A qualitative study to identify barriers to local implementation of prehospital termination of resuscitation protocols

Despite the existence of national American Heart Association guidelines and 2 termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) rules for ceasing efforts in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, many emergency medical services agencies in the United States have adopted their own local protocols. Public polici...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes 2009-07, Vol.2 (4), p.361-368
Hauptverfasser: Sasson, Comilla, Forman, Jane, Krass, David, Macy, Michelle, Kellermann, Arthur L, McNally, Bryan F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 368
container_issue 4
container_start_page 361
container_title Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
container_volume 2
creator Sasson, Comilla
Forman, Jane
Krass, David
Macy, Michelle
Kellermann, Arthur L
McNally, Bryan F
description Despite the existence of national American Heart Association guidelines and 2 termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) rules for ceasing efforts in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, many emergency medical services agencies in the United States have adopted their own local protocols. Public policies and local perceptions may serve as barriers or facilitators to implementing national TOR guidelines at the local level. Three focus groups, lasting 90 to 120 minutes, were conducted at the National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians meeting in January 2008. Snowball sampling was used to recruit participants. Two reviewers analyzed the data in an iterative process to identify recurrent and unifying themes. We identified 3 distinct groups whose current policies or perceptions may impede efforts to adopt national TOR guidelines: payers who incentivize transport; legislators who create state mandates for transport and allow only narrow use of do-not-resuscitate orders; and communities where cultural norms are perceived to impede termination of resuscitation. Our participants suggested that national organizations, such as the American Heart Association and American College of Emergency Physicians, may serve as potential facilitators in addressing these barriers by taking the lead in asking payers to change reimbursement structures; encouraging legislators to revise laws to reflect the best available medical evidence; and educating the public that rapid transport to the hospital cannot substitute for optimal provision of prehospital care. We have identified 3 influential groups who will need to work with national organizations to overcome current policies or prevailing perceptions that may impede implementing national TOR guidelines.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.830398
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733606784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733606784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-544a1b1d6f1766b3d4370b7eb9019db8c6b95f8ab6d6a26cb29089e67897f3733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF9PwjAUxRujEUS_gvbNJ7BdR_88kgWVBEOi8Ly0WxdrOjrajoRvbwlIfLo35_7OuckB4AmjCcYUvxSLz2K1WRerj_nXBCM-4QQRwa_AEIscjxlD0-vLjskA3IXwgxAlGSW3YJAhRDCn2RDsZ3DXS2uijGavYYh9fYDRQVPrbTTNASrpvdE-HEXrKmmhaTur23ROFreFroGd198udCnEwqh9a7aXk9ehD5U5s5130VXOhntw00gb9MN5jsDmdb4u3sfL1duimC3HFRF5HE_zXGKFa9pgRqkidU4YUkwrgbCoFa-oEtOGS0VrKjNaqUwgLjRlXLCGMEJG4PmUmz7veh1i2ZpQaWvlVrs-lAmhKOF5ItmJrLwLweum7LxppT-UGJXHzsv_nSeRl6fOk_Px_KNXra4vvr-SyS-UCIHR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733606784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A qualitative study to identify barriers to local implementation of prehospital termination of resuscitation protocols</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association</source><creator>Sasson, Comilla ; Forman, Jane ; Krass, David ; Macy, Michelle ; Kellermann, Arthur L ; McNally, Bryan F</creator><creatorcontrib>Sasson, Comilla ; Forman, Jane ; Krass, David ; Macy, Michelle ; Kellermann, Arthur L ; McNally, Bryan F</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the existence of national American Heart Association guidelines and 2 termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) rules for ceasing efforts in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, many emergency medical services agencies in the United States have adopted their own local protocols. Public policies and local perceptions may serve as barriers or facilitators to implementing national TOR guidelines at the local level. Three focus groups, lasting 90 to 120 minutes, were conducted at the National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians meeting in January 2008. Snowball sampling was used to recruit participants. Two reviewers analyzed the data in an iterative process to identify recurrent and unifying themes. We identified 3 distinct groups whose current policies or perceptions may impede efforts to adopt national TOR guidelines: payers who incentivize transport; legislators who create state mandates for transport and allow only narrow use of do-not-resuscitate orders; and communities where cultural norms are perceived to impede termination of resuscitation. Our participants suggested that national organizations, such as the American Heart Association and American College of Emergency Physicians, may serve as potential facilitators in addressing these barriers by taking the lead in asking payers to change reimbursement structures; encouraging legislators to revise laws to reflect the best available medical evidence; and educating the public that rapid transport to the hospital cannot substitute for optimal provision of prehospital care. We have identified 3 influential groups who will need to work with national organizations to overcome current policies or prevailing perceptions that may impede implementing national TOR guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-7713</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.830398</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20031862</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards ; Emergency Medical Services - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Emergency Medical Services - standards ; Emergency Medical Technicians - standards ; Emergency Medicine - standards ; Emergency Nursing - standards ; Focus Groups ; Health Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Heart Arrest - mortality ; Heart Arrest - therapy ; Humans ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Qualitative Research ; United States - epidemiology ; Withholding Treatment - standards</subject><ispartof>Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2009-07, Vol.2 (4), p.361-368</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-544a1b1d6f1766b3d4370b7eb9019db8c6b95f8ab6d6a26cb29089e67897f3733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-544a1b1d6f1766b3d4370b7eb9019db8c6b95f8ab6d6a26cb29089e67897f3733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20031862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sasson, Comilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forman, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krass, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macy, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellermann, Arthur L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNally, Bryan F</creatorcontrib><title>A qualitative study to identify barriers to local implementation of prehospital termination of resuscitation protocols</title><title>Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes</title><addtitle>Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes</addtitle><description>Despite the existence of national American Heart Association guidelines and 2 termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) rules for ceasing efforts in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, many emergency medical services agencies in the United States have adopted their own local protocols. Public policies and local perceptions may serve as barriers or facilitators to implementing national TOR guidelines at the local level. Three focus groups, lasting 90 to 120 minutes, were conducted at the National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians meeting in January 2008. Snowball sampling was used to recruit participants. Two reviewers analyzed the data in an iterative process to identify recurrent and unifying themes. We identified 3 distinct groups whose current policies or perceptions may impede efforts to adopt national TOR guidelines: payers who incentivize transport; legislators who create state mandates for transport and allow only narrow use of do-not-resuscitate orders; and communities where cultural norms are perceived to impede termination of resuscitation. Our participants suggested that national organizations, such as the American Heart Association and American College of Emergency Physicians, may serve as potential facilitators in addressing these barriers by taking the lead in asking payers to change reimbursement structures; encouraging legislators to revise laws to reflect the best available medical evidence; and educating the public that rapid transport to the hospital cannot substitute for optimal provision of prehospital care. We have identified 3 influential groups who will need to work with national organizations to overcome current policies or prevailing perceptions that may impede implementing national TOR guidelines.</description><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Technicians - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Nursing - standards</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - mortality</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Withholding Treatment - standards</subject><issn>1941-7713</issn><issn>1941-7705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF9PwjAUxRujEUS_gvbNJ7BdR_88kgWVBEOi8Ly0WxdrOjrajoRvbwlIfLo35_7OuckB4AmjCcYUvxSLz2K1WRerj_nXBCM-4QQRwa_AEIscjxlD0-vLjskA3IXwgxAlGSW3YJAhRDCn2RDsZ3DXS2uijGavYYh9fYDRQVPrbTTNASrpvdE-HEXrKmmhaTur23ROFreFroGd198udCnEwqh9a7aXk9ehD5U5s5130VXOhntw00gb9MN5jsDmdb4u3sfL1duimC3HFRF5HE_zXGKFa9pgRqkidU4YUkwrgbCoFa-oEtOGS0VrKjNaqUwgLjRlXLCGMEJG4PmUmz7veh1i2ZpQaWvlVrs-lAmhKOF5ItmJrLwLweum7LxppT-UGJXHzsv_nSeRl6fOk_Px_KNXra4vvr-SyS-UCIHR</recordid><startdate>200907</startdate><enddate>200907</enddate><creator>Sasson, Comilla</creator><creator>Forman, Jane</creator><creator>Krass, David</creator><creator>Macy, Michelle</creator><creator>Kellermann, Arthur L</creator><creator>McNally, Bryan F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200907</creationdate><title>A qualitative study to identify barriers to local implementation of prehospital termination of resuscitation protocols</title><author>Sasson, Comilla ; Forman, Jane ; Krass, David ; Macy, Michelle ; Kellermann, Arthur L ; McNally, Bryan F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-544a1b1d6f1766b3d4370b7eb9019db8c6b95f8ab6d6a26cb29089e67897f3733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Technicians - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Nursing - standards</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - mortality</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Withholding Treatment - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sasson, Comilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forman, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krass, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macy, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellermann, Arthur L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNally, Bryan F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sasson, Comilla</au><au>Forman, Jane</au><au>Krass, David</au><au>Macy, Michelle</au><au>Kellermann, Arthur L</au><au>McNally, Bryan F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A qualitative study to identify barriers to local implementation of prehospital termination of resuscitation protocols</atitle><jtitle>Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes</jtitle><addtitle>Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes</addtitle><date>2009-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>361-368</pages><issn>1941-7713</issn><eissn>1941-7705</eissn><abstract>Despite the existence of national American Heart Association guidelines and 2 termination-of-resuscitation (TOR) rules for ceasing efforts in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, many emergency medical services agencies in the United States have adopted their own local protocols. Public policies and local perceptions may serve as barriers or facilitators to implementing national TOR guidelines at the local level. Three focus groups, lasting 90 to 120 minutes, were conducted at the National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians meeting in January 2008. Snowball sampling was used to recruit participants. Two reviewers analyzed the data in an iterative process to identify recurrent and unifying themes. We identified 3 distinct groups whose current policies or perceptions may impede efforts to adopt national TOR guidelines: payers who incentivize transport; legislators who create state mandates for transport and allow only narrow use of do-not-resuscitate orders; and communities where cultural norms are perceived to impede termination of resuscitation. Our participants suggested that national organizations, such as the American Heart Association and American College of Emergency Physicians, may serve as potential facilitators in addressing these barriers by taking the lead in asking payers to change reimbursement structures; encouraging legislators to revise laws to reflect the best available medical evidence; and educating the public that rapid transport to the hospital cannot substitute for optimal provision of prehospital care. We have identified 3 influential groups who will need to work with national organizations to overcome current policies or prevailing perceptions that may impede implementing national TOR guidelines.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>20031862</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.830398</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1941-7713
ispartof Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2009-07, Vol.2 (4), p.361-368
issn 1941-7713
1941-7705
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733606784
source Electronic Journals Library; MEDLINE; American Heart Association
subjects Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards
Emergency Medical Services - legislation & jurisprudence
Emergency Medical Services - standards
Emergency Medical Technicians - standards
Emergency Medicine - standards
Emergency Nursing - standards
Focus Groups
Health Policy - legislation & jurisprudence
Heart Arrest - mortality
Heart Arrest - therapy
Humans
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Qualitative Research
United States - epidemiology
Withholding Treatment - standards
title A qualitative study to identify barriers to local implementation of prehospital termination of resuscitation protocols
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T10%3A18%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20qualitative%20study%20to%20identify%20barriers%20to%20local%20implementation%20of%20prehospital%20termination%20of%20resuscitation%20protocols&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20Cardiovascular%20quality%20and%20outcomes&rft.au=Sasson,%20Comilla&rft.date=2009-07&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=361-368&rft.issn=1941-7713&rft.eissn=1941-7705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.830398&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733606784%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733606784&rft_id=info:pmid/20031862&rfr_iscdi=true