Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate

A recent advance in the phylogenetic comparative analysis of continuous traits has been explicit, model-based measurement of "phylogenetic signal" in data sets composed of observations collected from species related by a phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic signal is a measure of the statistica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Systematic biology 2008-08, Vol.57 (4), p.591-601
Hauptverfasser: Revell, Liam J., Harmon, Luke J., Collar, David C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 601
container_issue 4
container_start_page 591
container_title Systematic biology
container_volume 57
creator Revell, Liam J.
Harmon, Luke J.
Collar, David C.
description A recent advance in the phylogenetic comparative analysis of continuous traits has been explicit, model-based measurement of "phylogenetic signal" in data sets composed of observations collected from species related by a phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic signal is a measure of the statistical dependence among species' trait values due to their phylogenetic relationships. Although phylogenetic signal is a measure of pattern (statistical dependence), there has nonetheless been a widespread propensity in the literature to attribute this pattern to aspects of the evolutionary process or rate. This may be due, in part, to the perception that high evolutionary rate necessarily results in low phylogenetic signal; and, conversely, that low evolutionary rate or stabilizing selection results in high phylogenetic signal (due to the resulting high resemblance between related species). In this study, we use individual-based numerical simulations on stochastic phylogenetic trees to clarify the relationship between phylogenetic signal, rate, and evolutionary process. Under the simplest model for quantitative trait evolution, homogeneous rate genetic drift, there is no relation between evolutionary rate and phylogenetic signal. For other circumstances, such as functional constraint, fluctuating selection, niche conservatism, and evolutionary heterogeneity, the relationship between process, rate, and phylogenetic signal is complex. For these reasons, we recommend against interpretations of evolutionary process or rate based on estimates of phylogenetic signal.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10635150802302427
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733668661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27756377</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1080/10635150802302427</oup_id><sourcerecordid>27756377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-9e1ec8a1aa06007dcfda03a69007972b3cdaa0822dd50db7fc8a470fb9a2da2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDFPwzAQhS0EoqXwAxhA2VgaONuJnYyolBapElUBUbFYTuyUlDQucYLov8dVqjKwMN2d3veeTg-hcwzXGCK4wcBoiEO3EgokIPwAdTFw5keUzQ-3O6O-A3gHnVi7BMCYhfgYdXDEIQ5j3kV0-r4pzEKXus5T7ylflLLoe8MvUzR1bkpZbbxpZVJtbd-TpfJmstan6CiThdVnu9lDL_fD58HYnzyOHga3Ez8NAqj9WGOdRhJLCQyAqzRTEqhksTtiThKaKidFhCgVgkp45uCAQ5bEkihJJO2hqzZ3XZnPRttarHKb6qKQpTaNFZxSxiLGsCNxS6aVsbbSmVhX-co9LzCIbVXiT1XOc7lLb5KVVr-OXTcO6LeAadb_yrto8aWtTbU3EM5DRvlW91s9t7X-3uuy-hCMUx6K8fxNjKav0d0sGIkp_QHaMogz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733668661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Revell, Liam J. ; Harmon, Luke J. ; Collar, David C.</creator><contributor>Oakley, Todd</contributor><creatorcontrib>Revell, Liam J. ; Harmon, Luke J. ; Collar, David C. ; Oakley, Todd</creatorcontrib><description>A recent advance in the phylogenetic comparative analysis of continuous traits has been explicit, model-based measurement of "phylogenetic signal" in data sets composed of observations collected from species related by a phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic signal is a measure of the statistical dependence among species' trait values due to their phylogenetic relationships. Although phylogenetic signal is a measure of pattern (statistical dependence), there has nonetheless been a widespread propensity in the literature to attribute this pattern to aspects of the evolutionary process or rate. This may be due, in part, to the perception that high evolutionary rate necessarily results in low phylogenetic signal; and, conversely, that low evolutionary rate or stabilizing selection results in high phylogenetic signal (due to the resulting high resemblance between related species). In this study, we use individual-based numerical simulations on stochastic phylogenetic trees to clarify the relationship between phylogenetic signal, rate, and evolutionary process. Under the simplest model for quantitative trait evolution, homogeneous rate genetic drift, there is no relation between evolutionary rate and phylogenetic signal. For other circumstances, such as functional constraint, fluctuating selection, niche conservatism, and evolutionary heterogeneity, the relationship between process, rate, and phylogenetic signal is complex. For these reasons, we recommend against interpretations of evolutionary process or rate based on estimates of phylogenetic signal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-5157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1076-836X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10635150802302427</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18709597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Biological taxonomies ; Brownian motion ; Comparative method ; Computer Simulation ; Evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; Evolutionary genetics ; evolutionary lability ; Evolutionary processes ; functional constraint ; Genetic Drift ; Models, Genetic ; Mutation ; niche conservatism ; Phenotypic traits ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; quantitative characters ; Stabilizing selection</subject><ispartof>Systematic biology, 2008-08, Vol.57 (4), p.591-601</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Society of Systematic Biologists</rights><rights>2008 Society of Systematic Biologists 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-9e1ec8a1aa06007dcfda03a69007972b3cdaa0822dd50db7fc8a470fb9a2da2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-9e1ec8a1aa06007dcfda03a69007972b3cdaa0822dd50db7fc8a470fb9a2da2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27756377$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27756377$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18709597$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Oakley, Todd</contributor><creatorcontrib>Revell, Liam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmon, Luke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collar, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate</title><title>Systematic biology</title><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><description>A recent advance in the phylogenetic comparative analysis of continuous traits has been explicit, model-based measurement of "phylogenetic signal" in data sets composed of observations collected from species related by a phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic signal is a measure of the statistical dependence among species' trait values due to their phylogenetic relationships. Although phylogenetic signal is a measure of pattern (statistical dependence), there has nonetheless been a widespread propensity in the literature to attribute this pattern to aspects of the evolutionary process or rate. This may be due, in part, to the perception that high evolutionary rate necessarily results in low phylogenetic signal; and, conversely, that low evolutionary rate or stabilizing selection results in high phylogenetic signal (due to the resulting high resemblance between related species). In this study, we use individual-based numerical simulations on stochastic phylogenetic trees to clarify the relationship between phylogenetic signal, rate, and evolutionary process. Under the simplest model for quantitative trait evolution, homogeneous rate genetic drift, there is no relation between evolutionary rate and phylogenetic signal. For other circumstances, such as functional constraint, fluctuating selection, niche conservatism, and evolutionary heterogeneity, the relationship between process, rate, and phylogenetic signal is complex. For these reasons, we recommend against interpretations of evolutionary process or rate based on estimates of phylogenetic signal.</description><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Brownian motion</subject><subject>Comparative method</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>evolutionary lability</subject><subject>Evolutionary processes</subject><subject>functional constraint</subject><subject>Genetic Drift</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>niche conservatism</subject><subject>Phenotypic traits</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>quantitative characters</subject><subject>Stabilizing selection</subject><issn>1063-5157</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkDFPwzAQhS0EoqXwAxhA2VgaONuJnYyolBapElUBUbFYTuyUlDQucYLov8dVqjKwMN2d3veeTg-hcwzXGCK4wcBoiEO3EgokIPwAdTFw5keUzQ-3O6O-A3gHnVi7BMCYhfgYdXDEIQ5j3kV0-r4pzEKXus5T7ylflLLoe8MvUzR1bkpZbbxpZVJtbd-TpfJmstan6CiThdVnu9lDL_fD58HYnzyOHga3Ez8NAqj9WGOdRhJLCQyAqzRTEqhksTtiThKaKidFhCgVgkp45uCAQ5bEkihJJO2hqzZ3XZnPRttarHKb6qKQpTaNFZxSxiLGsCNxS6aVsbbSmVhX-co9LzCIbVXiT1XOc7lLb5KVVr-OXTcO6LeAadb_yrto8aWtTbU3EM5DRvlW91s9t7X-3uuy-hCMUx6K8fxNjKav0d0sGIkp_QHaMogz</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Revell, Liam J.</creator><creator>Harmon, Luke J.</creator><creator>Collar, David C.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate</title><author>Revell, Liam J. ; Harmon, Luke J. ; Collar, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-9e1ec8a1aa06007dcfda03a69007972b3cdaa0822dd50db7fc8a470fb9a2da2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Brownian motion</topic><topic>Comparative method</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>evolutionary lability</topic><topic>Evolutionary processes</topic><topic>functional constraint</topic><topic>Genetic Drift</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>niche conservatism</topic><topic>Phenotypic traits</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>quantitative characters</topic><topic>Stabilizing selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Revell, Liam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmon, Luke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collar, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Revell, Liam J.</au><au>Harmon, Luke J.</au><au>Collar, David C.</au><au>Oakley, Todd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate</atitle><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>601</epage><pages>591-601</pages><issn>1063-5157</issn><eissn>1076-836X</eissn><abstract>A recent advance in the phylogenetic comparative analysis of continuous traits has been explicit, model-based measurement of "phylogenetic signal" in data sets composed of observations collected from species related by a phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic signal is a measure of the statistical dependence among species' trait values due to their phylogenetic relationships. Although phylogenetic signal is a measure of pattern (statistical dependence), there has nonetheless been a widespread propensity in the literature to attribute this pattern to aspects of the evolutionary process or rate. This may be due, in part, to the perception that high evolutionary rate necessarily results in low phylogenetic signal; and, conversely, that low evolutionary rate or stabilizing selection results in high phylogenetic signal (due to the resulting high resemblance between related species). In this study, we use individual-based numerical simulations on stochastic phylogenetic trees to clarify the relationship between phylogenetic signal, rate, and evolutionary process. Under the simplest model for quantitative trait evolution, homogeneous rate genetic drift, there is no relation between evolutionary rate and phylogenetic signal. For other circumstances, such as functional constraint, fluctuating selection, niche conservatism, and evolutionary heterogeneity, the relationship between process, rate, and phylogenetic signal is complex. For these reasons, we recommend against interpretations of evolutionary process or rate based on estimates of phylogenetic signal.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>18709597</pmid><doi>10.1080/10635150802302427</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-5157
ispartof Systematic biology, 2008-08, Vol.57 (4), p.591-601
issn 1063-5157
1076-836X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733668661
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE
subjects Biological taxonomies
Brownian motion
Comparative method
Computer Simulation
Evolution
Evolution, Molecular
Evolutionary genetics
evolutionary lability
Evolutionary processes
functional constraint
Genetic Drift
Models, Genetic
Mutation
niche conservatism
Phenotypic traits
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
quantitative characters
Stabilizing selection
title Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A57%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogenetic%20Signal,%20Evolutionary%20Process,%20and%20Rate&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20biology&rft.au=Revell,%20Liam%20J.&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=601&rft.pages=591-601&rft.issn=1063-5157&rft.eissn=1076-836X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10635150802302427&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27756377%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733668661&rft_id=info:pmid/18709597&rft_jstor_id=27756377&rft_oup_id=10.1080/10635150802302427&rfr_iscdi=true