Development and validation of an illustrated questionnaire to evaluate disabilities of the upper limb
We have developed an illustrated questionnaire, the Hand20, comprising 20 short and easy-to-understand questions to assess disorders of the upper limb. We have examined the usefulness of this questionnaire by comparing reliability, validity, responsiveness and the level of missing data with those of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume 2010-07, Vol.92 (7), p.963-969 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 969 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 963 |
| container_title | Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume |
| container_volume | 92 |
| creator | SUZUKI, M KURIMOTO, S SHINOHARA, T TATEBE, M IMAEDA, T HIRATA, H |
| description | We have developed an illustrated questionnaire, the Hand20, comprising 20 short and easy-to-understand questions to assess disorders of the upper limb. We have examined the usefulness of this questionnaire by comparing reliability, validity, responsiveness and the level of missing data with those of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. A series of 431 patients with disorders of the upper limb completed the Hand20 and the Japanese version of the DASH (DASH-JSSH) questionnaire. The norms for Hand20 scores were determined in another cross-sectional study. Most patients had no difficulty in completing the Hand20 questionnaire, whereas the DASH-JSSH had a significantly higher rate of missing data. The standard score for the Hand20 was smaller than the reported norms for the DASH. Our study showed that the Hand20 questionnaire provided validation comparable with that of the DASH-JSSH. Explanatory illustrations and short questions which were easy-to-understand led to better rates of response and fewer missing data, even in elderly individuals with cognitive deterioration. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1302/0301-620x.92b7.23410 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733626215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733626215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-317dd9faa954e7a99802535b67cc07ff19d1990ca058c27371f5ad75ed9774883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtP3TAQRi3UCi60_6BC3lSscutnfL1sebUSEpsisbMm9kQ1ch61EwT_vglcymqkmfPNjA4hXzjbcsnENyYZr2rBnrZWNGYrpOLsgGwEU6rS0pgPZPOG3B-R41IeGGNKa3lIjgTTVnOuNwQv8BHTMHbYTxT6QB8hxQBTHHo6tEuHxpTmMmWYMNC_M5Z11EPMSKeB4oLPy4iGWKCJKU4Ryxqc_iCdxxEzTbFrPpGPLaSCn_f1hNxdXf4-_1nd3F7_Ov9-U3ll7VRJbkKwLYDVCg1Yu2NCS93Uxntm2pbbwK1lHpjeeWGk4a2GYDQGa4za7eQJOXvdO-bh5VfXxeIxJehxmIszUtaiFlwvpHolfR5Kydi6MccO8rPjzK1-3SrPrfKcFT-Me_G7xE73B-amw_A_9CZ0Ab7uASgeUpuh97G8c8tmZWsr_wG4roQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733626215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and validation of an illustrated questionnaire to evaluate disabilities of the upper limb</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>SUZUKI, M ; KURIMOTO, S ; SHINOHARA, T ; TATEBE, M ; IMAEDA, T ; HIRATA, H</creator><creatorcontrib>SUZUKI, M ; KURIMOTO, S ; SHINOHARA, T ; TATEBE, M ; IMAEDA, T ; HIRATA, H</creatorcontrib><description>We have developed an illustrated questionnaire, the Hand20, comprising 20 short and easy-to-understand questions to assess disorders of the upper limb. We have examined the usefulness of this questionnaire by comparing reliability, validity, responsiveness and the level of missing data with those of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. A series of 431 patients with disorders of the upper limb completed the Hand20 and the Japanese version of the DASH (DASH-JSSH) questionnaire. The norms for Hand20 scores were determined in another cross-sectional study. Most patients had no difficulty in completing the Hand20 questionnaire, whereas the DASH-JSSH had a significantly higher rate of missing data. The standard score for the Hand20 was smaller than the reported norms for the DASH. Our study showed that the Hand20 questionnaire provided validation comparable with that of the DASH-JSSH. Explanatory illustrations and short questions which were easy-to-understand led to better rates of response and fewer missing data, even in elderly individuals with cognitive deterioration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-620X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-5377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.92b7.23410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20595115</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBSUAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Disability Evaluation ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Illustration ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - diagnosis ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology ; Orthopedic surgery ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Upper Extremity - physiopathology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 2010-07, Vol.92 (7), p.963-969</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-317dd9faa954e7a99802535b67cc07ff19d1990ca058c27371f5ad75ed9774883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-317dd9faa954e7a99802535b67cc07ff19d1990ca058c27371f5ad75ed9774883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23024969$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20595115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SUZUKI, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KURIMOTO, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHINOHARA, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TATEBE, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IMAEDA, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIRATA, H</creatorcontrib><title>Development and validation of an illustrated questionnaire to evaluate disabilities of the upper limb</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Br</addtitle><description>We have developed an illustrated questionnaire, the Hand20, comprising 20 short and easy-to-understand questions to assess disorders of the upper limb. We have examined the usefulness of this questionnaire by comparing reliability, validity, responsiveness and the level of missing data with those of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. A series of 431 patients with disorders of the upper limb completed the Hand20 and the Japanese version of the DASH (DASH-JSSH) questionnaire. The norms for Hand20 scores were determined in another cross-sectional study. Most patients had no difficulty in completing the Hand20 questionnaire, whereas the DASH-JSSH had a significantly higher rate of missing data. The standard score for the Hand20 was smaller than the reported norms for the DASH. Our study showed that the Hand20 questionnaire provided validation comparable with that of the DASH-JSSH. Explanatory illustrations and short questions which were easy-to-understand led to better rates of response and fewer missing data, even in elderly individuals with cognitive deterioration.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Illustration</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0301-620X</issn><issn>2044-5377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtP3TAQRi3UCi60_6BC3lSscutnfL1sebUSEpsisbMm9kQ1ch61EwT_vglcymqkmfPNjA4hXzjbcsnENyYZr2rBnrZWNGYrpOLsgGwEU6rS0pgPZPOG3B-R41IeGGNKa3lIjgTTVnOuNwQv8BHTMHbYTxT6QB8hxQBTHHo6tEuHxpTmMmWYMNC_M5Z11EPMSKeB4oLPy4iGWKCJKU4Ryxqc_iCdxxEzTbFrPpGPLaSCn_f1hNxdXf4-_1nd3F7_Ov9-U3ll7VRJbkKwLYDVCg1Yu2NCS93Uxntm2pbbwK1lHpjeeWGk4a2GYDQGa4za7eQJOXvdO-bh5VfXxeIxJehxmIszUtaiFlwvpHolfR5Kydi6MccO8rPjzK1-3SrPrfKcFT-Me_G7xE73B-amw_A_9CZ0Ab7uASgeUpuh97G8c8tmZWsr_wG4roQw</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>SUZUKI, M</creator><creator>KURIMOTO, S</creator><creator>SHINOHARA, T</creator><creator>TATEBE, M</creator><creator>IMAEDA, T</creator><creator>HIRATA, H</creator><general>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Development and validation of an illustrated questionnaire to evaluate disabilities of the upper limb</title><author>SUZUKI, M ; KURIMOTO, S ; SHINOHARA, T ; TATEBE, M ; IMAEDA, T ; HIRATA, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-317dd9faa954e7a99802535b67cc07ff19d1990ca058c27371f5ad75ed9774883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Illustration</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SUZUKI, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KURIMOTO, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHINOHARA, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TATEBE, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IMAEDA, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIRATA, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SUZUKI, M</au><au>KURIMOTO, S</au><au>SHINOHARA, T</au><au>TATEBE, M</au><au>IMAEDA, T</au><au>HIRATA, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and validation of an illustrated questionnaire to evaluate disabilities of the upper limb</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Br</addtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>969</epage><pages>963-969</pages><issn>0301-620X</issn><eissn>2044-5377</eissn><coden>JBSUAK</coden><abstract>We have developed an illustrated questionnaire, the Hand20, comprising 20 short and easy-to-understand questions to assess disorders of the upper limb. We have examined the usefulness of this questionnaire by comparing reliability, validity, responsiveness and the level of missing data with those of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. A series of 431 patients with disorders of the upper limb completed the Hand20 and the Japanese version of the DASH (DASH-JSSH) questionnaire. The norms for Hand20 scores were determined in another cross-sectional study. Most patients had no difficulty in completing the Hand20 questionnaire, whereas the DASH-JSSH had a significantly higher rate of missing data. The standard score for the Hand20 was smaller than the reported norms for the DASH. Our study showed that the Hand20 questionnaire provided validation comparable with that of the DASH-JSSH. Explanatory illustrations and short questions which were easy-to-understand led to better rates of response and fewer missing data, even in elderly individuals with cognitive deterioration.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</pub><pmid>20595115</pmid><doi>10.1302/0301-620x.92b7.23410</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-620X |
| ispartof | Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 2010-07, Vol.92 (7), p.963-969 |
| issn | 0301-620X 2044-5377 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733626215 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Activities of Daily Living Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Disability Evaluation Diseases of the osteoarticular system Female Humans Male Medical Illustration Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases - diagnosis Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology Orthopedic surgery Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surveys and Questionnaires Upper Extremity - physiopathology Young Adult |
| title | Development and validation of an illustrated questionnaire to evaluate disabilities of the upper limb |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A06%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20validation%20of%20an%20illustrated%20questionnaire%20to%20evaluate%20disabilities%20of%20the%20upper%20limb&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20British%20volume&rft.au=SUZUKI,%20M&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=969&rft.pages=963-969&rft.issn=0301-620X&rft.eissn=2044-5377&rft.coden=JBSUAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/0301-620x.92b7.23410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733626215%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733626215&rft_id=info:pmid/20595115&rfr_iscdi=true |