The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines
Spermatozoa from three species, bovine, ovine, and porcine, were frozen using standard techniques in two controlled-rate cooling machines, a commercial instrument and a custom-built device. Ice crystallisation was induced mechanically by touching the straws with a pre-cooled rod. The sperm samples w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cryobiology 2003-06, Vol.46 (3), p.246-253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 253 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 246 |
container_title | Cryobiology |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Kumar, S. Millar, J.D. Watson, P.F. |
description | Spermatozoa from three species, bovine, ovine, and porcine, were frozen using standard techniques in two controlled-rate cooling machines, a commercial instrument and a custom-built device. Ice crystallisation was induced mechanically by touching the straws with a pre-cooled rod. The sperm samples were stored 24
h, and then thawed rapidly and evaluated for motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity in the membrane-intact population. The custom-built controlled-rate cooling machine proved significantly better at all cooling rates for all species. This was particularly evident for the ram and the boar spermatozoa. In general, −30 or −50
°C/min were better than −1
°C/min, with a slight advantage being evident for −30
°C/min. However, this became very apparent for boar spermatozoa. It is clear that the higher cooling rates are necessary for successful freezing of spermatozoa from these species, and that careful control of the cooling rate is essential for maximal recovery of viable and functional cells. This is best achieved when the cooling profile is controlled from within a dummy sample. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00040-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73387242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0011224003000403</els_id><sourcerecordid>73387242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57894fda1f38644952f78cc6dbb714a31afbe1c837d2a186736fc9dd7181cbe33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS1ERIbAJ4C8AYGUBr-mH9kgFEGCFIkFYW1V22Vi5G43dveg8Bf5YzwPyDIry65T91b5EvKCs3ec8fr9N8Y4r4RQ7A2TbxljilXyEVlx1rFKyE48Jqv_yDF5mvPPAtWNVE_IMRctbwVXK3J3fYMUnUMz0-ioiTH48QdNMCONI51LNS9p4zcQdvV0G6eEGdMGLe2XEE4LO5xSGMs1QqJ5wjTAHP9EOKNQBIcJks9Fq7TPv2N5GecUQ0Bb7Vz-WQ5gbvyI-Rk5chAyPj-cJ-T750_X55fV1deLL-cfryqjhJirddN2ylngTra1Ut1auKY1prZ933AFkoPrkZtWNlYAb8vitTOdtQ1vuelRyhPyeq87pfhrwTzrwWeDIcCIccm6kbJthBIPgrypO8GEKuB6D5oUc07o9JT8AOlWc6a3oeldaHqbiGZS70LT20leHgyWfkB733VIqQCvDgBkA8ElGI3P95zqxLooF-7DnsPybxuPSWfjcTRofSoBaxv9A6P8BYt4tPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17692024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kumar, S. ; Millar, J.D. ; Watson, P.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, S. ; Millar, J.D. ; Watson, P.F.</creatorcontrib><description>Spermatozoa from three species, bovine, ovine, and porcine, were frozen using standard techniques in two controlled-rate cooling machines, a commercial instrument and a custom-built device. Ice crystallisation was induced mechanically by touching the straws with a pre-cooled rod. The sperm samples were stored 24
h, and then thawed rapidly and evaluated for motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity in the membrane-intact population. The custom-built controlled-rate cooling machine proved significantly better at all cooling rates for all species. This was particularly evident for the ram and the boar spermatozoa. In general, −30 or −50
°C/min were better than −1
°C/min, with a slight advantage being evident for −30
°C/min. However, this became very apparent for boar spermatozoa. It is clear that the higher cooling rates are necessary for successful freezing of spermatozoa from these species, and that careful control of the cooling rate is essential for maximal recovery of viable and functional cells. This is best achieved when the cooling profile is controlled from within a dummy sample.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-2240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00040-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12818214</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRYBAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acrosome-intact spermatozoa ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle - physiology ; Cell Survival ; Cryopreservation ; Cryopreservation - instrumentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Male ; Membrane integrity ; Semen Preservation - methods ; Sheep - physiology ; Sperm freezing ; Sperm motility ; Sperm viability ; Spermatozoa - physiology ; Swine - physiology</subject><ispartof>Cryobiology, 2003-06, Vol.46 (3), p.246-253</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science (USA)</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57894fda1f38644952f78cc6dbb714a31afbe1c837d2a186736fc9dd7181cbe33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57894fda1f38644952f78cc6dbb714a31afbe1c837d2a186736fc9dd7181cbe33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011224003000403$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14925001$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12818214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millar, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, P.F.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines</title><title>Cryobiology</title><addtitle>Cryobiology</addtitle><description>Spermatozoa from three species, bovine, ovine, and porcine, were frozen using standard techniques in two controlled-rate cooling machines, a commercial instrument and a custom-built device. Ice crystallisation was induced mechanically by touching the straws with a pre-cooled rod. The sperm samples were stored 24
h, and then thawed rapidly and evaluated for motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity in the membrane-intact population. The custom-built controlled-rate cooling machine proved significantly better at all cooling rates for all species. This was particularly evident for the ram and the boar spermatozoa. In general, −30 or −50
°C/min were better than −1
°C/min, with a slight advantage being evident for −30
°C/min. However, this became very apparent for boar spermatozoa. It is clear that the higher cooling rates are necessary for successful freezing of spermatozoa from these species, and that careful control of the cooling rate is essential for maximal recovery of viable and functional cells. This is best achieved when the cooling profile is controlled from within a dummy sample.</description><subject>Acrosome-intact spermatozoa</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Membrane integrity</subject><subject>Semen Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Sheep - physiology</subject><subject>Sperm freezing</subject><subject>Sperm motility</subject><subject>Sperm viability</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - physiology</subject><subject>Swine - physiology</subject><issn>0011-2240</issn><issn>1090-2392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS1ERIbAJ4C8AYGUBr-mH9kgFEGCFIkFYW1V22Vi5G43dveg8Bf5YzwPyDIry65T91b5EvKCs3ec8fr9N8Y4r4RQ7A2TbxljilXyEVlx1rFKyE48Jqv_yDF5mvPPAtWNVE_IMRctbwVXK3J3fYMUnUMz0-ioiTH48QdNMCONI51LNS9p4zcQdvV0G6eEGdMGLe2XEE4LO5xSGMs1QqJ5wjTAHP9EOKNQBIcJks9Fq7TPv2N5GecUQ0Bb7Vz-WQ5gbvyI-Rk5chAyPj-cJ-T750_X55fV1deLL-cfryqjhJirddN2ylngTra1Ut1auKY1prZ933AFkoPrkZtWNlYAb8vitTOdtQ1vuelRyhPyeq87pfhrwTzrwWeDIcCIccm6kbJthBIPgrypO8GEKuB6D5oUc07o9JT8AOlWc6a3oeldaHqbiGZS70LT20leHgyWfkB733VIqQCvDgBkA8ElGI3P95zqxLooF-7DnsPybxuPSWfjcTRofSoBaxv9A6P8BYt4tPk</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>Kumar, S.</creator><creator>Millar, J.D.</creator><creator>Watson, P.F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines</title><author>Kumar, S. ; Millar, J.D. ; Watson, P.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57894fda1f38644952f78cc6dbb714a31afbe1c837d2a186736fc9dd7181cbe33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Acrosome-intact spermatozoa</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Membrane integrity</topic><topic>Semen Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Sheep - physiology</topic><topic>Sperm freezing</topic><topic>Sperm motility</topic><topic>Sperm viability</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - physiology</topic><topic>Swine - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millar, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, P.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cryobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, S.</au><au>Millar, J.D.</au><au>Watson, P.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines</atitle><jtitle>Cryobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Cryobiology</addtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>246-253</pages><issn>0011-2240</issn><eissn>1090-2392</eissn><coden>CRYBAS</coden><abstract>Spermatozoa from three species, bovine, ovine, and porcine, were frozen using standard techniques in two controlled-rate cooling machines, a commercial instrument and a custom-built device. Ice crystallisation was induced mechanically by touching the straws with a pre-cooled rod. The sperm samples were stored 24
h, and then thawed rapidly and evaluated for motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity in the membrane-intact population. The custom-built controlled-rate cooling machine proved significantly better at all cooling rates for all species. This was particularly evident for the ram and the boar spermatozoa. In general, −30 or −50
°C/min were better than −1
°C/min, with a slight advantage being evident for −30
°C/min. However, this became very apparent for boar spermatozoa. It is clear that the higher cooling rates are necessary for successful freezing of spermatozoa from these species, and that careful control of the cooling rate is essential for maximal recovery of viable and functional cells. This is best achieved when the cooling profile is controlled from within a dummy sample.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12818214</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00040-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-2240 |
ispartof | Cryobiology, 2003-06, Vol.46 (3), p.246-253 |
issn | 0011-2240 1090-2392 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73387242 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acrosome-intact spermatozoa Animals Biological and medical sciences Cattle - physiology Cell Survival Cryopreservation Cryopreservation - instrumentation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Male Membrane integrity Semen Preservation - methods Sheep - physiology Sperm freezing Sperm motility Sperm viability Spermatozoa - physiology Swine - physiology |
title | The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T04%3A48%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20cooling%20rate%20on%20the%20survival%20of%20cryopreserved%20bull,%20ram,%20and%20boar%20spermatozoa:%20a%20comparison%20of%20two%20controlled-rate%20cooling%20machines&rft.jtitle=Cryobiology&rft.au=Kumar,%20S.&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=246-253&rft.issn=0011-2240&rft.eissn=1090-2392&rft.coden=CRYBAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00040-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73387242%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17692024&rft_id=info:pmid/12818214&rft_els_id=S0011224003000403&rfr_iscdi=true |