Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos
We studied whether bovine embryos developing after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with sex-sorted spermatozoa differed in developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio from embryos produced with unsorted spermatozoa. Abattoir-derived oocytes were fertilized with X-sorted, Y-sorted or unsorted spermato...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zygote (Cambridge) 2010-08, Vol.18 (3), p.185-194 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 194 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 185 |
container_title | Zygote (Cambridge) |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Peippo, J. Räty, M. Korhonen, K. Eronen, M. Kananen, K. Hurme, T. Halmekytö, M. Mäki-Tanila, A. |
description | We studied whether bovine embryos developing after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with sex-sorted spermatozoa differed in developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio from embryos produced with unsorted spermatozoa. Abattoir-derived oocytes were fertilized with X-sorted, Y-sorted or unsorted spermatozoa from a single bull. To evaluate economical use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa, washed spermatozoa from a single straw (2 million spermatozoa) were used to fertilize each batch of collected oocytes without any further isolation steps. Concentration of the unsorted spermatozoa was adjusted accordingly. Fertilizations were assessed by staining sperm asters at 10 hpi and pronuclei at 20 hpi. Embryo development and morphological quality were monitored on days 2, 7, 8 and 9 of the development (IVF = day 0). All embryos were sexed using PCR. Following fertilization, penetration and subsequent cleavage rates were compromised in the X-sorted group compared with the Y-sorted and unsorted groups (penetration: 58.0% vs. 89.8% and 90.0%, cleavage: 65.3% vs. 81.5% and 75.0%). The use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa did not, however, reduce the proportion of transferable embryos (sex-sorted 29.6% vs. unsorted 27.7%) or their quality (quality 1: sex-sorted 36.0% vs. unsorted 19.9%). The Y-sorted spermatozoa produced more transferable embryos of better quality than the X-sorted spermatozoa (days 7–8: 31.9% vs. 26.4%, quality 1: 38.9% vs. 30.6%). On average, out of 10 transferable embryos, nine were of the predicted sex in the X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa groups. These results indicate that low numbers of X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa can be used successfully for female and male embryo production in vitro. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0967199409990281 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733649809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0967199409990281</cupid><sourcerecordid>733649809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8579d882a3c8b1cf0312de345003764c77ee4a878b72ec578f25de898914db93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAURS0EokPLB7BBFhs2BOw4ie0lrZhSqVJVQWFpOc5L6zaJU9uZdmbFP_AN_BhfgqMZigRiZVn3vPuu3kXoBSVvKaH83SciK06lLIiUkuSCPkILWlQyE5yRx2gxy9ms76FnIVwTQjiXxVO0lxNKZF6JBfpx0o_aROxabAe8stE73IKPtrMbHa0bZqV2KzsAds6sIwR8Z-MVDnCfBecjNLj1bgPDz2_f45W-S_8wgu91dBuncTJoYAWdG3sYou7wTXKK1oQ3-HbSnY1rrIdmdsN-3jev2w3Y4RJDX_u1CwfoSau7AM937z66WH74fPQxOz07Pjl6f5qZdIKYgSi5bITINTOipqYljOYNsKIkhPGqMJwDFFpwUfMcTMlFm5cNCCkkLZpasn30eus7enc7QYiqt8FA1-kB3BQUZ6wqpCAz-eov8tpNfkjhVCl5KiWXRYLoFjLeheChVaO3vfZrRYmaG1T_NJhmXu6Mp7qH5mHid2UJyLaADRHuH3Ttb1TFGS9VdXyuKiK_HH4VS7VMPNuF0OmYtrmEP1H_H-MXH625Hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>597719294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Peippo, J. ; Räty, M. ; Korhonen, K. ; Eronen, M. ; Kananen, K. ; Hurme, T. ; Halmekytö, M. ; Mäki-Tanila, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peippo, J. ; Räty, M. ; Korhonen, K. ; Eronen, M. ; Kananen, K. ; Hurme, T. ; Halmekytö, M. ; Mäki-Tanila, A.</creatorcontrib><description>We studied whether bovine embryos developing after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with sex-sorted spermatozoa differed in developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio from embryos produced with unsorted spermatozoa. Abattoir-derived oocytes were fertilized with X-sorted, Y-sorted or unsorted spermatozoa from a single bull. To evaluate economical use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa, washed spermatozoa from a single straw (2 million spermatozoa) were used to fertilize each batch of collected oocytes without any further isolation steps. Concentration of the unsorted spermatozoa was adjusted accordingly. Fertilizations were assessed by staining sperm asters at 10 hpi and pronuclei at 20 hpi. Embryo development and morphological quality were monitored on days 2, 7, 8 and 9 of the development (IVF = day 0). All embryos were sexed using PCR. Following fertilization, penetration and subsequent cleavage rates were compromised in the X-sorted group compared with the Y-sorted and unsorted groups (penetration: 58.0% vs. 89.8% and 90.0%, cleavage: 65.3% vs. 81.5% and 75.0%). The use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa did not, however, reduce the proportion of transferable embryos (sex-sorted 29.6% vs. unsorted 27.7%) or their quality (quality 1: sex-sorted 36.0% vs. unsorted 19.9%). The Y-sorted spermatozoa produced more transferable embryos of better quality than the X-sorted spermatozoa (days 7–8: 31.9% vs. 26.4%, quality 1: 38.9% vs. 30.6%). On average, out of 10 transferable embryos, nine were of the predicted sex in the X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa groups. These results indicate that low numbers of X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa can be used successfully for female and male embryo production in vitro.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-1994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0967199409990281</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20109268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cattle ; Embryo sexing ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism ; Embryonic Development ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - methods ; Flow cytometry ; Kinetics ; Male ; Oocytes ; Sex Ratio ; Sexual dimorphism ; Sperm aster ; Spermatozoa</subject><ispartof>Zygote (Cambridge), 2010-08, Vol.18 (3), p.185-194</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8579d882a3c8b1cf0312de345003764c77ee4a878b72ec578f25de898914db93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8579d882a3c8b1cf0312de345003764c77ee4a878b72ec578f25de898914db93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0967199409990281/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20109268$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peippo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Räty, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eronen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kananen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurme, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halmekytö, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäki-Tanila, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos</title><title>Zygote (Cambridge)</title><addtitle>Zygote</addtitle><description>We studied whether bovine embryos developing after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with sex-sorted spermatozoa differed in developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio from embryos produced with unsorted spermatozoa. Abattoir-derived oocytes were fertilized with X-sorted, Y-sorted or unsorted spermatozoa from a single bull. To evaluate economical use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa, washed spermatozoa from a single straw (2 million spermatozoa) were used to fertilize each batch of collected oocytes without any further isolation steps. Concentration of the unsorted spermatozoa was adjusted accordingly. Fertilizations were assessed by staining sperm asters at 10 hpi and pronuclei at 20 hpi. Embryo development and morphological quality were monitored on days 2, 7, 8 and 9 of the development (IVF = day 0). All embryos were sexed using PCR. Following fertilization, penetration and subsequent cleavage rates were compromised in the X-sorted group compared with the Y-sorted and unsorted groups (penetration: 58.0% vs. 89.8% and 90.0%, cleavage: 65.3% vs. 81.5% and 75.0%). The use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa did not, however, reduce the proportion of transferable embryos (sex-sorted 29.6% vs. unsorted 27.7%) or their quality (quality 1: sex-sorted 36.0% vs. unsorted 19.9%). The Y-sorted spermatozoa produced more transferable embryos of better quality than the X-sorted spermatozoa (days 7–8: 31.9% vs. 26.4%, quality 1: 38.9% vs. 30.6%). On average, out of 10 transferable embryos, nine were of the predicted sex in the X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa groups. These results indicate that low numbers of X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa can be used successfully for female and male embryo production in vitro.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Embryo sexing</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism</subject><subject>Embryonic Development</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Sex Ratio</subject><subject>Sexual dimorphism</subject><subject>Sperm aster</subject><subject>Spermatozoa</subject><issn>0967-1994</issn><issn>1469-8730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAURS0EokPLB7BBFhs2BOw4ie0lrZhSqVJVQWFpOc5L6zaJU9uZdmbFP_AN_BhfgqMZigRiZVn3vPuu3kXoBSVvKaH83SciK06lLIiUkuSCPkILWlQyE5yRx2gxy9ms76FnIVwTQjiXxVO0lxNKZF6JBfpx0o_aROxabAe8stE73IKPtrMbHa0bZqV2KzsAds6sIwR8Z-MVDnCfBecjNLj1bgPDz2_f45W-S_8wgu91dBuncTJoYAWdG3sYou7wTXKK1oQ3-HbSnY1rrIdmdsN-3jev2w3Y4RJDX_u1CwfoSau7AM937z66WH74fPQxOz07Pjl6f5qZdIKYgSi5bITINTOipqYljOYNsKIkhPGqMJwDFFpwUfMcTMlFm5cNCCkkLZpasn30eus7enc7QYiqt8FA1-kB3BQUZ6wqpCAz-eov8tpNfkjhVCl5KiWXRYLoFjLeheChVaO3vfZrRYmaG1T_NJhmXu6Mp7qH5mHid2UJyLaADRHuH3Ttb1TFGS9VdXyuKiK_HH4VS7VMPNuF0OmYtrmEP1H_H-MXH625Hw</recordid><startdate>201008</startdate><enddate>201008</enddate><creator>Peippo, J.</creator><creator>Räty, M.</creator><creator>Korhonen, K.</creator><creator>Eronen, M.</creator><creator>Kananen, K.</creator><creator>Hurme, T.</creator><creator>Halmekytö, M.</creator><creator>Mäki-Tanila, A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201008</creationdate><title>Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos</title><author>Peippo, J. ; Räty, M. ; Korhonen, K. ; Eronen, M. ; Kananen, K. ; Hurme, T. ; Halmekytö, M. ; Mäki-Tanila, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8579d882a3c8b1cf0312de345003764c77ee4a878b72ec578f25de898914db93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Embryo sexing</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism</topic><topic>Embryonic Development</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Sex Ratio</topic><topic>Sexual dimorphism</topic><topic>Sperm aster</topic><topic>Spermatozoa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peippo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Räty, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eronen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kananen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurme, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halmekytö, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäki-Tanila, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zygote (Cambridge)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peippo, J.</au><au>Räty, M.</au><au>Korhonen, K.</au><au>Eronen, M.</au><au>Kananen, K.</au><au>Hurme, T.</au><au>Halmekytö, M.</au><au>Mäki-Tanila, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos</atitle><jtitle>Zygote (Cambridge)</jtitle><addtitle>Zygote</addtitle><date>2010-08</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>185-194</pages><issn>0967-1994</issn><eissn>1469-8730</eissn><abstract>We studied whether bovine embryos developing after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with sex-sorted spermatozoa differed in developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio from embryos produced with unsorted spermatozoa. Abattoir-derived oocytes were fertilized with X-sorted, Y-sorted or unsorted spermatozoa from a single bull. To evaluate economical use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa, washed spermatozoa from a single straw (2 million spermatozoa) were used to fertilize each batch of collected oocytes without any further isolation steps. Concentration of the unsorted spermatozoa was adjusted accordingly. Fertilizations were assessed by staining sperm asters at 10 hpi and pronuclei at 20 hpi. Embryo development and morphological quality were monitored on days 2, 7, 8 and 9 of the development (IVF = day 0). All embryos were sexed using PCR. Following fertilization, penetration and subsequent cleavage rates were compromised in the X-sorted group compared with the Y-sorted and unsorted groups (penetration: 58.0% vs. 89.8% and 90.0%, cleavage: 65.3% vs. 81.5% and 75.0%). The use of the sex-sorted spermatozoa did not, however, reduce the proportion of transferable embryos (sex-sorted 29.6% vs. unsorted 27.7%) or their quality (quality 1: sex-sorted 36.0% vs. unsorted 19.9%). The Y-sorted spermatozoa produced more transferable embryos of better quality than the X-sorted spermatozoa (days 7–8: 31.9% vs. 26.4%, quality 1: 38.9% vs. 30.6%). On average, out of 10 transferable embryos, nine were of the predicted sex in the X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa groups. These results indicate that low numbers of X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa can be used successfully for female and male embryo production in vitro.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>20109268</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0967199409990281</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0967-1994 |
ispartof | Zygote (Cambridge), 2010-08, Vol.18 (3), p.185-194 |
issn | 0967-1994 1469-8730 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733649809 |
source | MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Animals Cattle Embryo sexing Embryo Transfer - methods Embryo, Mammalian - metabolism Embryonic Development Female Fertilization in Vitro - methods Flow cytometry Kinetics Male Oocytes Sex Ratio Sexual dimorphism Sperm aster Spermatozoa |
title | Impact of in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sex-sorted frozen–thawed spermatozoa on developmental kinetics, quality and sex ratio of developing embryos |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T02%3A01%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20in%20vitro%20fertilization%20of%20bovine%20oocytes%20with%20sex-sorted%20frozen%E2%80%93thawed%20spermatozoa%20on%20developmental%20kinetics,%20quality%20and%20sex%20ratio%20of%20developing%20embryos&rft.jtitle=Zygote%20(Cambridge)&rft.au=Peippo,%20J.&rft.date=2010-08&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=185-194&rft.issn=0967-1994&rft.eissn=1469-8730&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0967199409990281&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733649809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=597719294&rft_id=info:pmid/20109268&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0967199409990281&rfr_iscdi=true |