Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use
This study investigated antimicrobial-resistant (AR) Escherichia coli isolated from “farm-to-fork” production of cattle fed diets containing the antimicrobial growth promoter (AGP) chlortetracycline plus sulfamethazine (44 ppm each, AS700) or no AGP (control). For each treatment, samples included: f...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of food microbiology 2010-01, Vol.137 (1), p.40-48 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 48 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 40 |
| container_title | International journal of food microbiology |
| container_volume | 137 |
| creator | Alexander, T.W. Inglis, G.D. Yanke, L.J. Topp, E. Read, R.R. Reuter, T. McAllister, T.A. |
| description | This study investigated antimicrobial-resistant (AR)
Escherichia coli isolated from “farm-to-fork” production of cattle fed diets containing the antimicrobial growth promoter (AGP) chlortetracycline plus sulfamethazine (44
ppm each, AS700) or no AGP (control). For each treatment, samples included: feces just prior to euthanization; hides after euthanization; intestinal digesta from the lower digestive tract; carcasses immediately after evisceration and after 24
h in the chiller; and ground beef stored at 5
°C for 1 and 8
days. Samples were also collected from the abattoir environment and from air during hide removal. Total, ampicillin (Amp
r)-, and tetracycline (Tet
r)-resistant
E. coli were isolated on MacConkey agar or MacConkey agar containing ampicillin or tetracycline, respectively. Amp
r and Tet
r
E. coli were isolated from the feces and hides of all cattle. Compared to the control, the prevalence of Amp
r (26.5%
vs. 7.9%) and Tet
r (50.9%
vs. 12.6%)
E. coli was greater in feces from AS700 treated animals (
P
<
0.05), but was similar between treatments for hide samples (
P
>
0.05). The prevalence of carcass or ground beef contamination with AR
E. coli was not different between treatments. Resistant
E. coli were isolated from the abattoir environment after processing of both groups of cattle. Susceptibilities to 11 antimicrobials and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analyses were conducted on 360 Amp
r and Tet
r
E. coli isolates. Twenty-five antibiogram profiles were detected, with isolates exhibiting resistance to up to 9 antimicrobials. Most (28.2%) Amp
r
E. coli were also resistant to streptomycin and tetracycline, whereas Tet
r
E. coli (53.5%) were mainly resistant to only tetracycline. Thirty one genotypes were detected by PFGE with most isolates from meat and environmental samples having similar genetic profiles to isolates from hides or digesta. These data demonstrate that antimicrobial-resistant
E. coli can contaminate meat products during slaughter and enter the food chain regardless of whether or not cattle are administered AGP. The abundance of AR
E. coli on the hides of animals is likely a key element for controlling end-product contamination. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733869573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168160509006023</els_id><sourcerecordid>733869573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-934f12a3938cd6a21bd4dd4cb3dac149cab5163f3848c2bfd3074c6788b372943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCX0DmAJwS_JUPH9GqBaRKXOBsTca24m0SF9tL1f76ZtkVcEKcRho9M37HDyFvOKs54-2HfR32PkY7B0yxFozpmvOasf4J2fC-05VULXtKNivbV7xlzQV5kfOeMdZIyZ6TC651K4XuNuThCtJclVj5mG4ojpAAi0vhAUqIC42eXmYc1waOASjGKVDIOWKA4iy9C2Wk3jk7xUIRSpncqQf0Zol3Cx1DLjHdH_fAUsKvwEOAiR6ye0meeZiye3WuW_L96vLb7nN1_fXTl93H6wqV7EqlpfJcgNSyR9uC4INV1iocpAXkSiMMDW-ll73qUQzeStYpbLu-H2QntJJb8v609zbFHweXi5lDRjdNsLh4yKaTsm91s5YtefdPUnDRM9E1K6hP4HpOzsl5c5vCDOnecGaOisze_KXIHBUZzs2qaJ19fX7kMMzO_pk8O1mBt2cAMsLkEywY8m9OCKk61hxD7E6cWz_vZ3DJZAxuQWdDcliMjeE_4jwC_1G3ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21280275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Alexander, T.W. ; Inglis, G.D. ; Yanke, L.J. ; Topp, E. ; Read, R.R. ; Reuter, T. ; McAllister, T.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alexander, T.W. ; Inglis, G.D. ; Yanke, L.J. ; Topp, E. ; Read, R.R. ; Reuter, T. ; McAllister, T.A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated antimicrobial-resistant (AR)
Escherichia coli isolated from “farm-to-fork” production of cattle fed diets containing the antimicrobial growth promoter (AGP) chlortetracycline plus sulfamethazine (44
ppm each, AS700) or no AGP (control). For each treatment, samples included: feces just prior to euthanization; hides after euthanization; intestinal digesta from the lower digestive tract; carcasses immediately after evisceration and after 24
h in the chiller; and ground beef stored at 5
°C for 1 and 8
days. Samples were also collected from the abattoir environment and from air during hide removal. Total, ampicillin (Amp
r)-, and tetracycline (Tet
r)-resistant
E. coli were isolated on MacConkey agar or MacConkey agar containing ampicillin or tetracycline, respectively. Amp
r and Tet
r
E. coli were isolated from the feces and hides of all cattle. Compared to the control, the prevalence of Amp
r (26.5%
vs. 7.9%) and Tet
r (50.9%
vs. 12.6%)
E. coli was greater in feces from AS700 treated animals (
P
<
0.05), but was similar between treatments for hide samples (
P
>
0.05). The prevalence of carcass or ground beef contamination with AR
E. coli was not different between treatments. Resistant
E. coli were isolated from the abattoir environment after processing of both groups of cattle. Susceptibilities to 11 antimicrobials and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analyses were conducted on 360 Amp
r and Tet
r
E. coli isolates. Twenty-five antibiogram profiles were detected, with isolates exhibiting resistance to up to 9 antimicrobials. Most (28.2%) Amp
r
E. coli were also resistant to streptomycin and tetracycline, whereas Tet
r
E. coli (53.5%) were mainly resistant to only tetracycline. Thirty one genotypes were detected by PFGE with most isolates from meat and environmental samples having similar genetic profiles to isolates from hides or digesta. These data demonstrate that antimicrobial-resistant
E. coli can contaminate meat products during slaughter and enter the food chain regardless of whether or not cattle are administered AGP. The abundance of AR
E. coli on the hides of animals is likely a key element for controlling end-product contamination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19963297</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJFMDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Abattoir ; Abattoirs ; Ampicillin Resistance ; Animal Feed ; Animal Husbandry ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Antimicrobial resistance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Cattle - microbiology ; Chlortetracycline - administration & dosage ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Environmental Microbiology ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - genetics ; Escherichia coli - isolation & purification ; Feces - microbiology ; Food Contamination - prevention & control ; Food industries ; Food Microbiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetic Variation ; Growth promoter ; Meat - microbiology ; Sulfamethazine - administration & dosage ; Tetracycline Resistance]]></subject><ispartof>International journal of food microbiology, 2010-01, Vol.137 (1), p.40-48</ispartof><rights>2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Crown Copyright 2009. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-934f12a3938cd6a21bd4dd4cb3dac149cab5163f3848c2bfd3074c6788b372943</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160509006023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22347055$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19963297$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alexander, T.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inglis, G.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanke, L.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topp, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAllister, T.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use</title><title>International journal of food microbiology</title><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><description>This study investigated antimicrobial-resistant (AR)
Escherichia coli isolated from “farm-to-fork” production of cattle fed diets containing the antimicrobial growth promoter (AGP) chlortetracycline plus sulfamethazine (44
ppm each, AS700) or no AGP (control). For each treatment, samples included: feces just prior to euthanization; hides after euthanization; intestinal digesta from the lower digestive tract; carcasses immediately after evisceration and after 24
h in the chiller; and ground beef stored at 5
°C for 1 and 8
days. Samples were also collected from the abattoir environment and from air during hide removal. Total, ampicillin (Amp
r)-, and tetracycline (Tet
r)-resistant
E. coli were isolated on MacConkey agar or MacConkey agar containing ampicillin or tetracycline, respectively. Amp
r and Tet
r
E. coli were isolated from the feces and hides of all cattle. Compared to the control, the prevalence of Amp
r (26.5%
vs. 7.9%) and Tet
r (50.9%
vs. 12.6%)
E. coli was greater in feces from AS700 treated animals (
P
<
0.05), but was similar between treatments for hide samples (
P
>
0.05). The prevalence of carcass or ground beef contamination with AR
E. coli was not different between treatments. Resistant
E. coli were isolated from the abattoir environment after processing of both groups of cattle. Susceptibilities to 11 antimicrobials and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analyses were conducted on 360 Amp
r and Tet
r
E. coli isolates. Twenty-five antibiogram profiles were detected, with isolates exhibiting resistance to up to 9 antimicrobials. Most (28.2%) Amp
r
E. coli were also resistant to streptomycin and tetracycline, whereas Tet
r
E. coli (53.5%) were mainly resistant to only tetracycline. Thirty one genotypes were detected by PFGE with most isolates from meat and environmental samples having similar genetic profiles to isolates from hides or digesta. These data demonstrate that antimicrobial-resistant
E. coli can contaminate meat products during slaughter and enter the food chain regardless of whether or not cattle are administered AGP. The abundance of AR
E. coli on the hides of animals is likely a key element for controlling end-product contamination.</description><subject>Abattoir</subject><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Ampicillin Resistance</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle - microbiology</subject><subject>Chlortetracycline - administration & dosage</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>Environmental Microbiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - genetics</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Food Contamination - prevention & control</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Growth promoter</subject><subject>Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Sulfamethazine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Tetracycline Resistance</subject><issn>0168-1605</issn><issn>1879-3460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCX0DmAJwS_JUPH9GqBaRKXOBsTca24m0SF9tL1f76ZtkVcEKcRho9M37HDyFvOKs54-2HfR32PkY7B0yxFozpmvOasf4J2fC-05VULXtKNivbV7xlzQV5kfOeMdZIyZ6TC651K4XuNuThCtJclVj5mG4ojpAAi0vhAUqIC42eXmYc1waOASjGKVDIOWKA4iy9C2Wk3jk7xUIRSpncqQf0Zol3Cx1DLjHdH_fAUsKvwEOAiR6ye0meeZiye3WuW_L96vLb7nN1_fXTl93H6wqV7EqlpfJcgNSyR9uC4INV1iocpAXkSiMMDW-ll73qUQzeStYpbLu-H2QntJJb8v609zbFHweXi5lDRjdNsLh4yKaTsm91s5YtefdPUnDRM9E1K6hP4HpOzsl5c5vCDOnecGaOisze_KXIHBUZzs2qaJ19fX7kMMzO_pk8O1mBt2cAMsLkEywY8m9OCKk61hxD7E6cWz_vZ3DJZAxuQWdDcliMjeE_4jwC_1G3ig</recordid><startdate>20100131</startdate><enddate>20100131</enddate><creator>Alexander, T.W.</creator><creator>Inglis, G.D.</creator><creator>Yanke, L.J.</creator><creator>Topp, E.</creator><creator>Read, R.R.</creator><creator>Reuter, T.</creator><creator>McAllister, T.A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100131</creationdate><title>Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use</title><author>Alexander, T.W. ; Inglis, G.D. ; Yanke, L.J. ; Topp, E. ; Read, R.R. ; Reuter, T. ; McAllister, T.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-934f12a3938cd6a21bd4dd4cb3dac149cab5163f3848c2bfd3074c6788b372943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abattoir</topic><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Ampicillin Resistance</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle - microbiology</topic><topic>Chlortetracycline - administration & dosage</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>Environmental Microbiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - genetics</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Food Contamination - prevention & control</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Growth promoter</topic><topic>Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Sulfamethazine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Tetracycline Resistance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alexander, T.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inglis, G.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanke, L.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topp, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAllister, T.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alexander, T.W.</au><au>Inglis, G.D.</au><au>Yanke, L.J.</au><au>Topp, E.</au><au>Read, R.R.</au><au>Reuter, T.</au><au>McAllister, T.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use</atitle><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><date>2010-01-31</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>40-48</pages><issn>0168-1605</issn><eissn>1879-3460</eissn><coden>IJFMDD</coden><abstract>This study investigated antimicrobial-resistant (AR)
Escherichia coli isolated from “farm-to-fork” production of cattle fed diets containing the antimicrobial growth promoter (AGP) chlortetracycline plus sulfamethazine (44
ppm each, AS700) or no AGP (control). For each treatment, samples included: feces just prior to euthanization; hides after euthanization; intestinal digesta from the lower digestive tract; carcasses immediately after evisceration and after 24
h in the chiller; and ground beef stored at 5
°C for 1 and 8
days. Samples were also collected from the abattoir environment and from air during hide removal. Total, ampicillin (Amp
r)-, and tetracycline (Tet
r)-resistant
E. coli were isolated on MacConkey agar or MacConkey agar containing ampicillin or tetracycline, respectively. Amp
r and Tet
r
E. coli were isolated from the feces and hides of all cattle. Compared to the control, the prevalence of Amp
r (26.5%
vs. 7.9%) and Tet
r (50.9%
vs. 12.6%)
E. coli was greater in feces from AS700 treated animals (
P
<
0.05), but was similar between treatments for hide samples (
P
>
0.05). The prevalence of carcass or ground beef contamination with AR
E. coli was not different between treatments. Resistant
E. coli were isolated from the abattoir environment after processing of both groups of cattle. Susceptibilities to 11 antimicrobials and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analyses were conducted on 360 Amp
r and Tet
r
E. coli isolates. Twenty-five antibiogram profiles were detected, with isolates exhibiting resistance to up to 9 antimicrobials. Most (28.2%) Amp
r
E. coli were also resistant to streptomycin and tetracycline, whereas Tet
r
E. coli (53.5%) were mainly resistant to only tetracycline. Thirty one genotypes were detected by PFGE with most isolates from meat and environmental samples having similar genetic profiles to isolates from hides or digesta. These data demonstrate that antimicrobial-resistant
E. coli can contaminate meat products during slaughter and enter the food chain regardless of whether or not cattle are administered AGP. The abundance of AR
E. coli on the hides of animals is likely a key element for controlling end-product contamination.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>19963297</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0168-1605 |
| ispartof | International journal of food microbiology, 2010-01, Vol.137 (1), p.40-48 |
| issn | 0168-1605 1879-3460 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733869573 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Abattoir Abattoirs Ampicillin Resistance Animal Feed Animal Husbandry Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage Antimicrobial resistance Biological and medical sciences Cattle Cattle - microbiology Chlortetracycline - administration & dosage DNA, Bacterial - genetics DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification Drug Resistance, Bacterial Environmental Microbiology Escherichia coli Escherichia coli - drug effects Escherichia coli - genetics Escherichia coli - isolation & purification Feces - microbiology Food Contamination - prevention & control Food industries Food Microbiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetic Variation Growth promoter Meat - microbiology Sulfamethazine - administration & dosage Tetracycline Resistance |
| title | Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A24%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Farm-to-fork%20characterization%20of%20Escherichia%20coli%20associated%20with%20feedlot%20cattle%20with%20a%20known%20history%20of%20antimicrobial%20use&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20food%20microbiology&rft.au=Alexander,%20T.W.&rft.date=2010-01-31&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=40-48&rft.issn=0168-1605&rft.eissn=1879-3460&rft.coden=IJFMDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733869573%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21280275&rft_id=info:pmid/19963297&rft_els_id=S0168160509006023&rfr_iscdi=true |