Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis
Background and Aims: Cyclosporin A (CSA), an immunosuppressive agent, is highly efficacious in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We retrospectively investigated patients with refractory UC treated with CSA therapy to elucidate the efficacy and the prognostic factors. Methods: Forty...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2010-03, Vol.25 (3), p.494-498 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 498 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 494 |
container_title | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Bamba, Shigeki Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki Inatomi, Osamu Nakahara, Tamio Koizumi, Yusuke Saitoh, Yasuharu Sasaki, Masaya Fujiyama, Yoshihide Andoh, Akira |
description | Background and Aims: Cyclosporin A (CSA), an immunosuppressive agent, is highly efficacious in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We retrospectively investigated patients with refractory UC treated with CSA therapy to elucidate the efficacy and the prognostic factors.
Methods: Forty‐one patients (26 men and 15 women) were enrolled. The efficacy of CSA was assessed at three time points: short‐ and mid‐term assessments took place 2 weeks and 1 year after CSA administration, respectively, and long‐term assessments at the end of the observation period.
Results: The short‐term response rate was 71%. Background analysis revealed risk factors for CSA unresponsiveness: (i) more than 10 000 mg of prednisolone used before CSA treatment; (ii) the presence of circulating (C7‐HRP); and (iii) disease duration more than 4 years. The mid‐term relapse‐free survival rate was 51.0%. The addition of azathioprine (AZA) after CSA treatment significantly suppressed the incidence of relapse at 1 year (72.5% vs 26.7%, P = 0.0237). The overall colectomy‐free survival rate was 46.4%, and the induction of AZA after CSA treatment significantly reduced the colectomy rate (66.7% vs 30.5%, P = 0.0419). Among CSA responders, AZA naïve patients had significant lower‐probabilities for colectomies compared to patients with prior AZA treatment (22.5% vs 56.7%, P = 0.0309). The administration of CSA was discontinued in five cases.
Conclusion: Our results revealed factors affecting the efficacy of CSA therapy for patients with refractory UC. AZA is an important agent that maintains disease quiescence once one responds to CSA. However, refractory patients despite AZA treatment are more likely to have consequent colectomies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06119.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733860735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733860735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-c464ee971f2b651f10294a15f3367553ecaf0e001ba8c80b7f6d607763deccd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1uEzEURi0EoqHlFZA3iNUM1-O_8YJFVdGkVQVIbYVgYzmODQ6TOLUnkHn7epoQtnhhW77nu746CGECNSnr_bImjEFFJBN1A6BqEISoevcMTY6F52gCLeGVokSdoFc5LwGAgeQv0UkDVIJs2gn6dmlsH1PGxntn-7D-gfufDjvvgzV2wNFjO9gu5k1MYY3Px2oymwH7mHByPj3FB7ztbHnvw2-HbexCH_IZeuFNl93rw3mK7i8_3l3MqpvP06uL85vKslaosgvmnJLEN3PBiSfQKGYI95QKyTl11nhwAGRuWtvCXHqxECCloAtn7YLSU_Ru33eT4sPW5V6vQrau68zaxW3WktK2BCgvZLsnbYo5l-H1JoWVSYMmoEeveqlHfXrUp0ev-smr3pXom8Mn2_nKLY7BvyIL8PYAmGxNV7ysbcj_uIYzpRgp3Ic99yd0bvjvAfT1dDbeSr7a50Pu3e6YN-mXFpJKrr9-murZ9Du_vaYz_YU-Aq-Loxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733860735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bamba, Shigeki ; Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki ; Inatomi, Osamu ; Nakahara, Tamio ; Koizumi, Yusuke ; Saitoh, Yasuharu ; Sasaki, Masaya ; Fujiyama, Yoshihide ; Andoh, Akira</creator><creatorcontrib>Bamba, Shigeki ; Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki ; Inatomi, Osamu ; Nakahara, Tamio ; Koizumi, Yusuke ; Saitoh, Yasuharu ; Sasaki, Masaya ; Fujiyama, Yoshihide ; Andoh, Akira</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aims: Cyclosporin A (CSA), an immunosuppressive agent, is highly efficacious in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We retrospectively investigated patients with refractory UC treated with CSA therapy to elucidate the efficacy and the prognostic factors.
Methods: Forty‐one patients (26 men and 15 women) were enrolled. The efficacy of CSA was assessed at three time points: short‐ and mid‐term assessments took place 2 weeks and 1 year after CSA administration, respectively, and long‐term assessments at the end of the observation period.
Results: The short‐term response rate was 71%. Background analysis revealed risk factors for CSA unresponsiveness: (i) more than 10 000 mg of prednisolone used before CSA treatment; (ii) the presence of circulating (C7‐HRP); and (iii) disease duration more than 4 years. The mid‐term relapse‐free survival rate was 51.0%. The addition of azathioprine (AZA) after CSA treatment significantly suppressed the incidence of relapse at 1 year (72.5% vs 26.7%, P = 0.0237). The overall colectomy‐free survival rate was 46.4%, and the induction of AZA after CSA treatment significantly reduced the colectomy rate (66.7% vs 30.5%, P = 0.0419). Among CSA responders, AZA naïve patients had significant lower‐probabilities for colectomies compared to patients with prior AZA treatment (22.5% vs 56.7%, P = 0.0309). The administration of CSA was discontinued in five cases.
Conclusion: Our results revealed factors affecting the efficacy of CSA therapy for patients with refractory UC. AZA is an important agent that maintains disease quiescence once one responds to CSA. However, refractory patients despite AZA treatment are more likely to have consequent colectomies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06119.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20370728</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; azathioprine ; Azathioprine - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; colectomy ; Colectomy - methods ; Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnosis ; Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy ; Colitis, Ulcerative - mortality ; Cyclosporine - therapeutic use ; cyclosporine A ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Resistance ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Secondary Prevention ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome ; ulcerative colitis</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2010-03, Vol.25 (3), p.494-498</ispartof><rights>2010 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-c464ee971f2b651f10294a15f3367553ecaf0e001ba8c80b7f6d607763deccd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-c464ee971f2b651f10294a15f3367553ecaf0e001ba8c80b7f6d607763deccd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1746.2009.06119.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1746.2009.06119.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22549941$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20370728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bamba, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inatomi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakahara, Tamio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saitoh, Yasuharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Masaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiyama, Yoshihide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andoh, Akira</creatorcontrib><title>Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Background and Aims: Cyclosporin A (CSA), an immunosuppressive agent, is highly efficacious in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We retrospectively investigated patients with refractory UC treated with CSA therapy to elucidate the efficacy and the prognostic factors.
Methods: Forty‐one patients (26 men and 15 women) were enrolled. The efficacy of CSA was assessed at three time points: short‐ and mid‐term assessments took place 2 weeks and 1 year after CSA administration, respectively, and long‐term assessments at the end of the observation period.
Results: The short‐term response rate was 71%. Background analysis revealed risk factors for CSA unresponsiveness: (i) more than 10 000 mg of prednisolone used before CSA treatment; (ii) the presence of circulating (C7‐HRP); and (iii) disease duration more than 4 years. The mid‐term relapse‐free survival rate was 51.0%. The addition of azathioprine (AZA) after CSA treatment significantly suppressed the incidence of relapse at 1 year (72.5% vs 26.7%, P = 0.0237). The overall colectomy‐free survival rate was 46.4%, and the induction of AZA after CSA treatment significantly reduced the colectomy rate (66.7% vs 30.5%, P = 0.0419). Among CSA responders, AZA naïve patients had significant lower‐probabilities for colectomies compared to patients with prior AZA treatment (22.5% vs 56.7%, P = 0.0309). The administration of CSA was discontinued in five cases.
Conclusion: Our results revealed factors affecting the efficacy of CSA therapy for patients with refractory UC. AZA is an important agent that maintains disease quiescence once one responds to CSA. However, refractory patients despite AZA treatment are more likely to have consequent colectomies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>azathioprine</subject><subject>Azathioprine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>colectomy</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - mortality</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>cyclosporine A</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Resistance</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Secondary Prevention</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>ulcerative colitis</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1uEzEURi0EoqHlFZA3iNUM1-O_8YJFVdGkVQVIbYVgYzmODQ6TOLUnkHn7epoQtnhhW77nu746CGECNSnr_bImjEFFJBN1A6BqEISoevcMTY6F52gCLeGVokSdoFc5LwGAgeQv0UkDVIJs2gn6dmlsH1PGxntn-7D-gfufDjvvgzV2wNFjO9gu5k1MYY3Px2oymwH7mHByPj3FB7ztbHnvw2-HbexCH_IZeuFNl93rw3mK7i8_3l3MqpvP06uL85vKslaosgvmnJLEN3PBiSfQKGYI95QKyTl11nhwAGRuWtvCXHqxECCloAtn7YLSU_Ru33eT4sPW5V6vQrau68zaxW3WktK2BCgvZLsnbYo5l-H1JoWVSYMmoEeveqlHfXrUp0ev-smr3pXom8Mn2_nKLY7BvyIL8PYAmGxNV7ysbcj_uIYzpRgp3Ic99yd0bvjvAfT1dDbeSr7a50Pu3e6YN-mXFpJKrr9-murZ9Du_vaYz_YU-Aq-Loxs</recordid><startdate>201003</startdate><enddate>201003</enddate><creator>Bamba, Shigeki</creator><creator>Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki</creator><creator>Inatomi, Osamu</creator><creator>Nakahara, Tamio</creator><creator>Koizumi, Yusuke</creator><creator>Saitoh, Yasuharu</creator><creator>Sasaki, Masaya</creator><creator>Fujiyama, Yoshihide</creator><creator>Andoh, Akira</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201003</creationdate><title>Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis</title><author>Bamba, Shigeki ; Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki ; Inatomi, Osamu ; Nakahara, Tamio ; Koizumi, Yusuke ; Saitoh, Yasuharu ; Sasaki, Masaya ; Fujiyama, Yoshihide ; Andoh, Akira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-c464ee971f2b651f10294a15f3367553ecaf0e001ba8c80b7f6d607763deccd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>azathioprine</topic><topic>Azathioprine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>colectomy</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - mortality</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>cyclosporine A</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Resistance</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Secondary Prevention</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>ulcerative colitis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bamba, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inatomi, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakahara, Tamio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saitoh, Yasuharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Masaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiyama, Yoshihide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andoh, Akira</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bamba, Shigeki</au><au>Tsujikawa, Tomoyuki</au><au>Inatomi, Osamu</au><au>Nakahara, Tamio</au><au>Koizumi, Yusuke</au><au>Saitoh, Yasuharu</au><au>Sasaki, Masaya</au><au>Fujiyama, Yoshihide</au><au>Andoh, Akira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2010-03</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>494</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>494-498</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Background and Aims: Cyclosporin A (CSA), an immunosuppressive agent, is highly efficacious in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We retrospectively investigated patients with refractory UC treated with CSA therapy to elucidate the efficacy and the prognostic factors.
Methods: Forty‐one patients (26 men and 15 women) were enrolled. The efficacy of CSA was assessed at three time points: short‐ and mid‐term assessments took place 2 weeks and 1 year after CSA administration, respectively, and long‐term assessments at the end of the observation period.
Results: The short‐term response rate was 71%. Background analysis revealed risk factors for CSA unresponsiveness: (i) more than 10 000 mg of prednisolone used before CSA treatment; (ii) the presence of circulating (C7‐HRP); and (iii) disease duration more than 4 years. The mid‐term relapse‐free survival rate was 51.0%. The addition of azathioprine (AZA) after CSA treatment significantly suppressed the incidence of relapse at 1 year (72.5% vs 26.7%, P = 0.0237). The overall colectomy‐free survival rate was 46.4%, and the induction of AZA after CSA treatment significantly reduced the colectomy rate (66.7% vs 30.5%, P = 0.0419). Among CSA responders, AZA naïve patients had significant lower‐probabilities for colectomies compared to patients with prior AZA treatment (22.5% vs 56.7%, P = 0.0309). The administration of CSA was discontinued in five cases.
Conclusion: Our results revealed factors affecting the efficacy of CSA therapy for patients with refractory UC. AZA is an important agent that maintains disease quiescence once one responds to CSA. However, refractory patients despite AZA treatment are more likely to have consequent colectomies.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>20370728</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06119.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0815-9319 |
ispartof | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2010-03, Vol.25 (3), p.494-498 |
issn | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733860735 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adolescent Adult azathioprine Azathioprine - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences colectomy Colectomy - methods Colitis, Ulcerative - diagnosis Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy Colitis, Ulcerative - mortality Cyclosporine - therapeutic use cyclosporine A Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Drug Resistance Drug Therapy, Combination Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Humans Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Other diseases. Semiology Remission Induction Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Secondary Prevention Severity of Illness Index Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the digestive system Survival Rate Treatment Outcome ulcerative colitis |
title | Factors affecting the efficacy of cyclosporin A therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T18%3A22%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20affecting%20the%20efficacy%20of%20cyclosporin%20A%20therapy%20for%20refractory%20ulcerative%20colitis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Bamba,%20Shigeki&rft.date=2010-03&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=494&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=494-498&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06119.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733860735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733860735&rft_id=info:pmid/20370728&rfr_iscdi=true |