Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy

Abstract Purpose Microcirculatory disturbances are well known during shock; however, the accompanied histomorphological alterations are widely unknown. We used high resolution confocal-laser-scanning microscopy for the evaluation of microcirculation and histomorphology during Burn Shock treatment. M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of critical care 2010-03, Vol.25 (1), p.173.e1-173.e7
Hauptverfasser: Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD, Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD, Guggenheim, Merlin, MD, Aust, Matthias C., MD, Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD, Knobloch, Karsten, MD, Vogt, Peter M., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 173.e7
container_issue 1
container_start_page 173.e1
container_title Journal of critical care
container_volume 25
creator Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD
Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD
Guggenheim, Merlin, MD
Aust, Matthias C., MD
Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD
Knobloch, Karsten, MD
Vogt, Peter M., PhD
description Abstract Purpose Microcirculatory disturbances are well known during shock; however, the accompanied histomorphological alterations are widely unknown. We used high resolution confocal-laser-scanning microscopy for the evaluation of microcirculation and histomorphology during Burn Shock treatment. Methods Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy was performed in 10 burn shock patients (4 women, 6 men; aged 40.6 ± 11.4 years, burn extent >20% body surface area) initially and 24 hours after shock resuscitation. Ten matched hemodynamic stable burn intensive care unit patients served as controls. The following parameters were evaluated: quantitative blood cell flow, cell size of the granular layer, basal layer thickness, and epidermal thickness. Results Quantitative blood cell flow in controls was 62.45 ± 3.39 cells per minute. Burn shock significantly reduced blood cell flow to 37.27 ± 3.64 cells per minute; fluid resuscitation effectively restored baseline blood flow (65.18 ± 3.76 cells per minute) after 24 hours. Granular cell size was 793.61 ± 41.58 μ m2 in controls vs 644.27 ± 42.96 μ m2 during burn shock. Post resuscitation granular cell size measured 932.74 ± 38.83 μ m2 . Basal layer thickness was 14.84 ± 0.59 μ m in controls, 13.26 ± 0.54 μ m in burn patients at admission and before resuscitation, and 17.50 ± 0.46 μ m after resuscitation. Epidermal thickness in control patients was 49.60 ± 2.36 μ m, 37.83 ± 2.47 μ m in burn patients at admission and 69.50 ± 3.18 μ m after resuscitation. Conclusions Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy provides a noninvasive tool for simultaneous evaluation of microcirculation and tissue histomorphology. It may help to assess the adequacy of and response to resuscitation of burn patients early after trauma.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.03.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733685057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0883944109000719</els_id><sourcerecordid>733685057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c29994cd1ed0cc72b60c1c233dfbd8d727f1aefc085f6f9e19103a1800b3e1923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIwIOnHitJfwVEkMWPhQUP6jmkK-mZ9HYnY9I9MOCPN-0MLOzBUwj11Ju89RYhrxlsGbD6_bAdMOKWA8gtiC2AeEI2rKqaoq1Z9ZRsoG1FIcuSXZEXKQ0ArBGiek6umCx501T1hvy59cnt9jN1nk4OY0AXcRn17IKn2hu6d2kOU4iHfRjD7kTNEp3f0W6JnqZ9wHs6R6vnyfqZLmktZaWjOwaKwfcB9ViMOtlYJNTer_V_zyQMh9NL8qzXY7KvLuc1-fXl88-bb8Xd96-3N5_uCixFOxfIpZQlGmYNIDa8qwEZciFM35nWNLzpmbY9Qlv1dS8tkwyEZi1AJ_KFi2vy7qx7iOH3YtOsJpfQjqP2NixJ5anUbQVVk8m3j8ghZKf5cyprCl4CK9tM8TO1GknR9uoQ3aTjKUNqjUYNao1GrdEoECpHk5veXKSXbrLmoeWSRQY-nAGbR3F0NqqEznq0xkWLszLB_V__46N2HJ13OYB7e7LpwYdKXIH6sS7HuhsgAaBhUvwFMF63Pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1033240148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD ; Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD ; Guggenheim, Merlin, MD ; Aust, Matthias C., MD ; Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD ; Knobloch, Karsten, MD ; Vogt, Peter M., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD ; Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD ; Guggenheim, Merlin, MD ; Aust, Matthias C., MD ; Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD ; Knobloch, Karsten, MD ; Vogt, Peter M., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose Microcirculatory disturbances are well known during shock; however, the accompanied histomorphological alterations are widely unknown. We used high resolution confocal-laser-scanning microscopy for the evaluation of microcirculation and histomorphology during Burn Shock treatment. Methods Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy was performed in 10 burn shock patients (4 women, 6 men; aged 40.6 ± 11.4 years, burn extent &gt;20% body surface area) initially and 24 hours after shock resuscitation. Ten matched hemodynamic stable burn intensive care unit patients served as controls. The following parameters were evaluated: quantitative blood cell flow, cell size of the granular layer, basal layer thickness, and epidermal thickness. Results Quantitative blood cell flow in controls was 62.45 ± 3.39 cells per minute. Burn shock significantly reduced blood cell flow to 37.27 ± 3.64 cells per minute; fluid resuscitation effectively restored baseline blood flow (65.18 ± 3.76 cells per minute) after 24 hours. Granular cell size was 793.61 ± 41.58 μ m2 in controls vs 644.27 ± 42.96 μ m2 during burn shock. Post resuscitation granular cell size measured 932.74 ± 38.83 μ m2 . Basal layer thickness was 14.84 ± 0.59 μ m in controls, 13.26 ± 0.54 μ m in burn patients at admission and before resuscitation, and 17.50 ± 0.46 μ m after resuscitation. Epidermal thickness in control patients was 49.60 ± 2.36 μ m, 37.83 ± 2.47 μ m in burn patients at admission and 69.50 ± 3.18 μ m after resuscitation. Conclusions Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy provides a noninvasive tool for simultaneous evaluation of microcirculation and tissue histomorphology. It may help to assess the adequacy of and response to resuscitation of burn patients early after trauma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-9441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19427756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blood ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Burn shock ; Burns ; Burns - pathology ; Burns - physiopathology ; Burns - therapy ; Case-Control Studies ; Cell Size ; Confocal laser scanning microscopy ; Critical Care ; Cutaneous morphology ; Epidermis ; Female ; Fluid substitution ; Fluid Therapy ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Investigations ; Male ; Microcirculation ; Microscopy ; Microscopy, Confocal - methods ; Shock, Traumatic - pathology ; Shock, Traumatic - physiopathology ; Shock, Traumatic - therapy ; Skin - blood supply ; Skin - pathology ; Skin - physiopathology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of critical care, 2010-03, Vol.25 (1), p.173.e1-173.e7</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c29994cd1ed0cc72b60c1c233dfbd8d727f1aefc085f6f9e19103a1800b3e1923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c29994cd1ed0cc72b60c1c233dfbd8d727f1aefc085f6f9e19103a1800b3e1923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1033240148?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19427756$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guggenheim, Merlin, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aust, Matthias C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knobloch, Karsten, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Peter M., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy</title><title>Journal of critical care</title><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose Microcirculatory disturbances are well known during shock; however, the accompanied histomorphological alterations are widely unknown. We used high resolution confocal-laser-scanning microscopy for the evaluation of microcirculation and histomorphology during Burn Shock treatment. Methods Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy was performed in 10 burn shock patients (4 women, 6 men; aged 40.6 ± 11.4 years, burn extent &gt;20% body surface area) initially and 24 hours after shock resuscitation. Ten matched hemodynamic stable burn intensive care unit patients served as controls. The following parameters were evaluated: quantitative blood cell flow, cell size of the granular layer, basal layer thickness, and epidermal thickness. Results Quantitative blood cell flow in controls was 62.45 ± 3.39 cells per minute. Burn shock significantly reduced blood cell flow to 37.27 ± 3.64 cells per minute; fluid resuscitation effectively restored baseline blood flow (65.18 ± 3.76 cells per minute) after 24 hours. Granular cell size was 793.61 ± 41.58 μ m2 in controls vs 644.27 ± 42.96 μ m2 during burn shock. Post resuscitation granular cell size measured 932.74 ± 38.83 μ m2 . Basal layer thickness was 14.84 ± 0.59 μ m in controls, 13.26 ± 0.54 μ m in burn patients at admission and before resuscitation, and 17.50 ± 0.46 μ m after resuscitation. Epidermal thickness in control patients was 49.60 ± 2.36 μ m, 37.83 ± 2.47 μ m in burn patients at admission and 69.50 ± 3.18 μ m after resuscitation. Conclusions Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy provides a noninvasive tool for simultaneous evaluation of microcirculation and tissue histomorphology. It may help to assess the adequacy of and response to resuscitation of burn patients early after trauma.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity</subject><subject>Burn shock</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Burns - pathology</subject><subject>Burns - physiopathology</subject><subject>Burns - therapy</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cell Size</subject><subject>Confocal laser scanning microscopy</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Cutaneous morphology</subject><subject>Epidermis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluid substitution</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microcirculation</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal - methods</subject><subject>Shock, Traumatic - pathology</subject><subject>Shock, Traumatic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shock, Traumatic - therapy</subject><subject>Skin - blood supply</subject><subject>Skin - pathology</subject><subject>Skin - physiopathology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIwIOnHitJfwVEkMWPhQUP6jmkK-mZ9HYnY9I9MOCPN-0MLOzBUwj11Ju89RYhrxlsGbD6_bAdMOKWA8gtiC2AeEI2rKqaoq1Z9ZRsoG1FIcuSXZEXKQ0ArBGiek6umCx501T1hvy59cnt9jN1nk4OY0AXcRn17IKn2hu6d2kOU4iHfRjD7kTNEp3f0W6JnqZ9wHs6R6vnyfqZLmktZaWjOwaKwfcB9ViMOtlYJNTer_V_zyQMh9NL8qzXY7KvLuc1-fXl88-bb8Xd96-3N5_uCixFOxfIpZQlGmYNIDa8qwEZciFM35nWNLzpmbY9Qlv1dS8tkwyEZi1AJ_KFi2vy7qx7iOH3YtOsJpfQjqP2NixJ5anUbQVVk8m3j8ghZKf5cyprCl4CK9tM8TO1GknR9uoQ3aTjKUNqjUYNao1GrdEoECpHk5veXKSXbrLmoeWSRQY-nAGbR3F0NqqEznq0xkWLszLB_V__46N2HJ13OYB7e7LpwYdKXIH6sS7HuhsgAaBhUvwFMF63Pw</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD</creator><creator>Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD</creator><creator>Guggenheim, Merlin, MD</creator><creator>Aust, Matthias C., MD</creator><creator>Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD</creator><creator>Knobloch, Karsten, MD</creator><creator>Vogt, Peter M., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy</title><author>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD ; Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD ; Guggenheim, Merlin, MD ; Aust, Matthias C., MD ; Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD ; Knobloch, Karsten, MD ; Vogt, Peter M., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c29994cd1ed0cc72b60c1c233dfbd8d727f1aefc085f6f9e19103a1800b3e1923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity</topic><topic>Burn shock</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Burns - pathology</topic><topic>Burns - physiopathology</topic><topic>Burns - therapy</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cell Size</topic><topic>Confocal laser scanning microscopy</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Cutaneous morphology</topic><topic>Epidermis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluid substitution</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microcirculation</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal - methods</topic><topic>Shock, Traumatic - pathology</topic><topic>Shock, Traumatic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shock, Traumatic - therapy</topic><topic>Skin - blood supply</topic><topic>Skin - pathology</topic><topic>Skin - physiopathology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guggenheim, Merlin, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aust, Matthias C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knobloch, Karsten, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Peter M., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD</au><au>Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD</au><au>Guggenheim, Merlin, MD</au><au>Aust, Matthias C., MD</au><au>Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD</au><au>Knobloch, Karsten, MD</au><au>Vogt, Peter M., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>173.e1</spage><epage>173.e7</epage><pages>173.e1-173.e7</pages><issn>0883-9441</issn><eissn>1557-8615</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose Microcirculatory disturbances are well known during shock; however, the accompanied histomorphological alterations are widely unknown. We used high resolution confocal-laser-scanning microscopy for the evaluation of microcirculation and histomorphology during Burn Shock treatment. Methods Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy was performed in 10 burn shock patients (4 women, 6 men; aged 40.6 ± 11.4 years, burn extent &gt;20% body surface area) initially and 24 hours after shock resuscitation. Ten matched hemodynamic stable burn intensive care unit patients served as controls. The following parameters were evaluated: quantitative blood cell flow, cell size of the granular layer, basal layer thickness, and epidermal thickness. Results Quantitative blood cell flow in controls was 62.45 ± 3.39 cells per minute. Burn shock significantly reduced blood cell flow to 37.27 ± 3.64 cells per minute; fluid resuscitation effectively restored baseline blood flow (65.18 ± 3.76 cells per minute) after 24 hours. Granular cell size was 793.61 ± 41.58 μ m2 in controls vs 644.27 ± 42.96 μ m2 during burn shock. Post resuscitation granular cell size measured 932.74 ± 38.83 μ m2 . Basal layer thickness was 14.84 ± 0.59 μ m in controls, 13.26 ± 0.54 μ m in burn patients at admission and before resuscitation, and 17.50 ± 0.46 μ m after resuscitation. Epidermal thickness in control patients was 49.60 ± 2.36 μ m, 37.83 ± 2.47 μ m in burn patients at admission and 69.50 ± 3.18 μ m after resuscitation. Conclusions Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy provides a noninvasive tool for simultaneous evaluation of microcirculation and tissue histomorphology. It may help to assess the adequacy of and response to resuscitation of burn patients early after trauma.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19427756</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.03.003</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-9441
ispartof Journal of critical care, 2010-03, Vol.25 (1), p.173.e1-173.e7
issn 0883-9441
1557-8615
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733685057
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Adult
Blood
Blood Flow Velocity
Burn shock
Burns
Burns - pathology
Burns - physiopathology
Burns - therapy
Case-Control Studies
Cell Size
Confocal laser scanning microscopy
Critical Care
Cutaneous morphology
Epidermis
Female
Fluid substitution
Fluid Therapy
Hemodynamics
Humans
Investigations
Male
Microcirculation
Microscopy
Microscopy, Confocal - methods
Shock, Traumatic - pathology
Shock, Traumatic - physiopathology
Shock, Traumatic - therapy
Skin - blood supply
Skin - pathology
Skin - physiopathology
Treatment Outcome
title Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A07%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insight%20in%20microcirculation%20and%20histomorphology%20during%20burn%20shock%20treatment%20using%20in%20vivo%20confocal-laser-scanning%20microscopy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Altintas,%20Mehmet%20Ali,%20MD&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=173.e1&rft.epage=173.e7&rft.pages=173.e1-173.e7&rft.issn=0883-9441&rft.eissn=1557-8615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733685057%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1033240148&rft_id=info:pmid/19427756&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0883944109000719&rfr_iscdi=true