Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy
Abstract Purpose Microcirculatory disturbances are well known during shock; however, the accompanied histomorphological alterations are widely unknown. We used high resolution confocal-laser-scanning microscopy for the evaluation of microcirculation and histomorphology during Burn Shock treatment. M...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of critical care 2010-03, Vol.25 (1), p.173.e1-173.e7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 173.e7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 173.e1 |
container_title | Journal of critical care |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD Guggenheim, Merlin, MD Aust, Matthias C., MD Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD Knobloch, Karsten, MD Vogt, Peter M., PhD |
description | Abstract Purpose Microcirculatory disturbances are well known during shock; however, the accompanied histomorphological alterations are widely unknown. We used high resolution confocal-laser-scanning microscopy for the evaluation of microcirculation and histomorphology during Burn Shock treatment. Methods Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy was performed in 10 burn shock patients (4 women, 6 men; aged 40.6 ± 11.4 years, burn extent >20% body surface area) initially and 24 hours after shock resuscitation. Ten matched hemodynamic stable burn intensive care unit patients served as controls. The following parameters were evaluated: quantitative blood cell flow, cell size of the granular layer, basal layer thickness, and epidermal thickness. Results Quantitative blood cell flow in controls was 62.45 ± 3.39 cells per minute. Burn shock significantly reduced blood cell flow to 37.27 ± 3.64 cells per minute; fluid resuscitation effectively restored baseline blood flow (65.18 ± 3.76 cells per minute) after 24 hours. Granular cell size was 793.61 ± 41.58 μ m2 in controls vs 644.27 ± 42.96 μ m2 during burn shock. Post resuscitation granular cell size measured 932.74 ± 38.83 μ m2 . Basal layer thickness was 14.84 ± 0.59 μ m in controls, 13.26 ± 0.54 μ m in burn patients at admission and before resuscitation, and 17.50 ± 0.46 μ m after resuscitation. Epidermal thickness in control patients was 49.60 ± 2.36 μ m, 37.83 ± 2.47 μ m in burn patients at admission and 69.50 ± 3.18 μ m after resuscitation. Conclusions Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy provides a noninvasive tool for simultaneous evaluation of microcirculation and tissue histomorphology. It may help to assess the adequacy of and response to resuscitation of burn patients early after trauma. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.03.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733685057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0883944109000719</els_id><sourcerecordid>733685057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c29994cd1ed0cc72b60c1c233dfbd8d727f1aefc085f6f9e19103a1800b3e1923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIwIOnHitJfwVEkMWPhQUP6jmkK-mZ9HYnY9I9MOCPN-0MLOzBUwj11Ju89RYhrxlsGbD6_bAdMOKWA8gtiC2AeEI2rKqaoq1Z9ZRsoG1FIcuSXZEXKQ0ArBGiek6umCx501T1hvy59cnt9jN1nk4OY0AXcRn17IKn2hu6d2kOU4iHfRjD7kTNEp3f0W6JnqZ9wHs6R6vnyfqZLmktZaWjOwaKwfcB9ViMOtlYJNTer_V_zyQMh9NL8qzXY7KvLuc1-fXl88-bb8Xd96-3N5_uCixFOxfIpZQlGmYNIDa8qwEZciFM35nWNLzpmbY9Qlv1dS8tkwyEZi1AJ_KFi2vy7qx7iOH3YtOsJpfQjqP2NixJ5anUbQVVk8m3j8ghZKf5cyprCl4CK9tM8TO1GknR9uoQ3aTjKUNqjUYNao1GrdEoECpHk5veXKSXbrLmoeWSRQY-nAGbR3F0NqqEznq0xkWLszLB_V__46N2HJ13OYB7e7LpwYdKXIH6sS7HuhsgAaBhUvwFMF63Pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1033240148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD ; Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD ; Guggenheim, Merlin, MD ; Aust, Matthias C., MD ; Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD ; Knobloch, Karsten, MD ; Vogt, Peter M., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD ; Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD ; Guggenheim, Merlin, MD ; Aust, Matthias C., MD ; Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD ; Knobloch, Karsten, MD ; Vogt, Peter M., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose Microcirculatory disturbances are well known during shock; however, the accompanied histomorphological alterations are widely unknown. We used high resolution confocal-laser-scanning microscopy for the evaluation of microcirculation and histomorphology during Burn Shock treatment. Methods Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy was performed in 10 burn shock patients (4 women, 6 men; aged 40.6 ± 11.4 years, burn extent >20% body surface area) initially and 24 hours after shock resuscitation. Ten matched hemodynamic stable burn intensive care unit patients served as controls. The following parameters were evaluated: quantitative blood cell flow, cell size of the granular layer, basal layer thickness, and epidermal thickness. Results Quantitative blood cell flow in controls was 62.45 ± 3.39 cells per minute. Burn shock significantly reduced blood cell flow to 37.27 ± 3.64 cells per minute; fluid resuscitation effectively restored baseline blood flow (65.18 ± 3.76 cells per minute) after 24 hours. Granular cell size was 793.61 ± 41.58 μ m2 in controls vs 644.27 ± 42.96 μ m2 during burn shock. Post resuscitation granular cell size measured 932.74 ± 38.83 μ m2 . Basal layer thickness was 14.84 ± 0.59 μ m in controls, 13.26 ± 0.54 μ m in burn patients at admission and before resuscitation, and 17.50 ± 0.46 μ m after resuscitation. Epidermal thickness in control patients was 49.60 ± 2.36 μ m, 37.83 ± 2.47 μ m in burn patients at admission and 69.50 ± 3.18 μ m after resuscitation. Conclusions Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy provides a noninvasive tool for simultaneous evaluation of microcirculation and tissue histomorphology. It may help to assess the adequacy of and response to resuscitation of burn patients early after trauma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-9441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19427756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blood ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Burn shock ; Burns ; Burns - pathology ; Burns - physiopathology ; Burns - therapy ; Case-Control Studies ; Cell Size ; Confocal laser scanning microscopy ; Critical Care ; Cutaneous morphology ; Epidermis ; Female ; Fluid substitution ; Fluid Therapy ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Investigations ; Male ; Microcirculation ; Microscopy ; Microscopy, Confocal - methods ; Shock, Traumatic - pathology ; Shock, Traumatic - physiopathology ; Shock, Traumatic - therapy ; Skin - blood supply ; Skin - pathology ; Skin - physiopathology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of critical care, 2010-03, Vol.25 (1), p.173.e1-173.e7</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c29994cd1ed0cc72b60c1c233dfbd8d727f1aefc085f6f9e19103a1800b3e1923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c29994cd1ed0cc72b60c1c233dfbd8d727f1aefc085f6f9e19103a1800b3e1923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1033240148?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19427756$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guggenheim, Merlin, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aust, Matthias C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knobloch, Karsten, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Peter M., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy</title><title>Journal of critical care</title><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose Microcirculatory disturbances are well known during shock; however, the accompanied histomorphological alterations are widely unknown. We used high resolution confocal-laser-scanning microscopy for the evaluation of microcirculation and histomorphology during Burn Shock treatment. Methods Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy was performed in 10 burn shock patients (4 women, 6 men; aged 40.6 ± 11.4 years, burn extent >20% body surface area) initially and 24 hours after shock resuscitation. Ten matched hemodynamic stable burn intensive care unit patients served as controls. The following parameters were evaluated: quantitative blood cell flow, cell size of the granular layer, basal layer thickness, and epidermal thickness. Results Quantitative blood cell flow in controls was 62.45 ± 3.39 cells per minute. Burn shock significantly reduced blood cell flow to 37.27 ± 3.64 cells per minute; fluid resuscitation effectively restored baseline blood flow (65.18 ± 3.76 cells per minute) after 24 hours. Granular cell size was 793.61 ± 41.58 μ m2 in controls vs 644.27 ± 42.96 μ m2 during burn shock. Post resuscitation granular cell size measured 932.74 ± 38.83 μ m2 . Basal layer thickness was 14.84 ± 0.59 μ m in controls, 13.26 ± 0.54 μ m in burn patients at admission and before resuscitation, and 17.50 ± 0.46 μ m after resuscitation. Epidermal thickness in control patients was 49.60 ± 2.36 μ m, 37.83 ± 2.47 μ m in burn patients at admission and 69.50 ± 3.18 μ m after resuscitation. Conclusions Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy provides a noninvasive tool for simultaneous evaluation of microcirculation and tissue histomorphology. It may help to assess the adequacy of and response to resuscitation of burn patients early after trauma.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity</subject><subject>Burn shock</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Burns - pathology</subject><subject>Burns - physiopathology</subject><subject>Burns - therapy</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cell Size</subject><subject>Confocal laser scanning microscopy</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Cutaneous morphology</subject><subject>Epidermis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluid substitution</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microcirculation</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal - methods</subject><subject>Shock, Traumatic - pathology</subject><subject>Shock, Traumatic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shock, Traumatic - therapy</subject><subject>Skin - blood supply</subject><subject>Skin - pathology</subject><subject>Skin - physiopathology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIwIOnHitJfwVEkMWPhQUP6jmkK-mZ9HYnY9I9MOCPN-0MLOzBUwj11Ju89RYhrxlsGbD6_bAdMOKWA8gtiC2AeEI2rKqaoq1Z9ZRsoG1FIcuSXZEXKQ0ArBGiek6umCx501T1hvy59cnt9jN1nk4OY0AXcRn17IKn2hu6d2kOU4iHfRjD7kTNEp3f0W6JnqZ9wHs6R6vnyfqZLmktZaWjOwaKwfcB9ViMOtlYJNTer_V_zyQMh9NL8qzXY7KvLuc1-fXl88-bb8Xd96-3N5_uCixFOxfIpZQlGmYNIDa8qwEZciFM35nWNLzpmbY9Qlv1dS8tkwyEZi1AJ_KFi2vy7qx7iOH3YtOsJpfQjqP2NixJ5anUbQVVk8m3j8ghZKf5cyprCl4CK9tM8TO1GknR9uoQ3aTjKUNqjUYNao1GrdEoECpHk5veXKSXbrLmoeWSRQY-nAGbR3F0NqqEznq0xkWLszLB_V__46N2HJ13OYB7e7LpwYdKXIH6sS7HuhsgAaBhUvwFMF63Pw</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD</creator><creator>Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD</creator><creator>Guggenheim, Merlin, MD</creator><creator>Aust, Matthias C., MD</creator><creator>Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD</creator><creator>Knobloch, Karsten, MD</creator><creator>Vogt, Peter M., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy</title><author>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD ; Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD ; Guggenheim, Merlin, MD ; Aust, Matthias C., MD ; Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD ; Knobloch, Karsten, MD ; Vogt, Peter M., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c29994cd1ed0cc72b60c1c233dfbd8d727f1aefc085f6f9e19103a1800b3e1923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity</topic><topic>Burn shock</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Burns - pathology</topic><topic>Burns - physiopathology</topic><topic>Burns - therapy</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cell Size</topic><topic>Confocal laser scanning microscopy</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Cutaneous morphology</topic><topic>Epidermis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluid substitution</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microcirculation</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal - methods</topic><topic>Shock, Traumatic - pathology</topic><topic>Shock, Traumatic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shock, Traumatic - therapy</topic><topic>Skin - blood supply</topic><topic>Skin - pathology</topic><topic>Skin - physiopathology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guggenheim, Merlin, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aust, Matthias C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knobloch, Karsten, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Peter M., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Altintas, Mehmet Ali, MD</au><au>Altintas, Ahmet Ali, MD</au><au>Guggenheim, Merlin, MD</au><au>Aust, Matthias C., MD</au><au>Niederbichler, Andreas David, MD</au><au>Knobloch, Karsten, MD</au><au>Vogt, Peter M., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>173.e1</spage><epage>173.e7</epage><pages>173.e1-173.e7</pages><issn>0883-9441</issn><eissn>1557-8615</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose Microcirculatory disturbances are well known during shock; however, the accompanied histomorphological alterations are widely unknown. We used high resolution confocal-laser-scanning microscopy for the evaluation of microcirculation and histomorphology during Burn Shock treatment. Methods Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy was performed in 10 burn shock patients (4 women, 6 men; aged 40.6 ± 11.4 years, burn extent >20% body surface area) initially and 24 hours after shock resuscitation. Ten matched hemodynamic stable burn intensive care unit patients served as controls. The following parameters were evaluated: quantitative blood cell flow, cell size of the granular layer, basal layer thickness, and epidermal thickness. Results Quantitative blood cell flow in controls was 62.45 ± 3.39 cells per minute. Burn shock significantly reduced blood cell flow to 37.27 ± 3.64 cells per minute; fluid resuscitation effectively restored baseline blood flow (65.18 ± 3.76 cells per minute) after 24 hours. Granular cell size was 793.61 ± 41.58 μ m2 in controls vs 644.27 ± 42.96 μ m2 during burn shock. Post resuscitation granular cell size measured 932.74 ± 38.83 μ m2 . Basal layer thickness was 14.84 ± 0.59 μ m in controls, 13.26 ± 0.54 μ m in burn patients at admission and before resuscitation, and 17.50 ± 0.46 μ m after resuscitation. Epidermal thickness in control patients was 49.60 ± 2.36 μ m, 37.83 ± 2.47 μ m in burn patients at admission and 69.50 ± 3.18 μ m after resuscitation. Conclusions Confocal-laser-scanning microscopy provides a noninvasive tool for simultaneous evaluation of microcirculation and tissue histomorphology. It may help to assess the adequacy of and response to resuscitation of burn patients early after trauma.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19427756</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.03.003</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-9441 |
ispartof | Journal of critical care, 2010-03, Vol.25 (1), p.173.e1-173.e7 |
issn | 0883-9441 1557-8615 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733685057 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adult Blood Blood Flow Velocity Burn shock Burns Burns - pathology Burns - physiopathology Burns - therapy Case-Control Studies Cell Size Confocal laser scanning microscopy Critical Care Cutaneous morphology Epidermis Female Fluid substitution Fluid Therapy Hemodynamics Humans Investigations Male Microcirculation Microscopy Microscopy, Confocal - methods Shock, Traumatic - pathology Shock, Traumatic - physiopathology Shock, Traumatic - therapy Skin - blood supply Skin - pathology Skin - physiopathology Treatment Outcome |
title | Insight in microcirculation and histomorphology during burn shock treatment using in vivo confocal-laser-scanning microscopy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A07%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insight%20in%20microcirculation%20and%20histomorphology%20during%20burn%20shock%20treatment%20using%20in%20vivo%20confocal-laser-scanning%20microscopy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Altintas,%20Mehmet%20Ali,%20MD&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=173.e1&rft.epage=173.e7&rft.pages=173.e1-173.e7&rft.issn=0883-9441&rft.eissn=1557-8615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733685057%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1033240148&rft_id=info:pmid/19427756&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0883944109000719&rfr_iscdi=true |