Editorial: Assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals
The accurate performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from animal sources and the correct presentation of the results is a complex matter. A review of the published literature revealed a number of recurring errors with regard to methodology, quality control, appropriate interp...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2010-04, Vol.65 (4), p.601-604 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 604 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 601 |
| container_title | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy |
| container_volume | 65 |
| creator | Schwarz, Stefan Silley, Peter Simjee, Shabbir Woodford, Neil van Duijkeren, Engeline Johnson, Alan P. Gaastra, Wim |
| description | The accurate performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from animal sources and the correct presentation of the results is a complex matter. A review of the published literature revealed a number of recurring errors with regard to methodology, quality control, appropriate interpretive criteria, and calculation of MIC50 and MIC90 values. Although more subjective, there is also no consensus regarding the definition of multiresistance. This Editorial is intended to provide guidance to authors on how to avoid these frequently detected shortcomings. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jac/dkq037 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733708964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733708964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-e407a680cfd6513a2f982fe9d779a00ae2cda27b855113bc822a13ce617ac11c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMoOj42_gApbgShem8yTVp3Ij4ZUMQXswlpmmrGPsYkBeffGxl14eouzncO5x5CdhGOEAp2PFP6uHr_ACZWyAjHHFIKBa6SETDIUjHO2AbZ9H4GADzj-TrZoIA5ZoKNyPN5ZUPvrGpOklPvjfe2e03Cm0lUF2xrtevLKCZ-8NrMgy1tY8Mi6eukVDqYaEz6MijbmSqpXd9Gm21V47fJWh2P2fm5W-Tx4vzh7Cqd3F5en51OUh1rhdSMQSieg64rniFTtC5yWpuiEqJQAMpQXSkqyjzLEFmpc0oVMm04CqURNdsiB8vcues_BuODbG1s2jSqM_3gpWBMQF7wcST3_5GzfnBdLCcpCs5FUdAIHS6h-Lf3ztRy7uI_biER5PfYMo4tl2NHeO8ncShbU_2hv-tGIF0C1gfz-acr9y65YCKTVy9TSadPeHczuZfIvgA_XorV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217667992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Editorial: Assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Schwarz, Stefan ; Silley, Peter ; Simjee, Shabbir ; Woodford, Neil ; van Duijkeren, Engeline ; Johnson, Alan P. ; Gaastra, Wim</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Stefan ; Silley, Peter ; Simjee, Shabbir ; Woodford, Neil ; van Duijkeren, Engeline ; Johnson, Alan P. ; Gaastra, Wim</creatorcontrib><description>The accurate performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from animal sources and the correct presentation of the results is a complex matter. A review of the published literature revealed a number of recurring errors with regard to methodology, quality control, appropriate interpretive criteria, and calculation of MIC50 and MIC90 values. Although more subjective, there is also no consensus regarding the definition of multiresistance. This Editorial is intended to provide guidance to authors on how to avoid these frequently detected shortcomings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkq037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20181573</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal diseases ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; antimicrobial susceptibility testing ; Antiviral drugs ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Diagnostic Errors - prevention & control ; Drug resistance ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; interpretive criteria ; MIC50 ; MIC90 ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; multiresistance ; Quality Control</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2010-04, Vol.65 (4), p.601-604</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-e407a680cfd6513a2f982fe9d779a00ae2cda27b855113bc822a13ce617ac11c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-e407a680cfd6513a2f982fe9d779a00ae2cda27b855113bc822a13ce617ac11c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20181573$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silley, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simjee, Shabbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodford, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Duijkeren, Engeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Alan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaastra, Wim</creatorcontrib><title>Editorial: Assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><description>The accurate performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from animal sources and the correct presentation of the results is a complex matter. A review of the published literature revealed a number of recurring errors with regard to methodology, quality control, appropriate interpretive criteria, and calculation of MIC50 and MIC90 values. Although more subjective, there is also no consensus regarding the definition of multiresistance. This Editorial is intended to provide guidance to authors on how to avoid these frequently detected shortcomings.</description><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>antimicrobial susceptibility testing</subject><subject>Antiviral drugs</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors - prevention & control</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</subject><subject>interpretive criteria</subject><subject>MIC50</subject><subject>MIC90</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>multiresistance</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMoOj42_gApbgShem8yTVp3Ij4ZUMQXswlpmmrGPsYkBeffGxl14eouzncO5x5CdhGOEAp2PFP6uHr_ACZWyAjHHFIKBa6SETDIUjHO2AbZ9H4GADzj-TrZoIA5ZoKNyPN5ZUPvrGpOklPvjfe2e03Cm0lUF2xrtevLKCZ-8NrMgy1tY8Mi6eukVDqYaEz6MijbmSqpXd9Gm21V47fJWh2P2fm5W-Tx4vzh7Cqd3F5en51OUh1rhdSMQSieg64rniFTtC5yWpuiEqJQAMpQXSkqyjzLEFmpc0oVMm04CqURNdsiB8vcues_BuODbG1s2jSqM_3gpWBMQF7wcST3_5GzfnBdLCcpCs5FUdAIHS6h-Lf3ztRy7uI_biER5PfYMo4tl2NHeO8ncShbU_2hv-tGIF0C1gfz-acr9y65YCKTVy9TSadPeHczuZfIvgA_XorV</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Schwarz, Stefan</creator><creator>Silley, Peter</creator><creator>Simjee, Shabbir</creator><creator>Woodford, Neil</creator><creator>van Duijkeren, Engeline</creator><creator>Johnson, Alan P.</creator><creator>Gaastra, Wim</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Editorial: Assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals</title><author>Schwarz, Stefan ; Silley, Peter ; Simjee, Shabbir ; Woodford, Neil ; van Duijkeren, Engeline ; Johnson, Alan P. ; Gaastra, Wim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-e407a680cfd6513a2f982fe9d779a00ae2cda27b855113bc822a13ce617ac11c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>antimicrobial susceptibility testing</topic><topic>Antiviral drugs</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors - prevention & control</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</topic><topic>interpretive criteria</topic><topic>MIC50</topic><topic>MIC90</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>multiresistance</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silley, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simjee, Shabbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodford, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Duijkeren, Engeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Alan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaastra, Wim</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwarz, Stefan</au><au>Silley, Peter</au><au>Simjee, Shabbir</au><au>Woodford, Neil</au><au>van Duijkeren, Engeline</au><au>Johnson, Alan P.</au><au>Gaastra, Wim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Editorial: Assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>601</spage><epage>604</epage><pages>601-604</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><abstract>The accurate performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from animal sources and the correct presentation of the results is a complex matter. A review of the published literature revealed a number of recurring errors with regard to methodology, quality control, appropriate interpretive criteria, and calculation of MIC50 and MIC90 values. Although more subjective, there is also no consensus regarding the definition of multiresistance. This Editorial is intended to provide guidance to authors on how to avoid these frequently detected shortcomings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>20181573</pmid><doi>10.1093/jac/dkq037</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-7453 |
| ispartof | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2010-04, Vol.65 (4), p.601-604 |
| issn | 0305-7453 1460-2091 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733708964 |
| source | MEDLINE; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); Oxford Journals Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Animal diseases Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology antimicrobial susceptibility testing Antiviral drugs Bacteria Bacteria - drug effects Bacteria - isolation & purification Diagnostic Errors - prevention & control Drug resistance Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial interpretive criteria MIC50 MIC90 Microbial Sensitivity Tests multiresistance Quality Control |
| title | Editorial: Assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T20%3A58%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Editorial:%20Assessing%20the%20antimicrobial%20susceptibility%20of%20bacteria%20obtained%20from%20animals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Schwarz,%20Stefan&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=601&rft.epage=604&rft.pages=601-604&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/dkq037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733708964%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217667992&rft_id=info:pmid/20181573&rfr_iscdi=true |