Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS
High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate−polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-perform...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2010-03, Vol.58 (5), p.2777-2786 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2786 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2777 |
container_title | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Gao, Liyan Ma, Wujun Chen, Jing Wang, Ke Li, Jing Wang, Shunli Bekes, Frank Appels, Rudi Yan, Yueming |
description | High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate−polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Comparative analysis demonstrated that each methodology has its own advantages and disadvantages. The main drawback of SDS-PAGE was its overestimation of molecular mass and incorrect identification of HMW-GS due to its low resolution. However, it had the advantages of technical simplicity and low requirements of equipment; thus, it is suitable for large-scale and high-throughput HMW-GS screening for breeding programs, especially when the glutenin composition is clear in the breeding material. MALDI-TOF-MS clearly expressed many technical advantages among the four methods evaluated, including high throughput, high resolution, and accuracy; it was, however, associated with high equipment cost, thus preventing many breeding companies from accessing the technology. RP-HPLC and HPCE were found to be intermediate between SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS. Both RP-HPLC and HPCE demonstrated higher resolution and reproducibility over SDS-PAGE but lower detection power than MALDI-TOF-MS. Results demonstrated that MALDI-TOF-MS is suitable for analyzing HMW-GS for routine breeding line screening and for identifying new genotypes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/jf903363z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733622951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733622951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-e508ab9fda4a758111b2e8e6c6f08458a839e862845ec189f86af77390c1b6743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0ctOGzEYBWCralVS6KIv0HpTVZUw9WUunmU0QIKUiIgBsRz949jE0WQmtT2Vwgv0tWuUFFiw8u3TsXWM0BdGzxjl7NfaFFSITDy-QyOWckpSxuR7NKLxkMg0Y0fok_drSqlMc_oRHXHKkizhfIT-litwoIJ29hGC7TsM3RKX_WYbt4P9o_G4g3bnrce9wfcrDQFP7cMKz_tWq6EFh-91XAc8aYegO9vhamiGzgaPmx2uziuyGE8uTvHNgkwXs_IUTxdlXD7dMh_Pzq_I7fUlmVcn6IOB1uvPh_EY3V1e3JZTMrueXJXjGQGRyUB0SiU0hVlCAnkqGWMN11JnKjNUJqkEKQotMx7nWjFZGJmByXNRUMWaLE_EMfqxz926_vegfag31ivdttDpfvB1HnvkvEhZlD_3Urnee6dNvXV2A25XM1o_1V4_1x7t10Pq0Gz08ln-7zmC7wcAXkFrHHTK-hcnBBcyEdF92zsDfQ0PLpq7KqYIyqQQSf4qCZSv1_3g4vf4N570D4Gom-4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733622951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Gao, Liyan ; Ma, Wujun ; Chen, Jing ; Wang, Ke ; Li, Jing ; Wang, Shunli ; Bekes, Frank ; Appels, Rudi ; Yan, Yueming</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Liyan ; Ma, Wujun ; Chen, Jing ; Wang, Ke ; Li, Jing ; Wang, Shunli ; Bekes, Frank ; Appels, Rudi ; Yan, Yueming</creatorcontrib><description>High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate−polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Comparative analysis demonstrated that each methodology has its own advantages and disadvantages. The main drawback of SDS-PAGE was its overestimation of molecular mass and incorrect identification of HMW-GS due to its low resolution. However, it had the advantages of technical simplicity and low requirements of equipment; thus, it is suitable for large-scale and high-throughput HMW-GS screening for breeding programs, especially when the glutenin composition is clear in the breeding material. MALDI-TOF-MS clearly expressed many technical advantages among the four methods evaluated, including high throughput, high resolution, and accuracy; it was, however, associated with high equipment cost, thus preventing many breeding companies from accessing the technology. RP-HPLC and HPCE were found to be intermediate between SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS. Both RP-HPLC and HPCE demonstrated higher resolution and reproducibility over SDS-PAGE but lower detection power than MALDI-TOF-MS. Results demonstrated that MALDI-TOF-MS is suitable for analyzing HMW-GS for routine breeding line screening and for identifying new genotypes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jf903363z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20146422</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAFCAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Analytical Methods ; Animal, plant, fungal and microbial proteins, edible seaweeds and food yeasts ; Biological and medical sciences ; capillary electrophoresis ; Cereal and baking product industries ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods ; cultivars ; Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel - methods ; food analysis ; food composition ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genotype ; glutenins ; Glutens - chemistry ; mass spectrometry ; matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry ; Molecular Weight ; polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis ; reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography ; Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization - methods ; Triticum - chemistry ; Triticum aestivum ; wheat</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2010-03, Vol.58 (5), p.2777-2786</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-e508ab9fda4a758111b2e8e6c6f08458a839e862845ec189f86af77390c1b6743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-e508ab9fda4a758111b2e8e6c6f08458a839e862845ec189f86af77390c1b6743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jf903363z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf903363z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2751,27055,27903,27904,56716,56766</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23323843$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20146422$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Liyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Wujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shunli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekes, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appels, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yueming</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS</title><title>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><description>High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate−polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Comparative analysis demonstrated that each methodology has its own advantages and disadvantages. The main drawback of SDS-PAGE was its overestimation of molecular mass and incorrect identification of HMW-GS due to its low resolution. However, it had the advantages of technical simplicity and low requirements of equipment; thus, it is suitable for large-scale and high-throughput HMW-GS screening for breeding programs, especially when the glutenin composition is clear in the breeding material. MALDI-TOF-MS clearly expressed many technical advantages among the four methods evaluated, including high throughput, high resolution, and accuracy; it was, however, associated with high equipment cost, thus preventing many breeding companies from accessing the technology. RP-HPLC and HPCE were found to be intermediate between SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS. Both RP-HPLC and HPCE demonstrated higher resolution and reproducibility over SDS-PAGE but lower detection power than MALDI-TOF-MS. Results demonstrated that MALDI-TOF-MS is suitable for analyzing HMW-GS for routine breeding line screening and for identifying new genotypes.</description><subject>Analytical Methods</subject><subject>Animal, plant, fungal and microbial proteins, edible seaweeds and food yeasts</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>capillary electrophoresis</subject><subject>Cereal and baking product industries</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel - methods</subject><subject>food analysis</subject><subject>food composition</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>glutenins</subject><subject>Glutens - chemistry</subject><subject>mass spectrometry</subject><subject>matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Molecular Weight</subject><subject>polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization - methods</subject><subject>Triticum - chemistry</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>wheat</subject><issn>0021-8561</issn><issn>1520-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0ctOGzEYBWCralVS6KIv0HpTVZUw9WUunmU0QIKUiIgBsRz949jE0WQmtT2Vwgv0tWuUFFiw8u3TsXWM0BdGzxjl7NfaFFSITDy-QyOWckpSxuR7NKLxkMg0Y0fok_drSqlMc_oRHXHKkizhfIT-litwoIJ29hGC7TsM3RKX_WYbt4P9o_G4g3bnrce9wfcrDQFP7cMKz_tWq6EFh-91XAc8aYegO9vhamiGzgaPmx2uziuyGE8uTvHNgkwXs_IUTxdlXD7dMh_Pzq_I7fUlmVcn6IOB1uvPh_EY3V1e3JZTMrueXJXjGQGRyUB0SiU0hVlCAnkqGWMN11JnKjNUJqkEKQotMx7nWjFZGJmByXNRUMWaLE_EMfqxz926_vegfag31ivdttDpfvB1HnvkvEhZlD_3Urnee6dNvXV2A25XM1o_1V4_1x7t10Pq0Gz08ln-7zmC7wcAXkFrHHTK-hcnBBcyEdF92zsDfQ0PLpq7KqYIyqQQSf4qCZSv1_3g4vf4N570D4Gom-4</recordid><startdate>20100310</startdate><enddate>20100310</enddate><creator>Gao, Liyan</creator><creator>Ma, Wujun</creator><creator>Chen, Jing</creator><creator>Wang, Ke</creator><creator>Li, Jing</creator><creator>Wang, Shunli</creator><creator>Bekes, Frank</creator><creator>Appels, Rudi</creator><creator>Yan, Yueming</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100310</creationdate><title>Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS</title><author>Gao, Liyan ; Ma, Wujun ; Chen, Jing ; Wang, Ke ; Li, Jing ; Wang, Shunli ; Bekes, Frank ; Appels, Rudi ; Yan, Yueming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-e508ab9fda4a758111b2e8e6c6f08458a839e862845ec189f86af77390c1b6743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Analytical Methods</topic><topic>Animal, plant, fungal and microbial proteins, edible seaweeds and food yeasts</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>capillary electrophoresis</topic><topic>Cereal and baking product industries</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel - methods</topic><topic>food analysis</topic><topic>food composition</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>glutenins</topic><topic>Glutens - chemistry</topic><topic>mass spectrometry</topic><topic>matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Molecular Weight</topic><topic>polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization - methods</topic><topic>Triticum - chemistry</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Liyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Wujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shunli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekes, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appels, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yueming</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Liyan</au><au>Ma, Wujun</au><au>Chen, Jing</au><au>Wang, Ke</au><au>Li, Jing</au><au>Wang, Shunli</au><au>Bekes, Frank</au><au>Appels, Rudi</au><au>Yan, Yueming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><date>2010-03-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2777</spage><epage>2786</epage><pages>2777-2786</pages><issn>0021-8561</issn><eissn>1520-5118</eissn><coden>JAFCAU</coden><abstract>High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate−polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Comparative analysis demonstrated that each methodology has its own advantages and disadvantages. The main drawback of SDS-PAGE was its overestimation of molecular mass and incorrect identification of HMW-GS due to its low resolution. However, it had the advantages of technical simplicity and low requirements of equipment; thus, it is suitable for large-scale and high-throughput HMW-GS screening for breeding programs, especially when the glutenin composition is clear in the breeding material. MALDI-TOF-MS clearly expressed many technical advantages among the four methods evaluated, including high throughput, high resolution, and accuracy; it was, however, associated with high equipment cost, thus preventing many breeding companies from accessing the technology. RP-HPLC and HPCE were found to be intermediate between SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS. Both RP-HPLC and HPCE demonstrated higher resolution and reproducibility over SDS-PAGE but lower detection power than MALDI-TOF-MS. Results demonstrated that MALDI-TOF-MS is suitable for analyzing HMW-GS for routine breeding line screening and for identifying new genotypes.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>20146422</pmid><doi>10.1021/jf903363z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8561 |
ispartof | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2010-03, Vol.58 (5), p.2777-2786 |
issn | 0021-8561 1520-5118 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733622951 |
source | MEDLINE; ACS Publications |
subjects | Analytical Methods Animal, plant, fungal and microbial proteins, edible seaweeds and food yeasts Biological and medical sciences capillary electrophoresis Cereal and baking product industries Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods cultivars Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel - methods food analysis food composition Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology genotype glutenins Glutens - chemistry mass spectrometry matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry Molecular Weight polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization - methods Triticum - chemistry Triticum aestivum wheat |
title | Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T05%3A45%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20and%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Wheat%20High%20Molecular%20Weight%20Glutenin%20Subunits%20by%20SDS-PAGE,%20RP-HPLC,%20HPCE,%20and%20MALDI-TOF-MS&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20food%20chemistry&rft.au=Gao,%20Liyan&rft.date=2010-03-10&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2777&rft.epage=2786&rft.pages=2777-2786&rft.issn=0021-8561&rft.eissn=1520-5118&rft.coden=JAFCAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jf903363z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733622951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733622951&rft_id=info:pmid/20146422&rfr_iscdi=true |