The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure
When participants read a text while searching for a target letter, they are more likely to miss the target letter embedded in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. This effect is usually observed with a text displayed normally, for which it has been found that frequent functio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of experimental psychology 2010-03, Vol.64 (1), p.47-52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 52 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 47 |
container_title | Canadian journal of experimental psychology |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Saint-Aubin, Jean Kenny, Sophie Roy-Charland, Annie |
description | When participants read a text while searching for a target letter, they are more likely to miss the target letter embedded in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. This effect is usually observed with a text displayed normally, for which it has been found that frequent function words are fixated for a smaller amount of time than less frequent content words. However, similar pattern of omissions have been observed with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure in which words appear one at a time. These parallel results would demonstrate that fixation duration per se is not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect only if eye movements are not made during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Therefore, the authors performed eye monitoring during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Results revealed that, with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure, participants fixated function and content words for almost the entire presentation duration. It is concluded that eye movements are not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect.
Lorsque les participants lisent un texte en cherchant une lettre cible, ils sont plus susceptibles de rater la lettre cible lorsqu'elle fait partie de mots fonctionnels que de mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cet effet se manifeste habituellement avec un texte présenté normalement, condition au cours de laquelle il fut observé que les mots fonctionnels sont fixés moins longtemps que les mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cependant, des patrons d'omissions semblables ont été observés en utilisant une procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide au cours de laquelle les mots apparaissent un à la fois. Ces résultats parallèles démontreraient que la durée de fixation en tant que telle n'est pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot seulement si les mouvements oculaires ne sont pas exécutés durant la procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Par conséquent, les auteurs ont mesuré les mouvements oculaires durant la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Les résultats ont révélé que, au cours de la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide, les participants fixent les mots fonctionnels et signifiants durant la majeure partie de la durée de présentation. Il est conclu que les mouvements oculaires ne constituent pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0016850 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733879839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614514366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-7850eb7dd23c57e133f786e17ba483f66c16233b4cb7fd5a7606afbaf8c1666e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90V-L1DAQAPAgineegp9AgiKKUE2aNEkf5Vj_wB7KeupjmKYTL0e3rUl6sN_enLunKOJDmIT5McxkCHnI2UvOhH4FjHFlGnaLHHOjTaXrlt0ud96qqhx-RO6ldFkQE5LfJUc1E0ZKbo5JPr9AupkGpJOnqx3Ss-kKtzjmRMNIc0mehZTC-K1aY84Y6cp7dJlu8CqkkLGnX0O--Ak3MIeefsIYYKBfQlpK-BgxlWKQwzSWx-SwXyLeJ3c8DAkfHOIJ-fxmdX76rlp_ePv-9PW6Alm3udJlIux039fCNRq5EF4bhVx3II3wSjmuaiE66Trt-wa0Ygp8B96UhFIoTsizfd05Tt8XTNluQ3I4DDDitCSrhTC6NaIt8vFf8nJa4lias4rLhkuh1H8Ra1lTt0oW9HyPXJxSiujtHMMW4s5yZq-XZW-WVeijQ72l22L_C95sp4CnBwDJweAjjC6k365WpbP62r3YO5jBzmnnIObgBkxuibF8v3U4WyUtt1IX_OTf-A_1AxCYtdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>609052964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Saint-Aubin, Jean ; Kenny, Sophie ; Roy-Charland, Annie</creator><contributor>Mewhort, Douglas J. K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Saint-Aubin, Jean ; Kenny, Sophie ; Roy-Charland, Annie ; Mewhort, Douglas J. K</creatorcontrib><description>When participants read a text while searching for a target letter, they are more likely to miss the target letter embedded in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. This effect is usually observed with a text displayed normally, for which it has been found that frequent function words are fixated for a smaller amount of time than less frequent content words. However, similar pattern of omissions have been observed with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure in which words appear one at a time. These parallel results would demonstrate that fixation duration per se is not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect only if eye movements are not made during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Therefore, the authors performed eye monitoring during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Results revealed that, with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure, participants fixated function and content words for almost the entire presentation duration. It is concluded that eye movements are not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect.
Lorsque les participants lisent un texte en cherchant une lettre cible, ils sont plus susceptibles de rater la lettre cible lorsqu'elle fait partie de mots fonctionnels que de mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cet effet se manifeste habituellement avec un texte présenté normalement, condition au cours de laquelle il fut observé que les mots fonctionnels sont fixés moins longtemps que les mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cependant, des patrons d'omissions semblables ont été observés en utilisant une procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide au cours de laquelle les mots apparaissent un à la fois. Ces résultats parallèles démontreraient que la durée de fixation en tant que telle n'est pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot seulement si les mouvements oculaires ne sont pas exécutés durant la procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Par conséquent, les auteurs ont mesuré les mouvements oculaires durant la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Les résultats ont révélé que, au cours de la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide, les participants fixent les mots fonctionnels et signifiants durant la majeure partie de la durée de présentation. Il est conclu que les mouvements oculaires ne constituent pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1196-1961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0016850</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20384418</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJEPEK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Old Chelsea, PQ: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Experimental psychology ; Eye Movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Language ; Letters (Alphabet) ; Lexical Decision ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Production and perception of written language ; Psycholinguistics - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Reading ; Serial Learning - physiology ; Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology ; Stimulus Presentation Methods ; Time Factors ; Visual task performance ; Vocabulary ; Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of experimental psychology, 2010-03, Vol.64 (1), p.47-52</ispartof><rights>2010 Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Psychological Association Mar 2010</rights><rights>2010, Canadian Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-7850eb7dd23c57e133f786e17ba483f66c16233b4cb7fd5a7606afbaf8c1666e3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-7908-1506</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22651428$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20384418$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mewhort, Douglas J. K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Saint-Aubin, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenny, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy-Charland, Annie</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure</title><title>Canadian journal of experimental psychology</title><addtitle>Can J Exp Psychol</addtitle><description>When participants read a text while searching for a target letter, they are more likely to miss the target letter embedded in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. This effect is usually observed with a text displayed normally, for which it has been found that frequent function words are fixated for a smaller amount of time than less frequent content words. However, similar pattern of omissions have been observed with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure in which words appear one at a time. These parallel results would demonstrate that fixation duration per se is not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect only if eye movements are not made during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Therefore, the authors performed eye monitoring during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Results revealed that, with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure, participants fixated function and content words for almost the entire presentation duration. It is concluded that eye movements are not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect.
Lorsque les participants lisent un texte en cherchant une lettre cible, ils sont plus susceptibles de rater la lettre cible lorsqu'elle fait partie de mots fonctionnels que de mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cet effet se manifeste habituellement avec un texte présenté normalement, condition au cours de laquelle il fut observé que les mots fonctionnels sont fixés moins longtemps que les mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cependant, des patrons d'omissions semblables ont été observés en utilisant une procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide au cours de laquelle les mots apparaissent un à la fois. Ces résultats parallèles démontreraient que la durée de fixation en tant que telle n'est pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot seulement si les mouvements oculaires ne sont pas exécutés durant la procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Par conséquent, les auteurs ont mesuré les mouvements oculaires durant la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Les résultats ont révélé que, au cours de la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide, les participants fixent les mots fonctionnels et signifiants durant la majeure partie de la durée de présentation. Il est conclu que les mouvements oculaires ne constituent pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot.</description><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Letters (Alphabet)</subject><subject>Lexical Decision</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Serial Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Stimulus Presentation Methods</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><issn>1196-1961</issn><issn>1878-7290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90V-L1DAQAPAgineegp9AgiKKUE2aNEkf5Vj_wB7KeupjmKYTL0e3rUl6sN_enLunKOJDmIT5McxkCHnI2UvOhH4FjHFlGnaLHHOjTaXrlt0ud96qqhx-RO6ldFkQE5LfJUc1E0ZKbo5JPr9AupkGpJOnqx3Ss-kKtzjmRMNIc0mehZTC-K1aY84Y6cp7dJlu8CqkkLGnX0O--Ak3MIeefsIYYKBfQlpK-BgxlWKQwzSWx-SwXyLeJ3c8DAkfHOIJ-fxmdX76rlp_ePv-9PW6Alm3udJlIux039fCNRq5EF4bhVx3II3wSjmuaiE66Trt-wa0Ygp8B96UhFIoTsizfd05Tt8XTNluQ3I4DDDitCSrhTC6NaIt8vFf8nJa4lias4rLhkuh1H8Ra1lTt0oW9HyPXJxSiujtHMMW4s5yZq-XZW-WVeijQ72l22L_C95sp4CnBwDJweAjjC6k365WpbP62r3YO5jBzmnnIObgBkxuibF8v3U4WyUtt1IX_OTf-A_1AxCYtdA</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Saint-Aubin, Jean</creator><creator>Kenny, Sophie</creator><creator>Roy-Charland, Annie</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>Canadian Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-1506</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure</title><author>Saint-Aubin, Jean ; Kenny, Sophie ; Roy-Charland, Annie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-7850eb7dd23c57e133f786e17ba483f66c16233b4cb7fd5a7606afbaf8c1666e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Letters (Alphabet)</topic><topic>Lexical Decision</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Serial Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Stimulus Presentation Methods</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Words (Phonetic Units)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saint-Aubin, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenny, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy-Charland, Annie</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of experimental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saint-Aubin, Jean</au><au>Kenny, Sophie</au><au>Roy-Charland, Annie</au><au>Mewhort, Douglas J. K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of experimental psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Exp Psychol</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>47-52</pages><issn>1196-1961</issn><eissn>1878-7290</eissn><coden>CJEPEK</coden><abstract>When participants read a text while searching for a target letter, they are more likely to miss the target letter embedded in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. This effect is usually observed with a text displayed normally, for which it has been found that frequent function words are fixated for a smaller amount of time than less frequent content words. However, similar pattern of omissions have been observed with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure in which words appear one at a time. These parallel results would demonstrate that fixation duration per se is not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect only if eye movements are not made during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Therefore, the authors performed eye monitoring during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Results revealed that, with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure, participants fixated function and content words for almost the entire presentation duration. It is concluded that eye movements are not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect.
Lorsque les participants lisent un texte en cherchant une lettre cible, ils sont plus susceptibles de rater la lettre cible lorsqu'elle fait partie de mots fonctionnels que de mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cet effet se manifeste habituellement avec un texte présenté normalement, condition au cours de laquelle il fut observé que les mots fonctionnels sont fixés moins longtemps que les mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cependant, des patrons d'omissions semblables ont été observés en utilisant une procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide au cours de laquelle les mots apparaissent un à la fois. Ces résultats parallèles démontreraient que la durée de fixation en tant que telle n'est pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot seulement si les mouvements oculaires ne sont pas exécutés durant la procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Par conséquent, les auteurs ont mesuré les mouvements oculaires durant la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Les résultats ont révélé que, au cours de la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide, les participants fixent les mots fonctionnels et signifiants durant la majeure partie de la durée de présentation. Il est conclu que les mouvements oculaires ne constituent pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot.</abstract><cop>Old Chelsea, PQ</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><pmid>20384418</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0016850</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-1506</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1196-1961 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of experimental psychology, 2010-03, Vol.64 (1), p.47-52 |
issn | 1196-1961 1878-7290 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733879839 |
source | MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Attention - physiology Biological and medical sciences Cognition & reasoning Experimental psychology Eye Movements Eye Movements - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Language Letters (Alphabet) Lexical Decision Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Photic Stimulation - methods Production and perception of written language Psycholinguistics - methods Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time - physiology Reading Serial Learning - physiology Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology Stimulus Presentation Methods Time Factors Visual task performance Vocabulary Words (Phonetic Units) |
title | The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T09%3A42%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Eye%20Movements%20in%20the%20Missing-Letter%20Effect%20Revisited%20With%20the%20Rapid%20Serial%20Visual%20Presentation%20Procedure&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology&rft.au=Saint-Aubin,%20Jean&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=47-52&rft.issn=1196-1961&rft.eissn=1878-7290&rft.coden=CJEPEK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0016850&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614514366%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=609052964&rft_id=info:pmid/20384418&rfr_iscdi=true |