A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease
Abstract Objectives To compare responsiveness and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) for the disease-specific Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index (WORC) and the two region-specific questionnaires Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Oxford Shoulder Scale (OSS) in patients with rotat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 2010-05, Vol.63 (5), p.575-584 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 584 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 575 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical epidemiology |
| container_volume | 63 |
| creator | Ekeberg, Ole M Bautz-Holter, Erik Keller, Anne Tveitå, Einar K Juel, Niels G Brox, Jens I |
| description | Abstract Objectives To compare responsiveness and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) for the disease-specific Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index (WORC) and the two region-specific questionnaires Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Oxford Shoulder Scale (OSS) in patients with rotator cuff disease receiving corticosteroid injection therapy. Study Design and Setting One hundred twenty-one patients with rotator cuff disease. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index, SPADI, and OSS were administered before treatment and at 2 and 6 weeks after corticosteroid injection. Responsiveness was compared between questionnaires using the standardized response mean (SRM), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and reliable change proportion (RCP) statistics. Minimal clinically important change estimates were reported. Results The differences between questionnaires were small and not consistent across the different responsiveness indices. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was significantly more responsive than OSS measured by SRM and RCP at 2 and 6 weeks. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index was significantly more responsive than OSS in RCP and area under receiver operating characteristic curve at 6 weeks. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was significantly more responsive than WORC measured by RCP at 2 weeks. Minimal clinically important change was estimated to 5, 275, and 20 points for OSS, WORC, and SPADI, respectively. Conclusions All questionnaires are suitable for measuring change in patients with rotator cuff disease. Disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than the region-specific SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.07.012 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733839771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S089543560900225X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2735256871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-5660ee26a2ba1ead0e30b9a891252390184e2e2dcda61619c319b79032d373543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0suO0zAUBuAIgZgy8AojSwixSji2EzveIKpyG2mkIgqCneU6J8KltYOdjJi3x6EdRpoNK28-_778pyguKFQUqHi1q3Z27zwOrmIAqgJZAWUPigVtZVs2itGHxQJa1ZQ1b8RZ8SSlHQCVIJvHxRlVLRcMxKJIS_JrwjS64L1xEUkfJt-RziU0Ccs0oHW9s-Tb-vOKON_hb-IS8WEkh5B1xDQEn9w1kvGH8WTzafn2kpicsN5ssicxjGYMkdip729TnxaPerNP-Oy0nhdf37_7svpYXq0_XK6WV6WtWxjLRghAZMKwraFoOkAOW2VaRVnDuALa1siQdbYzggqqLKdqKxVw1nHJm5qfFy-PuUMMfx-pDy5Z3O-NxzAlLTlvuZKSZvn8ntyFKfp8OU1hVkxxlZU4KhtDShF7PUR3MPEmIz23onf6thU9t6JB6txK3nhxip-2B-zutp1qyODFCZhkzb6PxluX_jnGJK8Fn92bo8P8bdcOo07WobfY5ersqLvg_n-X1_ciZuXyqT_xBtPdu3ViGvRmnqF5hEABMNZ8538AIXnBoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1033832939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Ekeberg, Ole M ; Bautz-Holter, Erik ; Keller, Anne ; Tveitå, Einar K ; Juel, Niels G ; Brox, Jens I</creator><creatorcontrib>Ekeberg, Ole M ; Bautz-Holter, Erik ; Keller, Anne ; Tveitå, Einar K ; Juel, Niels G ; Brox, Jens I</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives To compare responsiveness and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) for the disease-specific Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index (WORC) and the two region-specific questionnaires Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Oxford Shoulder Scale (OSS) in patients with rotator cuff disease receiving corticosteroid injection therapy. Study Design and Setting One hundred twenty-one patients with rotator cuff disease. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index, SPADI, and OSS were administered before treatment and at 2 and 6 weeks after corticosteroid injection. Responsiveness was compared between questionnaires using the standardized response mean (SRM), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and reliable change proportion (RCP) statistics. Minimal clinically important change estimates were reported. Results The differences between questionnaires were small and not consistent across the different responsiveness indices. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was significantly more responsive than OSS measured by SRM and RCP at 2 and 6 weeks. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index was significantly more responsive than OSS in RCP and area under receiver operating characteristic curve at 6 weeks. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was significantly more responsive than WORC measured by RCP at 2 weeks. Minimal clinically important change was estimated to 5, 275, and 20 points for OSS, WORC, and SPADI, respectively. Conclusions All questionnaires are suitable for measuring change in patients with rotator cuff disease. Disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than the region-specific SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.07.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19836206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Confidence intervals ; Disability Evaluation ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Epidemiologic Methods ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Glucocorticoids - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Injection ; Injections, Intra-Articular ; Internal Medicine ; Juxtaarticular diseases. Extraarticular rhumatism ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Minimal clinically important change ; Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases ; OSS ; Pain ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Quality of Life ; Responsiveness ; Rotator cuff ; Rotator cuff disease ; Severity of Illness Index ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - drug therapy ; Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - rehabilitation ; SPADI ; Treatment Outcome ; WORC</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2010-05, Vol.63 (5), p.575-584</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-5660ee26a2ba1ead0e30b9a891252390184e2e2dcda61619c319b79032d373543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-5660ee26a2ba1ead0e30b9a891252390184e2e2dcda61619c319b79032d373543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1033832939?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22734636$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19836206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ekeberg, Ole M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bautz-Holter, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tveitå, Einar K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juel, Niels G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brox, Jens I</creatorcontrib><title>A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease</title><title>Journal of clinical epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives To compare responsiveness and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) for the disease-specific Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index (WORC) and the two region-specific questionnaires Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Oxford Shoulder Scale (OSS) in patients with rotator cuff disease receiving corticosteroid injection therapy. Study Design and Setting One hundred twenty-one patients with rotator cuff disease. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index, SPADI, and OSS were administered before treatment and at 2 and 6 weeks after corticosteroid injection. Responsiveness was compared between questionnaires using the standardized response mean (SRM), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and reliable change proportion (RCP) statistics. Minimal clinically important change estimates were reported. Results The differences between questionnaires were small and not consistent across the different responsiveness indices. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was significantly more responsive than OSS measured by SRM and RCP at 2 and 6 weeks. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index was significantly more responsive than OSS in RCP and area under receiver operating characteristic curve at 6 weeks. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was significantly more responsive than WORC measured by RCP at 2 weeks. Minimal clinically important change was estimated to 5, 275, and 20 points for OSS, WORC, and SPADI, respectively. Conclusions All questionnaires are suitable for measuring change in patients with rotator cuff disease. Disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than the region-specific SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Methods</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glucocorticoids - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Injections, Intra-Articular</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Juxtaarticular diseases. Extraarticular rhumatism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimal clinically important change</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases</subject><subject>OSS</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Responsiveness</subject><subject>Rotator cuff</subject><subject>Rotator cuff disease</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - drug therapy</subject><subject>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - rehabilitation</subject><subject>SPADI</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>WORC</subject><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0suO0zAUBuAIgZgy8AojSwixSji2EzveIKpyG2mkIgqCneU6J8KltYOdjJi3x6EdRpoNK28-_778pyguKFQUqHi1q3Z27zwOrmIAqgJZAWUPigVtZVs2itGHxQJa1ZQ1b8RZ8SSlHQCVIJvHxRlVLRcMxKJIS_JrwjS64L1xEUkfJt-RziU0Ccs0oHW9s-Tb-vOKON_hb-IS8WEkh5B1xDQEn9w1kvGH8WTzafn2kpicsN5ssicxjGYMkdip729TnxaPerNP-Oy0nhdf37_7svpYXq0_XK6WV6WtWxjLRghAZMKwraFoOkAOW2VaRVnDuALa1siQdbYzggqqLKdqKxVw1nHJm5qfFy-PuUMMfx-pDy5Z3O-NxzAlLTlvuZKSZvn8ntyFKfp8OU1hVkxxlZU4KhtDShF7PUR3MPEmIz23onf6thU9t6JB6txK3nhxip-2B-zutp1qyODFCZhkzb6PxluX_jnGJK8Fn92bo8P8bdcOo07WobfY5ersqLvg_n-X1_ciZuXyqT_xBtPdu3ViGvRmnqF5hEABMNZ8538AIXnBoQ</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Ekeberg, Ole M</creator><creator>Bautz-Holter, Erik</creator><creator>Keller, Anne</creator><creator>Tveitå, Einar K</creator><creator>Juel, Niels G</creator><creator>Brox, Jens I</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease</title><author>Ekeberg, Ole M ; Bautz-Holter, Erik ; Keller, Anne ; Tveitå, Einar K ; Juel, Niels G ; Brox, Jens I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-5660ee26a2ba1ead0e30b9a891252390184e2e2dcda61619c319b79032d373543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Methods</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glucocorticoids - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Injections, Intra-Articular</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Juxtaarticular diseases. Extraarticular rhumatism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimal clinically important change</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases</topic><topic>OSS</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Responsiveness</topic><topic>Rotator cuff</topic><topic>Rotator cuff disease</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - drug therapy</topic><topic>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - rehabilitation</topic><topic>SPADI</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>WORC</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ekeberg, Ole M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bautz-Holter, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tveitå, Einar K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juel, Niels G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brox, Jens I</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ekeberg, Ole M</au><au>Bautz-Holter, Erik</au><au>Keller, Anne</au><au>Tveitå, Einar K</au><au>Juel, Niels G</au><au>Brox, Jens I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>584</epage><pages>575-584</pages><issn>0895-4356</issn><eissn>1878-5921</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives To compare responsiveness and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) for the disease-specific Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index (WORC) and the two region-specific questionnaires Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Oxford Shoulder Scale (OSS) in patients with rotator cuff disease receiving corticosteroid injection therapy. Study Design and Setting One hundred twenty-one patients with rotator cuff disease. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index, SPADI, and OSS were administered before treatment and at 2 and 6 weeks after corticosteroid injection. Responsiveness was compared between questionnaires using the standardized response mean (SRM), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and reliable change proportion (RCP) statistics. Minimal clinically important change estimates were reported. Results The differences between questionnaires were small and not consistent across the different responsiveness indices. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was significantly more responsive than OSS measured by SRM and RCP at 2 and 6 weeks. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index was significantly more responsive than OSS in RCP and area under receiver operating characteristic curve at 6 weeks. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was significantly more responsive than WORC measured by RCP at 2 weeks. Minimal clinically important change was estimated to 5, 275, and 20 points for OSS, WORC, and SPADI, respectively. Conclusions All questionnaires are suitable for measuring change in patients with rotator cuff disease. Disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than the region-specific SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19836206</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.07.012</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0895-4356 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2010-05, Vol.63 (5), p.575-584 |
| issn | 0895-4356 1878-5921 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733839771 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Confidence intervals Disability Evaluation Diseases of the osteoarticular system Epidemiologic Methods Epidemiology Female Glucocorticoids - administration & dosage Humans Injection Injections, Intra-Articular Internal Medicine Juxtaarticular diseases. Extraarticular rhumatism Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Minimal clinically important change Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases OSS Pain Pain Measurement - methods Quality of Life Responsiveness Rotator cuff Rotator cuff disease Severity of Illness Index Shoulder Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - drug therapy Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - rehabilitation SPADI Treatment Outcome WORC |
| title | A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A48%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20questionnaire%20found%20disease-specific%20WORC%20index%20is%20not%20more%20responsive%20than%20SPADI%20and%20OSS%20in%20rotator%20cuff%20disease&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20epidemiology&rft.au=Ekeberg,%20Ole%20M&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=584&rft.pages=575-584&rft.issn=0895-4356&rft.eissn=1878-5921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.07.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2735256871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1033832939&rft_id=info:pmid/19836206&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S089543560900225X&rfr_iscdi=true |