Validation of planar and tomographic radionuclide ventriculography by a dynamic ventricular phantom
Although there is increasing interest in the automatic processing of tomographic radionuclide ventriculography (TRV) studies, validation is mainly limited to a comparison of TRV results with data from planar radionuclide ventriculography (PRV) or gated perfusion single photon emission computed tomog...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear medicine communications 2003-07, Vol.24 (7), p.771-777 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 777 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 771 |
container_title | Nuclear medicine communications |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | DE BONDT, P VANDENBERGHE, S DE MEY, S SEGERS, P DE WINTER, O DE SUTTER, J VAN DE WIELE, C VERDONCK, P DIERCKX, R A |
description | Although there is increasing interest in the automatic processing of tomographic radionuclide ventriculography (TRV) studies, validation is mainly limited to a comparison of TRV results with data from planar radionuclide ventriculography (PRV) or gated perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The aim of this study was to use a dynamic physical cardiac phantom to validate the ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from PRV and TRV studies. A new dynamic left ventricular phantom was constructed and used to obtain 21 acquisitions in the planar and tomographic mode. The directly measured volumes and EFs of the phantom during the acquisitions were considered as the gold standard for comparison with TRV and PRV. EFs were calculated from PRV by background-corrected end-diastolic and end-systolic frames. Volumes and EFs were calculated from TRV by region growing with different lower thresholds to search for the optimal threshold. EF from PRV correlated significantly with the real EF (r = 0.94, P = 0.00). The optimal threshold value for volume calculation from TRV in 336 cases was 50% (r = 0.98, P = 0.00) yielding the best slope after linear regression. When considering these calculated end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, EF correlated well (r = 0.99, P = 0.00) with the real EF, and this correlation was significantly (P = 0.04) higher than that of the EF from PRV. Our experiments prove that EF measured by TRV yields more accurate results compared with PRV in dynamic cardiac phantom studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.mnm.0000080244.50447.ef |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73373807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73373807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-21b28cf14a73bc1dbdcf8a633fde2b271dfd9c109eb663b3ed316e77377167263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkFtr3DAQRkVoSLZJ_kIRhebNjqSxJW_fSmjaQCAvSV_FWJeuW_lSyW7Yf1_tha5ehGbOfIMOIR85KzlbqzvGy37oS7Y7DRNVVdasqlTp_BlZ8UpBUUvRvCMrxisoQIK8JO9T-rXDQaoLcslFw4Gv6xUxPzB0FuduHOjo6RRwwEhxsHQe-_FnxGnTGRrRZmAxGXX0rxvm2JklHNpb2m4pUrsdsM_o_26OmTY45Jhrcu4xJHdzvK_I68PXl_vvxdPzt8f7L0-FAVbLQvBWNMbzChW0htvWGt-gBPDWiVYobr1dm2zAtVJCC84Cl04pUIpLJSRckdtD7hTHP4tLs-67ZFzIf3LjkrQCUNAwlcHPB9DEMaXovJ5i12Pcas70TrFmXGfF-qRY7xVr5_Pwh-OWpe2dPY0enWbg0xHAZDD4iIPp0omrGRMAInPVgXsbw-xi-h2WNxf1xmGYN_vVUgAvBGPAVH4V-xL8A4Eil6Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73373807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of planar and tomographic radionuclide ventriculography by a dynamic ventricular phantom</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>DE BONDT, P ; VANDENBERGHE, S ; DE MEY, S ; SEGERS, P ; DE WINTER, O ; DE SUTTER, J ; VAN DE WIELE, C ; VERDONCK, P ; DIERCKX, R A</creator><creatorcontrib>DE BONDT, P ; VANDENBERGHE, S ; DE MEY, S ; SEGERS, P ; DE WINTER, O ; DE SUTTER, J ; VAN DE WIELE, C ; VERDONCK, P ; DIERCKX, R A</creatorcontrib><description>Although there is increasing interest in the automatic processing of tomographic radionuclide ventriculography (TRV) studies, validation is mainly limited to a comparison of TRV results with data from planar radionuclide ventriculography (PRV) or gated perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The aim of this study was to use a dynamic physical cardiac phantom to validate the ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from PRV and TRV studies. A new dynamic left ventricular phantom was constructed and used to obtain 21 acquisitions in the planar and tomographic mode. The directly measured volumes and EFs of the phantom during the acquisitions were considered as the gold standard for comparison with TRV and PRV. EFs were calculated from PRV by background-corrected end-diastolic and end-systolic frames. Volumes and EFs were calculated from TRV by region growing with different lower thresholds to search for the optimal threshold. EF from PRV correlated significantly with the real EF (r = 0.94, P = 0.00). The optimal threshold value for volume calculation from TRV in 336 cases was 50% (r = 0.98, P = 0.00) yielding the best slope after linear regression. When considering these calculated end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, EF correlated well (r = 0.99, P = 0.00) with the real EF, and this correlation was significantly (P = 0.04) higher than that of the EF from PRV. Our experiments prove that EF measured by TRV yields more accurate results compared with PRV in dynamic cardiac phantom studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-3636</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-5628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000080244.50447.ef</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12813195</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Aircraft ; Biological and medical sciences ; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Medical sciences ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radionuclide Ventriculography - instrumentation ; Radionuclide Ventriculography - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistics as Topic ; Stroke Volume ; Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - instrumentation ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</subject><ispartof>Nuclear medicine communications, 2003-07, Vol.24 (7), p.771-777</ispartof><rights>2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-21b28cf14a73bc1dbdcf8a633fde2b271dfd9c109eb663b3ed316e77377167263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-21b28cf14a73bc1dbdcf8a633fde2b271dfd9c109eb663b3ed316e77377167263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15002332$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12813195$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DE BONDT, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANDENBERGHE, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE MEY, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEGERS, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE WINTER, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE SUTTER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN DE WIELE, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERDONCK, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DIERCKX, R A</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of planar and tomographic radionuclide ventriculography by a dynamic ventricular phantom</title><title>Nuclear medicine communications</title><addtitle>Nucl Med Commun</addtitle><description>Although there is increasing interest in the automatic processing of tomographic radionuclide ventriculography (TRV) studies, validation is mainly limited to a comparison of TRV results with data from planar radionuclide ventriculography (PRV) or gated perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The aim of this study was to use a dynamic physical cardiac phantom to validate the ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from PRV and TRV studies. A new dynamic left ventricular phantom was constructed and used to obtain 21 acquisitions in the planar and tomographic mode. The directly measured volumes and EFs of the phantom during the acquisitions were considered as the gold standard for comparison with TRV and PRV. EFs were calculated from PRV by background-corrected end-diastolic and end-systolic frames. Volumes and EFs were calculated from TRV by region growing with different lower thresholds to search for the optimal threshold. EF from PRV correlated significantly with the real EF (r = 0.94, P = 0.00). The optimal threshold value for volume calculation from TRV in 336 cases was 50% (r = 0.98, P = 0.00) yielding the best slope after linear regression. When considering these calculated end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, EF correlated well (r = 0.99, P = 0.00) with the real EF, and this correlation was significantly (P = 0.04) higher than that of the EF from PRV. Our experiments prove that EF measured by TRV yields more accurate results compared with PRV in dynamic cardiac phantom studies.</description><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radionuclide Ventriculography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radionuclide Ventriculography - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</subject><issn>0143-3636</issn><issn>1473-5628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkFtr3DAQRkVoSLZJ_kIRhebNjqSxJW_fSmjaQCAvSV_FWJeuW_lSyW7Yf1_tha5ehGbOfIMOIR85KzlbqzvGy37oS7Y7DRNVVdasqlTp_BlZ8UpBUUvRvCMrxisoQIK8JO9T-rXDQaoLcslFw4Gv6xUxPzB0FuduHOjo6RRwwEhxsHQe-_FnxGnTGRrRZmAxGXX0rxvm2JklHNpb2m4pUrsdsM_o_26OmTY45Jhrcu4xJHdzvK_I68PXl_vvxdPzt8f7L0-FAVbLQvBWNMbzChW0htvWGt-gBPDWiVYobr1dm2zAtVJCC84Cl04pUIpLJSRckdtD7hTHP4tLs-67ZFzIf3LjkrQCUNAwlcHPB9DEMaXovJ5i12Pcas70TrFmXGfF-qRY7xVr5_Pwh-OWpe2dPY0enWbg0xHAZDD4iIPp0omrGRMAInPVgXsbw-xi-h2WNxf1xmGYN_vVUgAvBGPAVH4V-xL8A4Eil6Y</recordid><startdate>200307</startdate><enddate>200307</enddate><creator>DE BONDT, P</creator><creator>VANDENBERGHE, S</creator><creator>DE MEY, S</creator><creator>SEGERS, P</creator><creator>DE WINTER, O</creator><creator>DE SUTTER, J</creator><creator>VAN DE WIELE, C</creator><creator>VERDONCK, P</creator><creator>DIERCKX, R A</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200307</creationdate><title>Validation of planar and tomographic radionuclide ventriculography by a dynamic ventricular phantom</title><author>DE BONDT, P ; VANDENBERGHE, S ; DE MEY, S ; SEGERS, P ; DE WINTER, O ; DE SUTTER, J ; VAN DE WIELE, C ; VERDONCK, P ; DIERCKX, R A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-21b28cf14a73bc1dbdcf8a633fde2b271dfd9c109eb663b3ed316e77377167263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radionuclide Ventriculography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radionuclide Ventriculography - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DE BONDT, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANDENBERGHE, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE MEY, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEGERS, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE WINTER, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE SUTTER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN DE WIELE, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERDONCK, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DIERCKX, R A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nuclear medicine communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DE BONDT, P</au><au>VANDENBERGHE, S</au><au>DE MEY, S</au><au>SEGERS, P</au><au>DE WINTER, O</au><au>DE SUTTER, J</au><au>VAN DE WIELE, C</au><au>VERDONCK, P</au><au>DIERCKX, R A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of planar and tomographic radionuclide ventriculography by a dynamic ventricular phantom</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear medicine communications</jtitle><addtitle>Nucl Med Commun</addtitle><date>2003-07</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>777</epage><pages>771-777</pages><issn>0143-3636</issn><eissn>1473-5628</eissn><abstract>Although there is increasing interest in the automatic processing of tomographic radionuclide ventriculography (TRV) studies, validation is mainly limited to a comparison of TRV results with data from planar radionuclide ventriculography (PRV) or gated perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The aim of this study was to use a dynamic physical cardiac phantom to validate the ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from PRV and TRV studies. A new dynamic left ventricular phantom was constructed and used to obtain 21 acquisitions in the planar and tomographic mode. The directly measured volumes and EFs of the phantom during the acquisitions were considered as the gold standard for comparison with TRV and PRV. EFs were calculated from PRV by background-corrected end-diastolic and end-systolic frames. Volumes and EFs were calculated from TRV by region growing with different lower thresholds to search for the optimal threshold. EF from PRV correlated significantly with the real EF (r = 0.94, P = 0.00). The optimal threshold value for volume calculation from TRV in 336 cases was 50% (r = 0.98, P = 0.00) yielding the best slope after linear regression. When considering these calculated end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, EF correlated well (r = 0.99, P = 0.00) with the real EF, and this correlation was significantly (P = 0.04) higher than that of the EF from PRV. Our experiments prove that EF measured by TRV yields more accurate results compared with PRV in dynamic cardiac phantom studies.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>12813195</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.mnm.0000080244.50447.ef</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-3636 |
ispartof | Nuclear medicine communications, 2003-07, Vol.24 (7), p.771-777 |
issn | 0143-3636 1473-5628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73373807 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Aircraft Biological and medical sciences Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Medical sciences Phantoms, Imaging Radionuclide Ventriculography - instrumentation Radionuclide Ventriculography - methods Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Statistics as Topic Stroke Volume Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - instrumentation Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods |
title | Validation of planar and tomographic radionuclide ventriculography by a dynamic ventricular phantom |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A38%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20planar%20and%20tomographic%20radionuclide%20ventriculography%20by%20a%20dynamic%20ventricular%20phantom&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20medicine%20communications&rft.au=DE%20BONDT,%20P&rft.date=2003-07&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=777&rft.pages=771-777&rft.issn=0143-3636&rft.eissn=1473-5628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.mnm.0000080244.50447.ef&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73373807%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73373807&rft_id=info:pmid/12813195&rfr_iscdi=true |