Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos

We studied whether bovine embryos developing after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with sex-sorted spermatozoa differed in developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio from embryos produced with unsorted spermatozoa. Abattoir-derived oocytes were fertilized with X-sorted, Y-sorted or unsorted spermato...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zygote (Cambridge) 2010-08, Vol.18 (3), p.185-194
Hauptverfasser: Peippo, J., Räty, M., Korhonen, K., Eronen, M., Kananen, K., Hurme, T., Halmekytö, M., Mäki-Tanila, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 194
container_issue 3
container_start_page 185
container_title Zygote (Cambridge)
container_volume 18
creator Peippo, J.
Räty, M.
Korhonen, K.
Eronen, M.
Kananen, K.
Hurme, T.
Halmekytö, M.
Mäki-Tanila, A.
description We studied whether bovine embryos developing after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with sex-sorted spermatozoa differed in developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio from embryos produced with unsorted spermatozoa. Abattoir-derived oocytes were fertilized with X-sorted, Y-sorted or unsorted spermatozoa from a single bull. To evaluate economical use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa, washed spermatozoa from a single straw (2 million spermatozoa) were used to fertilize each batch of collected oocytes without any further isolation steps. Concentration of the unsorted spermatozoa was adjusted accordingly. Fertilizations were assessed by staining sperm asters at 10 hpi and pronuclei at 20 hpi. Embryo development and morphological quality were monitored on days 2, 7, 8 and 9 of the development (IVF = day 0). All embryos were sexed using PCR. Following fertilization, penetration and subsequent cleavage rates were compromised in the X-sorted group compared with the Y-sorted and unsorted groups (penetration: 58.0% vs. 89.8% and 90.0%, cleavage: 65.3% vs. 81.5% and 75.0%). The use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa did not, however, reduce the proportion of transferable embryos (sex-sorted 29.6% vs. unsorted 27.7%) or their quality (quality 1: sex-sorted 36.0% vs. unsorted 19.9%). The Y-sorted spermatozoa produced more transferable embryos of better quality than the X-sorted spermatozoa (days 7–8: 31.9% vs. 26.4%, quality 1: 38.9% vs. 30.6%). On average, out of 10 transferable embryos, nine were of the predicted sex in the X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa groups. These results indicate that low numbers of X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa can be used successfully for female and male embryo production in vitro.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0967199409990281
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733649809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0967199409990281</cupid><sourcerecordid>733649809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8579d882a3c8b1cf0312de345003764c77ee4a878b72ec578f25de898914db93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAURS0EokPLB7BBFhs2BOw4ie0lrZhSqVJVQWFpOc5L6zaJU9uZdmbFP_AN_BhfgqMZigRiZVn3vPuu3kXoBSVvKaH83SciK06lLIiUkuSCPkILWlQyE5yRx2gxy9ms76FnIVwTQjiXxVO0lxNKZF6JBfpx0o_aROxabAe8stE73IKPtrMbHa0bZqV2KzsAds6sIwR8Z-MVDnCfBecjNLj1bgPDz2_f45W-S_8wgu91dBuncTJoYAWdG3sYou7wTXKK1oQ3-HbSnY1rrIdmdsN-3jev2w3Y4RJDX_u1CwfoSau7AM937z66WH74fPQxOz07Pjl6f5qZdIKYgSi5bITINTOipqYljOYNsKIkhPGqMJwDFFpwUfMcTMlFm5cNCCkkLZpasn30eus7enc7QYiqt8FA1-kB3BQUZ6wqpCAz-eov8tpNfkjhVCl5KiWXRYLoFjLeheChVaO3vfZrRYmaG1T_NJhmXu6Mp7qH5mHid2UJyLaADRHuH3Ttb1TFGS9VdXyuKiK_HH4VS7VMPNuF0OmYtrmEP1H_H-MXH625Hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>597719294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Peippo, J. ; Räty, M. ; Korhonen, K. ; Eronen, M. ; Kananen, K. ; Hurme, T. ; Halmekytö, M. ; Mäki-Tanila, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peippo, J. ; Räty, M. ; Korhonen, K. ; Eronen, M. ; Kananen, K. ; Hurme, T. ; Halmekytö, M. ; Mäki-Tanila, A.</creatorcontrib><description>We studied whether bovine embryos developing after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with sex-sorted spermatozoa differed in developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio from embryos produced with unsorted spermatozoa. Abattoir-derived oocytes were fertilized with X-sorted, Y-sorted or unsorted spermatozoa from a single bull. To evaluate economical use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa, washed spermatozoa from a single straw (2 million spermatozoa) were used to fertilize each batch of collected oocytes without any further isolation steps. Concentration of the unsorted spermatozoa was adjusted accordingly. Fertilizations were assessed by staining sperm asters at 10 hpi and pronuclei at 20 hpi. Embryo development and morphological quality were monitored on days 2, 7, 8 and 9 of the development (IVF = day 0). All embryos were sexed using PCR. Following fertilization, penetration and subsequent cleavage rates were compromised in the X-sorted group compared with the Y-sorted and unsorted groups (penetration: 58.0% vs. 89.8% and 90.0%, cleavage: 65.3% vs. 81.5% and 75.0%). The use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa did not, however, reduce the proportion of transferable embryos (sex-sorted 29.6% vs. unsorted 27.7%) or their quality (quality 1: sex-sorted 36.0% vs. unsorted 19.9%). The Y-sorted spermatozoa produced more transferable embryos of better quality than the X-sorted spermatozoa (days 7–8: 31.9% vs. 26.4%, quality 1: 38.9% vs. 30.6%). On average, out of 10 transferable embryos, nine were of the predicted sex in the X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa groups. These results indicate that low numbers of X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa can be used successfully for female and male embryo production in vitro.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-1994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0967199409990281</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20109268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cattle ; Embryo sexing ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism ; Embryonic Development ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - methods ; Flow cytometry ; Kinetics ; Male ; Oocytes ; Sex Ratio ; Sexual dimorphism ; Sperm aster ; Spermatozoa</subject><ispartof>Zygote (Cambridge), 2010-08, Vol.18 (3), p.185-194</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8579d882a3c8b1cf0312de345003764c77ee4a878b72ec578f25de898914db93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8579d882a3c8b1cf0312de345003764c77ee4a878b72ec578f25de898914db93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0967199409990281/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20109268$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peippo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Räty, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eronen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kananen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurme, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halmekytö, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäki-Tanila, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos</title><title>Zygote (Cambridge)</title><addtitle>Zygote</addtitle><description>We studied whether bovine embryos developing after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with sex-sorted spermatozoa differed in developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio from embryos produced with unsorted spermatozoa. Abattoir-derived oocytes were fertilized with X-sorted, Y-sorted or unsorted spermatozoa from a single bull. To evaluate economical use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa, washed spermatozoa from a single straw (2 million spermatozoa) were used to fertilize each batch of collected oocytes without any further isolation steps. Concentration of the unsorted spermatozoa was adjusted accordingly. Fertilizations were assessed by staining sperm asters at 10 hpi and pronuclei at 20 hpi. Embryo development and morphological quality were monitored on days 2, 7, 8 and 9 of the development (IVF = day 0). All embryos were sexed using PCR. Following fertilization, penetration and subsequent cleavage rates were compromised in the X-sorted group compared with the Y-sorted and unsorted groups (penetration: 58.0% vs. 89.8% and 90.0%, cleavage: 65.3% vs. 81.5% and 75.0%). The use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa did not, however, reduce the proportion of transferable embryos (sex-sorted 29.6% vs. unsorted 27.7%) or their quality (quality 1: sex-sorted 36.0% vs. unsorted 19.9%). The Y-sorted spermatozoa produced more transferable embryos of better quality than the X-sorted spermatozoa (days 7–8: 31.9% vs. 26.4%, quality 1: 38.9% vs. 30.6%). On average, out of 10 transferable embryos, nine were of the predicted sex in the X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa groups. These results indicate that low numbers of X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa can be used successfully for female and male embryo production in vitro.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Embryo sexing</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism</subject><subject>Embryonic Development</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Sex Ratio</subject><subject>Sexual dimorphism</subject><subject>Sperm aster</subject><subject>Spermatozoa</subject><issn>0967-1994</issn><issn>1469-8730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAURS0EokPLB7BBFhs2BOw4ie0lrZhSqVJVQWFpOc5L6zaJU9uZdmbFP_AN_BhfgqMZigRiZVn3vPuu3kXoBSVvKaH83SciK06lLIiUkuSCPkILWlQyE5yRx2gxy9ms76FnIVwTQjiXxVO0lxNKZF6JBfpx0o_aROxabAe8stE73IKPtrMbHa0bZqV2KzsAds6sIwR8Z-MVDnCfBecjNLj1bgPDz2_f45W-S_8wgu91dBuncTJoYAWdG3sYou7wTXKK1oQ3-HbSnY1rrIdmdsN-3jev2w3Y4RJDX_u1CwfoSau7AM937z66WH74fPQxOz07Pjl6f5qZdIKYgSi5bITINTOipqYljOYNsKIkhPGqMJwDFFpwUfMcTMlFm5cNCCkkLZpasn30eus7enc7QYiqt8FA1-kB3BQUZ6wqpCAz-eov8tpNfkjhVCl5KiWXRYLoFjLeheChVaO3vfZrRYmaG1T_NJhmXu6Mp7qH5mHid2UJyLaADRHuH3Ttb1TFGS9VdXyuKiK_HH4VS7VMPNuF0OmYtrmEP1H_H-MXH625Hw</recordid><startdate>201008</startdate><enddate>201008</enddate><creator>Peippo, J.</creator><creator>Räty, M.</creator><creator>Korhonen, K.</creator><creator>Eronen, M.</creator><creator>Kananen, K.</creator><creator>Hurme, T.</creator><creator>Halmekytö, M.</creator><creator>Mäki-Tanila, A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201008</creationdate><title>Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos</title><author>Peippo, J. ; Räty, M. ; Korhonen, K. ; Eronen, M. ; Kananen, K. ; Hurme, T. ; Halmekytö, M. ; Mäki-Tanila, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8579d882a3c8b1cf0312de345003764c77ee4a878b72ec578f25de898914db93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Embryo sexing</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism</topic><topic>Embryonic Development</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Sex Ratio</topic><topic>Sexual dimorphism</topic><topic>Sperm aster</topic><topic>Spermatozoa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peippo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Räty, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eronen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kananen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurme, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halmekytö, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäki-Tanila, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zygote (Cambridge)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peippo, J.</au><au>Räty, M.</au><au>Korhonen, K.</au><au>Eronen, M.</au><au>Kananen, K.</au><au>Hurme, T.</au><au>Halmekytö, M.</au><au>Mäki-Tanila, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos</atitle><jtitle>Zygote (Cambridge)</jtitle><addtitle>Zygote</addtitle><date>2010-08</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>185-194</pages><issn>0967-1994</issn><eissn>1469-8730</eissn><abstract>We studied whether bovine embryos developing after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with sex-sorted spermatozoa differed in developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio from embryos produced with unsorted spermatozoa. Abattoir-derived oocytes were fertilized with X-sorted, Y-sorted or unsorted spermatozoa from a single bull. To evaluate economical use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa, washed spermatozoa from a single straw (2 million spermatozoa) were used to fertilize each batch of collected oocytes without any further isolation steps. Concentration of the unsorted spermatozoa was adjusted accordingly. Fertilizations were assessed by staining sperm asters at 10 hpi and pronuclei at 20 hpi. Embryo development and morphological quality were monitored on days 2, 7, 8 and 9 of the development (IVF = day 0). All embryos were sexed using PCR. Following fertilization, penetration and subsequent cleavage rates were compromised in the X-sorted group compared with the Y-sorted and unsorted groups (penetration: 58.0% vs. 89.8% and 90.0%, cleavage: 65.3% vs. 81.5% and 75.0%). The use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa did not, however, reduce the proportion of transferable embryos (sex-sorted 29.6% vs. unsorted 27.7%) or their quality (quality 1: sex-sorted 36.0% vs. unsorted 19.9%). The Y-sorted spermatozoa produced more transferable embryos of better quality than the X-sorted spermatozoa (days 7–8: 31.9% vs. 26.4%, quality 1: 38.9% vs. 30.6%). On average, out of 10 transferable embryos, nine were of the predicted sex in the X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa groups. These results indicate that low numbers of X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa can be used successfully for female and male embryo production in vitro.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>20109268</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0967199409990281</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0967-1994
ispartof Zygote (Cambridge), 2010-08, Vol.18 (3), p.185-194
issn 0967-1994
1469-8730
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733649809
source MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Cattle
Embryo sexing
Embryo Transfer - methods
Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism
Embryonic Development
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - methods
Flow cytometry
Kinetics
Male
Oocytes
Sex Ratio
Sexual dimorphism
Sperm aster
Spermatozoa
title Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T02%3A01%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20in%20vitro%20fertilization%20of%20bovine%20oocytes%20with%20sex-sorted%20frozen%E2%80%93thawed%20spermatozoa%20on%20developmental%20kinetics,%20quality%20and%20sex%20ratio%20of%20developing%20embryos&rft.jtitle=Zygote%20(Cambridge)&rft.au=Peippo,%20J.&rft.date=2010-08&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=185-194&rft.issn=0967-1994&rft.eissn=1469-8730&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0967199409990281&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733649809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=597719294&rft_id=info:pmid/20109268&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0967199409990281&rfr_iscdi=true