Management Practices and Risk of Occupational Blood Exposure in U.S. Paramedics: Non-Intact Skin Exposure

Purpose To estimate the risk of blood exposure to non-intact skin in U.S. paramedics; to estimate risk ratios for selected management practices. Methods A mail survey was conducted among a national sample of licensed paramedics in the United States in 2002–2003. Results The adjusted response rate wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of epidemiology 2009-12, Vol.19 (12), p.884-890
1. Verfasser: Leiss, Jack K., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 890
container_issue 12
container_start_page 884
container_title Annals of epidemiology
container_volume 19
creator Leiss, Jack K., PhD
description Purpose To estimate the risk of blood exposure to non-intact skin in U.S. paramedics; to estimate risk ratios for selected management practices. Methods A mail survey was conducted among a national sample of licensed paramedics in the United States in 2002–2003. Results The adjusted response rate was 55% ( N = 2,664). The overall 12-month risk of non-intact skin blood exposure was 8.7% (95% confidence interval: 6.4–11). As the number of types of personal protective equipment (PPE) always provided by the employer increased, risk decreased. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for selected factors were: not being provided with appropriate PPE, 2.4 (1.6–3.3); job evaluation doesn't include following safety procedures, 1.8 (1.0–2.7); supervisor wouldn't speak to paramedic about not following Universal Precautions, 2.1 (0.9–3.2); both of the above supervisory behaviors, 2.3 (1.3–3.6). Conclusions Providing appropriate personal protective equipment is an effective means of preventing non-intact skin blood exposure and possible consequent bloodborne infection in paramedics. Future research should aim to identify factors limiting the provision of this equipment and to evaluate the advisability of interventions to increase provision. Supervisory behaviors that emphasize safe work practices may also be effective in preventing non-intact skin exposure in paramedics. Future research should develop interventions that apply general knowledge of management behaviors that promote worker safety to the work environment of paramedics.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.08.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733675662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1047279709003007</els_id><sourcerecordid>21287947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-73e336a4d7ca3b32b23aa97e4500c16536920792330080e0cde2815fb44a12313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wF8AnOCUd20kcc0AqVQuVCq1Yera8zizybmKndoLov69Xuy0SB8TJPjzzjvQ-Q8hbBiUD1pysS-M9jq7DoeQAqoS2BGiekUPWSlHwuq2f5z9UsuBSyQNylNIaAGQr-UtywJSqKlHDIXFfjTc_cUA_0Zto7OQsJmp8R7-7tKFhRa-tnUczueBNTz_1IXT0_PcY0hyROk9vy0VJb0w0A3bOpg_0W_DFpZ9yFF1sMvAIvyIvVqZP-Hr_HpPbi_MfZ1-Kq-vPl2enV4Wt6mYqpEAhGlN10hqxFHzJhTFKYlUDWNbUolEcpOJCALSAYDvkLatXy6oyjAsmjsn7Xe4Yw92MadKDSxb73ngMc9Iyx8u6aXgm3_2T5Iy3UlUyg3IH2hhSirjSY3SDifeagd760Gv95ENvfWhodfaRJ9_sV8zLXNCfub2ADJzuAMyV_HIYdbIOvc1lRrST7oL7jyUf_8qwvfPOmn6D95jWYY7ZXdJMJ65BL7Znsb0KUAC5RSkeADqLs2c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21287947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management Practices and Risk of Occupational Blood Exposure in U.S. Paramedics: Non-Intact Skin Exposure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Leiss, Jack K., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Leiss, Jack K., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To estimate the risk of blood exposure to non-intact skin in U.S. paramedics; to estimate risk ratios for selected management practices. Methods A mail survey was conducted among a national sample of licensed paramedics in the United States in 2002–2003. Results The adjusted response rate was 55% ( N = 2,664). The overall 12-month risk of non-intact skin blood exposure was 8.7% (95% confidence interval: 6.4–11). As the number of types of personal protective equipment (PPE) always provided by the employer increased, risk decreased. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for selected factors were: not being provided with appropriate PPE, 2.4 (1.6–3.3); job evaluation doesn't include following safety procedures, 1.8 (1.0–2.7); supervisor wouldn't speak to paramedic about not following Universal Precautions, 2.1 (0.9–3.2); both of the above supervisory behaviors, 2.3 (1.3–3.6). Conclusions Providing appropriate personal protective equipment is an effective means of preventing non-intact skin blood exposure and possible consequent bloodborne infection in paramedics. Future research should aim to identify factors limiting the provision of this equipment and to evaluate the advisability of interventions to increase provision. Supervisory behaviors that emphasize safe work practices may also be effective in preventing non-intact skin exposure in paramedics. Future research should develop interventions that apply general knowledge of management behaviors that promote worker safety to the work environment of paramedics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-2797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.08.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19944350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accidents, Occupational - prevention &amp; control ; Adult ; Blood Exposure ; Data Collection ; Emergency Medical Technicians ; Female ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Occupational Exposure ; Paramedic ; Prehospital ; Protective Clothing - utilization ; Risk ; Safety ; Safety Management - methods ; Survey ; United States</subject><ispartof>Annals of epidemiology, 2009-12, Vol.19 (12), p.884-890</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-73e336a4d7ca3b32b23aa97e4500c16536920792330080e0cde2815fb44a12313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-73e336a4d7ca3b32b23aa97e4500c16536920792330080e0cde2815fb44a12313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279709003007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19944350$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leiss, Jack K., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Management Practices and Risk of Occupational Blood Exposure in U.S. Paramedics: Non-Intact Skin Exposure</title><title>Annals of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Ann Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Purpose To estimate the risk of blood exposure to non-intact skin in U.S. paramedics; to estimate risk ratios for selected management practices. Methods A mail survey was conducted among a national sample of licensed paramedics in the United States in 2002–2003. Results The adjusted response rate was 55% ( N = 2,664). The overall 12-month risk of non-intact skin blood exposure was 8.7% (95% confidence interval: 6.4–11). As the number of types of personal protective equipment (PPE) always provided by the employer increased, risk decreased. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for selected factors were: not being provided with appropriate PPE, 2.4 (1.6–3.3); job evaluation doesn't include following safety procedures, 1.8 (1.0–2.7); supervisor wouldn't speak to paramedic about not following Universal Precautions, 2.1 (0.9–3.2); both of the above supervisory behaviors, 2.3 (1.3–3.6). Conclusions Providing appropriate personal protective equipment is an effective means of preventing non-intact skin blood exposure and possible consequent bloodborne infection in paramedics. Future research should aim to identify factors limiting the provision of this equipment and to evaluate the advisability of interventions to increase provision. Supervisory behaviors that emphasize safe work practices may also be effective in preventing non-intact skin exposure in paramedics. Future research should develop interventions that apply general knowledge of management behaviors that promote worker safety to the work environment of paramedics.</description><subject>Accidents, Occupational - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood Exposure</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Technicians</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure</subject><subject>Paramedic</subject><subject>Prehospital</subject><subject>Protective Clothing - utilization</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety Management - methods</subject><subject>Survey</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1047-2797</issn><issn>1873-2585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wF8AnOCUd20kcc0AqVQuVCq1Yera8zizybmKndoLov69Xuy0SB8TJPjzzjvQ-Q8hbBiUD1pysS-M9jq7DoeQAqoS2BGiekUPWSlHwuq2f5z9UsuBSyQNylNIaAGQr-UtywJSqKlHDIXFfjTc_cUA_0Zto7OQsJmp8R7-7tKFhRa-tnUczueBNTz_1IXT0_PcY0hyROk9vy0VJb0w0A3bOpg_0W_DFpZ9yFF1sMvAIvyIvVqZP-Hr_HpPbi_MfZ1-Kq-vPl2enV4Wt6mYqpEAhGlN10hqxFHzJhTFKYlUDWNbUolEcpOJCALSAYDvkLatXy6oyjAsmjsn7Xe4Yw92MadKDSxb73ngMc9Iyx8u6aXgm3_2T5Iy3UlUyg3IH2hhSirjSY3SDifeagd760Gv95ENvfWhodfaRJ9_sV8zLXNCfub2ADJzuAMyV_HIYdbIOvc1lRrST7oL7jyUf_8qwvfPOmn6D95jWYY7ZXdJMJ65BL7Znsb0KUAC5RSkeADqLs2c</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Leiss, Jack K., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Management Practices and Risk of Occupational Blood Exposure in U.S. Paramedics: Non-Intact Skin Exposure</title><author>Leiss, Jack K., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-73e336a4d7ca3b32b23aa97e4500c16536920792330080e0cde2815fb44a12313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Occupational - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood Exposure</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Technicians</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure</topic><topic>Paramedic</topic><topic>Prehospital</topic><topic>Protective Clothing - utilization</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety Management - methods</topic><topic>Survey</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leiss, Jack K., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leiss, Jack K., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management Practices and Risk of Occupational Blood Exposure in U.S. Paramedics: Non-Intact Skin Exposure</atitle><jtitle>Annals of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>884</spage><epage>890</epage><pages>884-890</pages><issn>1047-2797</issn><eissn>1873-2585</eissn><abstract>Purpose To estimate the risk of blood exposure to non-intact skin in U.S. paramedics; to estimate risk ratios for selected management practices. Methods A mail survey was conducted among a national sample of licensed paramedics in the United States in 2002–2003. Results The adjusted response rate was 55% ( N = 2,664). The overall 12-month risk of non-intact skin blood exposure was 8.7% (95% confidence interval: 6.4–11). As the number of types of personal protective equipment (PPE) always provided by the employer increased, risk decreased. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for selected factors were: not being provided with appropriate PPE, 2.4 (1.6–3.3); job evaluation doesn't include following safety procedures, 1.8 (1.0–2.7); supervisor wouldn't speak to paramedic about not following Universal Precautions, 2.1 (0.9–3.2); both of the above supervisory behaviors, 2.3 (1.3–3.6). Conclusions Providing appropriate personal protective equipment is an effective means of preventing non-intact skin blood exposure and possible consequent bloodborne infection in paramedics. Future research should aim to identify factors limiting the provision of this equipment and to evaluate the advisability of interventions to increase provision. Supervisory behaviors that emphasize safe work practices may also be effective in preventing non-intact skin exposure in paramedics. Future research should develop interventions that apply general knowledge of management behaviors that promote worker safety to the work environment of paramedics.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19944350</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.08.006</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-2797
ispartof Annals of epidemiology, 2009-12, Vol.19 (12), p.884-890
issn 1047-2797
1873-2585
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733675662
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accidents, Occupational - prevention & control
Adult
Blood Exposure
Data Collection
Emergency Medical Technicians
Female
Humans
Internal Medicine
Male
Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control
Occupational Exposure
Paramedic
Prehospital
Protective Clothing - utilization
Risk
Safety
Safety Management - methods
Survey
United States
title Management Practices and Risk of Occupational Blood Exposure in U.S. Paramedics: Non-Intact Skin Exposure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T22%3A13%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20Practices%20and%20Risk%20of%20Occupational%20Blood%20Exposure%20in%20U.S.%20Paramedics:%20Non-Intact%20Skin%20Exposure&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Leiss,%20Jack%20K.,%20PhD&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=884&rft.epage=890&rft.pages=884-890&rft.issn=1047-2797&rft.eissn=1873-2585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.08.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21287947%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21287947&rft_id=info:pmid/19944350&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1047279709003007&rfr_iscdi=true