Mechanism of Action and Efficacy of Seed Meal-Induced Pathogen Suppression Differ in a Brassicaceae Species and Time-Dependent Manner

The effect of seed meals derived from Brassica juncea, B. napus, or Sinapis alba on suppression of soilborne pathogens inciting replant disease of apple was evaluated in greenhouse trials. Regardless of plant source, seed meal amendment significantly improved apple growth in all orchard soils; howev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Phytopathology 2007-04, Vol.97 (4), p.454-460
Hauptverfasser: Mazzola, M, Brown, J, Izzo, A.D, Cohen, M.F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 460
container_issue 4
container_start_page 454
container_title Phytopathology
container_volume 97
creator Mazzola, M
Brown, J
Izzo, A.D
Cohen, M.F
description The effect of seed meals derived from Brassica juncea, B. napus, or Sinapis alba on suppression of soilborne pathogens inciting replant disease of apple was evaluated in greenhouse trials. Regardless of plant source, seed meal amendment significantly improved apple growth in all orchard soils; however, relative differences in pathogen suppression were observed. All seed meals suppressed root infection by native Rhizoctonia spp. and an introduced isolate of Rhizoctonia solani AG-5, though B. juncea seed meal often generated a lower level of disease control relative to other seed meal types. When introduction of the pathogen was delayed until 4 to 8 weeks post seed meal amendment, disease suppression was associated with proliferation of resident Streptomyces spp. and not qualitative or quantitative attributes of seed meal glucosinolate content. Using the same experimental system, when soils were pasteurized prior to pathogen infestation, control of R. solani was eliminated regardless of seed meal type. In the case of B. juncea seed meal amendment, the mechanism of R. solani suppression varied in a temporal manner, which initially was associated with the generation of allylisothiocyanate and was not affected by soil pasteurization. Among those tested, only B. juncea seed meal did not stimulate orchard soil populations of Pythium spp. and infection of apple roots by these oomycetes. Although application of B. napus seed meal alone consistently induced an increase in Pythium spp. populations, no significant increase in Pythium spp. populations was observed in response to a composite B. juncea and B. napus seed meal amendment. Suppression of soil populations and root infestation by Pratylenchus spp. was dependent upon seed meal type, with only B. juncea providing sustained nematode control. Collectively, these studies suggest that use of a composite B. juncea and B. napus seed meal mixture can provide superior control of the pathogen complex inciting apple replant disease relative to either seed meal used alone.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/PHYTO-97-4-0454
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733747060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19640834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57e462c7e606fb8df097943f1a7859cbbd5a878088bb577a9717888c691869c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c1u1DAUBWALgehQWLMDb4CVqZ04_lmWttBKHbXSTCVYWY5z3RolTrCTRR-A98bTGQlWrCxb3z3S9UHoLaOfGdX85Pbyx_aGaEk4obzhz9CKaV4TKRR_jlaU1oxorr8foVc5_6SUStWIl-iIqaIqJVbo9xrcg40hD3j0-NTNYYzYxg5feB-cdY-75w1Ah9dge3IVu8WVy62dH8Z7iHizTFOCnHdj58F7SDiUAPwl2fJYAsAC3kzgAuSn3G0YgJzDBLGDOOO1jRHSa_TC2z7Dm8N5jO6-XmzPLsn1zbers9Nr4nhVzaSRwEXlJAgqfKs6T7Usi3hmy17atW3XWCUVVaptGymtlkwqpZzQTAntWH2MPu1zpzT-WiDPZgjZQd_bCOOSjaxrySUVtMiP_5VMC05VzQs82UOXxpwTeDOlMNj0aBg1u47MU0dGS8PNrqMy8e4QvbQDdH_9oZQCPhyAzc72PtnoQv7Hiaa4urj3e-ftaOx9KuZuU1FWU6qoLL9Q_wGFCaKW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19640834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanism of Action and Efficacy of Seed Meal-Induced Pathogen Suppression Differ in a Brassicaceae Species and Time-Dependent Manner</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>Mazzola, M ; Brown, J ; Izzo, A.D ; Cohen, M.F</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazzola, M ; Brown, J ; Izzo, A.D ; Cohen, M.F</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of seed meals derived from Brassica juncea, B. napus, or Sinapis alba on suppression of soilborne pathogens inciting replant disease of apple was evaluated in greenhouse trials. Regardless of plant source, seed meal amendment significantly improved apple growth in all orchard soils; however, relative differences in pathogen suppression were observed. All seed meals suppressed root infection by native Rhizoctonia spp. and an introduced isolate of Rhizoctonia solani AG-5, though B. juncea seed meal often generated a lower level of disease control relative to other seed meal types. When introduction of the pathogen was delayed until 4 to 8 weeks post seed meal amendment, disease suppression was associated with proliferation of resident Streptomyces spp. and not qualitative or quantitative attributes of seed meal glucosinolate content. Using the same experimental system, when soils were pasteurized prior to pathogen infestation, control of R. solani was eliminated regardless of seed meal type. In the case of B. juncea seed meal amendment, the mechanism of R. solani suppression varied in a temporal manner, which initially was associated with the generation of allylisothiocyanate and was not affected by soil pasteurization. Among those tested, only B. juncea seed meal did not stimulate orchard soil populations of Pythium spp. and infection of apple roots by these oomycetes. Although application of B. napus seed meal alone consistently induced an increase in Pythium spp. populations, no significant increase in Pythium spp. populations was observed in response to a composite B. juncea and B. napus seed meal amendment. Suppression of soil populations and root infestation by Pratylenchus spp. was dependent upon seed meal type, with only B. juncea providing sustained nematode control. Collectively, these studies suggest that use of a composite B. juncea and B. napus seed meal mixture can provide superior control of the pathogen complex inciting apple replant disease relative to either seed meal used alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-949X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7684</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-4-0454</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18943286</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHYTAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society</publisher><subject>antifungal properties ; apples ; Bacterial plant pathogens ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brassica juncea ; Brassica napus ; Brassicaceae ; chemical constituents of plants ; disease control ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; fungal diseases of plants ; Fungal plant pathogens ; glucosinolates ; Malus ; Malus domestica ; meals (products) ; Nematoda ; nematode control ; Oomycetes ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; plant parasitic nematodes ; plant pathogenic fungi ; Pratylenchus ; Pythium ; Rhizoctonia ; Rhizoctonia solani ; seeds ; Sinapis alba ; soil amendments ; soil-borne diseases ; Streptomyces ; Thanatephorus cucumeris</subject><ispartof>Phytopathology, 2007-04, Vol.97 (4), p.454-460</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57e462c7e606fb8df097943f1a7859cbbd5a878088bb577a9717888c691869c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57e462c7e606fb8df097943f1a7859cbbd5a878088bb577a9717888c691869c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3724,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18653283$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18943286$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazzola, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izzo, A.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, M.F</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanism of Action and Efficacy of Seed Meal-Induced Pathogen Suppression Differ in a Brassicaceae Species and Time-Dependent Manner</title><title>Phytopathology</title><addtitle>Phytopathology</addtitle><description>The effect of seed meals derived from Brassica juncea, B. napus, or Sinapis alba on suppression of soilborne pathogens inciting replant disease of apple was evaluated in greenhouse trials. Regardless of plant source, seed meal amendment significantly improved apple growth in all orchard soils; however, relative differences in pathogen suppression were observed. All seed meals suppressed root infection by native Rhizoctonia spp. and an introduced isolate of Rhizoctonia solani AG-5, though B. juncea seed meal often generated a lower level of disease control relative to other seed meal types. When introduction of the pathogen was delayed until 4 to 8 weeks post seed meal amendment, disease suppression was associated with proliferation of resident Streptomyces spp. and not qualitative or quantitative attributes of seed meal glucosinolate content. Using the same experimental system, when soils were pasteurized prior to pathogen infestation, control of R. solani was eliminated regardless of seed meal type. In the case of B. juncea seed meal amendment, the mechanism of R. solani suppression varied in a temporal manner, which initially was associated with the generation of allylisothiocyanate and was not affected by soil pasteurization. Among those tested, only B. juncea seed meal did not stimulate orchard soil populations of Pythium spp. and infection of apple roots by these oomycetes. Although application of B. napus seed meal alone consistently induced an increase in Pythium spp. populations, no significant increase in Pythium spp. populations was observed in response to a composite B. juncea and B. napus seed meal amendment. Suppression of soil populations and root infestation by Pratylenchus spp. was dependent upon seed meal type, with only B. juncea providing sustained nematode control. Collectively, these studies suggest that use of a composite B. juncea and B. napus seed meal mixture can provide superior control of the pathogen complex inciting apple replant disease relative to either seed meal used alone.</description><subject>antifungal properties</subject><subject>apples</subject><subject>Bacterial plant pathogens</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brassica juncea</subject><subject>Brassica napus</subject><subject>Brassicaceae</subject><subject>chemical constituents of plants</subject><subject>disease control</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>fungal diseases of plants</subject><subject>Fungal plant pathogens</subject><subject>glucosinolates</subject><subject>Malus</subject><subject>Malus domestica</subject><subject>meals (products)</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>nematode control</subject><subject>Oomycetes</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>plant parasitic nematodes</subject><subject>plant pathogenic fungi</subject><subject>Pratylenchus</subject><subject>Pythium</subject><subject>Rhizoctonia</subject><subject>Rhizoctonia solani</subject><subject>seeds</subject><subject>Sinapis alba</subject><subject>soil amendments</subject><subject>soil-borne diseases</subject><subject>Streptomyces</subject><subject>Thanatephorus cucumeris</subject><issn>0031-949X</issn><issn>1943-7684</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90c1u1DAUBWALgehQWLMDb4CVqZ04_lmWttBKHbXSTCVYWY5z3RolTrCTRR-A98bTGQlWrCxb3z3S9UHoLaOfGdX85Pbyx_aGaEk4obzhz9CKaV4TKRR_jlaU1oxorr8foVc5_6SUStWIl-iIqaIqJVbo9xrcg40hD3j0-NTNYYzYxg5feB-cdY-75w1Ah9dge3IVu8WVy62dH8Z7iHizTFOCnHdj58F7SDiUAPwl2fJYAsAC3kzgAuSn3G0YgJzDBLGDOOO1jRHSa_TC2z7Dm8N5jO6-XmzPLsn1zbers9Nr4nhVzaSRwEXlJAgqfKs6T7Usi3hmy17atW3XWCUVVaptGymtlkwqpZzQTAntWH2MPu1zpzT-WiDPZgjZQd_bCOOSjaxrySUVtMiP_5VMC05VzQs82UOXxpwTeDOlMNj0aBg1u47MU0dGS8PNrqMy8e4QvbQDdH_9oZQCPhyAzc72PtnoQv7Hiaa4urj3e-ftaOx9KuZuU1FWU6qoLL9Q_wGFCaKW</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Mazzola, M</creator><creator>Brown, J</creator><creator>Izzo, A.D</creator><creator>Cohen, M.F</creator><general>American Phytopathological Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Mechanism of Action and Efficacy of Seed Meal-Induced Pathogen Suppression Differ in a Brassicaceae Species and Time-Dependent Manner</title><author>Mazzola, M ; Brown, J ; Izzo, A.D ; Cohen, M.F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-57e462c7e606fb8df097943f1a7859cbbd5a878088bb577a9717888c691869c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>antifungal properties</topic><topic>apples</topic><topic>Bacterial plant pathogens</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brassica juncea</topic><topic>Brassica napus</topic><topic>Brassicaceae</topic><topic>chemical constituents of plants</topic><topic>disease control</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>fungal diseases of plants</topic><topic>Fungal plant pathogens</topic><topic>glucosinolates</topic><topic>Malus</topic><topic>Malus domestica</topic><topic>meals (products)</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>nematode control</topic><topic>Oomycetes</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>plant parasitic nematodes</topic><topic>plant pathogenic fungi</topic><topic>Pratylenchus</topic><topic>Pythium</topic><topic>Rhizoctonia</topic><topic>Rhizoctonia solani</topic><topic>seeds</topic><topic>Sinapis alba</topic><topic>soil amendments</topic><topic>soil-borne diseases</topic><topic>Streptomyces</topic><topic>Thanatephorus cucumeris</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazzola, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izzo, A.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, M.F</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazzola, M</au><au>Brown, J</au><au>Izzo, A.D</au><au>Cohen, M.F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanism of Action and Efficacy of Seed Meal-Induced Pathogen Suppression Differ in a Brassicaceae Species and Time-Dependent Manner</atitle><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Phytopathology</addtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>454</spage><epage>460</epage><pages>454-460</pages><issn>0031-949X</issn><eissn>1943-7684</eissn><coden>PHYTAJ</coden><abstract>The effect of seed meals derived from Brassica juncea, B. napus, or Sinapis alba on suppression of soilborne pathogens inciting replant disease of apple was evaluated in greenhouse trials. Regardless of plant source, seed meal amendment significantly improved apple growth in all orchard soils; however, relative differences in pathogen suppression were observed. All seed meals suppressed root infection by native Rhizoctonia spp. and an introduced isolate of Rhizoctonia solani AG-5, though B. juncea seed meal often generated a lower level of disease control relative to other seed meal types. When introduction of the pathogen was delayed until 4 to 8 weeks post seed meal amendment, disease suppression was associated with proliferation of resident Streptomyces spp. and not qualitative or quantitative attributes of seed meal glucosinolate content. Using the same experimental system, when soils were pasteurized prior to pathogen infestation, control of R. solani was eliminated regardless of seed meal type. In the case of B. juncea seed meal amendment, the mechanism of R. solani suppression varied in a temporal manner, which initially was associated with the generation of allylisothiocyanate and was not affected by soil pasteurization. Among those tested, only B. juncea seed meal did not stimulate orchard soil populations of Pythium spp. and infection of apple roots by these oomycetes. Although application of B. napus seed meal alone consistently induced an increase in Pythium spp. populations, no significant increase in Pythium spp. populations was observed in response to a composite B. juncea and B. napus seed meal amendment. Suppression of soil populations and root infestation by Pratylenchus spp. was dependent upon seed meal type, with only B. juncea providing sustained nematode control. Collectively, these studies suggest that use of a composite B. juncea and B. napus seed meal mixture can provide superior control of the pathogen complex inciting apple replant disease relative to either seed meal used alone.</abstract><cop>St. Paul, MN</cop><pub>American Phytopathological Society</pub><pmid>18943286</pmid><doi>10.1094/PHYTO-97-4-0454</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-949X
ispartof Phytopathology, 2007-04, Vol.97 (4), p.454-460
issn 0031-949X
1943-7684
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733747060
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues
subjects antifungal properties
apples
Bacterial plant pathogens
Biological and medical sciences
Brassica juncea
Brassica napus
Brassicaceae
chemical constituents of plants
disease control
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
fungal diseases of plants
Fungal plant pathogens
glucosinolates
Malus
Malus domestica
meals (products)
Nematoda
nematode control
Oomycetes
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
plant parasitic nematodes
plant pathogenic fungi
Pratylenchus
Pythium
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia solani
seeds
Sinapis alba
soil amendments
soil-borne diseases
Streptomyces
Thanatephorus cucumeris
title Mechanism of Action and Efficacy of Seed Meal-Induced Pathogen Suppression Differ in a Brassicaceae Species and Time-Dependent Manner
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A29%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanism%20of%20Action%20and%20Efficacy%20of%20Seed%20Meal-Induced%20Pathogen%20Suppression%20Differ%20in%20a%20Brassicaceae%20Species%20and%20Time-Dependent%20Manner&rft.jtitle=Phytopathology&rft.au=Mazzola,%20M&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=454&rft.epage=460&rft.pages=454-460&rft.issn=0031-949X&rft.eissn=1943-7684&rft.coden=PHYTAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PHYTO-97-4-0454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19640834%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19640834&rft_id=info:pmid/18943286&rfr_iscdi=true