Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate
A recent advance in the phylogenetic comparative analysis of continuous traits has been explicit, model-based measurement of "phylogenetic signal" in data sets composed of observations collected from species related by a phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic signal is a measure of the statistica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Systematic biology 2008-08, Vol.57 (4), p.591-601 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 601 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 591 |
container_title | Systematic biology |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Revell, Liam J. Harmon, Luke J. Collar, David C. |
description | A recent advance in the phylogenetic comparative analysis of continuous traits has been explicit, model-based measurement of "phylogenetic signal" in data sets composed of observations collected from species related by a phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic signal is a measure of the statistical dependence among species' trait values due to their phylogenetic relationships. Although phylogenetic signal is a measure of pattern (statistical dependence), there has nonetheless been a widespread propensity in the literature to attribute this pattern to aspects of the evolutionary process or rate. This may be due, in part, to the perception that high evolutionary rate necessarily results in low phylogenetic signal; and, conversely, that low evolutionary rate or stabilizing selection results in high phylogenetic signal (due to the resulting high resemblance between related species). In this study, we use individual-based numerical simulations on stochastic phylogenetic trees to clarify the relationship between phylogenetic signal, rate, and evolutionary process. Under the simplest model for quantitative trait evolution, homogeneous rate genetic drift, there is no relation between evolutionary rate and phylogenetic signal. For other circumstances, such as functional constraint, fluctuating selection, niche conservatism, and evolutionary heterogeneity, the relationship between process, rate, and phylogenetic signal is complex. For these reasons, we recommend against interpretations of evolutionary process or rate based on estimates of phylogenetic signal. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10635150802302427 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733668661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27756377</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1080/10635150802302427</oup_id><sourcerecordid>27756377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-9e1ec8a1aa06007dcfda03a69007972b3cdaa0822dd50db7fc8a470fb9a2da2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDFPwzAQhS0EoqXwAxhA2VgaONuJnYyolBapElUBUbFYTuyUlDQucYLov8dVqjKwMN2d3veeTg-hcwzXGCK4wcBoiEO3EgokIPwAdTFw5keUzQ-3O6O-A3gHnVi7BMCYhfgYdXDEIQ5j3kV0-r4pzEKXus5T7ylflLLoe8MvUzR1bkpZbbxpZVJtbd-TpfJmstan6CiThdVnu9lDL_fD58HYnzyOHga3Ez8NAqj9WGOdRhJLCQyAqzRTEqhksTtiThKaKidFhCgVgkp45uCAQ5bEkihJJO2hqzZ3XZnPRttarHKb6qKQpTaNFZxSxiLGsCNxS6aVsbbSmVhX-co9LzCIbVXiT1XOc7lLb5KVVr-OXTcO6LeAadb_yrto8aWtTbU3EM5DRvlW91s9t7X-3uuy-hCMUx6K8fxNjKav0d0sGIkp_QHaMogz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733668661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Revell, Liam J. ; Harmon, Luke J. ; Collar, David C.</creator><contributor>Oakley, Todd</contributor><creatorcontrib>Revell, Liam J. ; Harmon, Luke J. ; Collar, David C. ; Oakley, Todd</creatorcontrib><description>A recent advance in the phylogenetic comparative analysis of continuous traits has been explicit, model-based measurement of "phylogenetic signal" in data sets composed of observations collected from species related by a phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic signal is a measure of the statistical dependence among species' trait values due to their phylogenetic relationships. Although phylogenetic signal is a measure of pattern (statistical dependence), there has nonetheless been a widespread propensity in the literature to attribute this pattern to aspects of the evolutionary process or rate. This may be due, in part, to the perception that high evolutionary rate necessarily results in low phylogenetic signal; and, conversely, that low evolutionary rate or stabilizing selection results in high phylogenetic signal (due to the resulting high resemblance between related species). In this study, we use individual-based numerical simulations on stochastic phylogenetic trees to clarify the relationship between phylogenetic signal, rate, and evolutionary process. Under the simplest model for quantitative trait evolution, homogeneous rate genetic drift, there is no relation between evolutionary rate and phylogenetic signal. For other circumstances, such as functional constraint, fluctuating selection, niche conservatism, and evolutionary heterogeneity, the relationship between process, rate, and phylogenetic signal is complex. For these reasons, we recommend against interpretations of evolutionary process or rate based on estimates of phylogenetic signal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-5157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1076-836X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10635150802302427</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18709597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Biological taxonomies ; Brownian motion ; Comparative method ; Computer Simulation ; Evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; Evolutionary genetics ; evolutionary lability ; Evolutionary processes ; functional constraint ; Genetic Drift ; Models, Genetic ; Mutation ; niche conservatism ; Phenotypic traits ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; quantitative characters ; Stabilizing selection</subject><ispartof>Systematic biology, 2008-08, Vol.57 (4), p.591-601</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Society of Systematic Biologists</rights><rights>2008 Society of Systematic Biologists 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-9e1ec8a1aa06007dcfda03a69007972b3cdaa0822dd50db7fc8a470fb9a2da2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-9e1ec8a1aa06007dcfda03a69007972b3cdaa0822dd50db7fc8a470fb9a2da2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27756377$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27756377$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18709597$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Oakley, Todd</contributor><creatorcontrib>Revell, Liam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmon, Luke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collar, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate</title><title>Systematic biology</title><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><description>A recent advance in the phylogenetic comparative analysis of continuous traits has been explicit, model-based measurement of "phylogenetic signal" in data sets composed of observations collected from species related by a phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic signal is a measure of the statistical dependence among species' trait values due to their phylogenetic relationships. Although phylogenetic signal is a measure of pattern (statistical dependence), there has nonetheless been a widespread propensity in the literature to attribute this pattern to aspects of the evolutionary process or rate. This may be due, in part, to the perception that high evolutionary rate necessarily results in low phylogenetic signal; and, conversely, that low evolutionary rate or stabilizing selection results in high phylogenetic signal (due to the resulting high resemblance between related species). In this study, we use individual-based numerical simulations on stochastic phylogenetic trees to clarify the relationship between phylogenetic signal, rate, and evolutionary process. Under the simplest model for quantitative trait evolution, homogeneous rate genetic drift, there is no relation between evolutionary rate and phylogenetic signal. For other circumstances, such as functional constraint, fluctuating selection, niche conservatism, and evolutionary heterogeneity, the relationship between process, rate, and phylogenetic signal is complex. For these reasons, we recommend against interpretations of evolutionary process or rate based on estimates of phylogenetic signal.</description><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Brownian motion</subject><subject>Comparative method</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>evolutionary lability</subject><subject>Evolutionary processes</subject><subject>functional constraint</subject><subject>Genetic Drift</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>niche conservatism</subject><subject>Phenotypic traits</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>quantitative characters</subject><subject>Stabilizing selection</subject><issn>1063-5157</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkDFPwzAQhS0EoqXwAxhA2VgaONuJnYyolBapElUBUbFYTuyUlDQucYLov8dVqjKwMN2d3veeTg-hcwzXGCK4wcBoiEO3EgokIPwAdTFw5keUzQ-3O6O-A3gHnVi7BMCYhfgYdXDEIQ5j3kV0-r4pzEKXus5T7ylflLLoe8MvUzR1bkpZbbxpZVJtbd-TpfJmstan6CiThdVnu9lDL_fD58HYnzyOHga3Ez8NAqj9WGOdRhJLCQyAqzRTEqhksTtiThKaKidFhCgVgkp45uCAQ5bEkihJJO2hqzZ3XZnPRttarHKb6qKQpTaNFZxSxiLGsCNxS6aVsbbSmVhX-co9LzCIbVXiT1XOc7lLb5KVVr-OXTcO6LeAadb_yrto8aWtTbU3EM5DRvlW91s9t7X-3uuy-hCMUx6K8fxNjKav0d0sGIkp_QHaMogz</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Revell, Liam J.</creator><creator>Harmon, Luke J.</creator><creator>Collar, David C.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate</title><author>Revell, Liam J. ; Harmon, Luke J. ; Collar, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-9e1ec8a1aa06007dcfda03a69007972b3cdaa0822dd50db7fc8a470fb9a2da2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Brownian motion</topic><topic>Comparative method</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>evolutionary lability</topic><topic>Evolutionary processes</topic><topic>functional constraint</topic><topic>Genetic Drift</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>niche conservatism</topic><topic>Phenotypic traits</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>quantitative characters</topic><topic>Stabilizing selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Revell, Liam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmon, Luke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collar, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Revell, Liam J.</au><au>Harmon, Luke J.</au><au>Collar, David C.</au><au>Oakley, Todd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate</atitle><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>601</epage><pages>591-601</pages><issn>1063-5157</issn><eissn>1076-836X</eissn><abstract>A recent advance in the phylogenetic comparative analysis of continuous traits has been explicit, model-based measurement of "phylogenetic signal" in data sets composed of observations collected from species related by a phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic signal is a measure of the statistical dependence among species' trait values due to their phylogenetic relationships. Although phylogenetic signal is a measure of pattern (statistical dependence), there has nonetheless been a widespread propensity in the literature to attribute this pattern to aspects of the evolutionary process or rate. This may be due, in part, to the perception that high evolutionary rate necessarily results in low phylogenetic signal; and, conversely, that low evolutionary rate or stabilizing selection results in high phylogenetic signal (due to the resulting high resemblance between related species). In this study, we use individual-based numerical simulations on stochastic phylogenetic trees to clarify the relationship between phylogenetic signal, rate, and evolutionary process. Under the simplest model for quantitative trait evolution, homogeneous rate genetic drift, there is no relation between evolutionary rate and phylogenetic signal. For other circumstances, such as functional constraint, fluctuating selection, niche conservatism, and evolutionary heterogeneity, the relationship between process, rate, and phylogenetic signal is complex. For these reasons, we recommend against interpretations of evolutionary process or rate based on estimates of phylogenetic signal.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>18709597</pmid><doi>10.1080/10635150802302427</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1063-5157 |
ispartof | Systematic biology, 2008-08, Vol.57 (4), p.591-601 |
issn | 1063-5157 1076-836X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733668661 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE |
subjects | Biological taxonomies Brownian motion Comparative method Computer Simulation Evolution Evolution, Molecular Evolutionary genetics evolutionary lability Evolutionary processes functional constraint Genetic Drift Models, Genetic Mutation niche conservatism Phenotypic traits Phylogenetics Phylogeny quantitative characters Stabilizing selection |
title | Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A57%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogenetic%20Signal,%20Evolutionary%20Process,%20and%20Rate&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20biology&rft.au=Revell,%20Liam%20J.&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=601&rft.pages=591-601&rft.issn=1063-5157&rft.eissn=1076-836X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10635150802302427&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27756377%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733668661&rft_id=info:pmid/18709597&rft_jstor_id=27756377&rft_oup_id=10.1080/10635150802302427&rfr_iscdi=true |