Orientation tuning of curvature adaptation reveals both curvature-polarity-selective and non-selective mechanisms
We have used a curvature after-effect, or CAE, to explore whether curvature detectors are tuned for the overall orientation of a curve. CAEs were measured for half-cycle cosine-shaped contours as a function of adaptor contour orientation for a fixed test contour orientation. CAEs (i) were greatest w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2009-11, Vol.9 (12), p.3.1-3 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3.1 |
container_title | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Bell, Jason Gheorghiu, Elena Kingdom, Frederick A A |
description | We have used a curvature after-effect, or CAE, to explore whether curvature detectors are tuned for the overall orientation of a curve. CAEs were measured for half-cycle cosine-shaped contours as a function of adaptor contour orientation for a fixed test contour orientation. CAEs (i) were greatest when the adaptor and test contours had the same orientation, (ii) decreased rapidly as the orientation of the adapting contours rotated away from the test, the data being well fit by a Gaussian function with a standard deviation of 16 degrees , (iii) increased again to a secondary peak when the adapting contours were rotated 180 degrees relative to the test. Control experiments showed that the shape of the curvature-orientation tuning function could not be explained by local orientation adaptation, and that instead curvature encoding mechanisms are tuned for orientation. The secondary peak in the CAE at 180 degrees is argued to be inconsistent with curvature opponency and instead a result of the combination of polarity-selective and polarity-non-selective curvature mechanisms. The results are discussed in relation to recent psychophysical and physiological models of form processing and the possible significance of the findings with regard to symmetry processing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1167/9.12.3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733837446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733837446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-869596c6e029650063dea291f812331f9d325baf6ef4dd4bb54add27c74b342e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXAJ6CsYJXiV5xmiRAvqVI3sLYce0KNEju1nUr9e4JaoKsZzT1zFheha4LnhIjyvpoTOmcnaEoKxvOSCXp6tE_QRYxfGFNcYHKOJhTjguGKT9FmFSy4pJL1LkuDs-4z802mh7BVaQiQKaP6QxxgC6qNWe3T-p_Ie9-qYNMuj9CCTnY7PjmTOe-OLh3otXI2dvESnTWjBa4Oc4Y-np_eH1_z5erl7fFhmWuGRcoXoioqoQVgWokCY8EMKFqRZkEoY6SpDKNFrRoBDTeG13XBlTG01CWvGafAZuhu7-2D3wwQk-xs1NC2yoEfoiwZW7CSczGSt3tSBx9jgEb2wXYq7CTB8qddWUlCJRvBm4NyqDswf9hvnewb98l2rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733837446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Orientation tuning of curvature adaptation reveals both curvature-polarity-selective and non-selective mechanisms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bell, Jason ; Gheorghiu, Elena ; Kingdom, Frederick A A</creator><creatorcontrib>Bell, Jason ; Gheorghiu, Elena ; Kingdom, Frederick A A</creatorcontrib><description>We have used a curvature after-effect, or CAE, to explore whether curvature detectors are tuned for the overall orientation of a curve. CAEs were measured for half-cycle cosine-shaped contours as a function of adaptor contour orientation for a fixed test contour orientation. CAEs (i) were greatest when the adaptor and test contours had the same orientation, (ii) decreased rapidly as the orientation of the adapting contours rotated away from the test, the data being well fit by a Gaussian function with a standard deviation of 16 degrees , (iii) increased again to a secondary peak when the adapting contours were rotated 180 degrees relative to the test. Control experiments showed that the shape of the curvature-orientation tuning function could not be explained by local orientation adaptation, and that instead curvature encoding mechanisms are tuned for orientation. The secondary peak in the CAE at 180 degrees is argued to be inconsistent with curvature opponency and instead a result of the combination of polarity-selective and polarity-non-selective curvature mechanisms. The results are discussed in relation to recent psychophysical and physiological models of form processing and the possible significance of the findings with regard to symmetry processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/9.12.3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20053094</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; Female ; Figural Aftereffect ; Form Perception ; Humans ; Male ; Motion Perception ; Neurons - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Psychophysics ; Rotation ; Vision, Ocular</subject><ispartof>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2009-11, Vol.9 (12), p.3.1-3</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-869596c6e029650063dea291f812331f9d325baf6ef4dd4bb54add27c74b342e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20053094$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bell, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheorghiu, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingdom, Frederick A A</creatorcontrib><title>Orientation tuning of curvature adaptation reveals both curvature-polarity-selective and non-selective mechanisms</title><title>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><description>We have used a curvature after-effect, or CAE, to explore whether curvature detectors are tuned for the overall orientation of a curve. CAEs were measured for half-cycle cosine-shaped contours as a function of adaptor contour orientation for a fixed test contour orientation. CAEs (i) were greatest when the adaptor and test contours had the same orientation, (ii) decreased rapidly as the orientation of the adapting contours rotated away from the test, the data being well fit by a Gaussian function with a standard deviation of 16 degrees , (iii) increased again to a secondary peak when the adapting contours were rotated 180 degrees relative to the test. Control experiments showed that the shape of the curvature-orientation tuning function could not be explained by local orientation adaptation, and that instead curvature encoding mechanisms are tuned for orientation. The secondary peak in the CAE at 180 degrees is argued to be inconsistent with curvature opponency and instead a result of the combination of polarity-selective and polarity-non-selective curvature mechanisms. The results are discussed in relation to recent psychophysical and physiological models of form processing and the possible significance of the findings with regard to symmetry processing.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Figural Aftereffect</subject><subject>Form Perception</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion Perception</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Vision, Ocular</subject><issn>1534-7362</issn><issn>1534-7362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXAJ6CsYJXiV5xmiRAvqVI3sLYce0KNEju1nUr9e4JaoKsZzT1zFheha4LnhIjyvpoTOmcnaEoKxvOSCXp6tE_QRYxfGFNcYHKOJhTjguGKT9FmFSy4pJL1LkuDs-4z802mh7BVaQiQKaP6QxxgC6qNWe3T-p_Ie9-qYNMuj9CCTnY7PjmTOe-OLh3otXI2dvESnTWjBa4Oc4Y-np_eH1_z5erl7fFhmWuGRcoXoioqoQVgWokCY8EMKFqRZkEoY6SpDKNFrRoBDTeG13XBlTG01CWvGafAZuhu7-2D3wwQk-xs1NC2yoEfoiwZW7CSczGSt3tSBx9jgEb2wXYq7CTB8qddWUlCJRvBm4NyqDswf9hvnewb98l2rg</recordid><startdate>20091110</startdate><enddate>20091110</enddate><creator>Bell, Jason</creator><creator>Gheorghiu, Elena</creator><creator>Kingdom, Frederick A A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091110</creationdate><title>Orientation tuning of curvature adaptation reveals both curvature-polarity-selective and non-selective mechanisms</title><author>Bell, Jason ; Gheorghiu, Elena ; Kingdom, Frederick A A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-869596c6e029650063dea291f812331f9d325baf6ef4dd4bb54add27c74b342e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Figural Aftereffect</topic><topic>Form Perception</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion Perception</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Vision, Ocular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bell, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheorghiu, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingdom, Frederick A A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bell, Jason</au><au>Gheorghiu, Elena</au><au>Kingdom, Frederick A A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Orientation tuning of curvature adaptation reveals both curvature-polarity-selective and non-selective mechanisms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><date>2009-11-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3.1</spage><epage>3</epage><pages>3.1-3</pages><issn>1534-7362</issn><eissn>1534-7362</eissn><abstract>We have used a curvature after-effect, or CAE, to explore whether curvature detectors are tuned for the overall orientation of a curve. CAEs were measured for half-cycle cosine-shaped contours as a function of adaptor contour orientation for a fixed test contour orientation. CAEs (i) were greatest when the adaptor and test contours had the same orientation, (ii) decreased rapidly as the orientation of the adapting contours rotated away from the test, the data being well fit by a Gaussian function with a standard deviation of 16 degrees , (iii) increased again to a secondary peak when the adapting contours were rotated 180 degrees relative to the test. Control experiments showed that the shape of the curvature-orientation tuning function could not be explained by local orientation adaptation, and that instead curvature encoding mechanisms are tuned for orientation. The secondary peak in the CAE at 180 degrees is argued to be inconsistent with curvature opponency and instead a result of the combination of polarity-selective and polarity-non-selective curvature mechanisms. The results are discussed in relation to recent psychophysical and physiological models of form processing and the possible significance of the findings with regard to symmetry processing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>20053094</pmid><doi>10.1167/9.12.3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1534-7362 |
ispartof | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2009-11, Vol.9 (12), p.3.1-3 |
issn | 1534-7362 1534-7362 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733837446 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adaptation, Physiological Female Figural Aftereffect Form Perception Humans Male Motion Perception Neurons - physiology Photic Stimulation Psychophysics Rotation Vision, Ocular |
title | Orientation tuning of curvature adaptation reveals both curvature-polarity-selective and non-selective mechanisms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T07%3A37%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Orientation%20tuning%20of%20curvature%20adaptation%20reveals%20both%20curvature-polarity-selective%20and%20non-selective%20mechanisms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vision%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Bell,%20Jason&rft.date=2009-11-10&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3.1&rft.epage=3&rft.pages=3.1-3&rft.issn=1534-7362&rft.eissn=1534-7362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/9.12.3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733837446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733837446&rft_id=info:pmid/20053094&rfr_iscdi=true |