Unexpected major role for venous stenting in deep reflux disease

Background Treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) has largely focused on reflux. Minimally-invasive techniques to address superficial and perforator reflux have evolved, but correction of deep reflux continues to be challenging. The advent of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) scan and minimal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 2010-02, Vol.51 (2), p.401-408
Hauptverfasser: Raju, Seshadri, MD, Darcey, Rikki, BS, Neglén, Peter, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 408
container_issue 2
container_start_page 401
container_title Journal of vascular surgery
container_volume 51
creator Raju, Seshadri, MD
Darcey, Rikki, BS
Neglén, Peter, MD, PhD
description Background Treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) has largely focused on reflux. Minimally-invasive techniques to address superficial and perforator reflux have evolved, but correction of deep reflux continues to be challenging. The advent of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) scan and minimally invasive venous stent technology have renewed interest in the obstructive component in CVI pathophysiology. The aim of this study is to assess stent-related and clinical outcomes following treatment by iliac venous stenting alone in limbs with a combination of iliac vein obstruction and deep venous reflux. Methods A total of 528 limbs in 504 patients, ranging in age from 15 to 87, underwent IVUS-guided iliac vein stent placement to correct obstruction over an 11-year period. The etiology of obstruction was nonthrombotic in 196 (37%), post-thrombotic in 285 (54%) limbs, and combined in 47 (9%). Clinical severity class of CEAP was C3 in 44%, C4,5 in 27%, and C6 in 25% of stented limbs. Deep venous reflux was present in all limbs, associated with superficial and/or perforator reflux in 69%. Reflux was severe in 309/528 (59%) limbs (reflux multisegment score ≥3) and 224/528 (42%) limbs had axial reflux. Venography and other functional tests had poor diagnostic sensitivity to detect obstruction, which was ultimately diagnosed by IVUS. The IVUS-guided iliac vein stenting was the only procedure performed and the associated reflux was left uncorrected. Results There was no mortality; morbidity was minor. Cumulative secondary stent patency was 88% at 5 years; no stent occlusions occurred in nonthrombotic limbs. Cumulative rates of limbs with healed active ulcers, freedom of ulcer recurrence in legs with healed ulcers (C5 ), and freedom from leg dermatitis at 5 years were 54%, 88%, and 81%, respectively. Cumulative rate of substantial improvement of pain and swelling at 5 years was 78% and 55%, respectively. Quality of life improved significantly. Reflux parameters did not deteriorate after stenting. Conclusion Iliac venous stenting alone is sufficient to control symptoms in the majority of patients with combined outflow obstruction and deep reflux. Partial correction of the pathophysiology in limbs with multisystem or multilevel disease can provide substantial symptom relief. Percutaneous stent technology in concert with other minimally-invasive techniques to address superficial and/or perforator reflux offers such partial correction in limbs with advanced CVI and com
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733659201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0741521409016759</els_id><sourcerecordid>733659201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c9962e6b1cc08ea4a95a5dca9722598763401ea5743a5e41d00b721958be40b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtPwzAQhC0EgvL4AVxQbpwS1k4cx0JCoIqXVIkD9Gw5zhY5pE6xkwr-Pa4KHDhw2j3MjHa_IeSUQkaBlhdt1q5DxgBkBlUGOdshEwpSpGUFcpdMQBQ05YwWB-QwhBaAUl6JfXIQLVBKBhNyPXf4sUIzYJMsddv7xPcdJou4rNH1Y0jCgG6w7jWxLmkQV4nHRTd-JI0NqAMek72F7gKefM8jMr-7fZk-pLOn-8fpzSw1BYchNVKWDMuaGgMV6kJLrnljtBSMcVmJMi-AouaiyDXHgjYAtWBU8qrGAuo8PyLn29yV799HDINa2mCw67TDeKYSeV7y-BKNSrpVGt-HEK9VK2-X2n8qCmrDTbUqclMbbgoqFblFz9l3-lgvsfl1_ICKgsutAOOPa4teBWPRGWysj_RU09t_46_-uE1nnTW6e8NPDG0_ehfhKaoCU6CeN8VtegMZ8wSX-RdCSpGr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733659201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unexpected major role for venous stenting in deep reflux disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Raju, Seshadri, MD ; Darcey, Rikki, BS ; Neglén, Peter, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Raju, Seshadri, MD ; Darcey, Rikki, BS ; Neglén, Peter, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) has largely focused on reflux. Minimally-invasive techniques to address superficial and perforator reflux have evolved, but correction of deep reflux continues to be challenging. The advent of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) scan and minimally invasive venous stent technology have renewed interest in the obstructive component in CVI pathophysiology. The aim of this study is to assess stent-related and clinical outcomes following treatment by iliac venous stenting alone in limbs with a combination of iliac vein obstruction and deep venous reflux. Methods A total of 528 limbs in 504 patients, ranging in age from 15 to 87, underwent IVUS-guided iliac vein stent placement to correct obstruction over an 11-year period. The etiology of obstruction was nonthrombotic in 196 (37%), post-thrombotic in 285 (54%) limbs, and combined in 47 (9%). Clinical severity class of CEAP was C3 in 44%, C4,5 in 27%, and C6 in 25% of stented limbs. Deep venous reflux was present in all limbs, associated with superficial and/or perforator reflux in 69%. Reflux was severe in 309/528 (59%) limbs (reflux multisegment score ≥3) and 224/528 (42%) limbs had axial reflux. Venography and other functional tests had poor diagnostic sensitivity to detect obstruction, which was ultimately diagnosed by IVUS. The IVUS-guided iliac vein stenting was the only procedure performed and the associated reflux was left uncorrected. Results There was no mortality; morbidity was minor. Cumulative secondary stent patency was 88% at 5 years; no stent occlusions occurred in nonthrombotic limbs. Cumulative rates of limbs with healed active ulcers, freedom of ulcer recurrence in legs with healed ulcers (C5 ), and freedom from leg dermatitis at 5 years were 54%, 88%, and 81%, respectively. Cumulative rate of substantial improvement of pain and swelling at 5 years was 78% and 55%, respectively. Quality of life improved significantly. Reflux parameters did not deteriorate after stenting. Conclusion Iliac venous stenting alone is sufficient to control symptoms in the majority of patients with combined outflow obstruction and deep reflux. Partial correction of the pathophysiology in limbs with multisystem or multilevel disease can provide substantial symptom relief. Percutaneous stent technology in concert with other minimally-invasive techniques to address superficial and/or perforator reflux offers such partial correction in limbs with advanced CVI and complex venous pathology. Open correction of obstruction or reflux is now required only infrequently as a “last resort”.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20006920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Catheterization - adverse effects ; Catheterization - instrumentation ; Chronic Disease ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Edema - etiology ; Edema - therapy ; Female ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Iliac Vein - diagnostic imaging ; Iliac Vein - physiopathology ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain - etiology ; Pain Management ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Selection ; Phlebography ; Quality of Life ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stents ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Varicose Ulcer - etiology ; Varicose Ulcer - therapy ; Vascular Patency ; Venous Insufficiency - complications ; Venous Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging ; Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology ; Venous Insufficiency - therapy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2010-02, Vol.51 (2), p.401-408</ispartof><rights>Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2010 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c9962e6b1cc08ea4a95a5dca9722598763401ea5743a5e41d00b721958be40b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c9962e6b1cc08ea4a95a5dca9722598763401ea5743a5e41d00b721958be40b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521409016759$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20006920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raju, Seshadri, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darcey, Rikki, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neglén, Peter, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Unexpected major role for venous stenting in deep reflux disease</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Background Treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) has largely focused on reflux. Minimally-invasive techniques to address superficial and perforator reflux have evolved, but correction of deep reflux continues to be challenging. The advent of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) scan and minimally invasive venous stent technology have renewed interest in the obstructive component in CVI pathophysiology. The aim of this study is to assess stent-related and clinical outcomes following treatment by iliac venous stenting alone in limbs with a combination of iliac vein obstruction and deep venous reflux. Methods A total of 528 limbs in 504 patients, ranging in age from 15 to 87, underwent IVUS-guided iliac vein stent placement to correct obstruction over an 11-year period. The etiology of obstruction was nonthrombotic in 196 (37%), post-thrombotic in 285 (54%) limbs, and combined in 47 (9%). Clinical severity class of CEAP was C3 in 44%, C4,5 in 27%, and C6 in 25% of stented limbs. Deep venous reflux was present in all limbs, associated with superficial and/or perforator reflux in 69%. Reflux was severe in 309/528 (59%) limbs (reflux multisegment score ≥3) and 224/528 (42%) limbs had axial reflux. Venography and other functional tests had poor diagnostic sensitivity to detect obstruction, which was ultimately diagnosed by IVUS. The IVUS-guided iliac vein stenting was the only procedure performed and the associated reflux was left uncorrected. Results There was no mortality; morbidity was minor. Cumulative secondary stent patency was 88% at 5 years; no stent occlusions occurred in nonthrombotic limbs. Cumulative rates of limbs with healed active ulcers, freedom of ulcer recurrence in legs with healed ulcers (C5 ), and freedom from leg dermatitis at 5 years were 54%, 88%, and 81%, respectively. Cumulative rate of substantial improvement of pain and swelling at 5 years was 78% and 55%, respectively. Quality of life improved significantly. Reflux parameters did not deteriorate after stenting. Conclusion Iliac venous stenting alone is sufficient to control symptoms in the majority of patients with combined outflow obstruction and deep reflux. Partial correction of the pathophysiology in limbs with multisystem or multilevel disease can provide substantial symptom relief. Percutaneous stent technology in concert with other minimally-invasive techniques to address superficial and/or perforator reflux offers such partial correction in limbs with advanced CVI and complex venous pathology. Open correction of obstruction or reflux is now required only infrequently as a “last resort”.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Catheterization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheterization - instrumentation</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic</subject><subject>Edema - etiology</subject><subject>Edema - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iliac Vein - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Iliac Vein - physiopathology</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Phlebography</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Varicose Ulcer - etiology</subject><subject>Varicose Ulcer - therapy</subject><subject>Vascular Patency</subject><subject>Venous Insufficiency - complications</subject><subject>Venous Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><subject>Venous Insufficiency - therapy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtPwzAQhC0EgvL4AVxQbpwS1k4cx0JCoIqXVIkD9Gw5zhY5pE6xkwr-Pa4KHDhw2j3MjHa_IeSUQkaBlhdt1q5DxgBkBlUGOdshEwpSpGUFcpdMQBQ05YwWB-QwhBaAUl6JfXIQLVBKBhNyPXf4sUIzYJMsddv7xPcdJou4rNH1Y0jCgG6w7jWxLmkQV4nHRTd-JI0NqAMek72F7gKefM8jMr-7fZk-pLOn-8fpzSw1BYchNVKWDMuaGgMV6kJLrnljtBSMcVmJMi-AouaiyDXHgjYAtWBU8qrGAuo8PyLn29yV799HDINa2mCw67TDeKYSeV7y-BKNSrpVGt-HEK9VK2-X2n8qCmrDTbUqclMbbgoqFblFz9l3-lgvsfl1_ICKgsutAOOPa4teBWPRGWysj_RU09t_46_-uE1nnTW6e8NPDG0_ehfhKaoCU6CeN8VtegMZ8wSX-RdCSpGr</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Raju, Seshadri, MD</creator><creator>Darcey, Rikki, BS</creator><creator>Neglén, Peter, MD, PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Unexpected major role for venous stenting in deep reflux disease</title><author>Raju, Seshadri, MD ; Darcey, Rikki, BS ; Neglén, Peter, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c9962e6b1cc08ea4a95a5dca9722598763401ea5743a5e41d00b721958be40b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Catheterization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheterization - instrumentation</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic</topic><topic>Edema - etiology</topic><topic>Edema - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iliac Vein - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Iliac Vein - physiopathology</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Phlebography</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Varicose Ulcer - etiology</topic><topic>Varicose Ulcer - therapy</topic><topic>Vascular Patency</topic><topic>Venous Insufficiency - complications</topic><topic>Venous Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><topic>Venous Insufficiency - therapy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raju, Seshadri, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darcey, Rikki, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neglén, Peter, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raju, Seshadri, MD</au><au>Darcey, Rikki, BS</au><au>Neglén, Peter, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unexpected major role for venous stenting in deep reflux disease</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>408</epage><pages>401-408</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Background Treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) has largely focused on reflux. Minimally-invasive techniques to address superficial and perforator reflux have evolved, but correction of deep reflux continues to be challenging. The advent of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) scan and minimally invasive venous stent technology have renewed interest in the obstructive component in CVI pathophysiology. The aim of this study is to assess stent-related and clinical outcomes following treatment by iliac venous stenting alone in limbs with a combination of iliac vein obstruction and deep venous reflux. Methods A total of 528 limbs in 504 patients, ranging in age from 15 to 87, underwent IVUS-guided iliac vein stent placement to correct obstruction over an 11-year period. The etiology of obstruction was nonthrombotic in 196 (37%), post-thrombotic in 285 (54%) limbs, and combined in 47 (9%). Clinical severity class of CEAP was C3 in 44%, C4,5 in 27%, and C6 in 25% of stented limbs. Deep venous reflux was present in all limbs, associated with superficial and/or perforator reflux in 69%. Reflux was severe in 309/528 (59%) limbs (reflux multisegment score ≥3) and 224/528 (42%) limbs had axial reflux. Venography and other functional tests had poor diagnostic sensitivity to detect obstruction, which was ultimately diagnosed by IVUS. The IVUS-guided iliac vein stenting was the only procedure performed and the associated reflux was left uncorrected. Results There was no mortality; morbidity was minor. Cumulative secondary stent patency was 88% at 5 years; no stent occlusions occurred in nonthrombotic limbs. Cumulative rates of limbs with healed active ulcers, freedom of ulcer recurrence in legs with healed ulcers (C5 ), and freedom from leg dermatitis at 5 years were 54%, 88%, and 81%, respectively. Cumulative rate of substantial improvement of pain and swelling at 5 years was 78% and 55%, respectively. Quality of life improved significantly. Reflux parameters did not deteriorate after stenting. Conclusion Iliac venous stenting alone is sufficient to control symptoms in the majority of patients with combined outflow obstruction and deep reflux. Partial correction of the pathophysiology in limbs with multisystem or multilevel disease can provide substantial symptom relief. Percutaneous stent technology in concert with other minimally-invasive techniques to address superficial and/or perforator reflux offers such partial correction in limbs with advanced CVI and complex venous pathology. Open correction of obstruction or reflux is now required only infrequently as a “last resort”.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>20006920</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.032</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-5214
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery, 2010-02, Vol.51 (2), p.401-408
issn 0741-5214
1097-6809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733659201
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Catheterization - adverse effects
Catheterization - instrumentation
Chronic Disease
Constriction, Pathologic
Edema - etiology
Edema - therapy
Female
Hemodynamics
Humans
Iliac Vein - diagnostic imaging
Iliac Vein - physiopathology
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Pain - etiology
Pain Management
Pain Measurement
Patient Selection
Phlebography
Quality of Life
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Stents
Surgery
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Varicose Ulcer - etiology
Varicose Ulcer - therapy
Vascular Patency
Venous Insufficiency - complications
Venous Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging
Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology
Venous Insufficiency - therapy
Young Adult
title Unexpected major role for venous stenting in deep reflux disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A50%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unexpected%20major%20role%20for%20venous%20stenting%20in%20deep%20reflux%20disease&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Raju,%20Seshadri,%20MD&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=408&rft.pages=401-408&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733659201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733659201&rft_id=info:pmid/20006920&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0741521409016759&rfr_iscdi=true