Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis

Background and Aims:  Cyclosporin A (CSA), an immunosuppressive agent, is highly efficacious in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We retrospectively investigated patients with refractory UC treated with CSA therapy to elucidate the efficacy and the prognostic factors. Methods:  Forty...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2010-03, Vol.25 (3), p.494-498
Hauptverfasser: Bamba, Shigeki, Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki, Inatomi, Osamu, Nakahara, Tamio, Koizumi, Yusuke, Saitoh, Yasuharu, Sasaki, Masaya, Fujiyama, Yoshihide, Andoh, Akira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 498
container_issue 3
container_start_page 494
container_title Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume 25
creator Bamba, Shigeki
Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki
Inatomi, Osamu
Nakahara, Tamio
Koizumi, Yusuke
Saitoh, Yasuharu
Sasaki, Masaya
Fujiyama, Yoshihide
Andoh, Akira
description Background and Aims:  Cyclosporin A (CSA), an immunosuppressive agent, is highly efficacious in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We retrospectively investigated patients with refractory UC treated with CSA therapy to elucidate the efficacy and the prognostic factors. Methods:  Forty‐one patients (26 men and 15 women) were enrolled. The efficacy of CSA was assessed at three time points: short‐ and mid‐term assessments took place 2 weeks and 1 year after CSA administration, respectively, and long‐term assessments at the end of the observation period. Results:  The short‐term response rate was 71%. Background analysis revealed risk factors for CSA unresponsiveness: (i) more than 10 000 mg of prednisolone used before CSA treatment; (ii) the presence of circulating (C7‐HRP); and (iii) disease duration more than 4 years. The mid‐term relapse‐free survival rate was 51.0%. The addition of azathioprine (AZA) after CSA treatment significantly suppressed the incidence of relapse at 1 year (72.5% vs 26.7%, P = 0.0237). The overall colectomy‐free survival rate was 46.4%, and the induction of AZA after CSA treatment significantly reduced the colectomy rate (66.7% vs 30.5%, P = 0.0419). Among CSA responders, AZA naïve patients had significant lower‐probabilities for colectomies compared to patients with prior AZA treatment (22.5% vs 56.7%, P = 0.0309). The administration of CSA was discontinued in five cases. Conclusion:  Our results revealed factors affecting the efficacy of CSA therapy for patients with refractory UC. AZA is an important agent that maintains disease quiescence once one responds to CSA. However, refractory patients despite AZA treatment are more likely to have consequent colectomies.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06119.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733860735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733860735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-c464ee971f2b651f10294a15f3367553ecaf0e001ba8c80b7f6d607763deccd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1uEzEURi0EoqHlFZA3iNUM1-O_8YJFVdGkVQVIbYVgYzmODQ6TOLUnkHn7epoQtnhhW77nu746CGECNSnr_bImjEFFJBN1A6BqEISoevcMTY6F52gCLeGVokSdoFc5LwGAgeQv0UkDVIJs2gn6dmlsH1PGxntn-7D-gfufDjvvgzV2wNFjO9gu5k1MYY3Px2oymwH7mHByPj3FB7ztbHnvw2-HbexCH_IZeuFNl93rw3mK7i8_3l3MqpvP06uL85vKslaosgvmnJLEN3PBiSfQKGYI95QKyTl11nhwAGRuWtvCXHqxECCloAtn7YLSU_Ru33eT4sPW5V6vQrau68zaxW3WktK2BCgvZLsnbYo5l-H1JoWVSYMmoEeveqlHfXrUp0ev-smr3pXom8Mn2_nKLY7BvyIL8PYAmGxNV7ysbcj_uIYzpRgp3Ic99yd0bvjvAfT1dDbeSr7a50Pu3e6YN-mXFpJKrr9-murZ9Du_vaYz_YU-Aq-Loxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733860735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bamba, Shigeki ; Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki ; Inatomi, Osamu ; Nakahara, Tamio ; Koizumi, Yusuke ; Saitoh, Yasuharu ; Sasaki, Masaya ; Fujiyama, Yoshihide ; Andoh, Akira</creator><creatorcontrib>Bamba, Shigeki ; Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki ; Inatomi, Osamu ; Nakahara, Tamio ; Koizumi, Yusuke ; Saitoh, Yasuharu ; Sasaki, Masaya ; Fujiyama, Yoshihide ; Andoh, Akira</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aims:  Cyclosporin A (CSA), an immunosuppressive agent, is highly efficacious in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We retrospectively investigated patients with refractory UC treated with CSA therapy to elucidate the efficacy and the prognostic factors. Methods:  Forty‐one patients (26 men and 15 women) were enrolled. The efficacy of CSA was assessed at three time points: short‐ and mid‐term assessments took place 2 weeks and 1 year after CSA administration, respectively, and long‐term assessments at the end of the observation period. Results:  The short‐term response rate was 71%. Background analysis revealed risk factors for CSA unresponsiveness: (i) more than 10 000 mg of prednisolone used before CSA treatment; (ii) the presence of circulating (C7‐HRP); and (iii) disease duration more than 4 years. The mid‐term relapse‐free survival rate was 51.0%. The addition of azathioprine (AZA) after CSA treatment significantly suppressed the incidence of relapse at 1 year (72.5% vs 26.7%, P = 0.0237). The overall colectomy‐free survival rate was 46.4%, and the induction of AZA after CSA treatment significantly reduced the colectomy rate (66.7% vs 30.5%, P = 0.0419). Among CSA responders, AZA naïve patients had significant lower‐probabilities for colectomies compared to patients with prior AZA treatment (22.5% vs 56.7%, P = 0.0309). The administration of CSA was discontinued in five cases. Conclusion:  Our results revealed factors affecting the efficacy of CSA therapy for patients with refractory UC. AZA is an important agent that maintains disease quiescence once one responds to CSA. However, refractory patients despite AZA treatment are more likely to have consequent colectomies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06119.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20370728</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; azathioprine ; Azathioprine - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; colectomy ; Colectomy - methods ; Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnosis ; Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy ; Colitis, Ulcerative - mortality ; Cyclosporine - therapeutic use ; cyclosporine A ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Resistance ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Secondary Prevention ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome ; ulcerative colitis</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2010-03, Vol.25 (3), p.494-498</ispartof><rights>2010 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-c464ee971f2b651f10294a15f3367553ecaf0e001ba8c80b7f6d607763deccd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-c464ee971f2b651f10294a15f3367553ecaf0e001ba8c80b7f6d607763deccd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1746.2009.06119.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1746.2009.06119.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22549941$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20370728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bamba, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inatomi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakahara, Tamio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saitoh, Yasuharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Masaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiyama, Yoshihide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andoh, Akira</creatorcontrib><title>Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Background and Aims:  Cyclosporin A (CSA), an immunosuppressive agent, is highly efficacious in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We retrospectively investigated patients with refractory UC treated with CSA therapy to elucidate the efficacy and the prognostic factors. Methods:  Forty‐one patients (26 men and 15 women) were enrolled. The efficacy of CSA was assessed at three time points: short‐ and mid‐term assessments took place 2 weeks and 1 year after CSA administration, respectively, and long‐term assessments at the end of the observation period. Results:  The short‐term response rate was 71%. Background analysis revealed risk factors for CSA unresponsiveness: (i) more than 10 000 mg of prednisolone used before CSA treatment; (ii) the presence of circulating (C7‐HRP); and (iii) disease duration more than 4 years. The mid‐term relapse‐free survival rate was 51.0%. The addition of azathioprine (AZA) after CSA treatment significantly suppressed the incidence of relapse at 1 year (72.5% vs 26.7%, P = 0.0237). The overall colectomy‐free survival rate was 46.4%, and the induction of AZA after CSA treatment significantly reduced the colectomy rate (66.7% vs 30.5%, P = 0.0419). Among CSA responders, AZA naïve patients had significant lower‐probabilities for colectomies compared to patients with prior AZA treatment (22.5% vs 56.7%, P = 0.0309). The administration of CSA was discontinued in five cases. Conclusion:  Our results revealed factors affecting the efficacy of CSA therapy for patients with refractory UC. AZA is an important agent that maintains disease quiescence once one responds to CSA. However, refractory patients despite AZA treatment are more likely to have consequent colectomies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>azathioprine</subject><subject>Azathioprine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>colectomy</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - mortality</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>cyclosporine A</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Resistance</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Secondary Prevention</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>ulcerative colitis</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1uEzEURi0EoqHlFZA3iNUM1-O_8YJFVdGkVQVIbYVgYzmODQ6TOLUnkHn7epoQtnhhW77nu746CGECNSnr_bImjEFFJBN1A6BqEISoevcMTY6F52gCLeGVokSdoFc5LwGAgeQv0UkDVIJs2gn6dmlsH1PGxntn-7D-gfufDjvvgzV2wNFjO9gu5k1MYY3Px2oymwH7mHByPj3FB7ztbHnvw2-HbexCH_IZeuFNl93rw3mK7i8_3l3MqpvP06uL85vKslaosgvmnJLEN3PBiSfQKGYI95QKyTl11nhwAGRuWtvCXHqxECCloAtn7YLSU_Ru33eT4sPW5V6vQrau68zaxW3WktK2BCgvZLsnbYo5l-H1JoWVSYMmoEeveqlHfXrUp0ev-smr3pXom8Mn2_nKLY7BvyIL8PYAmGxNV7ysbcj_uIYzpRgp3Ic99yd0bvjvAfT1dDbeSr7a50Pu3e6YN-mXFpJKrr9-murZ9Du_vaYz_YU-Aq-Loxs</recordid><startdate>201003</startdate><enddate>201003</enddate><creator>Bamba, Shigeki</creator><creator>Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki</creator><creator>Inatomi, Osamu</creator><creator>Nakahara, Tamio</creator><creator>Koizumi, Yusuke</creator><creator>Saitoh, Yasuharu</creator><creator>Sasaki, Masaya</creator><creator>Fujiyama, Yoshihide</creator><creator>Andoh, Akira</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201003</creationdate><title>Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis</title><author>Bamba, Shigeki ; Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki ; Inatomi, Osamu ; Nakahara, Tamio ; Koizumi, Yusuke ; Saitoh, Yasuharu ; Sasaki, Masaya ; Fujiyama, Yoshihide ; Andoh, Akira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-c464ee971f2b651f10294a15f3367553ecaf0e001ba8c80b7f6d607763deccd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>azathioprine</topic><topic>Azathioprine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>colectomy</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - mortality</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>cyclosporine A</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Resistance</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Secondary Prevention</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>ulcerative colitis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bamba, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inatomi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakahara, Tamio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saitoh, Yasuharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Masaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiyama, Yoshihide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andoh, Akira</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bamba, Shigeki</au><au>Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki</au><au>Inatomi, Osamu</au><au>Nakahara, Tamio</au><au>Koizumi, Yusuke</au><au>Saitoh, Yasuharu</au><au>Sasaki, Masaya</au><au>Fujiyama, Yoshihide</au><au>Andoh, Akira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2010-03</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>494</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>494-498</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Background and Aims:  Cyclosporin A (CSA), an immunosuppressive agent, is highly efficacious in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We retrospectively investigated patients with refractory UC treated with CSA therapy to elucidate the efficacy and the prognostic factors. Methods:  Forty‐one patients (26 men and 15 women) were enrolled. The efficacy of CSA was assessed at three time points: short‐ and mid‐term assessments took place 2 weeks and 1 year after CSA administration, respectively, and long‐term assessments at the end of the observation period. Results:  The short‐term response rate was 71%. Background analysis revealed risk factors for CSA unresponsiveness: (i) more than 10 000 mg of prednisolone used before CSA treatment; (ii) the presence of circulating (C7‐HRP); and (iii) disease duration more than 4 years. The mid‐term relapse‐free survival rate was 51.0%. The addition of azathioprine (AZA) after CSA treatment significantly suppressed the incidence of relapse at 1 year (72.5% vs 26.7%, P = 0.0237). The overall colectomy‐free survival rate was 46.4%, and the induction of AZA after CSA treatment significantly reduced the colectomy rate (66.7% vs 30.5%, P = 0.0419). Among CSA responders, AZA naïve patients had significant lower‐probabilities for colectomies compared to patients with prior AZA treatment (22.5% vs 56.7%, P = 0.0309). The administration of CSA was discontinued in five cases. Conclusion:  Our results revealed factors affecting the efficacy of CSA therapy for patients with refractory UC. AZA is an important agent that maintains disease quiescence once one responds to CSA. However, refractory patients despite AZA treatment are more likely to have consequent colectomies.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>20370728</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06119.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0815-9319
ispartof Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2010-03, Vol.25 (3), p.494-498
issn 0815-9319
1440-1746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733860735
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adolescent
Adult
azathioprine
Azathioprine - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
colectomy
Colectomy - methods
Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnosis
Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy
Colitis, Ulcerative - mortality
Cyclosporine - therapeutic use
cyclosporine A
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Resistance
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Other diseases. Semiology
Remission Induction
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Secondary Prevention
Severity of Illness Index
Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
ulcerative colitis
title Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T18%3A22%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20affecting%20the%20efficacy%20of%20cyclosporin%20A%20therapy%20for%20refractory%20ulcerative%20colitis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Bamba,%20Shigeki&rft.date=2010-03&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=494&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=494-498&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06119.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733860735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733860735&rft_id=info:pmid/20370728&rfr_iscdi=true