Effects of nicotine on novelty detection and memory recognition performance: double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of smokers and nonsmokers
Rationale Dependent smokers exhibit deficits in attentional and memory processes when smoking abstinent as compared to when satiated. While nicotine replacement therapy improves attention during abstinence, it is unclear whether this is due to the alleviation of withdrawal-related deficits or inhere...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychopharmacologia 2009-09, Vol.205 (4), p.625-633 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 633 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 625 |
container_title | Psychopharmacologia |
container_volume | 205 |
creator | Froeliger, Brett Gilbert, David G. McClernon, F. Joseph |
description | Rationale
Dependent smokers exhibit deficits in attentional and memory processes when smoking abstinent as compared to when satiated. While nicotine replacement therapy improves attention during abstinence, it is unclear whether this is due to the alleviation of withdrawal-related deficits or inherent beneficial effects of nicotine.
Objectives
The primary aim of these studies was to test whether nicotine exerts a beneficial effect on novelty detection and whether such effects occur in nonsmokers as well as habitual smokers.
Materials and methods
In two parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, 24 smokers (study 1) and 24 nonsmokers (study 2) were tested in two counterbalanced sessions: once while wearing a nicotine patch (smokers = 14 mg; nonsmokers = 7 mg) and once while wearing a placebo patch. On each day, participants performed three content-specific oddball tasks (perceptual, semantic, and emotional) that required them to press a button whenever they saw a novel target (20% of stimuli) embedded in a stream of common nontarget stimuli (80% of stimuli). Recognition memory for targets was subsequently tested. Reports of mood, smoking withdrawal, patch side effects, and blind success were collected in each session.
Results
Among smokers, compared to placebo, nicotine decreased target reaction time during all oddball tasks. Among nonsmokers, nicotine increased target detection accuracy and subsequent memory recognition. Nicotine’s enhancement on each respective measure was not task-content specific in either sample.
Conclusions
These data suggest that acute nicotine administration may exert direct beneficial effects on novelty detection and subsequent memory recognition in both smokers and nonsmokers. Moreover, these effects are not content-specific. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00213-009-1571-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733574813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20213154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-10634b8e8bfa26acb0c52cda9d1de382dbb9870dad630683f6f7cf4fe8cc383e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2K1TAUgIMozp3RB3AjRVA3RvPXm9SdDDMqDLjRdUiTk6FjmlyTVuhT-Mqm9xYHBM0m5Jzv_IQPoWeUvKWEyHeFEEY5JqTDtJUULw_QjgrOMCOSPUQ7QjjHnLbqDJ2XckfqEUo8Rme0E0pJQXfo15X3YKfSJN_EwaZpiNCk2MT0E8K0NA6mmh5qxETXjDCmvDQZbLqNwzF8gOxTHk208L5xae4D4D4M0b1pDsFY6BO2KU45hQCuKdPsBjhOK2P6Drkc-8YUt-cT9MibUODpdl-gb9dXXy8_4ZsvHz9ffrjBVnRywpTsuegVqN4btje2J7Zl1pnOUQdcMdf3nZLEGbfnZK-433tpvfCgrOWKA79Ar099Dzn9mKFMehyKhRBMhDQXLTlvpVCUV_LVf0m2OqCtqOCLv8C7NOdYf6EZVV2ruFi70RNkcyolg9eHPIwmL5oSvUrVJ6m6StWrVL3Umudb47kfwd1XbBYr8HIDTLEm-FxtDOUPx6hUhMt1Q3biSk3FW8j3G_57-m-alr2G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218958343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of nicotine on novelty detection and memory recognition performance: double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of smokers and nonsmokers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Froeliger, Brett ; Gilbert, David G. ; McClernon, F. Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Froeliger, Brett ; Gilbert, David G. ; McClernon, F. Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale
Dependent smokers exhibit deficits in attentional and memory processes when smoking abstinent as compared to when satiated. While nicotine replacement therapy improves attention during abstinence, it is unclear whether this is due to the alleviation of withdrawal-related deficits or inherent beneficial effects of nicotine.
Objectives
The primary aim of these studies was to test whether nicotine exerts a beneficial effect on novelty detection and whether such effects occur in nonsmokers as well as habitual smokers.
Materials and methods
In two parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, 24 smokers (study 1) and 24 nonsmokers (study 2) were tested in two counterbalanced sessions: once while wearing a nicotine patch (smokers = 14 mg; nonsmokers = 7 mg) and once while wearing a placebo patch. On each day, participants performed three content-specific oddball tasks (perceptual, semantic, and emotional) that required them to press a button whenever they saw a novel target (20% of stimuli) embedded in a stream of common nontarget stimuli (80% of stimuli). Recognition memory for targets was subsequently tested. Reports of mood, smoking withdrawal, patch side effects, and blind success were collected in each session.
Results
Among smokers, compared to placebo, nicotine decreased target reaction time during all oddball tasks. Among nonsmokers, nicotine increased target detection accuracy and subsequent memory recognition. Nicotine’s enhancement on each respective measure was not task-content specific in either sample.
Conclusions
These data suggest that acute nicotine administration may exert direct beneficial effects on novelty detection and subsequent memory recognition in both smokers and nonsmokers. Moreover, these effects are not content-specific.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00213-009-1571-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19488741</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSYPAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Addictive behaviors ; Administration, Cutaneous ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Clinical trials ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognition - drug effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Exploratory Behavior - drug effects ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Memory ; Memory - drug effects ; Middle Aged ; Neurosciences ; Nicotine ; Nicotine - administration & dosage ; Nicotine - pharmacology ; Original Investigation ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Placebos ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychopharmacology ; Smoking ; Smoking - psychology ; Tobacco smoking ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Psychopharmacologia, 2009-09, Vol.205 (4), p.625-633</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-10634b8e8bfa26acb0c52cda9d1de382dbb9870dad630683f6f7cf4fe8cc383e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-10634b8e8bfa26acb0c52cda9d1de382dbb9870dad630683f6f7cf4fe8cc383e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00213-009-1571-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00213-009-1571-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21780374$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19488741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Froeliger, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClernon, F. Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of nicotine on novelty detection and memory recognition performance: double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of smokers and nonsmokers</title><title>Psychopharmacologia</title><addtitle>Psychopharmacology</addtitle><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><description>Rationale
Dependent smokers exhibit deficits in attentional and memory processes when smoking abstinent as compared to when satiated. While nicotine replacement therapy improves attention during abstinence, it is unclear whether this is due to the alleviation of withdrawal-related deficits or inherent beneficial effects of nicotine.
Objectives
The primary aim of these studies was to test whether nicotine exerts a beneficial effect on novelty detection and whether such effects occur in nonsmokers as well as habitual smokers.
Materials and methods
In two parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, 24 smokers (study 1) and 24 nonsmokers (study 2) were tested in two counterbalanced sessions: once while wearing a nicotine patch (smokers = 14 mg; nonsmokers = 7 mg) and once while wearing a placebo patch. On each day, participants performed three content-specific oddball tasks (perceptual, semantic, and emotional) that required them to press a button whenever they saw a novel target (20% of stimuli) embedded in a stream of common nontarget stimuli (80% of stimuli). Recognition memory for targets was subsequently tested. Reports of mood, smoking withdrawal, patch side effects, and blind success were collected in each session.
Results
Among smokers, compared to placebo, nicotine decreased target reaction time during all oddball tasks. Among nonsmokers, nicotine increased target detection accuracy and subsequent memory recognition. Nicotine’s enhancement on each respective measure was not task-content specific in either sample.
Conclusions
These data suggest that acute nicotine administration may exert direct beneficial effects on novelty detection and subsequent memory recognition in both smokers and nonsmokers. Moreover, these effects are not content-specific.</description><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Administration, Cutaneous</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition - drug effects</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Exploratory Behavior - drug effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - drug effects</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>Nicotine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Nicotine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopharmacology</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - psychology</subject><subject>Tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0033-3158</issn><issn>1432-2072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2K1TAUgIMozp3RB3AjRVA3RvPXm9SdDDMqDLjRdUiTk6FjmlyTVuhT-Mqm9xYHBM0m5Jzv_IQPoWeUvKWEyHeFEEY5JqTDtJUULw_QjgrOMCOSPUQ7QjjHnLbqDJ2XckfqEUo8Rme0E0pJQXfo15X3YKfSJN_EwaZpiNCk2MT0E8K0NA6mmh5qxETXjDCmvDQZbLqNwzF8gOxTHk208L5xae4D4D4M0b1pDsFY6BO2KU45hQCuKdPsBjhOK2P6Drkc-8YUt-cT9MibUODpdl-gb9dXXy8_4ZsvHz9ffrjBVnRywpTsuegVqN4btje2J7Zl1pnOUQdcMdf3nZLEGbfnZK-433tpvfCgrOWKA79Ar099Dzn9mKFMehyKhRBMhDQXLTlvpVCUV_LVf0m2OqCtqOCLv8C7NOdYf6EZVV2ruFi70RNkcyolg9eHPIwmL5oSvUrVJ6m6StWrVL3Umudb47kfwd1XbBYr8HIDTLEm-FxtDOUPx6hUhMt1Q3biSk3FW8j3G_57-m-alr2G</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Froeliger, Brett</creator><creator>Gilbert, David G.</creator><creator>McClernon, F. Joseph</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Effects of nicotine on novelty detection and memory recognition performance: double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of smokers and nonsmokers</title><author>Froeliger, Brett ; Gilbert, David G. ; McClernon, F. Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-10634b8e8bfa26acb0c52cda9d1de382dbb9870dad630683f6f7cf4fe8cc383e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Administration, Cutaneous</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition - drug effects</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Exploratory Behavior - drug effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - drug effects</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>Nicotine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Nicotine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopharmacology</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - psychology</topic><topic>Tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Froeliger, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClernon, F. Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychopharmacologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Froeliger, Brett</au><au>Gilbert, David G.</au><au>McClernon, F. Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of nicotine on novelty detection and memory recognition performance: double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of smokers and nonsmokers</atitle><jtitle>Psychopharmacologia</jtitle><stitle>Psychopharmacology</stitle><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>205</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>633</epage><pages>625-633</pages><issn>0033-3158</issn><eissn>1432-2072</eissn><coden>PSYPAG</coden><abstract>Rationale
Dependent smokers exhibit deficits in attentional and memory processes when smoking abstinent as compared to when satiated. While nicotine replacement therapy improves attention during abstinence, it is unclear whether this is due to the alleviation of withdrawal-related deficits or inherent beneficial effects of nicotine.
Objectives
The primary aim of these studies was to test whether nicotine exerts a beneficial effect on novelty detection and whether such effects occur in nonsmokers as well as habitual smokers.
Materials and methods
In two parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, 24 smokers (study 1) and 24 nonsmokers (study 2) were tested in two counterbalanced sessions: once while wearing a nicotine patch (smokers = 14 mg; nonsmokers = 7 mg) and once while wearing a placebo patch. On each day, participants performed three content-specific oddball tasks (perceptual, semantic, and emotional) that required them to press a button whenever they saw a novel target (20% of stimuli) embedded in a stream of common nontarget stimuli (80% of stimuli). Recognition memory for targets was subsequently tested. Reports of mood, smoking withdrawal, patch side effects, and blind success were collected in each session.
Results
Among smokers, compared to placebo, nicotine decreased target reaction time during all oddball tasks. Among nonsmokers, nicotine increased target detection accuracy and subsequent memory recognition. Nicotine’s enhancement on each respective measure was not task-content specific in either sample.
Conclusions
These data suggest that acute nicotine administration may exert direct beneficial effects on novelty detection and subsequent memory recognition in both smokers and nonsmokers. Moreover, these effects are not content-specific.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19488741</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00213-009-1571-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-3158 |
ispartof | Psychopharmacologia, 2009-09, Vol.205 (4), p.625-633 |
issn | 0033-3158 1432-2072 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733574813 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Addictive behaviors Administration, Cutaneous Adolescent Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Clinical trials Cognition & reasoning Cognition - drug effects Double-Blind Method Exploratory Behavior - drug effects Female Humans Male Medical sciences Memory Memory - drug effects Middle Aged Neurosciences Nicotine Nicotine - administration & dosage Nicotine - pharmacology Original Investigation Pharmacology/Toxicology Placebos Psychiatry Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychopharmacology Smoking Smoking - psychology Tobacco smoking Tobacco, tobacco smoking Toxicology |
title | Effects of nicotine on novelty detection and memory recognition performance: double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of smokers and nonsmokers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A58%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20nicotine%20on%20novelty%20detection%20and%20memory%20recognition%20performance:%20double-blind,%20placebo-controlled%20studies%20of%20smokers%20and%20nonsmokers&rft.jtitle=Psychopharmacologia&rft.au=Froeliger,%20Brett&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=205&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=633&rft.pages=625-633&rft.issn=0033-3158&rft.eissn=1432-2072&rft.coden=PSYPAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00213-009-1571-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20213154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218958343&rft_id=info:pmid/19488741&rfr_iscdi=true |