Diagnostic imaging of carcinoid metastases to the abdomen and pelvis

Functional and anatomical imaging methods are currently the standard approach to the evaluation of carcinoid tumor extent. Due to the nature of carcinoid tumors ,there is not a single imaging procedure that is sufficient to detect the malignancy. The aim of the study was to compare the value of CT,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical science monitor 2004-06, Vol.10 Suppl 3, p.9-16
Hauptverfasser: Cwikła, Jarosław B, Buscombe, John R, Caplin, Martyn E, Watkinson, Anthony F, Walecki, Jerzy, Gorczyca-Wiśniewska, Ewa, Hilson, Andrew J W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue
container_start_page 9
container_title Medical science monitor
container_volume 10 Suppl 3
creator Cwikła, Jarosław B
Buscombe, John R
Caplin, Martyn E
Watkinson, Anthony F
Walecki, Jerzy
Gorczyca-Wiśniewska, Ewa
Hilson, Andrew J W
description Functional and anatomical imaging methods are currently the standard approach to the evaluation of carcinoid tumor extent. Due to the nature of carcinoid tumors ,there is not a single imaging procedure that is sufficient to detect the malignancy. The aim of the study was to compare the value of CT, MR and functional imaging study with(111) In-Octreotide (SRS) in carcinoid detection and evaluation of its extent as well as to work out the imaging studies diagnostic algorithm that could enhance diagnostic efficacy. A total of 34 patients with carcinoid tumor confirmed clinically,biochemically and/or histopathologically were enrolled into the study. Computed tomography (CT) examinations of the abdomen and pelvis were performed before and after administration of a contrast medium, the triple-phase liver scanning included. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)of the liver was performed according to the standardized protocol before and after administration of a contrast medium .Planar scintigraphy with(111) In Octreotide and SPECT were performed. In each case liver as well as lymph node metastases in the abdomen and pelvis were searched for. All results were reviewed independently. Clinical picture at follow-up and further imaging and/or histological studies confirmed or excluded the diagnosis of the disease. Twenty nine patients were diagnosed with carcinoid tumor. Liver metastases were found in 26 patients and lymph node metastases were detected in 18 of them. Complete diagnostic conformity as far as the diagnosis and extent of the disease are concerned was obtained only in 7 cases. Incorrect assessment of the disease extent was the source of discrepancy between the imaging studies results in most of the remaining 22 patients. The SRS and MR results of liver metastases detection were mostly consistent with one another. Both imaging modalities evaluated the extent of hepatic metastases incorrectly in 22%of the patients,as compared to 43% of the patients for CT. The highest proportion percentages of incorrect results of lymphatic involvement detection were 41%, 29%and 43%for MR, SRS and CT, respectively. The results of our study have indicated that application of a complex imaging algorithm enables higher accuracy of hepatic and lymph nodes metastases detection in carcinoid tumor patients. Combining the results of MR and SRS in evaluating the extent of the carcinoid disease seems to represent higher diagnostic value than relying on one of this method in combination wi
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733601803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733601803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p125t-eca1cfa4a3cb9279209c4ae04959b7b3a41ca82cd502d1d335722691e39f0aee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j81KxDAURoMgzjj6CpKdq0KS27TNUmb8gwE3ui63yW2NtE1tUsG3t-AMfPBtDgfOBdvKIocMSi027DrGLyFUVQh9xTay0FBJo7bscPDYjSEmb7kfsPNjx0PLLc7Wj8E7PlDCuI4iT4GnT-LYuDDQyHF0fKL-x8cbdtliH-n29Dv28fT4vn_Jjm_Pr_uHYzZJpVNGFqVtMUewjVGlUcLYHEnkRpumbABzabFS1mmhnHQAulSqMJLAtAKJYMfu_73THL4XiqkefLTU9zhSWGJdAhRCVgJW8u5ELs1Arp7mNW7-rc_h8AeQW1Nx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733601803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic imaging of carcinoid metastases to the abdomen and pelvis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Cwikła, Jarosław B ; Buscombe, John R ; Caplin, Martyn E ; Watkinson, Anthony F ; Walecki, Jerzy ; Gorczyca-Wiśniewska, Ewa ; Hilson, Andrew J W</creator><creatorcontrib>Cwikła, Jarosław B ; Buscombe, John R ; Caplin, Martyn E ; Watkinson, Anthony F ; Walecki, Jerzy ; Gorczyca-Wiśniewska, Ewa ; Hilson, Andrew J W</creatorcontrib><description>Functional and anatomical imaging methods are currently the standard approach to the evaluation of carcinoid tumor extent. Due to the nature of carcinoid tumors ,there is not a single imaging procedure that is sufficient to detect the malignancy. The aim of the study was to compare the value of CT, MR and functional imaging study with(111) In-Octreotide (SRS) in carcinoid detection and evaluation of its extent as well as to work out the imaging studies diagnostic algorithm that could enhance diagnostic efficacy. A total of 34 patients with carcinoid tumor confirmed clinically,biochemically and/or histopathologically were enrolled into the study. Computed tomography (CT) examinations of the abdomen and pelvis were performed before and after administration of a contrast medium, the triple-phase liver scanning included. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)of the liver was performed according to the standardized protocol before and after administration of a contrast medium .Planar scintigraphy with(111) In Octreotide and SPECT were performed. In each case liver as well as lymph node metastases in the abdomen and pelvis were searched for. All results were reviewed independently. Clinical picture at follow-up and further imaging and/or histological studies confirmed or excluded the diagnosis of the disease. Twenty nine patients were diagnosed with carcinoid tumor. Liver metastases were found in 26 patients and lymph node metastases were detected in 18 of them. Complete diagnostic conformity as far as the diagnosis and extent of the disease are concerned was obtained only in 7 cases. Incorrect assessment of the disease extent was the source of discrepancy between the imaging studies results in most of the remaining 22 patients. The SRS and MR results of liver metastases detection were mostly consistent with one another. Both imaging modalities evaluated the extent of hepatic metastases incorrectly in 22%of the patients,as compared to 43% of the patients for CT. The highest proportion percentages of incorrect results of lymphatic involvement detection were 41%, 29%and 43%for MR, SRS and CT, respectively. The results of our study have indicated that application of a complex imaging algorithm enables higher accuracy of hepatic and lymph nodes metastases detection in carcinoid tumor patients. Combining the results of MR and SRS in evaluating the extent of the carcinoid disease seems to represent higher diagnostic value than relying on one of this method in combination with CT images.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1643-3750</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16538192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Algorithms ; Carcinoid Tumor - diagnosis ; Carcinoid Tumor - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoid Tumor - secondary ; Contrast Media ; Diagnostic Errors ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Liver Neoplasms - secondary ; Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome - diagnosis ; Middle Aged ; Octreotide - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Medical science monitor, 2004-06, Vol.10 Suppl 3, p.9-16</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16538192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cwikła, Jarosław B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buscombe, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caplin, Martyn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkinson, Anthony F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walecki, Jerzy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorczyca-Wiśniewska, Ewa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilson, Andrew J W</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic imaging of carcinoid metastases to the abdomen and pelvis</title><title>Medical science monitor</title><addtitle>Med Sci Monit</addtitle><description>Functional and anatomical imaging methods are currently the standard approach to the evaluation of carcinoid tumor extent. Due to the nature of carcinoid tumors ,there is not a single imaging procedure that is sufficient to detect the malignancy. The aim of the study was to compare the value of CT, MR and functional imaging study with(111) In-Octreotide (SRS) in carcinoid detection and evaluation of its extent as well as to work out the imaging studies diagnostic algorithm that could enhance diagnostic efficacy. A total of 34 patients with carcinoid tumor confirmed clinically,biochemically and/or histopathologically were enrolled into the study. Computed tomography (CT) examinations of the abdomen and pelvis were performed before and after administration of a contrast medium, the triple-phase liver scanning included. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)of the liver was performed according to the standardized protocol before and after administration of a contrast medium .Planar scintigraphy with(111) In Octreotide and SPECT were performed. In each case liver as well as lymph node metastases in the abdomen and pelvis were searched for. All results were reviewed independently. Clinical picture at follow-up and further imaging and/or histological studies confirmed or excluded the diagnosis of the disease. Twenty nine patients were diagnosed with carcinoid tumor. Liver metastases were found in 26 patients and lymph node metastases were detected in 18 of them. Complete diagnostic conformity as far as the diagnosis and extent of the disease are concerned was obtained only in 7 cases. Incorrect assessment of the disease extent was the source of discrepancy between the imaging studies results in most of the remaining 22 patients. The SRS and MR results of liver metastases detection were mostly consistent with one another. Both imaging modalities evaluated the extent of hepatic metastases incorrectly in 22%of the patients,as compared to 43% of the patients for CT. The highest proportion percentages of incorrect results of lymphatic involvement detection were 41%, 29%and 43%for MR, SRS and CT, respectively. The results of our study have indicated that application of a complex imaging algorithm enables higher accuracy of hepatic and lymph nodes metastases detection in carcinoid tumor patients. Combining the results of MR and SRS in evaluating the extent of the carcinoid disease seems to represent higher diagnostic value than relying on one of this method in combination with CT images.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Carcinoid Tumor - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoid Tumor - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoid Tumor - secondary</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Octreotide - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1643-3750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j81KxDAURoMgzjj6CpKdq0KS27TNUmb8gwE3ui63yW2NtE1tUsG3t-AMfPBtDgfOBdvKIocMSi027DrGLyFUVQh9xTay0FBJo7bscPDYjSEmb7kfsPNjx0PLLc7Wj8E7PlDCuI4iT4GnT-LYuDDQyHF0fKL-x8cbdtliH-n29Dv28fT4vn_Jjm_Pr_uHYzZJpVNGFqVtMUewjVGlUcLYHEnkRpumbABzabFS1mmhnHQAulSqMJLAtAKJYMfu_73THL4XiqkefLTU9zhSWGJdAhRCVgJW8u5ELs1Arp7mNW7-rc_h8AeQW1Nx</recordid><startdate>200406</startdate><enddate>200406</enddate><creator>Cwikła, Jarosław B</creator><creator>Buscombe, John R</creator><creator>Caplin, Martyn E</creator><creator>Watkinson, Anthony F</creator><creator>Walecki, Jerzy</creator><creator>Gorczyca-Wiśniewska, Ewa</creator><creator>Hilson, Andrew J W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200406</creationdate><title>Diagnostic imaging of carcinoid metastases to the abdomen and pelvis</title><author>Cwikła, Jarosław B ; Buscombe, John R ; Caplin, Martyn E ; Watkinson, Anthony F ; Walecki, Jerzy ; Gorczyca-Wiśniewska, Ewa ; Hilson, Andrew J W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p125t-eca1cfa4a3cb9279209c4ae04959b7b3a41ca82cd502d1d335722691e39f0aee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Carcinoid Tumor - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoid Tumor - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoid Tumor - secondary</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Octreotide - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cwikła, Jarosław B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buscombe, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caplin, Martyn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkinson, Anthony F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walecki, Jerzy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorczyca-Wiśniewska, Ewa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilson, Andrew J W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical science monitor</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cwikła, Jarosław B</au><au>Buscombe, John R</au><au>Caplin, Martyn E</au><au>Watkinson, Anthony F</au><au>Walecki, Jerzy</au><au>Gorczyca-Wiśniewska, Ewa</au><au>Hilson, Andrew J W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic imaging of carcinoid metastases to the abdomen and pelvis</atitle><jtitle>Medical science monitor</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Monit</addtitle><date>2004-06</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>10 Suppl 3</volume><spage>9</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>9-16</pages><eissn>1643-3750</eissn><abstract>Functional and anatomical imaging methods are currently the standard approach to the evaluation of carcinoid tumor extent. Due to the nature of carcinoid tumors ,there is not a single imaging procedure that is sufficient to detect the malignancy. The aim of the study was to compare the value of CT, MR and functional imaging study with(111) In-Octreotide (SRS) in carcinoid detection and evaluation of its extent as well as to work out the imaging studies diagnostic algorithm that could enhance diagnostic efficacy. A total of 34 patients with carcinoid tumor confirmed clinically,biochemically and/or histopathologically were enrolled into the study. Computed tomography (CT) examinations of the abdomen and pelvis were performed before and after administration of a contrast medium, the triple-phase liver scanning included. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)of the liver was performed according to the standardized protocol before and after administration of a contrast medium .Planar scintigraphy with(111) In Octreotide and SPECT were performed. In each case liver as well as lymph node metastases in the abdomen and pelvis were searched for. All results were reviewed independently. Clinical picture at follow-up and further imaging and/or histological studies confirmed or excluded the diagnosis of the disease. Twenty nine patients were diagnosed with carcinoid tumor. Liver metastases were found in 26 patients and lymph node metastases were detected in 18 of them. Complete diagnostic conformity as far as the diagnosis and extent of the disease are concerned was obtained only in 7 cases. Incorrect assessment of the disease extent was the source of discrepancy between the imaging studies results in most of the remaining 22 patients. The SRS and MR results of liver metastases detection were mostly consistent with one another. Both imaging modalities evaluated the extent of hepatic metastases incorrectly in 22%of the patients,as compared to 43% of the patients for CT. The highest proportion percentages of incorrect results of lymphatic involvement detection were 41%, 29%and 43%for MR, SRS and CT, respectively. The results of our study have indicated that application of a complex imaging algorithm enables higher accuracy of hepatic and lymph nodes metastases detection in carcinoid tumor patients. Combining the results of MR and SRS in evaluating the extent of the carcinoid disease seems to represent higher diagnostic value than relying on one of this method in combination with CT images.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16538192</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1643-3750
ispartof Medical science monitor, 2004-06, Vol.10 Suppl 3, p.9-16
issn 1643-3750
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733601803
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Algorithms
Carcinoid Tumor - diagnosis
Carcinoid Tumor - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoid Tumor - secondary
Contrast Media
Diagnostic Errors
Female
Humans
Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis
Liver Neoplasms - secondary
Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnosis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome - diagnosis
Middle Aged
Octreotide - analogs & derivatives
Radiopharmaceuticals
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Young Adult
title Diagnostic imaging of carcinoid metastases to the abdomen and pelvis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A58%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20imaging%20of%20carcinoid%20metastases%20to%20the%20abdomen%20and%20pelvis&rft.jtitle=Medical%20science%20monitor&rft.au=Cwik%C5%82a,%20Jaros%C5%82aw%20B&rft.date=2004-06&rft.volume=10%20Suppl%203&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=9-16&rft.eissn=1643-3750&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733601803%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733601803&rft_id=info:pmid/16538192&rfr_iscdi=true