The effect of analyte concentration range on measurement errors obtained by NIR spectroscopy

Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was employed to quantify five compounds, ammonium, glucose, glutamate, glutamine, and lactate, in conditions similar to those obtained in animal cell cultivations over varying ranges of analyte concentrations. These components represent the primary nutrients and was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Talanta (Oxford) 2000-06, Vol.52 (3), p.473-484
Hauptverfasser: Riley, Mark R, Crider, Heather M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 484
container_issue 3
container_start_page 473
container_title Talanta (Oxford)
container_volume 52
creator Riley, Mark R
Crider, Heather M
description Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was employed to quantify five compounds, ammonium, glucose, glutamate, glutamine, and lactate, in conditions similar to those obtained in animal cell cultivations over varying ranges of analyte concentrations. These components represent the primary nutrients and wastes of animal cells for which such noninvasive monitoring schemes are required for development of accurate control schemes. Ideal cultivation conditions involve maintaining concentrations of these components as low as 1 mM each, however, it is not known if measurements of these compounds can be accurately accomplished at such a low level. We have found that NIRS measurements of these analytes over narrow and low (0–1 mM) concentration ranges yield measurement errors of roughly 11% of the concentration range. By contrast, wide concentration ranges (0–30 mM) yield measurement errors of roughly 1.6% of the concentration range. Decreasing the concentration range over which an analyte is quantified in four out of five cases decreases the optimal spectral range by 100 cm −1 for measurement by partial least squares regression analysis. There appears a similarity in the ratio of (standard error of prediction (SEP)/concentration range) which may provide an estimation of the anticipated SEP to be obtained for measurement over a new concentration range. It was found that for the five analytes evaluated here, the ratio of SEP to concentration range divided by that obtained for a second concentration range is equal to a fairly constant value of 6.6. This relationship was found to be followed reasonably well by an extensive number of measurement results reported in the literature for similar conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00403-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733831415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039914000004033</els_id><sourcerecordid>733831415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-df3b75e6f33026f411af4b8aeaf79112a77b45d2dcf33be7b0302e8d7a52f1873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9LHDEUxUNR6mr9CJU8SK0P0978mc3sU5GlrYJYaNe3QshkbjQyM1mTWWG_vRl3cd8UArmQ37035xxCPjP4xoBNv_8DELNixiR8BTgHkCAK8YFMWKVyUSqxRyavyAE5TOkBALgA8ZEcsGo2rQDUhPxf3CNF59AONDhqetOuB6Q29Bb7IZrBh55G098hzUWHJq0idvmJYowhJhrqwfgeG1qv6c3VX5qWeVQMyYbl-hPZd6ZNeLy9j8jtr5-L-WVx_ef31fziurCS86FonKhViVMnBPCpk4wZJ-vKoHFqxhg3StWybHhjM1GjqiFzWDXKlNyNeo_I2WbuMobHFaZBdz5ZbFvTY1glrYSoBJOszOSXN0nOJFcViAyWG9BmLSmi08voOxPXmoEeA9AvAejRXQ3jyQHose9ku2BVd9jsuraOZ-B0C5hkTeuyt9anHVeC5C-SfmwwzL49eYw6WY85lMbHbLBugn_nJ891FaIq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21427803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of analyte concentration range on measurement errors obtained by NIR spectroscopy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Riley, Mark R ; Crider, Heather M</creator><creatorcontrib>Riley, Mark R ; Crider, Heather M</creatorcontrib><description>Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was employed to quantify five compounds, ammonium, glucose, glutamate, glutamine, and lactate, in conditions similar to those obtained in animal cell cultivations over varying ranges of analyte concentrations. These components represent the primary nutrients and wastes of animal cells for which such noninvasive monitoring schemes are required for development of accurate control schemes. Ideal cultivation conditions involve maintaining concentrations of these components as low as 1 mM each, however, it is not known if measurements of these compounds can be accurately accomplished at such a low level. We have found that NIRS measurements of these analytes over narrow and low (0–1 mM) concentration ranges yield measurement errors of roughly 11% of the concentration range. By contrast, wide concentration ranges (0–30 mM) yield measurement errors of roughly 1.6% of the concentration range. Decreasing the concentration range over which an analyte is quantified in four out of five cases decreases the optimal spectral range by 100 cm −1 for measurement by partial least squares regression analysis. There appears a similarity in the ratio of (standard error of prediction (SEP)/concentration range) which may provide an estimation of the anticipated SEP to be obtained for measurement over a new concentration range. It was found that for the five analytes evaluated here, the ratio of SEP to concentration range divided by that obtained for a second concentration range is equal to a fairly constant value of 6.6. This relationship was found to be followed reasonably well by an extensive number of measurement results reported in the literature for similar conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-9140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00403-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18968007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TLNTA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal cell culture ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bioreactor monitoring ; Bioreactors ; Biotechnology ; Composition effects ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Infrared spectroscopy ; Measurement errors ; Methods. Procedures. Technologies ; NIR spectroscopy ; Others ; Various methods and equipments</subject><ispartof>Talanta (Oxford), 2000-06, Vol.52 (3), p.473-484</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-df3b75e6f33026f411af4b8aeaf79112a77b45d2dcf33be7b0302e8d7a52f1873</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039914000004033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1504287$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18968007$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riley, Mark R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crider, Heather M</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of analyte concentration range on measurement errors obtained by NIR spectroscopy</title><title>Talanta (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><description>Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was employed to quantify five compounds, ammonium, glucose, glutamate, glutamine, and lactate, in conditions similar to those obtained in animal cell cultivations over varying ranges of analyte concentrations. These components represent the primary nutrients and wastes of animal cells for which such noninvasive monitoring schemes are required for development of accurate control schemes. Ideal cultivation conditions involve maintaining concentrations of these components as low as 1 mM each, however, it is not known if measurements of these compounds can be accurately accomplished at such a low level. We have found that NIRS measurements of these analytes over narrow and low (0–1 mM) concentration ranges yield measurement errors of roughly 11% of the concentration range. By contrast, wide concentration ranges (0–30 mM) yield measurement errors of roughly 1.6% of the concentration range. Decreasing the concentration range over which an analyte is quantified in four out of five cases decreases the optimal spectral range by 100 cm −1 for measurement by partial least squares regression analysis. There appears a similarity in the ratio of (standard error of prediction (SEP)/concentration range) which may provide an estimation of the anticipated SEP to be obtained for measurement over a new concentration range. It was found that for the five analytes evaluated here, the ratio of SEP to concentration range divided by that obtained for a second concentration range is equal to a fairly constant value of 6.6. This relationship was found to be followed reasonably well by an extensive number of measurement results reported in the literature for similar conditions.</description><subject>Animal cell culture</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bioreactor monitoring</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Infrared spectroscopy</subject><subject>Measurement errors</subject><subject>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</subject><subject>NIR spectroscopy</subject><subject>Others</subject><subject>Various methods and equipments</subject><issn>0039-9140</issn><issn>1873-3573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV9LHDEUxUNR6mr9CJU8SK0P0978mc3sU5GlrYJYaNe3QshkbjQyM1mTWWG_vRl3cd8UArmQ37035xxCPjP4xoBNv_8DELNixiR8BTgHkCAK8YFMWKVyUSqxRyavyAE5TOkBALgA8ZEcsGo2rQDUhPxf3CNF59AONDhqetOuB6Q29Bb7IZrBh55G098hzUWHJq0idvmJYowhJhrqwfgeG1qv6c3VX5qWeVQMyYbl-hPZd6ZNeLy9j8jtr5-L-WVx_ef31fziurCS86FonKhViVMnBPCpk4wZJ-vKoHFqxhg3StWybHhjM1GjqiFzWDXKlNyNeo_I2WbuMobHFaZBdz5ZbFvTY1glrYSoBJOszOSXN0nOJFcViAyWG9BmLSmi08voOxPXmoEeA9AvAejRXQ3jyQHose9ku2BVd9jsuraOZ-B0C5hkTeuyt9anHVeC5C-SfmwwzL49eYw6WY85lMbHbLBugn_nJ891FaIq</recordid><startdate>20000630</startdate><enddate>20000630</enddate><creator>Riley, Mark R</creator><creator>Crider, Heather M</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000630</creationdate><title>The effect of analyte concentration range on measurement errors obtained by NIR spectroscopy</title><author>Riley, Mark R ; Crider, Heather M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-df3b75e6f33026f411af4b8aeaf79112a77b45d2dcf33be7b0302e8d7a52f1873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animal cell culture</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bioreactor monitoring</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Infrared spectroscopy</topic><topic>Measurement errors</topic><topic>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</topic><topic>NIR spectroscopy</topic><topic>Others</topic><topic>Various methods and equipments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riley, Mark R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crider, Heather M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riley, Mark R</au><au>Crider, Heather M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of analyte concentration range on measurement errors obtained by NIR spectroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><date>2000-06-30</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>484</epage><pages>473-484</pages><issn>0039-9140</issn><eissn>1873-3573</eissn><coden>TLNTA2</coden><abstract>Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was employed to quantify five compounds, ammonium, glucose, glutamate, glutamine, and lactate, in conditions similar to those obtained in animal cell cultivations over varying ranges of analyte concentrations. These components represent the primary nutrients and wastes of animal cells for which such noninvasive monitoring schemes are required for development of accurate control schemes. Ideal cultivation conditions involve maintaining concentrations of these components as low as 1 mM each, however, it is not known if measurements of these compounds can be accurately accomplished at such a low level. We have found that NIRS measurements of these analytes over narrow and low (0–1 mM) concentration ranges yield measurement errors of roughly 11% of the concentration range. By contrast, wide concentration ranges (0–30 mM) yield measurement errors of roughly 1.6% of the concentration range. Decreasing the concentration range over which an analyte is quantified in four out of five cases decreases the optimal spectral range by 100 cm −1 for measurement by partial least squares regression analysis. There appears a similarity in the ratio of (standard error of prediction (SEP)/concentration range) which may provide an estimation of the anticipated SEP to be obtained for measurement over a new concentration range. It was found that for the five analytes evaluated here, the ratio of SEP to concentration range divided by that obtained for a second concentration range is equal to a fairly constant value of 6.6. This relationship was found to be followed reasonably well by an extensive number of measurement results reported in the literature for similar conditions.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>18968007</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00403-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-9140
ispartof Talanta (Oxford), 2000-06, Vol.52 (3), p.473-484
issn 0039-9140
1873-3573
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733831415
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal cell culture
Biological and medical sciences
Bioreactor monitoring
Bioreactors
Biotechnology
Composition effects
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Infrared spectroscopy
Measurement errors
Methods. Procedures. Technologies
NIR spectroscopy
Others
Various methods and equipments
title The effect of analyte concentration range on measurement errors obtained by NIR spectroscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T08%3A14%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20analyte%20concentration%20range%20on%20measurement%20errors%20obtained%20by%20NIR%20spectroscopy&rft.jtitle=Talanta%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Riley,%20Mark%20R&rft.date=2000-06-30&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=484&rft.pages=473-484&rft.issn=0039-9140&rft.eissn=1873-3573&rft.coden=TLNTA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00403-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733831415%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21427803&rft_id=info:pmid/18968007&rft_els_id=S0039914000004033&rfr_iscdi=true