Biological control of pathogens causing root rot complex in field pea using Clonostachys rosea strain ACM941

ABSTRACT Pea root rot complex (PRRC), caused by Alternaria alternata, Aphanomyces euteiches, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi, F. solani f. sp. pisi, Mycosphaerella pinodes, Pythium spp., Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is a major yield-limiting factor for field pea production in Can...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Phytopathology 2003-03, Vol.93 (3), p.329-335
1. Verfasser: Xue, A.G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 335
container_issue 3
container_start_page 329
container_title Phytopathology
container_volume 93
creator Xue, A.G
description ABSTRACT Pea root rot complex (PRRC), caused by Alternaria alternata, Aphanomyces euteiches, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi, F. solani f. sp. pisi, Mycosphaerella pinodes, Pythium spp., Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is a major yield-limiting factor for field pea production in Canada. A strain of Clonostachys rosea (syn. Gliocladium roseum), ACM941 (ATCC 74447), was identified as a mycoparasite against these pathogens. When grown near the pathogen, ACM941 often was stimulated to produce lateral branches that grew directly toward the pathogen mycelium, typically entwining around the pathogen mycelium. When applied to the seed, ACM941 propagated in the rhizosphere and colonized the seed coat, hypocotyl, and roots as the plant developed and grew. ACM941 significantly reduced the recovery of all fungal pathogens from infected seed, increased in vitro seed germination by 44% and seedling emergence by 22%, and reduced root rot severity by 76%. The effects were similar to those of thiram fungicide, which increased germination and emergence by 33 and 29%, respectively, and reduced root rot severity by 65%. When soil was inoculated with selected PRRC pathogens in a controlled environment, seed treatment with ACM941 significantly increased emergence by 26, 38, 28, 13, and 21% for F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi, F. solani f. sp. pisi, M. pinodes, R. solani, and S. sclerotiorum, respectively. Under field conditions from 1995 to 1997, ACM941 increased emergence by 17, 23, 22, 13, and 18% and yield by 15, 6, 28, 6, and 19% for the five respective pathogens. The seed treatment effects of ACM941 on these PRRC pathogens were greater or statistically equivalent to those achieved with thiram. Results of this study suggest that ACM941 is an effective bioagent in controlling PRRC and is an alternative to existing chemical products.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.3.329
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733747876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733747876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-d2bc921f704770983a5501b5d3380fc5285de85e05f28869c2763aa9b97d3f303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90VFrHCEQB3ApLc3l2k9QaPel7dNeRkdPfUyPpimkJNAE2ifxXL1s8daN7kHy7WtyB3kLgj7MbwbGPyEfKCwoaH5ydf73-nLBAHChcVEP06_IjGqOrVwq_prMaom2mus_R-S4lH8AIJVYviVHVGnOkeOMxG99imnTOxsbl4Ypp9ik0Ix2uk0bP5TG2V3ph02TU5rqNVW1HaO_b_qhCb2PXTN62-zNKqYhlcm624dSbamFMmVb5enql-b0HXkTbCz-_eGdk5uz79er8_bi8sfP1elF67hiU9uxtdOMBglcStAKrRBA16JDVBCcYEp0XgkPIjClltoxuURr9VrLDgMCzsnX_dwxp7udL5PZ9sX5GO3g064YiSi5VLVrTr68KKmSDKQUFeIeurpXyT6YMfdbmx8MBfMYh3mKwzzGYTSaepiuXR8P43frre-eew7_X8HnA7ClRhCyHVxfnh0XGvTTRp_2Lthk7CZXc_ObAUWgwLRSEv8DG9ucCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18720775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biological control of pathogens causing root rot complex in field pea using Clonostachys rosea strain ACM941</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>Xue, A.G</creator><creatorcontrib>Xue, A.G</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Pea root rot complex (PRRC), caused by Alternaria alternata, Aphanomyces euteiches, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi, F. solani f. sp. pisi, Mycosphaerella pinodes, Pythium spp., Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is a major yield-limiting factor for field pea production in Canada. A strain of Clonostachys rosea (syn. Gliocladium roseum), ACM941 (ATCC 74447), was identified as a mycoparasite against these pathogens. When grown near the pathogen, ACM941 often was stimulated to produce lateral branches that grew directly toward the pathogen mycelium, typically entwining around the pathogen mycelium. When applied to the seed, ACM941 propagated in the rhizosphere and colonized the seed coat, hypocotyl, and roots as the plant developed and grew. ACM941 significantly reduced the recovery of all fungal pathogens from infected seed, increased in vitro seed germination by 44% and seedling emergence by 22%, and reduced root rot severity by 76%. The effects were similar to those of thiram fungicide, which increased germination and emergence by 33 and 29%, respectively, and reduced root rot severity by 65%. When soil was inoculated with selected PRRC pathogens in a controlled environment, seed treatment with ACM941 significantly increased emergence by 26, 38, 28, 13, and 21% for F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi, F. solani f. sp. pisi, M. pinodes, R. solani, and S. sclerotiorum, respectively. Under field conditions from 1995 to 1997, ACM941 increased emergence by 17, 23, 22, 13, and 18% and yield by 15, 6, 28, 6, and 19% for the five respective pathogens. The seed treatment effects of ACM941 on these PRRC pathogens were greater or statistically equivalent to those achieved with thiram. Results of this study suggest that ACM941 is an effective bioagent in controlling PRRC and is an alternative to existing chemical products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-949X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7684</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.3.329</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18944343</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHYTAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Alternaria alternata ; Aphanomyces euteiches ; bioagents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological control ; Clonostachys rosea f. rosea ; Control ; developmental stages ; disease control ; Economic plant physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fungal plant pathogens ; fungicides ; Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi ; Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi ; mycoparasites ; Mycosphaerella pinodes ; pathogenesis ; pathogenicity ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Pisum sativum ; plant anatomy ; plant pathogenic fungi ; Pythium ; Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ; seed treatment ; Symbiosis (nodules, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, mycorrhiza...) ; symptoms ; Thanatephorus cucumeris</subject><ispartof>Phytopathology, 2003-03, Vol.93 (3), p.329-335</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-d2bc921f704770983a5501b5d3380fc5285de85e05f28869c2763aa9b97d3f303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-d2bc921f704770983a5501b5d3380fc5285de85e05f28869c2763aa9b97d3f303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3711,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14590930$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18944343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xue, A.G</creatorcontrib><title>Biological control of pathogens causing root rot complex in field pea using Clonostachys rosea strain ACM941</title><title>Phytopathology</title><addtitle>Phytopathology</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Pea root rot complex (PRRC), caused by Alternaria alternata, Aphanomyces euteiches, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi, F. solani f. sp. pisi, Mycosphaerella pinodes, Pythium spp., Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is a major yield-limiting factor for field pea production in Canada. A strain of Clonostachys rosea (syn. Gliocladium roseum), ACM941 (ATCC 74447), was identified as a mycoparasite against these pathogens. When grown near the pathogen, ACM941 often was stimulated to produce lateral branches that grew directly toward the pathogen mycelium, typically entwining around the pathogen mycelium. When applied to the seed, ACM941 propagated in the rhizosphere and colonized the seed coat, hypocotyl, and roots as the plant developed and grew. ACM941 significantly reduced the recovery of all fungal pathogens from infected seed, increased in vitro seed germination by 44% and seedling emergence by 22%, and reduced root rot severity by 76%. The effects were similar to those of thiram fungicide, which increased germination and emergence by 33 and 29%, respectively, and reduced root rot severity by 65%. When soil was inoculated with selected PRRC pathogens in a controlled environment, seed treatment with ACM941 significantly increased emergence by 26, 38, 28, 13, and 21% for F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi, F. solani f. sp. pisi, M. pinodes, R. solani, and S. sclerotiorum, respectively. Under field conditions from 1995 to 1997, ACM941 increased emergence by 17, 23, 22, 13, and 18% and yield by 15, 6, 28, 6, and 19% for the five respective pathogens. The seed treatment effects of ACM941 on these PRRC pathogens were greater or statistically equivalent to those achieved with thiram. Results of this study suggest that ACM941 is an effective bioagent in controlling PRRC and is an alternative to existing chemical products.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Alternaria alternata</subject><subject>Aphanomyces euteiches</subject><subject>bioagents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Clonostachys rosea f. rosea</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>developmental stages</subject><subject>disease control</subject><subject>Economic plant physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fungal plant pathogens</subject><subject>fungicides</subject><subject>Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi</subject><subject>Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi</subject><subject>mycoparasites</subject><subject>Mycosphaerella pinodes</subject><subject>pathogenesis</subject><subject>pathogenicity</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Pisum sativum</subject><subject>plant anatomy</subject><subject>plant pathogenic fungi</subject><subject>Pythium</subject><subject>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</subject><subject>seed treatment</subject><subject>Symbiosis (nodules, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, mycorrhiza...)</subject><subject>symptoms</subject><subject>Thanatephorus cucumeris</subject><issn>0031-949X</issn><issn>1943-7684</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90VFrHCEQB3ApLc3l2k9QaPel7dNeRkdPfUyPpimkJNAE2ifxXL1s8daN7kHy7WtyB3kLgj7MbwbGPyEfKCwoaH5ydf73-nLBAHChcVEP06_IjGqOrVwq_prMaom2mus_R-S4lH8AIJVYviVHVGnOkeOMxG99imnTOxsbl4Ypp9ik0Ix2uk0bP5TG2V3ph02TU5rqNVW1HaO_b_qhCb2PXTN62-zNKqYhlcm624dSbamFMmVb5enql-b0HXkTbCz-_eGdk5uz79er8_bi8sfP1elF67hiU9uxtdOMBglcStAKrRBA16JDVBCcYEp0XgkPIjClltoxuURr9VrLDgMCzsnX_dwxp7udL5PZ9sX5GO3g064YiSi5VLVrTr68KKmSDKQUFeIeurpXyT6YMfdbmx8MBfMYh3mKwzzGYTSaepiuXR8P43frre-eew7_X8HnA7ClRhCyHVxfnh0XGvTTRp_2Lthk7CZXc_ObAUWgwLRSEv8DG9ucCA</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>Xue, A.G</creator><general>American Phytopathological Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Biological control of pathogens causing root rot complex in field pea using Clonostachys rosea strain ACM941</title><author>Xue, A.G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-d2bc921f704770983a5501b5d3380fc5285de85e05f28869c2763aa9b97d3f303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Alternaria alternata</topic><topic>Aphanomyces euteiches</topic><topic>bioagents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Clonostachys rosea f. rosea</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>developmental stages</topic><topic>disease control</topic><topic>Economic plant physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fungal plant pathogens</topic><topic>fungicides</topic><topic>Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi</topic><topic>Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi</topic><topic>mycoparasites</topic><topic>Mycosphaerella pinodes</topic><topic>pathogenesis</topic><topic>pathogenicity</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Pisum sativum</topic><topic>plant anatomy</topic><topic>plant pathogenic fungi</topic><topic>Pythium</topic><topic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</topic><topic>seed treatment</topic><topic>Symbiosis (nodules, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, mycorrhiza...)</topic><topic>symptoms</topic><topic>Thanatephorus cucumeris</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xue, A.G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xue, A.G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biological control of pathogens causing root rot complex in field pea using Clonostachys rosea strain ACM941</atitle><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Phytopathology</addtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>329-335</pages><issn>0031-949X</issn><eissn>1943-7684</eissn><coden>PHYTAJ</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Pea root rot complex (PRRC), caused by Alternaria alternata, Aphanomyces euteiches, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi, F. solani f. sp. pisi, Mycosphaerella pinodes, Pythium spp., Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is a major yield-limiting factor for field pea production in Canada. A strain of Clonostachys rosea (syn. Gliocladium roseum), ACM941 (ATCC 74447), was identified as a mycoparasite against these pathogens. When grown near the pathogen, ACM941 often was stimulated to produce lateral branches that grew directly toward the pathogen mycelium, typically entwining around the pathogen mycelium. When applied to the seed, ACM941 propagated in the rhizosphere and colonized the seed coat, hypocotyl, and roots as the plant developed and grew. ACM941 significantly reduced the recovery of all fungal pathogens from infected seed, increased in vitro seed germination by 44% and seedling emergence by 22%, and reduced root rot severity by 76%. The effects were similar to those of thiram fungicide, which increased germination and emergence by 33 and 29%, respectively, and reduced root rot severity by 65%. When soil was inoculated with selected PRRC pathogens in a controlled environment, seed treatment with ACM941 significantly increased emergence by 26, 38, 28, 13, and 21% for F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi, F. solani f. sp. pisi, M. pinodes, R. solani, and S. sclerotiorum, respectively. Under field conditions from 1995 to 1997, ACM941 increased emergence by 17, 23, 22, 13, and 18% and yield by 15, 6, 28, 6, and 19% for the five respective pathogens. The seed treatment effects of ACM941 on these PRRC pathogens were greater or statistically equivalent to those achieved with thiram. Results of this study suggest that ACM941 is an effective bioagent in controlling PRRC and is an alternative to existing chemical products.</abstract><cop>St. Paul, MN</cop><pub>American Phytopathological Society</pub><pmid>18944343</pmid><doi>10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.3.329</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-949X
ispartof Phytopathology, 2003-03, Vol.93 (3), p.329-335
issn 0031-949X
1943-7684
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733747876
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Alternaria alternata
Aphanomyces euteiches
bioagents
Biological and medical sciences
Biological control
Clonostachys rosea f. rosea
Control
developmental stages
disease control
Economic plant physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fungal plant pathogens
fungicides
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi
Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi
mycoparasites
Mycosphaerella pinodes
pathogenesis
pathogenicity
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Pisum sativum
plant anatomy
plant pathogenic fungi
Pythium
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
seed treatment
Symbiosis (nodules, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, mycorrhiza...)
symptoms
Thanatephorus cucumeris
title Biological control of pathogens causing root rot complex in field pea using Clonostachys rosea strain ACM941
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T17%3A51%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biological%20control%20of%20pathogens%20causing%20root%20rot%20complex%20in%20field%20pea%20using%20Clonostachys%20rosea%20strain%20ACM941&rft.jtitle=Phytopathology&rft.au=Xue,%20A.G&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=329-335&rft.issn=0031-949X&rft.eissn=1943-7684&rft.coden=PHYTAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.3.329&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733747876%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18720775&rft_id=info:pmid/18944343&rfr_iscdi=true