The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure

When participants read a text while searching for a target letter, they are more likely to miss the target letter embedded in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. This effect is usually observed with a text displayed normally, for which it has been found that frequent functio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of experimental psychology 2010-03, Vol.64 (1), p.47-52
Hauptverfasser: Saint-Aubin, Jean, Kenny, Sophie, Roy-Charland, Annie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 52
container_issue 1
container_start_page 47
container_title Canadian journal of experimental psychology
container_volume 64
creator Saint-Aubin, Jean
Kenny, Sophie
Roy-Charland, Annie
description When participants read a text while searching for a target letter, they are more likely to miss the target letter embedded in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. This effect is usually observed with a text displayed normally, for which it has been found that frequent function words are fixated for a smaller amount of time than less frequent content words. However, similar pattern of omissions have been observed with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure in which words appear one at a time. These parallel results would demonstrate that fixation duration per se is not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect only if eye movements are not made during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Therefore, the authors performed eye monitoring during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Results revealed that, with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure, participants fixated function and content words for almost the entire presentation duration. It is concluded that eye movements are not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect. Lorsque les participants lisent un texte en cherchant une lettre cible, ils sont plus susceptibles de rater la lettre cible lorsqu'elle fait partie de mots fonctionnels que de mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cet effet se manifeste habituellement avec un texte présenté normalement, condition au cours de laquelle il fut observé que les mots fonctionnels sont fixés moins longtemps que les mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cependant, des patrons d'omissions semblables ont été observés en utilisant une procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide au cours de laquelle les mots apparaissent un à la fois. Ces résultats parallèles démontreraient que la durée de fixation en tant que telle n'est pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot seulement si les mouvements oculaires ne sont pas exécutés durant la procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Par conséquent, les auteurs ont mesuré les mouvements oculaires durant la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Les résultats ont révélé que, au cours de la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide, les participants fixent les mots fonctionnels et signifiants durant la majeure partie de la durée de présentation. Il est conclu que les mouvements oculaires ne constituent pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0016850
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733879839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614514366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-7850eb7dd23c57e133f786e17ba483f66c16233b4cb7fd5a7606afbaf8c1666e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90V-L1DAQAPAgineegp9AgiKKUE2aNEkf5Vj_wB7KeupjmKYTL0e3rUl6sN_enLunKOJDmIT5McxkCHnI2UvOhH4FjHFlGnaLHHOjTaXrlt0ud96qqhx-RO6ldFkQE5LfJUc1E0ZKbo5JPr9AupkGpJOnqx3Ss-kKtzjmRMNIc0mehZTC-K1aY84Y6cp7dJlu8CqkkLGnX0O--Ak3MIeefsIYYKBfQlpK-BgxlWKQwzSWx-SwXyLeJ3c8DAkfHOIJ-fxmdX76rlp_ePv-9PW6Alm3udJlIux039fCNRq5EF4bhVx3II3wSjmuaiE66Trt-wa0Ygp8B96UhFIoTsizfd05Tt8XTNluQ3I4DDDitCSrhTC6NaIt8vFf8nJa4lias4rLhkuh1H8Ra1lTt0oW9HyPXJxSiujtHMMW4s5yZq-XZW-WVeijQ72l22L_C95sp4CnBwDJweAjjC6k365WpbP62r3YO5jBzmnnIObgBkxuibF8v3U4WyUtt1IX_OTf-A_1AxCYtdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>609052964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Saint-Aubin, Jean ; Kenny, Sophie ; Roy-Charland, Annie</creator><contributor>Mewhort, Douglas J. K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Saint-Aubin, Jean ; Kenny, Sophie ; Roy-Charland, Annie ; Mewhort, Douglas J. K</creatorcontrib><description>When participants read a text while searching for a target letter, they are more likely to miss the target letter embedded in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. This effect is usually observed with a text displayed normally, for which it has been found that frequent function words are fixated for a smaller amount of time than less frequent content words. However, similar pattern of omissions have been observed with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure in which words appear one at a time. These parallel results would demonstrate that fixation duration per se is not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect only if eye movements are not made during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Therefore, the authors performed eye monitoring during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Results revealed that, with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure, participants fixated function and content words for almost the entire presentation duration. It is concluded that eye movements are not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect. Lorsque les participants lisent un texte en cherchant une lettre cible, ils sont plus susceptibles de rater la lettre cible lorsqu'elle fait partie de mots fonctionnels que de mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cet effet se manifeste habituellement avec un texte présenté normalement, condition au cours de laquelle il fut observé que les mots fonctionnels sont fixés moins longtemps que les mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cependant, des patrons d'omissions semblables ont été observés en utilisant une procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide au cours de laquelle les mots apparaissent un à la fois. Ces résultats parallèles démontreraient que la durée de fixation en tant que telle n'est pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot seulement si les mouvements oculaires ne sont pas exécutés durant la procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Par conséquent, les auteurs ont mesuré les mouvements oculaires durant la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Les résultats ont révélé que, au cours de la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide, les participants fixent les mots fonctionnels et signifiants durant la majeure partie de la durée de présentation. Il est conclu que les mouvements oculaires ne constituent pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1196-1961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0016850</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20384418</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJEPEK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Old Chelsea, PQ: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Experimental psychology ; Eye Movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Language ; Letters (Alphabet) ; Lexical Decision ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Production and perception of written language ; Psycholinguistics - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Reading ; Serial Learning - physiology ; Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology ; Stimulus Presentation Methods ; Time Factors ; Visual task performance ; Vocabulary ; Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of experimental psychology, 2010-03, Vol.64 (1), p.47-52</ispartof><rights>2010 Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Psychological Association Mar 2010</rights><rights>2010, Canadian Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-7850eb7dd23c57e133f786e17ba483f66c16233b4cb7fd5a7606afbaf8c1666e3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-7908-1506</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22651428$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20384418$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mewhort, Douglas J. K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Saint-Aubin, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenny, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy-Charland, Annie</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure</title><title>Canadian journal of experimental psychology</title><addtitle>Can J Exp Psychol</addtitle><description>When participants read a text while searching for a target letter, they are more likely to miss the target letter embedded in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. This effect is usually observed with a text displayed normally, for which it has been found that frequent function words are fixated for a smaller amount of time than less frequent content words. However, similar pattern of omissions have been observed with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure in which words appear one at a time. These parallel results would demonstrate that fixation duration per se is not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect only if eye movements are not made during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Therefore, the authors performed eye monitoring during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Results revealed that, with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure, participants fixated function and content words for almost the entire presentation duration. It is concluded that eye movements are not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect. Lorsque les participants lisent un texte en cherchant une lettre cible, ils sont plus susceptibles de rater la lettre cible lorsqu'elle fait partie de mots fonctionnels que de mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cet effet se manifeste habituellement avec un texte présenté normalement, condition au cours de laquelle il fut observé que les mots fonctionnels sont fixés moins longtemps que les mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cependant, des patrons d'omissions semblables ont été observés en utilisant une procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide au cours de laquelle les mots apparaissent un à la fois. Ces résultats parallèles démontreraient que la durée de fixation en tant que telle n'est pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot seulement si les mouvements oculaires ne sont pas exécutés durant la procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Par conséquent, les auteurs ont mesuré les mouvements oculaires durant la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Les résultats ont révélé que, au cours de la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide, les participants fixent les mots fonctionnels et signifiants durant la majeure partie de la durée de présentation. Il est conclu que les mouvements oculaires ne constituent pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot.</description><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Letters (Alphabet)</subject><subject>Lexical Decision</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Serial Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Stimulus Presentation Methods</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><issn>1196-1961</issn><issn>1878-7290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90V-L1DAQAPAgineegp9AgiKKUE2aNEkf5Vj_wB7KeupjmKYTL0e3rUl6sN_enLunKOJDmIT5McxkCHnI2UvOhH4FjHFlGnaLHHOjTaXrlt0ud96qqhx-RO6ldFkQE5LfJUc1E0ZKbo5JPr9AupkGpJOnqx3Ss-kKtzjmRMNIc0mehZTC-K1aY84Y6cp7dJlu8CqkkLGnX0O--Ak3MIeefsIYYKBfQlpK-BgxlWKQwzSWx-SwXyLeJ3c8DAkfHOIJ-fxmdX76rlp_ePv-9PW6Alm3udJlIux039fCNRq5EF4bhVx3II3wSjmuaiE66Trt-wa0Ygp8B96UhFIoTsizfd05Tt8XTNluQ3I4DDDitCSrhTC6NaIt8vFf8nJa4lias4rLhkuh1H8Ra1lTt0oW9HyPXJxSiujtHMMW4s5yZq-XZW-WVeijQ72l22L_C95sp4CnBwDJweAjjC6k365WpbP62r3YO5jBzmnnIObgBkxuibF8v3U4WyUtt1IX_OTf-A_1AxCYtdA</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Saint-Aubin, Jean</creator><creator>Kenny, Sophie</creator><creator>Roy-Charland, Annie</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>Canadian Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-1506</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure</title><author>Saint-Aubin, Jean ; Kenny, Sophie ; Roy-Charland, Annie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-7850eb7dd23c57e133f786e17ba483f66c16233b4cb7fd5a7606afbaf8c1666e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Letters (Alphabet)</topic><topic>Lexical Decision</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Serial Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Stimulus Presentation Methods</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Words (Phonetic Units)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saint-Aubin, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenny, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy-Charland, Annie</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of experimental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saint-Aubin, Jean</au><au>Kenny, Sophie</au><au>Roy-Charland, Annie</au><au>Mewhort, Douglas J. K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of experimental psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Exp Psychol</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>47-52</pages><issn>1196-1961</issn><eissn>1878-7290</eissn><coden>CJEPEK</coden><abstract>When participants read a text while searching for a target letter, they are more likely to miss the target letter embedded in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. This effect is usually observed with a text displayed normally, for which it has been found that frequent function words are fixated for a smaller amount of time than less frequent content words. However, similar pattern of omissions have been observed with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure in which words appear one at a time. These parallel results would demonstrate that fixation duration per se is not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect only if eye movements are not made during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Therefore, the authors performed eye monitoring during the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Results revealed that, with a rapid serial visual presentation procedure, participants fixated function and content words for almost the entire presentation duration. It is concluded that eye movements are not the proximal cause of the missing-letter effect. Lorsque les participants lisent un texte en cherchant une lettre cible, ils sont plus susceptibles de rater la lettre cible lorsqu'elle fait partie de mots fonctionnels que de mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cet effet se manifeste habituellement avec un texte présenté normalement, condition au cours de laquelle il fut observé que les mots fonctionnels sont fixés moins longtemps que les mots signifiants moins fréquents. Cependant, des patrons d'omissions semblables ont été observés en utilisant une procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide au cours de laquelle les mots apparaissent un à la fois. Ces résultats parallèles démontreraient que la durée de fixation en tant que telle n'est pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot seulement si les mouvements oculaires ne sont pas exécutés durant la procédure de présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Par conséquent, les auteurs ont mesuré les mouvements oculaires durant la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide. Les résultats ont révélé que, au cours de la présentation visuelle sérielle rapide, les participants fixent les mots fonctionnels et signifiants durant la majeure partie de la durée de présentation. Il est conclu que les mouvements oculaires ne constituent pas la cause proximale de l'effet d'omission du mot.</abstract><cop>Old Chelsea, PQ</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><pmid>20384418</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0016850</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-1506</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1196-1961
ispartof Canadian journal of experimental psychology, 2010-03, Vol.64 (1), p.47-52
issn 1196-1961
1878-7290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733879839
source MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Attention - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition & reasoning
Experimental psychology
Eye Movements
Eye Movements - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Language
Letters (Alphabet)
Lexical Decision
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Photic Stimulation - methods
Production and perception of written language
Psycholinguistics - methods
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Reading
Serial Learning - physiology
Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology
Stimulus Presentation Methods
Time Factors
Visual task performance
Vocabulary
Words (Phonetic Units)
title The Role of Eye Movements in the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited With the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Procedure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T09%3A42%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Eye%20Movements%20in%20the%20Missing-Letter%20Effect%20Revisited%20With%20the%20Rapid%20Serial%20Visual%20Presentation%20Procedure&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology&rft.au=Saint-Aubin,%20Jean&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=47-52&rft.issn=1196-1961&rft.eissn=1878-7290&rft.coden=CJEPEK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0016850&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614514366%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=609052964&rft_id=info:pmid/20384418&rfr_iscdi=true