The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is considered to be the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age, yet debate over appropriate diagnostic criteria and design limitations with sampling methodology have left some doubt as to the actual prevalence in the community. The obj...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2010-02, Vol.25 (2), p.544-551
Hauptverfasser: March, Wendy A., Moore, Vivienne M., Willson, Kristyn J., Phillips, David I.W., Norman, Robert J., Davies, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 551
container_issue 2
container_start_page 544
container_title Human reproduction (Oxford)
container_volume 25
creator March, Wendy A.
Moore, Vivienne M.
Willson, Kristyn J.
Phillips, David I.W.
Norman, Robert J.
Davies, Michael J.
description BACKGROUND Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is considered to be the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age, yet debate over appropriate diagnostic criteria and design limitations with sampling methodology have left some doubt as to the actual prevalence in the community. The objective of this study was to create a representative prevalence estimate of PCOS in the community under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria and the more recent Rotterdam consensus criteria and Androgen Excess Society (AES) criteria. METHODS A retrospective birth cohort study was carried out in which 728 women born during 1973–1975 in a single maternity hospital were traced and interviewed in adulthood (age = 27–34 year; n = 728). Symptoms of PCOS (hyperandrogenism, menstrual dysfunction and polycystic ovaries) were identified by examination and the presence of polycystic ovaries in those that did not consent to the ultrasound were imputed. RESULTS The estimated prevalence of PCOS in this birth cohort using the NIH criteria was 8.7 ± 2.0% (with no need for imputation). Under the Rotterdam criteria, the prevalence was 11.9 ± 2.4% which increased to 17.8 ± 2.8% when imputed data were included. Under the AES recommendations, PCOS prevalence was 10.2 ± 2.2%, and 12.0 ± 2.4% with the imputed data. Of the women with PCOS, 68–69% did not have a pre-existing diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS The Rotterdam and AES prevalence estimates were up to twice that obtained with the NIH criteria in this, as well other prevalence studies. In addition, this study also draws attention to the issue of many women with PCOS in the community remaining undiagnosed.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/humrep/dep399
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733710650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/dep399</oup_id><sourcerecordid>733710650</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-337ddb22966a4bff86826cfaa8025258da908c46377bafa315299d6a45187e4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M-P1CAUB3BiNO64evRquBi91OVHS8vRbNQ1GX8kjnHjhbyB1120hS60G-e_F-1kPZqQQODDe_Al5ClnrzjT8ux6GRNOZw4nqfU9suG1YpWQDbtPNkyoruJc8RPyKOcfjJVlpx6SE641Z1LwDZl210inhLcwYLBIY0-nOBzsIc_e0ngL6UDzIbgUR6Q-UKA2juMS_Fz2YZwGpJAzluHoEhymch7mBOV6uKLOw1WIf0vZ5GdMHh6TBz0MGZ8c51Py9e2b3flFtf307v35621l61bNlZStc3shtFJQ7_u-U51QtgfomGhE0znQrLO1km27hx4kb4TWrtiGdy3WVp6SF2vdKcWbBfNsRp8tDgMEjEs2benAmWpYkdUqbYo5J-zNlPxYPm44M38yNmvGZs24-GfHyst-RPdPH0Mt4PkRQLYw9AmC9fnOCSGZ5l1T3MvVxWX6b8_jG32e8dcdhvTTqFa2jbm4_G4-f_v44cvldme4_A0wR6Zc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733710650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>March, Wendy A. ; Moore, Vivienne M. ; Willson, Kristyn J. ; Phillips, David I.W. ; Norman, Robert J. ; Davies, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>March, Wendy A. ; Moore, Vivienne M. ; Willson, Kristyn J. ; Phillips, David I.W. ; Norman, Robert J. ; Davies, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is considered to be the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age, yet debate over appropriate diagnostic criteria and design limitations with sampling methodology have left some doubt as to the actual prevalence in the community. The objective of this study was to create a representative prevalence estimate of PCOS in the community under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria and the more recent Rotterdam consensus criteria and Androgen Excess Society (AES) criteria. METHODS A retrospective birth cohort study was carried out in which 728 women born during 1973–1975 in a single maternity hospital were traced and interviewed in adulthood (age = 27–34 year; n = 728). Symptoms of PCOS (hyperandrogenism, menstrual dysfunction and polycystic ovaries) were identified by examination and the presence of polycystic ovaries in those that did not consent to the ultrasound were imputed. RESULTS The estimated prevalence of PCOS in this birth cohort using the NIH criteria was 8.7 ± 2.0% (with no need for imputation). Under the Rotterdam criteria, the prevalence was 11.9 ± 2.4% which increased to 17.8 ± 2.8% when imputed data were included. Under the AES recommendations, PCOS prevalence was 10.2 ± 2.2%, and 12.0 ± 2.4% with the imputed data. Of the women with PCOS, 68–69% did not have a pre-existing diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS The Rotterdam and AES prevalence estimates were up to twice that obtained with the NIH criteria in this, as well other prevalence studies. In addition, this study also draws attention to the issue of many women with PCOS in the community remaining undiagnosed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep399</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19910321</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cohort Studies ; endocrine disorder ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; hirsutism ; Humans ; Hyperandrogenism - diagnosis ; Hyperandrogenism - epidemiology ; Medical sciences ; menstrual irregularity ; polycystic ovary syndrome ; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - classification ; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - diagnosis ; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Retrospective Studies ; Rotterdam criteria ; South Australia - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2010-02, Vol.25 (2), p.544-551</ispartof><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-337ddb22966a4bff86826cfaa8025258da908c46377bafa315299d6a45187e4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-337ddb22966a4bff86826cfaa8025258da908c46377bafa315299d6a45187e4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22309185$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19910321$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>March, Wendy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Vivienne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willson, Kristyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, David I.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is considered to be the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age, yet debate over appropriate diagnostic criteria and design limitations with sampling methodology have left some doubt as to the actual prevalence in the community. The objective of this study was to create a representative prevalence estimate of PCOS in the community under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria and the more recent Rotterdam consensus criteria and Androgen Excess Society (AES) criteria. METHODS A retrospective birth cohort study was carried out in which 728 women born during 1973–1975 in a single maternity hospital were traced and interviewed in adulthood (age = 27–34 year; n = 728). Symptoms of PCOS (hyperandrogenism, menstrual dysfunction and polycystic ovaries) were identified by examination and the presence of polycystic ovaries in those that did not consent to the ultrasound were imputed. RESULTS The estimated prevalence of PCOS in this birth cohort using the NIH criteria was 8.7 ± 2.0% (with no need for imputation). Under the Rotterdam criteria, the prevalence was 11.9 ± 2.4% which increased to 17.8 ± 2.8% when imputed data were included. Under the AES recommendations, PCOS prevalence was 10.2 ± 2.2%, and 12.0 ± 2.4% with the imputed data. Of the women with PCOS, 68–69% did not have a pre-existing diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS The Rotterdam and AES prevalence estimates were up to twice that obtained with the NIH criteria in this, as well other prevalence studies. In addition, this study also draws attention to the issue of many women with PCOS in the community remaining undiagnosed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>endocrine disorder</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>hirsutism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperandrogenism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hyperandrogenism - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>menstrual irregularity</subject><subject>polycystic ovary syndrome</subject><subject>Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - classification</subject><subject>Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rotterdam criteria</subject><subject>South Australia - epidemiology</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M-P1CAUB3BiNO64evRquBi91OVHS8vRbNQ1GX8kjnHjhbyB1120hS60G-e_F-1kPZqQQODDe_Al5ClnrzjT8ux6GRNOZw4nqfU9suG1YpWQDbtPNkyoruJc8RPyKOcfjJVlpx6SE641Z1LwDZl210inhLcwYLBIY0-nOBzsIc_e0ngL6UDzIbgUR6Q-UKA2juMS_Fz2YZwGpJAzluHoEhymch7mBOV6uKLOw1WIf0vZ5GdMHh6TBz0MGZ8c51Py9e2b3flFtf307v35621l61bNlZStc3shtFJQ7_u-U51QtgfomGhE0znQrLO1km27hx4kb4TWrtiGdy3WVp6SF2vdKcWbBfNsRp8tDgMEjEs2benAmWpYkdUqbYo5J-zNlPxYPm44M38yNmvGZs24-GfHyst-RPdPH0Mt4PkRQLYw9AmC9fnOCSGZ5l1T3MvVxWX6b8_jG32e8dcdhvTTqFa2jbm4_G4-f_v44cvldme4_A0wR6Zc</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>March, Wendy A.</creator><creator>Moore, Vivienne M.</creator><creator>Willson, Kristyn J.</creator><creator>Phillips, David I.W.</creator><creator>Norman, Robert J.</creator><creator>Davies, Michael J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria</title><author>March, Wendy A. ; Moore, Vivienne M. ; Willson, Kristyn J. ; Phillips, David I.W. ; Norman, Robert J. ; Davies, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-337ddb22966a4bff86826cfaa8025258da908c46377bafa315299d6a45187e4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>endocrine disorder</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>hirsutism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperandrogenism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hyperandrogenism - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>menstrual irregularity</topic><topic>polycystic ovary syndrome</topic><topic>Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - classification</topic><topic>Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rotterdam criteria</topic><topic>South Australia - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>March, Wendy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Vivienne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willson, Kristyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, David I.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>March, Wendy A.</au><au>Moore, Vivienne M.</au><au>Willson, Kristyn J.</au><au>Phillips, David I.W.</au><au>Norman, Robert J.</au><au>Davies, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>544</spage><epage>551</epage><pages>544-551</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><coden>HUREEE</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is considered to be the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age, yet debate over appropriate diagnostic criteria and design limitations with sampling methodology have left some doubt as to the actual prevalence in the community. The objective of this study was to create a representative prevalence estimate of PCOS in the community under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria and the more recent Rotterdam consensus criteria and Androgen Excess Society (AES) criteria. METHODS A retrospective birth cohort study was carried out in which 728 women born during 1973–1975 in a single maternity hospital were traced and interviewed in adulthood (age = 27–34 year; n = 728). Symptoms of PCOS (hyperandrogenism, menstrual dysfunction and polycystic ovaries) were identified by examination and the presence of polycystic ovaries in those that did not consent to the ultrasound were imputed. RESULTS The estimated prevalence of PCOS in this birth cohort using the NIH criteria was 8.7 ± 2.0% (with no need for imputation). Under the Rotterdam criteria, the prevalence was 11.9 ± 2.4% which increased to 17.8 ± 2.8% when imputed data were included. Under the AES recommendations, PCOS prevalence was 10.2 ± 2.2%, and 12.0 ± 2.4% with the imputed data. Of the women with PCOS, 68–69% did not have a pre-existing diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS The Rotterdam and AES prevalence estimates were up to twice that obtained with the NIH criteria in this, as well other prevalence studies. In addition, this study also draws attention to the issue of many women with PCOS in the community remaining undiagnosed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>19910321</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/dep399</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-1161
ispartof Human reproduction (Oxford), 2010-02, Vol.25 (2), p.544-551
issn 0268-1161
1460-2350
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733710650
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cohort Studies
endocrine disorder
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
hirsutism
Humans
Hyperandrogenism - diagnosis
Hyperandrogenism - epidemiology
Medical sciences
menstrual irregularity
polycystic ovary syndrome
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - classification
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - diagnosis
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - epidemiology
Prevalence
Retrospective Studies
Rotterdam criteria
South Australia - epidemiology
title The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T06%3A56%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20prevalence%20of%20polycystic%20ovary%20syndrome%20in%20a%20community%20sample%20assessed%20under%20contrasting%20diagnostic%20criteria&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=March,%20Wendy%20A.&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=544&rft.epage=551&rft.pages=544-551&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.coden=HUREEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/dep399&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733710650%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733710650&rft_id=info:pmid/19910321&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/dep399&rfr_iscdi=true