Differential effects of bovine viral diarrhoea virus on monocytes and dendritic cells
Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire, RG20 7NN UK Correspondence Bryan Charleston bryan.charleston{at}bbsrc.ac.uk Various pathogens have been shown to infect antigen-presenting cells and affect their capacity to interact with and stimulate T-cell responses. We have used an antige...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of general virology 2003-07, Vol.84 (7), p.1771-1780 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1780 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1771 |
container_title | Journal of general virology |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Glew, E. J Carr, B. V Brackenbury, L. S Hope, J. C Charleston, B Howard, C. J |
description | Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire, RG20 7NN UK
Correspondence Bryan Charleston bryan.charleston{at}bbsrc.ac.uk
Various pathogens have been shown to infect antigen-presenting cells and affect their capacity to interact with and stimulate T-cell responses. We have used an antigenically identical pair of non-cytopathic (ncp) and cytopathic (cp) bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) isolates to determine how the two biotypes affect monocyte and dendritic cell (DC) function. We have shown that monocytes and DCs are both susceptible to infection with ncp BVDV and cp BVDV in vitro . In addition, monocytes infected with ncp BVDV were compromised in their ability to stimulate allogeneic and memory CD4 + T cell responses, but DCs were not affected. This was not due to down-regulation of a number of recognized co-stimulatory molecules including CD80, CD86 and CD40. Striking differences in the response of the two cell types to infection with cytopathic virus were seen. Dendritic cells were not susceptible to the cytopathic effect caused by cp BVDV, whereas monocytes were killed. Analysis of interferon (IFN)- / production showed similar levels in monocytes and DCs exposed to cp BVDV, but none was detected in cells exposed to ncp BVDV. We conclude that the prevention of cell death in DCs is not associated with enhanced production of IFN- / , as proposed for influenza virus, but is by a distinct mechanism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1099/vir.0.18964-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73372115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73372115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-660800fe9ccf86094f92c0bba6ad642c8e189b3fda86c8f66d1227b0947a28643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PwyAYh4nRuDk9ejU9GS-dQFs-jsbvZIkXdyaUvmyYtkzoZvbfS7MlHj3xg_fJA_wQuiZ4TrCU9zsX5ikKycocn6ApKVmV0zQ5RVOMKc1JQfgEXcT4hTEpy4qfowmhgmDByRQtn5y1EKAfnG4zSNkMMfM2q_3O9ZAlfTpvnA5h7UGP-22a91nne2_2A8RM903WQN8ENziTGWjbeInOrG4jXB3XGVq-PH8-vuWLj9f3x4dFbgpJh5wxLDC2II2xgmFZWkkNrmvNdMNKagSkf9WFbbRgRljGGkIprxPINRWsLGbo9uDdBP-9hTiozsXxBboHv42KFwWnhFT_goTLAhcVT2B-AE3wMQawahNcp8NeEazGwlVqQKU4Fq5w4m-O4m3dQfNHHxtOwN0BWLvV-scFUCvoO5f0tfOjTJSKp_sT-gtf0Yqj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17930357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential effects of bovine viral diarrhoea virus on monocytes and dendritic cells</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Microbiology Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Glew, E. J ; Carr, B. V ; Brackenbury, L. S ; Hope, J. C ; Charleston, B ; Howard, C. J</creator><creatorcontrib>Glew, E. J ; Carr, B. V ; Brackenbury, L. S ; Hope, J. C ; Charleston, B ; Howard, C. J</creatorcontrib><description>Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire, RG20 7NN UK
Correspondence Bryan Charleston bryan.charleston{at}bbsrc.ac.uk
Various pathogens have been shown to infect antigen-presenting cells and affect their capacity to interact with and stimulate T-cell responses. We have used an antigenically identical pair of non-cytopathic (ncp) and cytopathic (cp) bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) isolates to determine how the two biotypes affect monocyte and dendritic cell (DC) function. We have shown that monocytes and DCs are both susceptible to infection with ncp BVDV and cp BVDV in vitro . In addition, monocytes infected with ncp BVDV were compromised in their ability to stimulate allogeneic and memory CD4 + T cell responses, but DCs were not affected. This was not due to down-regulation of a number of recognized co-stimulatory molecules including CD80, CD86 and CD40. Striking differences in the response of the two cell types to infection with cytopathic virus were seen. Dendritic cells were not susceptible to the cytopathic effect caused by cp BVDV, whereas monocytes were killed. Analysis of interferon (IFN)- / production showed similar levels in monocytes and DCs exposed to cp BVDV, but none was detected in cells exposed to ncp BVDV. We conclude that the prevention of cell death in DCs is not associated with enhanced production of IFN- / , as proposed for influenza virus, but is by a distinct mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-2099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.18964-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12810871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Soc General Microbiol</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antigen-Presenting Cells - immunology ; Antigen-Presenting Cells - virology ; Apoptosis ; Bovine diarrhea virus ; Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease - virology ; Cattle ; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology ; Dendritic Cells - immunology ; Dendritic Cells - virology ; Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral - classification ; Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral - pathogenicity ; Influenza virus ; Lymphocyte Activation ; Monocytes - immunology ; Monocytes - virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of general virology, 2003-07, Vol.84 (7), p.1771-1780</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-660800fe9ccf86094f92c0bba6ad642c8e189b3fda86c8f66d1227b0947a28643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-660800fe9ccf86094f92c0bba6ad642c8e189b3fda86c8f66d1227b0947a28643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3750,3751,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12810871$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glew, E. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, B. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brackenbury, L. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hope, J. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charleston, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, C. J</creatorcontrib><title>Differential effects of bovine viral diarrhoea virus on monocytes and dendritic cells</title><title>Journal of general virology</title><addtitle>J Gen Virol</addtitle><description>Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire, RG20 7NN UK
Correspondence Bryan Charleston bryan.charleston{at}bbsrc.ac.uk
Various pathogens have been shown to infect antigen-presenting cells and affect their capacity to interact with and stimulate T-cell responses. We have used an antigenically identical pair of non-cytopathic (ncp) and cytopathic (cp) bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) isolates to determine how the two biotypes affect monocyte and dendritic cell (DC) function. We have shown that monocytes and DCs are both susceptible to infection with ncp BVDV and cp BVDV in vitro . In addition, monocytes infected with ncp BVDV were compromised in their ability to stimulate allogeneic and memory CD4 + T cell responses, but DCs were not affected. This was not due to down-regulation of a number of recognized co-stimulatory molecules including CD80, CD86 and CD40. Striking differences in the response of the two cell types to infection with cytopathic virus were seen. Dendritic cells were not susceptible to the cytopathic effect caused by cp BVDV, whereas monocytes were killed. Analysis of interferon (IFN)- / production showed similar levels in monocytes and DCs exposed to cp BVDV, but none was detected in cells exposed to ncp BVDV. We conclude that the prevention of cell death in DCs is not associated with enhanced production of IFN- / , as proposed for influenza virus, but is by a distinct mechanism.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antigen-Presenting Cells - immunology</subject><subject>Antigen-Presenting Cells - virology</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Bovine diarrhea virus</subject><subject>Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease - virology</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>Dendritic Cells - immunology</subject><subject>Dendritic Cells - virology</subject><subject>Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral - classification</subject><subject>Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Influenza virus</subject><subject>Lymphocyte Activation</subject><subject>Monocytes - immunology</subject><subject>Monocytes - virology</subject><issn>0022-1317</issn><issn>1465-2099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1PwyAYh4nRuDk9ejU9GS-dQFs-jsbvZIkXdyaUvmyYtkzoZvbfS7MlHj3xg_fJA_wQuiZ4TrCU9zsX5ikKycocn6ApKVmV0zQ5RVOMKc1JQfgEXcT4hTEpy4qfowmhgmDByRQtn5y1EKAfnG4zSNkMMfM2q_3O9ZAlfTpvnA5h7UGP-22a91nne2_2A8RM903WQN8ENziTGWjbeInOrG4jXB3XGVq-PH8-vuWLj9f3x4dFbgpJh5wxLDC2II2xgmFZWkkNrmvNdMNKagSkf9WFbbRgRljGGkIprxPINRWsLGbo9uDdBP-9hTiozsXxBboHv42KFwWnhFT_goTLAhcVT2B-AE3wMQawahNcp8NeEazGwlVqQKU4Fq5w4m-O4m3dQfNHHxtOwN0BWLvV-scFUCvoO5f0tfOjTJSKp_sT-gtf0Yqj</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Glew, E. J</creator><creator>Carr, B. V</creator><creator>Brackenbury, L. S</creator><creator>Hope, J. C</creator><creator>Charleston, B</creator><creator>Howard, C. J</creator><general>Soc General Microbiol</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Differential effects of bovine viral diarrhoea virus on monocytes and dendritic cells</title><author>Glew, E. J ; Carr, B. V ; Brackenbury, L. S ; Hope, J. C ; Charleston, B ; Howard, C. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-660800fe9ccf86094f92c0bba6ad642c8e189b3fda86c8f66d1227b0947a28643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antigen-Presenting Cells - immunology</topic><topic>Antigen-Presenting Cells - virology</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Bovine diarrhea virus</topic><topic>Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease - virology</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>Dendritic Cells - immunology</topic><topic>Dendritic Cells - virology</topic><topic>Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral - classification</topic><topic>Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Influenza virus</topic><topic>Lymphocyte Activation</topic><topic>Monocytes - immunology</topic><topic>Monocytes - virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glew, E. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, B. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brackenbury, L. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hope, J. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charleston, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, C. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of general virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glew, E. J</au><au>Carr, B. V</au><au>Brackenbury, L. S</au><au>Hope, J. C</au><au>Charleston, B</au><au>Howard, C. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential effects of bovine viral diarrhoea virus on monocytes and dendritic cells</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general virology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gen Virol</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1771</spage><epage>1780</epage><pages>1771-1780</pages><issn>0022-1317</issn><eissn>1465-2099</eissn><abstract>Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire, RG20 7NN UK
Correspondence Bryan Charleston bryan.charleston{at}bbsrc.ac.uk
Various pathogens have been shown to infect antigen-presenting cells and affect their capacity to interact with and stimulate T-cell responses. We have used an antigenically identical pair of non-cytopathic (ncp) and cytopathic (cp) bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) isolates to determine how the two biotypes affect monocyte and dendritic cell (DC) function. We have shown that monocytes and DCs are both susceptible to infection with ncp BVDV and cp BVDV in vitro . In addition, monocytes infected with ncp BVDV were compromised in their ability to stimulate allogeneic and memory CD4 + T cell responses, but DCs were not affected. This was not due to down-regulation of a number of recognized co-stimulatory molecules including CD80, CD86 and CD40. Striking differences in the response of the two cell types to infection with cytopathic virus were seen. Dendritic cells were not susceptible to the cytopathic effect caused by cp BVDV, whereas monocytes were killed. Analysis of interferon (IFN)- / production showed similar levels in monocytes and DCs exposed to cp BVDV, but none was detected in cells exposed to ncp BVDV. We conclude that the prevention of cell death in DCs is not associated with enhanced production of IFN- / , as proposed for influenza virus, but is by a distinct mechanism.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Soc General Microbiol</pub><pmid>12810871</pmid><doi>10.1099/vir.0.18964-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1317 |
ispartof | Journal of general virology, 2003-07, Vol.84 (7), p.1771-1780 |
issn | 0022-1317 1465-2099 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73372115 |
source | MEDLINE; Microbiology Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Antigen-Presenting Cells - immunology Antigen-Presenting Cells - virology Apoptosis Bovine diarrhea virus Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease - virology Cattle CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology Dendritic Cells - immunology Dendritic Cells - virology Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral - classification Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral - pathogenicity Influenza virus Lymphocyte Activation Monocytes - immunology Monocytes - virology |
title | Differential effects of bovine viral diarrhoea virus on monocytes and dendritic cells |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T21%3A26%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20effects%20of%20bovine%20viral%20diarrhoea%20virus%20on%20monocytes%20and%20dendritic%20cells&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20virology&rft.au=Glew,%20E.%20J&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1771&rft.epage=1780&rft.pages=1771-1780&rft.issn=0022-1317&rft.eissn=1465-2099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1099/vir.0.18964-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73372115%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17930357&rft_id=info:pmid/12810871&rfr_iscdi=true |