Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Background & Aims Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has been proposed as an etiologic factor in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but evidence is conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of SIBO in IBS. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology 2009-12, Vol.7 (12), p.1279-1286 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1286 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1279 |
container_title | Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Ford, Alexander C Spiegel, Brennan M.R Talley, Nicholas J Moayyedi, Paul |
description | Background & Aims Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has been proposed as an etiologic factor in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but evidence is conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of SIBO in IBS. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to November 2008. Case series and case-control studies applying diagnostic tests for SIBO in unselected adults meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS were eligible. Prevalence of a positive test for SIBO was extracted and pooled for all studies, and compared between cases and controls using an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Twelve studies were identified containing 1921 subjects meeting criteria for IBS. Pooled prevalence of a positive lactulose or glucose hydrogen breath test was 54% (95% CI, 32%–76%) and 31% (95% CI, 14%–50%), respectively, with statistically significant heterogeneity between study results. Prevalence of a positive jejunal aspirate and culture was 4% (95% CI, 2%–9%). The pooled odds ratio for any positive test for SIBO in cases compared with healthy asymptomatic controls was 3.45 (95% CI, 0.9–12.7) or 4.7 (95% CI, 1.7–12.95), depending on the criteria used to define a positive test, with statistically significant heterogeneity for both. Conclusions Prevalence of SIBO in individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS was highest with breath testing. The prevalence in cases with IBS compared with controls varied according to criteria used to define a positive test. The role of testing for SIBO in individuals with suspected IBS remains unclear. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.031 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733607981</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1542356509006600</els_id><sourcerecordid>733607981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-1abd8f82a3d9f9adffec25a8deeecd615aa1d818607f5862bc1d7ddc57f2d1343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EoqXlB3BBuXFKGDuJk4CERCugKxVVYuFszdrj1ouTtLa3q_339WpXQuqB07zDe0-a7zH2jkPFgcuP60rf3lUCYKhAVlDzF-yUt40ou443L4-6bmV7wt7EuAYQQzN0r9kJHySIpulPmV2O6H2xmBLF5Cb0xQXqRMFldfNI4TbM23RXuKlYhOASrjwVF_OWfLHcTSbMI33KKiYaMTld_KJHR9sCJ1P8pIQl5sZddPGcvbLoI7093jP25_u335dX5fXNj8Xl1-tSt1ymkuPK9LYXWJvBDmisJS1a7A0RaSN5i8hNz3sJnW17KVaam84Y3XZWGF439Rn7cOi9D_PDJr-kRhc1eY8TzZuourrO2aHn2ckPTh3mGANZdR_ciGGnOKg9XbVWma7a01UgVaabM--P7ZvVSOZf4ogzGz4fDJR_zCSCitrRpMm4QDopM7v_1n95ltbeTU6j_0s7iut5EzLOqLiKQoFa7ufdrwsDgJQA9RPA3qF7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733607981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ford, Alexander C ; Spiegel, Brennan M.R ; Talley, Nicholas J ; Moayyedi, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Ford, Alexander C ; Spiegel, Brennan M.R ; Talley, Nicholas J ; Moayyedi, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Background & Aims Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has been proposed as an etiologic factor in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but evidence is conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of SIBO in IBS. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to November 2008. Case series and case-control studies applying diagnostic tests for SIBO in unselected adults meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS were eligible. Prevalence of a positive test for SIBO was extracted and pooled for all studies, and compared between cases and controls using an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Twelve studies were identified containing 1921 subjects meeting criteria for IBS. Pooled prevalence of a positive lactulose or glucose hydrogen breath test was 54% (95% CI, 32%–76%) and 31% (95% CI, 14%–50%), respectively, with statistically significant heterogeneity between study results. Prevalence of a positive jejunal aspirate and culture was 4% (95% CI, 2%–9%). The pooled odds ratio for any positive test for SIBO in cases compared with healthy asymptomatic controls was 3.45 (95% CI, 0.9–12.7) or 4.7 (95% CI, 1.7–12.95), depending on the criteria used to define a positive test, with statistically significant heterogeneity for both. Conclusions Prevalence of SIBO in individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS was highest with breath testing. The prevalence in cases with IBS compared with controls varied according to criteria used to define a positive test. The role of testing for SIBO in individuals with suspected IBS remains unclear.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-3565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-7714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19602448</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bacteria - growth & development ; Bacterial Infections - diagnosis ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Intestine, Small - microbiology ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome - etiology ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2009-12, Vol.7 (12), p.1279-1286</ispartof><rights>AGA Institute</rights><rights>2009 AGA Institute</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-1abd8f82a3d9f9adffec25a8deeecd615aa1d818607f5862bc1d7ddc57f2d1343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-1abd8f82a3d9f9adffec25a8deeecd615aa1d818607f5862bc1d7ddc57f2d1343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356509006600$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19602448$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ford, Alexander C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiegel, Brennan M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talley, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moayyedi, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Background & Aims Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has been proposed as an etiologic factor in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but evidence is conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of SIBO in IBS. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to November 2008. Case series and case-control studies applying diagnostic tests for SIBO in unselected adults meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS were eligible. Prevalence of a positive test for SIBO was extracted and pooled for all studies, and compared between cases and controls using an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Twelve studies were identified containing 1921 subjects meeting criteria for IBS. Pooled prevalence of a positive lactulose or glucose hydrogen breath test was 54% (95% CI, 32%–76%) and 31% (95% CI, 14%–50%), respectively, with statistically significant heterogeneity between study results. Prevalence of a positive jejunal aspirate and culture was 4% (95% CI, 2%–9%). The pooled odds ratio for any positive test for SIBO in cases compared with healthy asymptomatic controls was 3.45 (95% CI, 0.9–12.7) or 4.7 (95% CI, 1.7–12.95), depending on the criteria used to define a positive test, with statistically significant heterogeneity for both. Conclusions Prevalence of SIBO in individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS was highest with breath testing. The prevalence in cases with IBS compared with controls varied according to criteria used to define a positive test. The role of testing for SIBO in individuals with suspected IBS remains unclear.</description><subject>Bacteria - growth & development</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestine, Small - microbiology</subject><subject>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - etiology</subject><subject>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - microbiology</subject><issn>1542-3565</issn><issn>1542-7714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EoqXlB3BBuXFKGDuJk4CERCugKxVVYuFszdrj1ouTtLa3q_339WpXQuqB07zDe0-a7zH2jkPFgcuP60rf3lUCYKhAVlDzF-yUt40ou443L4-6bmV7wt7EuAYQQzN0r9kJHySIpulPmV2O6H2xmBLF5Cb0xQXqRMFldfNI4TbM23RXuKlYhOASrjwVF_OWfLHcTSbMI33KKiYaMTld_KJHR9sCJ1P8pIQl5sZddPGcvbLoI7093jP25_u335dX5fXNj8Xl1-tSt1ymkuPK9LYXWJvBDmisJS1a7A0RaSN5i8hNz3sJnW17KVaam84Y3XZWGF439Rn7cOi9D_PDJr-kRhc1eY8TzZuourrO2aHn2ckPTh3mGANZdR_ciGGnOKg9XbVWma7a01UgVaabM--P7ZvVSOZf4ogzGz4fDJR_zCSCitrRpMm4QDopM7v_1n95ltbeTU6j_0s7iut5EzLOqLiKQoFa7ufdrwsDgJQA9RPA3qF7</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Ford, Alexander C</creator><creator>Spiegel, Brennan M.R</creator><creator>Talley, Nicholas J</creator><creator>Moayyedi, Paul</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Ford, Alexander C ; Spiegel, Brennan M.R ; Talley, Nicholas J ; Moayyedi, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-1abd8f82a3d9f9adffec25a8deeecd615aa1d818607f5862bc1d7ddc57f2d1343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Bacteria - growth & development</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestine, Small - microbiology</topic><topic>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - etiology</topic><topic>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ford, Alexander C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiegel, Brennan M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talley, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moayyedi, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ford, Alexander C</au><au>Spiegel, Brennan M.R</au><au>Talley, Nicholas J</au><au>Moayyedi, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1279</spage><epage>1286</epage><pages>1279-1286</pages><issn>1542-3565</issn><eissn>1542-7714</eissn><abstract>Background & Aims Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has been proposed as an etiologic factor in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but evidence is conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of SIBO in IBS. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to November 2008. Case series and case-control studies applying diagnostic tests for SIBO in unselected adults meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS were eligible. Prevalence of a positive test for SIBO was extracted and pooled for all studies, and compared between cases and controls using an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Twelve studies were identified containing 1921 subjects meeting criteria for IBS. Pooled prevalence of a positive lactulose or glucose hydrogen breath test was 54% (95% CI, 32%–76%) and 31% (95% CI, 14%–50%), respectively, with statistically significant heterogeneity between study results. Prevalence of a positive jejunal aspirate and culture was 4% (95% CI, 2%–9%). The pooled odds ratio for any positive test for SIBO in cases compared with healthy asymptomatic controls was 3.45 (95% CI, 0.9–12.7) or 4.7 (95% CI, 1.7–12.95), depending on the criteria used to define a positive test, with statistically significant heterogeneity for both. Conclusions Prevalence of SIBO in individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS was highest with breath testing. The prevalence in cases with IBS compared with controls varied according to criteria used to define a positive test. The role of testing for SIBO in individuals with suspected IBS remains unclear.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19602448</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.031</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1542-3565 |
ispartof | Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2009-12, Vol.7 (12), p.1279-1286 |
issn | 1542-3565 1542-7714 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733607981 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Bacteria - growth & development Bacterial Infections - diagnosis Gastroenterology and Hepatology Humans Intestine, Small - microbiology Irritable Bowel Syndrome - etiology Irritable Bowel Syndrome - microbiology |
title | Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A51%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Small%20Intestinal%20Bacterial%20Overgrowth%20in%20Irritable%20Bowel%20Syndrome:%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Ford,%20Alexander%20C&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1279&rft.epage=1286&rft.pages=1279-1286&rft.issn=1542-3565&rft.eissn=1542-7714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733607981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733607981&rft_id=info:pmid/19602448&rft_els_id=S1542356509006600&rfr_iscdi=true |