4Mo7kPP3iTgQVjo2Urn7W0Z36568XERQjqTYMbuzpik0f7v7aXXOXjxVAX11a-KD6FHBDaEUHHph_2mBVAbELrV7A46JUy2DbSE3j32wE_QWSl7AMI1U_fRSQtUcaHpKfp2FXPo0y_sQ4jOuhmngDvb94cUx4oPfsR16nx5hi12aSxx57OtMY04pIyn4nEccTeXasdlgl2OLtXvc041DfMDdC_YvviHt_UcfX754tP2dXP98dWb7dV101EtayMkUwGYaimV1FnvNQRGPBUdE1rtuGxd4EoyKwkBF8AS1gFnLedUUBCWnqOna-4hp5-TL9UMsTjf93b0aSpGUqoUUMIX8sk_5D5NeVyeM0QqAK2Ulgt1uVIup1KyD-aQ42DzbAiYG-9m8W5uvJvV-7Lx-DZ36ga_O_J_RS9AswKxVP_7OLf5hxGSSm4-fNmat8-37-Frq827hb9Y-W659L_rfwBjEpkY</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Owens, David</creator><creator>Greenwood, Ben</creator><creator>Galley, Alistair</creator><creator>Tomkinson, Alun</creator><creator>Woolley, Sarah</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident &amp; Emergency Medicine</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Airflow efficacy of ballpoint pen tubes: a consideration for use in bystander cricothyrotomy</title><author>Owens, David ; Greenwood, Ben ; Galley, Alistair ; Tomkinson, Alun ; Woolley, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b397t-6748f04823373caee90f41e36b4698d572cf5874a7110cf0a14b05425536306a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Airway</topic><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Airway Obstruction - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Airway Resistance</topic><topic>ballpoint pens</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>cricothyroidotomy</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>emergency</topic><topic>emergency care system</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngeal Muscles - injuries</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>nursing</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Pens &amp; pencils</topic><topic>prehospital</topic><topic>prehospital care</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>temporary</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tracheostomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tracheostomy - methods</topic><topic>trauma</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Owens, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galley, Alistair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomkinson, Alun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Owens, David</au><au>Greenwood, Ben</au><au>Galley, Alistair</au><au>Tomkinson, Alun</au><au>Woolley, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Airflow efficacy of ballpoint pen tubes: a consideration for use in bystander cricothyrotomy</atitle><jtitle>Emergency medicine journal : EMJ</jtitle><addtitle>Emerg Med J</addtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>317-320</pages><issn>1472-0205</issn><eissn>1472-0213</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveTo examine the suitability of commonly available ballpoint pens as a substitute emergency tracheostomy tube.Methodscommonly available ballpoint pens were examined and compared against two standard cricothyroidotomy sets. The pens were evaluated for dimensions, speed of construction of a temporary tracheostomy tube and airway resistance with differing flow rates.ResultsInternal diameters of the pens varied considerably. Time taken to construct a temporary tube ranged from 3 to 170 s, and in the majority of pens the airway resistance increased dramatically as the airflow rate increased.ConclusionContrary to popular belief, the majority of ballpoint pens appear unsuitable for use as a substitute tracheostomy tube. In this study only two pens fulfilled the criteria for use: the Baron retractable ballpoint and the BIC soft feel Jumbo.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident &amp; Emergency Medicine</pub><pmid>20385693</pmid><doi>10.1136/emj.2008.069294</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-0205
ispartof Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2010-04, Vol.27 (4), p.317-320
issn 1472-0205
1472-0213
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733880315
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Airway
Airway management
Airway Obstruction - prevention & control
Airway Resistance
ballpoint pens
Construction
cricothyroidotomy
Emergencies
emergency
emergency care system
Equipment Design
Humans
Laryngeal Muscles - injuries
Medical equipment
nursing
Ostomy
Pens & pencils
prehospital
prehospital care
Studies
temporary
Time Factors
Tracheostomy - instrumentation
Tracheostomy - methods
trauma
Treatment Outcome
Ventilation
title Airflow efficacy of ballpoint pen tubes: a consideration for use in bystander cricothyrotomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Airflow%20efficacy%20of%20ballpoint%20pen%20tubes:%20a%20consideration%20for%20use%20in%20bystander%20cricothyrotomy&rft.jtitle=Emergency%20medicine%20journal%20:%20EMJ&rft.au=Owens,%20David&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=317-320&rft.issn=1472-0205&rft.eissn=1472-0213&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/emj.2008.069294&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4018041321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780098897&rft_id=info:pmid/20385693&rfr_iscdi=true