The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines

Spermatozoa from three species, bovine, ovine, and porcine, were frozen using standard techniques in two controlled-rate cooling machines, a commercial instrument and a custom-built device. Ice crystallisation was induced mechanically by touching the straws with a pre-cooled rod. The sperm samples w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cryobiology 2003-06, Vol.46 (3), p.246-253
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, S., Millar, J.D., Watson, P.F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 253
container_issue 3
container_start_page 246
container_title Cryobiology
container_volume 46
creator Kumar, S.
Millar, J.D.
Watson, P.F.
description Spermatozoa from three species, bovine, ovine, and porcine, were frozen using standard techniques in two controlled-rate cooling machines, a commercial instrument and a custom-built device. Ice crystallisation was induced mechanically by touching the straws with a pre-cooled rod. The sperm samples were stored 24 h, and then thawed rapidly and evaluated for motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity in the membrane-intact population. The custom-built controlled-rate cooling machine proved significantly better at all cooling rates for all species. This was particularly evident for the ram and the boar spermatozoa. In general, −30 or −50 °C/min were better than −1 °C/min, with a slight advantage being evident for −30 °C/min. However, this became very apparent for boar spermatozoa. It is clear that the higher cooling rates are necessary for successful freezing of spermatozoa from these species, and that careful control of the cooling rate is essential for maximal recovery of viable and functional cells. This is best achieved when the cooling profile is controlled from within a dummy sample.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00040-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73387242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0011224003000403</els_id><sourcerecordid>73387242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57894fda1f38644952f78cc6dbb714a31afbe1c837d2a186736fc9dd7181cbe33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS1ERIbAJ4C8AYGUBr-mH9kgFEGCFIkFYW1V22Vi5G43dveg8Bf5YzwPyDIry65T91b5EvKCs3ec8fr9N8Y4r4RQ7A2TbxljilXyEVlx1rFKyE48Jqv_yDF5mvPPAtWNVE_IMRctbwVXK3J3fYMUnUMz0-ioiTH48QdNMCONI51LNS9p4zcQdvV0G6eEGdMGLe2XEE4LO5xSGMs1QqJ5wjTAHP9EOKNQBIcJks9Fq7TPv2N5GecUQ0Bb7Vz-WQ5gbvyI-Rk5chAyPj-cJ-T750_X55fV1deLL-cfryqjhJirddN2ylngTra1Ut1auKY1prZ933AFkoPrkZtWNlYAb8vitTOdtQ1vuelRyhPyeq87pfhrwTzrwWeDIcCIccm6kbJthBIPgrypO8GEKuB6D5oUc07o9JT8AOlWc6a3oeldaHqbiGZS70LT20leHgyWfkB733VIqQCvDgBkA8ElGI3P95zqxLooF-7DnsPybxuPSWfjcTRofSoBaxv9A6P8BYt4tPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17692024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kumar, S. ; Millar, J.D. ; Watson, P.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, S. ; Millar, J.D. ; Watson, P.F.</creatorcontrib><description>Spermatozoa from three species, bovine, ovine, and porcine, were frozen using standard techniques in two controlled-rate cooling machines, a commercial instrument and a custom-built device. Ice crystallisation was induced mechanically by touching the straws with a pre-cooled rod. The sperm samples were stored 24 h, and then thawed rapidly and evaluated for motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity in the membrane-intact population. The custom-built controlled-rate cooling machine proved significantly better at all cooling rates for all species. This was particularly evident for the ram and the boar spermatozoa. In general, −30 or −50 °C/min were better than −1 °C/min, with a slight advantage being evident for −30 °C/min. However, this became very apparent for boar spermatozoa. It is clear that the higher cooling rates are necessary for successful freezing of spermatozoa from these species, and that careful control of the cooling rate is essential for maximal recovery of viable and functional cells. This is best achieved when the cooling profile is controlled from within a dummy sample.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-2240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00040-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12818214</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRYBAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acrosome-intact spermatozoa ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle - physiology ; Cell Survival ; Cryopreservation ; Cryopreservation - instrumentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Male ; Membrane integrity ; Semen Preservation - methods ; Sheep - physiology ; Sperm freezing ; Sperm motility ; Sperm viability ; Spermatozoa - physiology ; Swine - physiology</subject><ispartof>Cryobiology, 2003-06, Vol.46 (3), p.246-253</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science (USA)</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57894fda1f38644952f78cc6dbb714a31afbe1c837d2a186736fc9dd7181cbe33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57894fda1f38644952f78cc6dbb714a31afbe1c837d2a186736fc9dd7181cbe33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011224003000403$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14925001$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12818214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millar, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, P.F.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines</title><title>Cryobiology</title><addtitle>Cryobiology</addtitle><description>Spermatozoa from three species, bovine, ovine, and porcine, were frozen using standard techniques in two controlled-rate cooling machines, a commercial instrument and a custom-built device. Ice crystallisation was induced mechanically by touching the straws with a pre-cooled rod. The sperm samples were stored 24 h, and then thawed rapidly and evaluated for motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity in the membrane-intact population. The custom-built controlled-rate cooling machine proved significantly better at all cooling rates for all species. This was particularly evident for the ram and the boar spermatozoa. In general, −30 or −50 °C/min were better than −1 °C/min, with a slight advantage being evident for −30 °C/min. However, this became very apparent for boar spermatozoa. It is clear that the higher cooling rates are necessary for successful freezing of spermatozoa from these species, and that careful control of the cooling rate is essential for maximal recovery of viable and functional cells. This is best achieved when the cooling profile is controlled from within a dummy sample.</description><subject>Acrosome-intact spermatozoa</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Membrane integrity</subject><subject>Semen Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Sheep - physiology</subject><subject>Sperm freezing</subject><subject>Sperm motility</subject><subject>Sperm viability</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - physiology</subject><subject>Swine - physiology</subject><issn>0011-2240</issn><issn>1090-2392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS1ERIbAJ4C8AYGUBr-mH9kgFEGCFIkFYW1V22Vi5G43dveg8Bf5YzwPyDIry65T91b5EvKCs3ec8fr9N8Y4r4RQ7A2TbxljilXyEVlx1rFKyE48Jqv_yDF5mvPPAtWNVE_IMRctbwVXK3J3fYMUnUMz0-ioiTH48QdNMCONI51LNS9p4zcQdvV0G6eEGdMGLe2XEE4LO5xSGMs1QqJ5wjTAHP9EOKNQBIcJks9Fq7TPv2N5GecUQ0Bb7Vz-WQ5gbvyI-Rk5chAyPj-cJ-T750_X55fV1deLL-cfryqjhJirddN2ylngTra1Ut1auKY1prZ933AFkoPrkZtWNlYAb8vitTOdtQ1vuelRyhPyeq87pfhrwTzrwWeDIcCIccm6kbJthBIPgrypO8GEKuB6D5oUc07o9JT8AOlWc6a3oeldaHqbiGZS70LT20leHgyWfkB733VIqQCvDgBkA8ElGI3P95zqxLooF-7DnsPybxuPSWfjcTRofSoBaxv9A6P8BYt4tPk</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>Kumar, S.</creator><creator>Millar, J.D.</creator><creator>Watson, P.F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines</title><author>Kumar, S. ; Millar, J.D. ; Watson, P.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57894fda1f38644952f78cc6dbb714a31afbe1c837d2a186736fc9dd7181cbe33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Acrosome-intact spermatozoa</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Membrane integrity</topic><topic>Semen Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Sheep - physiology</topic><topic>Sperm freezing</topic><topic>Sperm motility</topic><topic>Sperm viability</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - physiology</topic><topic>Swine - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millar, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, P.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cryobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, S.</au><au>Millar, J.D.</au><au>Watson, P.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines</atitle><jtitle>Cryobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Cryobiology</addtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>246-253</pages><issn>0011-2240</issn><eissn>1090-2392</eissn><coden>CRYBAS</coden><abstract>Spermatozoa from three species, bovine, ovine, and porcine, were frozen using standard techniques in two controlled-rate cooling machines, a commercial instrument and a custom-built device. Ice crystallisation was induced mechanically by touching the straws with a pre-cooled rod. The sperm samples were stored 24 h, and then thawed rapidly and evaluated for motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity in the membrane-intact population. The custom-built controlled-rate cooling machine proved significantly better at all cooling rates for all species. This was particularly evident for the ram and the boar spermatozoa. In general, −30 or −50 °C/min were better than −1 °C/min, with a slight advantage being evident for −30 °C/min. However, this became very apparent for boar spermatozoa. It is clear that the higher cooling rates are necessary for successful freezing of spermatozoa from these species, and that careful control of the cooling rate is essential for maximal recovery of viable and functional cells. This is best achieved when the cooling profile is controlled from within a dummy sample.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12818214</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00040-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-2240
ispartof Cryobiology, 2003-06, Vol.46 (3), p.246-253
issn 0011-2240
1090-2392
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73387242
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acrosome-intact spermatozoa
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cattle - physiology
Cell Survival
Cryopreservation
Cryopreservation - instrumentation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Male
Membrane integrity
Semen Preservation - methods
Sheep - physiology
Sperm freezing
Sperm motility
Sperm viability
Spermatozoa - physiology
Swine - physiology
title The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T04%3A48%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20cooling%20rate%20on%20the%20survival%20of%20cryopreserved%20bull,%20ram,%20and%20boar%20spermatozoa:%20a%20comparison%20of%20two%20controlled-rate%20cooling%20machines&rft.jtitle=Cryobiology&rft.au=Kumar,%20S.&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=246-253&rft.issn=0011-2240&rft.eissn=1090-2392&rft.coden=CRYBAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00040-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73387242%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17692024&rft_id=info:pmid/12818214&rft_els_id=S0011224003000403&rfr_iscdi=true