Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery
Background: ‘Prehabilitation’ is an intervention to enhance functional capacity in anticipation of a forthcoming physiological stressor. In patients scheduled for colorectal surgery, the extent to which a structured prehabilitation regimen of stationary cycling and strengthening optimized recovery o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of surgery 2010-08, Vol.97 (8), p.1187-1197 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1197 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1187 |
container_title | British journal of surgery |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Carli, F. Charlebois, P. Stein, B. Feldman, L. Zavorsky, G. Kim, D. J. Scott, S. Mayo, N. E. |
description | Background:
‘Prehabilitation’ is an intervention to enhance functional capacity in anticipation of a forthcoming physiological stressor. In patients scheduled for colorectal surgery, the extent to which a structured prehabilitation regimen of stationary cycling and strengthening optimized recovery of functional walking capacity after surgery was compared with a simpler regimen of walking and breathing exercises.
Methods:
Some 112 patients (mean(s.d.) age 60(16) years) were randomized to either the structured bike and strengthening regimen (bike/strengthening group, 58 patients) or the simpler walking and breathing regimen (walk/breathing group, 54 patients). Randomization was done at the surgical planning visit; the mean time to surgery available for prehabilitation was 52 days; follow‐up was for approximately 10 weeks after surgery.
Results:
There were no differences between the groups in mean functional walking capacity over the prehabilitation period or at postoperative follow‐up. The proportion showing an improvement in walking capacity was greater in the walk/breathing group than in the bike/strengthening group at the end of the prehabilitation period (47 versus 22 per cent respectively; P = 0·051) and after surgery (41 versus 11 per cent; P = 0·019).
Conclusion:
There was an unexpected benefit from the recommendation to increase walking and breathing, as designed for the control group. Adherence to recommendations was low. An examination of prehabilitation ‘responders’ would add valuable information. Registration number: NCT00227526 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Prehabilitation aids recovery |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bjs.7102 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733594914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733594914</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4552-1c72fcd4d433776db42404b775c19fa2c1209ce2734b09e3f331de337b36fe8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0E1PwkAQBuCN0Qiiib_A9GI8FWd3tl16FKKoIWrw87bZbre6WFrcLVH89ZaAcJn3ME8mmZeQYwpdCsDO04nvCgpsh7QpxlHIaNzbJW0AECFFhi1y4P0EgCJEbJ-0GMTAIsA26Y9VmVVT-2uyQBe2tFoVQe1sM6s8mDnzoVJb2FrVtioDWwa6KipndN0AP3fvxi0OyV6uCm-O1tkhz1eXT4PrcHQ_vBlcjELNo4iFVAuW64xnHFGIOEs548BTISJNk1wxTRkk2jCBPIXEYI5IM9PYFOPc9DLskLPV3ZmrvubG13JqvTZFoUpTzb0UiFHCE8obebKW83RqMjlzdqrcQv6_3YDTNVC-eTh3qtTWbx1Lekkvpo0LV-7bFmax2VOQy9plU7tc1i77t4_L3Hrra_Oz8cp9yligiOTr3VDS0cP4DV-EBPwDY2aCGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733594914</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Carli, F. ; Charlebois, P. ; Stein, B. ; Feldman, L. ; Zavorsky, G. ; Kim, D. J. ; Scott, S. ; Mayo, N. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carli, F. ; Charlebois, P. ; Stein, B. ; Feldman, L. ; Zavorsky, G. ; Kim, D. J. ; Scott, S. ; Mayo, N. E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
‘Prehabilitation’ is an intervention to enhance functional capacity in anticipation of a forthcoming physiological stressor. In patients scheduled for colorectal surgery, the extent to which a structured prehabilitation regimen of stationary cycling and strengthening optimized recovery of functional walking capacity after surgery was compared with a simpler regimen of walking and breathing exercises.
Methods:
Some 112 patients (mean(s.d.) age 60(16) years) were randomized to either the structured bike and strengthening regimen (bike/strengthening group, 58 patients) or the simpler walking and breathing regimen (walk/breathing group, 54 patients). Randomization was done at the surgical planning visit; the mean time to surgery available for prehabilitation was 52 days; follow‐up was for approximately 10 weeks after surgery.
Results:
There were no differences between the groups in mean functional walking capacity over the prehabilitation period or at postoperative follow‐up. The proportion showing an improvement in walking capacity was greater in the walk/breathing group than in the bike/strengthening group at the end of the prehabilitation period (47 versus 22 per cent respectively; P = 0·051) and after surgery (41 versus 11 per cent; P = 0·019).
Conclusion:
There was an unexpected benefit from the recommendation to increase walking and breathing, as designed for the control group. Adherence to recommendations was low. An examination of prehabilitation ‘responders’ would add valuable information. Registration number: NCT00227526 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Prehabilitation aids recovery</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20602503</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSUAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bicycling ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonic Diseases - rehabilitation ; Colonic Diseases - surgery ; Exercise - physiology ; Female ; General aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Care - methods ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Rectal Diseases - rehabilitation ; Rectal Diseases - surgery ; Regression Analysis ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Treatment Outcome ; Walking</subject><ispartof>British journal of surgery, 2010-08, Vol.97 (8), p.1187-1197</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4552-1c72fcd4d433776db42404b775c19fa2c1209ce2734b09e3f331de337b36fe8d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbjs.7102$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbjs.7102$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22989861$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602503$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carli, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlebois, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zavorsky, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayo, N. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery</title><title>British journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><description>Background:
‘Prehabilitation’ is an intervention to enhance functional capacity in anticipation of a forthcoming physiological stressor. In patients scheduled for colorectal surgery, the extent to which a structured prehabilitation regimen of stationary cycling and strengthening optimized recovery of functional walking capacity after surgery was compared with a simpler regimen of walking and breathing exercises.
Methods:
Some 112 patients (mean(s.d.) age 60(16) years) were randomized to either the structured bike and strengthening regimen (bike/strengthening group, 58 patients) or the simpler walking and breathing regimen (walk/breathing group, 54 patients). Randomization was done at the surgical planning visit; the mean time to surgery available for prehabilitation was 52 days; follow‐up was for approximately 10 weeks after surgery.
Results:
There were no differences between the groups in mean functional walking capacity over the prehabilitation period or at postoperative follow‐up. The proportion showing an improvement in walking capacity was greater in the walk/breathing group than in the bike/strengthening group at the end of the prehabilitation period (47 versus 22 per cent respectively; P = 0·051) and after surgery (41 versus 11 per cent; P = 0·019).
Conclusion:
There was an unexpected benefit from the recommendation to increase walking and breathing, as designed for the control group. Adherence to recommendations was low. An examination of prehabilitation ‘responders’ would add valuable information. Registration number: NCT00227526 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Prehabilitation aids recovery</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonic Diseases - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Colonic Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Rectal Diseases - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rectal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0007-1323</issn><issn>1365-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0E1PwkAQBuCN0Qiiib_A9GI8FWd3tl16FKKoIWrw87bZbre6WFrcLVH89ZaAcJn3ME8mmZeQYwpdCsDO04nvCgpsh7QpxlHIaNzbJW0AECFFhi1y4P0EgCJEbJ-0GMTAIsA26Y9VmVVT-2uyQBe2tFoVQe1sM6s8mDnzoVJb2FrVtioDWwa6KipndN0AP3fvxi0OyV6uCm-O1tkhz1eXT4PrcHQ_vBlcjELNo4iFVAuW64xnHFGIOEs548BTISJNk1wxTRkk2jCBPIXEYI5IM9PYFOPc9DLskLPV3ZmrvubG13JqvTZFoUpTzb0UiFHCE8obebKW83RqMjlzdqrcQv6_3YDTNVC-eTh3qtTWbx1Lekkvpo0LV-7bFmax2VOQy9plU7tc1i77t4_L3Hrra_Oz8cp9yligiOTr3VDS0cP4DV-EBPwDY2aCGA</recordid><startdate>201008</startdate><enddate>201008</enddate><creator>Carli, F.</creator><creator>Charlebois, P.</creator><creator>Stein, B.</creator><creator>Feldman, L.</creator><creator>Zavorsky, G.</creator><creator>Kim, D. J.</creator><creator>Scott, S.</creator><creator>Mayo, N. E.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201008</creationdate><title>Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery</title><author>Carli, F. ; Charlebois, P. ; Stein, B. ; Feldman, L. ; Zavorsky, G. ; Kim, D. J. ; Scott, S. ; Mayo, N. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4552-1c72fcd4d433776db42404b775c19fa2c1209ce2734b09e3f331de337b36fe8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonic Diseases - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Colonic Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Rectal Diseases - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rectal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carli, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlebois, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zavorsky, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayo, N. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carli, F.</au><au>Charlebois, P.</au><au>Stein, B.</au><au>Feldman, L.</au><au>Zavorsky, G.</au><au>Kim, D. J.</au><au>Scott, S.</au><au>Mayo, N. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery</atitle><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><date>2010-08</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1187</spage><epage>1197</epage><pages>1187-1197</pages><issn>0007-1323</issn><eissn>1365-2168</eissn><coden>BJSUAM</coden><abstract>Background:
‘Prehabilitation’ is an intervention to enhance functional capacity in anticipation of a forthcoming physiological stressor. In patients scheduled for colorectal surgery, the extent to which a structured prehabilitation regimen of stationary cycling and strengthening optimized recovery of functional walking capacity after surgery was compared with a simpler regimen of walking and breathing exercises.
Methods:
Some 112 patients (mean(s.d.) age 60(16) years) were randomized to either the structured bike and strengthening regimen (bike/strengthening group, 58 patients) or the simpler walking and breathing regimen (walk/breathing group, 54 patients). Randomization was done at the surgical planning visit; the mean time to surgery available for prehabilitation was 52 days; follow‐up was for approximately 10 weeks after surgery.
Results:
There were no differences between the groups in mean functional walking capacity over the prehabilitation period or at postoperative follow‐up. The proportion showing an improvement in walking capacity was greater in the walk/breathing group than in the bike/strengthening group at the end of the prehabilitation period (47 versus 22 per cent respectively; P = 0·051) and after surgery (41 versus 11 per cent; P = 0·019).
Conclusion:
There was an unexpected benefit from the recommendation to increase walking and breathing, as designed for the control group. Adherence to recommendations was low. An examination of prehabilitation ‘responders’ would add valuable information. Registration number: NCT00227526 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Prehabilitation aids recovery</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>20602503</pmid><doi>10.1002/bjs.7102</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1323 |
ispartof | British journal of surgery, 2010-08, Vol.97 (8), p.1187-1197 |
issn | 0007-1323 1365-2168 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733594914 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged Bicycling Biological and medical sciences Colonic Diseases - rehabilitation Colonic Diseases - surgery Exercise - physiology Female General aspects Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Postoperative Care - methods Preoperative Care - methods Rectal Diseases - rehabilitation Rectal Diseases - surgery Regression Analysis Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the digestive system Treatment Outcome Walking |
title | Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A39%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20clinical%20trial%20of%20prehabilitation%20in%20colorectal%20surgery&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Carli,%20F.&rft.date=2010-08&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1187&rft.epage=1197&rft.pages=1187-1197&rft.issn=0007-1323&rft.eissn=1365-2168&rft.coden=BJSUAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bjs.7102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733594914%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733594914&rft_id=info:pmid/20602503&rfr_iscdi=true |