Sex Differences in Colour Vision

IN a previous communication1, it was shown that women with known colour-blind relatives were significantly more often red-green weak to a slight extent than women taken at random. This carried the implication that red-green blindness must be an incompletely recessive Mendelian character (although se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Nature (London) 1947-05, Vol.159 (4044), p.606-607
1. Verfasser:	PICKFORD, R. W
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Color Perception Color Vision Humanities and Social Sciences Humans letter multidisciplinary Old Medline Science Science (multidisciplinary) Sex Sex Characteristics
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	607
container_issue	4044
container_start_page	606
container_title	Nature (London)
container_volume	159
creator	PICKFORD, R. W
description	IN a previous communication1, it was shown that women with known colour-blind relatives were significantly more often red-green weak to a slight extent than women taken at random. This carried the implication that red-green blindness must be an incompletely recessive Mendelian character (although sex-linked), because a large proportion of the women with known colour-blind relatives must be heterozygous for that defect. Several later experiments have confirmed that conclusion, essentially the same results .being obtained with each new group tested.
doi_str_mv	10.1038/159606b0
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733815484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733815484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-69adcf0d35f43b0e73d7934fe9cc5a5b9215550526081f7ea5e5e6f946979ddf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1Lw0AQBuBFFFur4C-Q3NRDdDb7fZT6CQUPflyXZDMrKemm7jZQ_72RtnrzNId5eId3CDmlcEWB6WsqjARZwR4ZU65kzqVW-2QMUOgcNJMjcpTSHAAEVfyQjApgvCiEGpPsBdfZbeM9RgwOU9aEbNq1XR-z9yY1XTgmB75sE55s54S83d-9Th_z2fPD0_RmljvGzCqXpqydh5oJz1kFqFitDOMejXOiFJUpqBACRCFBU6-wFChQesOlUaauPZuQ803uMnafPaaVXTTJYduWAbs-WcWYpoJrPsiLjXSxSymit8vYLMr4ZSnYn3fY3TsGerYN7asF1r9w138AlxuQhlX4wGjnQ_UwFP0nLJSrPuLf1R34BiyHbuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733815484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex Differences in Colour Vision</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>PICKFORD, R. W</creator><creatorcontrib>PICKFORD, R. W</creatorcontrib><description>IN a previous communication1, it was shown that women with known colour-blind relatives were significantly more often red-green weak to a slight extent than women taken at random. This carried the implication that red-green blindness must be an incompletely recessive Mendelian character (although sex-linked), because a large proportion of the women with known colour-blind relatives must be heterozygous for that defect. Several later experiments have confirmed that conclusion, essentially the same results .being obtained with each new group tested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/159606b0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20342257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Color Perception ; Color Vision ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; letter ; multidisciplinary ; Old Medline ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Sex ; Sex Characteristics</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 1947-05, Vol.159 (4044), p.606-607</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 1947</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-69adcf0d35f43b0e73d7934fe9cc5a5b9215550526081f7ea5e5e6f946979ddf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-69adcf0d35f43b0e73d7934fe9cc5a5b9215550526081f7ea5e5e6f946979ddf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2727,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20342257$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PICKFORD, R. W</creatorcontrib><title>Sex Differences in Colour Vision</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>IN a previous communication1, it was shown that women with known colour-blind relatives were significantly more often red-green weak to a slight extent than women taken at random. This carried the implication that red-green blindness must be an incompletely recessive Mendelian character (although sex-linked), because a large proportion of the women with known colour-blind relatives must be heterozygous for that defect. Several later experiments have confirmed that conclusion, essentially the same results .being obtained with each new group tested.</description><subject>Color Perception</subject><subject>Color Vision</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Old Medline</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1947</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1Lw0AQBuBFFFur4C-Q3NRDdDb7fZT6CQUPflyXZDMrKemm7jZQ_72RtnrzNId5eId3CDmlcEWB6WsqjARZwR4ZU65kzqVW-2QMUOgcNJMjcpTSHAAEVfyQjApgvCiEGpPsBdfZbeM9RgwOU9aEbNq1XR-z9yY1XTgmB75sE55s54S83d-9Th_z2fPD0_RmljvGzCqXpqydh5oJz1kFqFitDOMejXOiFJUpqBACRCFBU6-wFChQesOlUaauPZuQ803uMnafPaaVXTTJYduWAbs-WcWYpoJrPsiLjXSxSymit8vYLMr4ZSnYn3fY3TsGerYN7asF1r9w138AlxuQhlX4wGjnQ_UwFP0nLJSrPuLf1R34BiyHbuw</recordid><startdate>19470503</startdate><enddate>19470503</enddate><creator>PICKFORD, R. W</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19470503</creationdate><title>Sex Differences in Colour Vision</title><author>PICKFORD, R. W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-69adcf0d35f43b0e73d7934fe9cc5a5b9215550526081f7ea5e5e6f946979ddf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1947</creationdate><topic>Color Perception</topic><topic>Color Vision</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Old Medline</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PICKFORD, R. W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PICKFORD, R. W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex Differences in Colour Vision</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>1947-05-03</date><risdate>1947</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>4044</issue><spage>606</spage><epage>607</epage><pages>606-607</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><abstract>IN a previous communication1, it was shown that women with known colour-blind relatives were significantly more often red-green weak to a slight extent than women taken at random. This carried the implication that red-green blindness must be an incompletely recessive Mendelian character (although sex-linked), because a large proportion of the women with known colour-blind relatives must be heterozygous for that defect. Several later experiments have confirmed that conclusion, essentially the same results .being obtained with each new group tested.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>20342257</pmid><doi>10.1038/159606b0</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0028-0836
ispartof	Nature (London), 1947-05, Vol.159 (4044), p.606-607
issn	0028-0836 1476-4687
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733815484
source	MEDLINE; Nature; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects	Color Perception Color Vision Humanities and Social Sciences Humans letter multidisciplinary Old Medline Science Science (multidisciplinary) Sex Sex Characteristics
title	Sex Differences in Colour Vision
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A13%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20Differences%20in%20Colour%20Vision&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=PICKFORD,%20R.%20W&rft.date=1947-05-03&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=4044&rft.spage=606&rft.epage=607&rft.pages=606-607&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/159606b0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733815484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733815484&rft_id=info:pmid/20342257&rfr_iscdi=true