Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS

High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate−polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-perform...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2010-03, Vol.58 (5), p.2777-2786
Hauptverfasser: Gao, Liyan, Ma, Wujun, Chen, Jing, Wang, Ke, Li, Jing, Wang, Shunli, Bekes, Frank, Appels, Rudi, Yan, Yueming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2786
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2777
container_title Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
container_volume 58
creator Gao, Liyan
Ma, Wujun
Chen, Jing
Wang, Ke
Li, Jing
Wang, Shunli
Bekes, Frank
Appels, Rudi
Yan, Yueming
description High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate−polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Comparative analysis demonstrated that each methodology has its own advantages and disadvantages. The main drawback of SDS-PAGE was its overestimation of molecular mass and incorrect identification of HMW-GS due to its low resolution. However, it had the advantages of technical simplicity and low requirements of equipment; thus, it is suitable for large-scale and high-throughput HMW-GS screening for breeding programs, especially when the glutenin composition is clear in the breeding material. MALDI-TOF-MS clearly expressed many technical advantages among the four methods evaluated, including high throughput, high resolution, and accuracy; it was, however, associated with high equipment cost, thus preventing many breeding companies from accessing the technology. RP-HPLC and HPCE were found to be intermediate between SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS. Both RP-HPLC and HPCE demonstrated higher resolution and reproducibility over SDS-PAGE but lower detection power than MALDI-TOF-MS. Results demonstrated that MALDI-TOF-MS is suitable for analyzing HMW-GS for routine breeding line screening and for identifying new genotypes.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/jf903363z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733622951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733622951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-e508ab9fda4a758111b2e8e6c6f08458a839e862845ec189f86af77390c1b6743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0ctOGzEYBWCralVS6KIv0HpTVZUw9WUunmU0QIKUiIgBsRz949jE0WQmtT2Vwgv0tWuUFFiw8u3TsXWM0BdGzxjl7NfaFFSITDy-QyOWckpSxuR7NKLxkMg0Y0fok_drSqlMc_oRHXHKkizhfIT-litwoIJ29hGC7TsM3RKX_WYbt4P9o_G4g3bnrce9wfcrDQFP7cMKz_tWq6EFh-91XAc8aYegO9vhamiGzgaPmx2uziuyGE8uTvHNgkwXs_IUTxdlXD7dMh_Pzq_I7fUlmVcn6IOB1uvPh_EY3V1e3JZTMrueXJXjGQGRyUB0SiU0hVlCAnkqGWMN11JnKjNUJqkEKQotMx7nWjFZGJmByXNRUMWaLE_EMfqxz926_vegfag31ivdttDpfvB1HnvkvEhZlD_3Urnee6dNvXV2A25XM1o_1V4_1x7t10Pq0Gz08ln-7zmC7wcAXkFrHHTK-hcnBBcyEdF92zsDfQ0PLpq7KqYIyqQQSf4qCZSv1_3g4vf4N570D4Gom-4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733622951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Gao, Liyan ; Ma, Wujun ; Chen, Jing ; Wang, Ke ; Li, Jing ; Wang, Shunli ; Bekes, Frank ; Appels, Rudi ; Yan, Yueming</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Liyan ; Ma, Wujun ; Chen, Jing ; Wang, Ke ; Li, Jing ; Wang, Shunli ; Bekes, Frank ; Appels, Rudi ; Yan, Yueming</creatorcontrib><description>High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate−polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Comparative analysis demonstrated that each methodology has its own advantages and disadvantages. The main drawback of SDS-PAGE was its overestimation of molecular mass and incorrect identification of HMW-GS due to its low resolution. However, it had the advantages of technical simplicity and low requirements of equipment; thus, it is suitable for large-scale and high-throughput HMW-GS screening for breeding programs, especially when the glutenin composition is clear in the breeding material. MALDI-TOF-MS clearly expressed many technical advantages among the four methods evaluated, including high throughput, high resolution, and accuracy; it was, however, associated with high equipment cost, thus preventing many breeding companies from accessing the technology. RP-HPLC and HPCE were found to be intermediate between SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS. Both RP-HPLC and HPCE demonstrated higher resolution and reproducibility over SDS-PAGE but lower detection power than MALDI-TOF-MS. Results demonstrated that MALDI-TOF-MS is suitable for analyzing HMW-GS for routine breeding line screening and for identifying new genotypes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jf903363z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20146422</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAFCAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Analytical Methods ; Animal, plant, fungal and microbial proteins, edible seaweeds and food yeasts ; Biological and medical sciences ; capillary electrophoresis ; Cereal and baking product industries ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods ; cultivars ; Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel - methods ; food analysis ; food composition ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genotype ; glutenins ; Glutens - chemistry ; mass spectrometry ; matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry ; Molecular Weight ; polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis ; reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography ; Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization - methods ; Triticum - chemistry ; Triticum aestivum ; wheat</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2010-03, Vol.58 (5), p.2777-2786</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-e508ab9fda4a758111b2e8e6c6f08458a839e862845ec189f86af77390c1b6743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-e508ab9fda4a758111b2e8e6c6f08458a839e862845ec189f86af77390c1b6743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jf903363z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf903363z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2751,27055,27903,27904,56716,56766</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23323843$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20146422$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Liyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Wujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shunli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekes, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appels, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yueming</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS</title><title>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><description>High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate−polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Comparative analysis demonstrated that each methodology has its own advantages and disadvantages. The main drawback of SDS-PAGE was its overestimation of molecular mass and incorrect identification of HMW-GS due to its low resolution. However, it had the advantages of technical simplicity and low requirements of equipment; thus, it is suitable for large-scale and high-throughput HMW-GS screening for breeding programs, especially when the glutenin composition is clear in the breeding material. MALDI-TOF-MS clearly expressed many technical advantages among the four methods evaluated, including high throughput, high resolution, and accuracy; it was, however, associated with high equipment cost, thus preventing many breeding companies from accessing the technology. RP-HPLC and HPCE were found to be intermediate between SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS. Both RP-HPLC and HPCE demonstrated higher resolution and reproducibility over SDS-PAGE but lower detection power than MALDI-TOF-MS. Results demonstrated that MALDI-TOF-MS is suitable for analyzing HMW-GS for routine breeding line screening and for identifying new genotypes.</description><subject>Analytical Methods</subject><subject>Animal, plant, fungal and microbial proteins, edible seaweeds and food yeasts</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>capillary electrophoresis</subject><subject>Cereal and baking product industries</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel - methods</subject><subject>food analysis</subject><subject>food composition</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>glutenins</subject><subject>Glutens - chemistry</subject><subject>mass spectrometry</subject><subject>matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Molecular Weight</subject><subject>polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization - methods</subject><subject>Triticum - chemistry</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>wheat</subject><issn>0021-8561</issn><issn>1520-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0ctOGzEYBWCralVS6KIv0HpTVZUw9WUunmU0QIKUiIgBsRz949jE0WQmtT2Vwgv0tWuUFFiw8u3TsXWM0BdGzxjl7NfaFFSITDy-QyOWckpSxuR7NKLxkMg0Y0fok_drSqlMc_oRHXHKkizhfIT-litwoIJ29hGC7TsM3RKX_WYbt4P9o_G4g3bnrce9wfcrDQFP7cMKz_tWq6EFh-91XAc8aYegO9vhamiGzgaPmx2uziuyGE8uTvHNgkwXs_IUTxdlXD7dMh_Pzq_I7fUlmVcn6IOB1uvPh_EY3V1e3JZTMrueXJXjGQGRyUB0SiU0hVlCAnkqGWMN11JnKjNUJqkEKQotMx7nWjFZGJmByXNRUMWaLE_EMfqxz926_vegfag31ivdttDpfvB1HnvkvEhZlD_3Urnee6dNvXV2A25XM1o_1V4_1x7t10Pq0Gz08ln-7zmC7wcAXkFrHHTK-hcnBBcyEdF92zsDfQ0PLpq7KqYIyqQQSf4qCZSv1_3g4vf4N570D4Gom-4</recordid><startdate>20100310</startdate><enddate>20100310</enddate><creator>Gao, Liyan</creator><creator>Ma, Wujun</creator><creator>Chen, Jing</creator><creator>Wang, Ke</creator><creator>Li, Jing</creator><creator>Wang, Shunli</creator><creator>Bekes, Frank</creator><creator>Appels, Rudi</creator><creator>Yan, Yueming</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100310</creationdate><title>Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS</title><author>Gao, Liyan ; Ma, Wujun ; Chen, Jing ; Wang, Ke ; Li, Jing ; Wang, Shunli ; Bekes, Frank ; Appels, Rudi ; Yan, Yueming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a368t-e508ab9fda4a758111b2e8e6c6f08458a839e862845ec189f86af77390c1b6743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Analytical Methods</topic><topic>Animal, plant, fungal and microbial proteins, edible seaweeds and food yeasts</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>capillary electrophoresis</topic><topic>Cereal and baking product industries</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel - methods</topic><topic>food analysis</topic><topic>food composition</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>glutenins</topic><topic>Glutens - chemistry</topic><topic>mass spectrometry</topic><topic>matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Molecular Weight</topic><topic>polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization - methods</topic><topic>Triticum - chemistry</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Liyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Wujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shunli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekes, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appels, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yueming</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Liyan</au><au>Ma, Wujun</au><au>Chen, Jing</au><au>Wang, Ke</au><au>Li, Jing</au><au>Wang, Shunli</au><au>Bekes, Frank</au><au>Appels, Rudi</au><au>Yan, Yueming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><date>2010-03-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2777</spage><epage>2786</epage><pages>2777-2786</pages><issn>0021-8561</issn><eissn>1520-5118</eissn><coden>JAFCAU</coden><abstract>High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate−polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Comparative analysis demonstrated that each methodology has its own advantages and disadvantages. The main drawback of SDS-PAGE was its overestimation of molecular mass and incorrect identification of HMW-GS due to its low resolution. However, it had the advantages of technical simplicity and low requirements of equipment; thus, it is suitable for large-scale and high-throughput HMW-GS screening for breeding programs, especially when the glutenin composition is clear in the breeding material. MALDI-TOF-MS clearly expressed many technical advantages among the four methods evaluated, including high throughput, high resolution, and accuracy; it was, however, associated with high equipment cost, thus preventing many breeding companies from accessing the technology. RP-HPLC and HPCE were found to be intermediate between SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS. Both RP-HPLC and HPCE demonstrated higher resolution and reproducibility over SDS-PAGE but lower detection power than MALDI-TOF-MS. Results demonstrated that MALDI-TOF-MS is suitable for analyzing HMW-GS for routine breeding line screening and for identifying new genotypes.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>20146422</pmid><doi>10.1021/jf903363z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8561
ispartof Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2010-03, Vol.58 (5), p.2777-2786
issn 0021-8561
1520-5118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733622951
source MEDLINE; ACS Publications
subjects Analytical Methods
Animal, plant, fungal and microbial proteins, edible seaweeds and food yeasts
Biological and medical sciences
capillary electrophoresis
Cereal and baking product industries
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods
cultivars
Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel - methods
food analysis
food composition
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
genotype
glutenins
Glutens - chemistry
mass spectrometry
matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
Molecular Weight
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography
Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization - methods
Triticum - chemistry
Triticum aestivum
wheat
title Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T05%3A45%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20and%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Wheat%20High%20Molecular%20Weight%20Glutenin%20Subunits%20by%20SDS-PAGE,%20RP-HPLC,%20HPCE,%20and%20MALDI-TOF-MS&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20food%20chemistry&rft.au=Gao,%20Liyan&rft.date=2010-03-10&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2777&rft.epage=2786&rft.pages=2777-2786&rft.issn=0021-8561&rft.eissn=1520-5118&rft.coden=JAFCAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jf903363z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733622951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733622951&rft_id=info:pmid/20146422&rfr_iscdi=true