Origin and use of the 100 cigarette criterion in tobacco surveys
Truly global standards and definitions will likely never exist for tobacco control surveillance. One difference across definitions of smoking status is whether or not a lifetime consumption of 100 cigarettes is a necessary criterion for ever and current smoking. Frequently asked questions about this...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tobacco control 2009-08, Vol.18 (4), p.317-323 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 323 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 317 |
container_title | Tobacco control |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Bondy, S J Victor, J C Diemert, L M |
description | Truly global standards and definitions will likely never exist for tobacco control surveillance. One difference across definitions of smoking status is whether or not a lifetime consumption of 100 cigarettes is a necessary criterion for ever and current smoking. Frequently asked questions about this measure demonstrate a need for information on its development and appropriateness in different settings. This commentary attempts to assemble information on the origin and adoption of this measure and provide some critical commentary on its usefulness. The question has been traced to Canadian and American mortality cohort studies from the mid-1950s. From there it has spread to inconsistent use in many settings. To our knowledge, it was not originally (or since) empirically defined as a threshold of exposure related to health consequences or future smoking risk when used in youth. Anecdotal evidence over several decades, however, shows the question has pragmatic utility in self-report data collection. It is a useful, if somewhat arbitrary, screener for “never regular” tobacco use among adults, where never smoking needs to be defined in data collection. Use of the criterion may lower prevalence estimates somewhat. Definitions must always be considered when creating time-trends or international comparisons. There are also circumstances where it is inappropriate to exclude individuals who do not meet this criterion from further data collection, or reports. For research in youth, the criterion typically should be used only with more detailed information about experimentation, but it may be a useful additional indicator of established smoking. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/tc.2008.027276 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733572241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27798614</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27798614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b482t-ac45a4910f1791a73beef7d2600b83c4258242f5c5d0e669a62c01656318f893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0b1PGzEYBnALFUFKWdlaWWKoGC71a_v8sRUiPiqlYUEdWCyf46OXJmdq-xD89zi6CKQunTw8P79-9RihEyBTACa-ZTelhKgpoZJKsYcmwIWqGAP1AU2IFrzitWCH6GNKK0KAyRoO0CForoFomKDvt7F76Hps-yUeksehxfm3x0AIdt2DjT5nj13sso9d6HGROTTWuYDTEJ_8S_qE9lu7Tv54dx6hu6vLu9lNNb-9_jE7n1cNVzRX1vHabh9tQWqwkjXet3JJBSGNYo7TWlFO29rVS-KF0FZQR0CU3UG1SrMj9HUc-xjD38GnbDZdcn69tr0PQzKSsVpSyqHI03_kKgyxL7sZkAo0JVLKoqajcjGkFH1rHmO3sfHFADHbZk12ZtusGZstF77sxg7Nxi_f-a7KAj6PYJVyiG85lVIrAbzk1Zh3Kfvnt9zGP0bI8i9m8WtmLqD-eS8W9-ai-LPRN5vV_5Z7BRsUldU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781920777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Origin and use of the 100 cigarette criterion in tobacco surveys</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Bondy, S J ; Victor, J C ; Diemert, L M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bondy, S J ; Victor, J C ; Diemert, L M</creatorcontrib><description>Truly global standards and definitions will likely never exist for tobacco control surveillance. One difference across definitions of smoking status is whether or not a lifetime consumption of 100 cigarettes is a necessary criterion for ever and current smoking. Frequently asked questions about this measure demonstrate a need for information on its development and appropriateness in different settings. This commentary attempts to assemble information on the origin and adoption of this measure and provide some critical commentary on its usefulness. The question has been traced to Canadian and American mortality cohort studies from the mid-1950s. From there it has spread to inconsistent use in many settings. To our knowledge, it was not originally (or since) empirically defined as a threshold of exposure related to health consequences or future smoking risk when used in youth. Anecdotal evidence over several decades, however, shows the question has pragmatic utility in self-report data collection. It is a useful, if somewhat arbitrary, screener for “never regular” tobacco use among adults, where never smoking needs to be defined in data collection. Use of the criterion may lower prevalence estimates somewhat. Definitions must always be considered when creating time-trends or international comparisons. There are also circumstances where it is inappropriate to exclude individuals who do not meet this criterion from further data collection, or reports. For research in youth, the criterion typically should be used only with more detailed information about experimentation, but it may be a useful additional indicator of established smoking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tc.2008.027276</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19491091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Behavior ; Cigar smoking ; Cigarette smoking ; Cigarettes ; Cigars ; Data collection ; Disease control ; Economic indicators ; Epidemiology ; Health surveillance ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Polls & surveys ; Population Surveillance - methods ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Reference Standards ; Researchers ; Self reports ; Smoking ; Smoking - adverse effects ; Smoking - epidemiology ; Smoking Cessation ; Special communication ; Studies ; Surveillance ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tobacco ; Tobacco smoking ; Trends ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2009-08, Vol.18 (4), p.317-323</ispartof><rights>2009 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright: 2009 2009 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b482t-ac45a4910f1791a73beef7d2600b83c4258242f5c5d0e669a62c01656318f893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b482t-ac45a4910f1791a73beef7d2600b83c4258242f5c5d0e669a62c01656318f893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/18/4/317.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/18/4/317.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,799,3183,23550,27901,27902,57992,58225,77343,77374</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19491091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bondy, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victor, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diemert, L M</creatorcontrib><title>Origin and use of the 100 cigarette criterion in tobacco surveys</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>Truly global standards and definitions will likely never exist for tobacco control surveillance. One difference across definitions of smoking status is whether or not a lifetime consumption of 100 cigarettes is a necessary criterion for ever and current smoking. Frequently asked questions about this measure demonstrate a need for information on its development and appropriateness in different settings. This commentary attempts to assemble information on the origin and adoption of this measure and provide some critical commentary on its usefulness. The question has been traced to Canadian and American mortality cohort studies from the mid-1950s. From there it has spread to inconsistent use in many settings. To our knowledge, it was not originally (or since) empirically defined as a threshold of exposure related to health consequences or future smoking risk when used in youth. Anecdotal evidence over several decades, however, shows the question has pragmatic utility in self-report data collection. It is a useful, if somewhat arbitrary, screener for “never regular” tobacco use among adults, where never smoking needs to be defined in data collection. Use of the criterion may lower prevalence estimates somewhat. Definitions must always be considered when creating time-trends or international comparisons. There are also circumstances where it is inappropriate to exclude individuals who do not meet this criterion from further data collection, or reports. For research in youth, the criterion typically should be used only with more detailed information about experimentation, but it may be a useful additional indicator of established smoking.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cigar smoking</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Cigars</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Economic indicators</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population Surveillance - methods</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Self reports</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - adverse effects</subject><subject>Smoking - epidemiology</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation</subject><subject>Special communication</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0b1PGzEYBnALFUFKWdlaWWKoGC71a_v8sRUiPiqlYUEdWCyf46OXJmdq-xD89zi6CKQunTw8P79-9RihEyBTACa-ZTelhKgpoZJKsYcmwIWqGAP1AU2IFrzitWCH6GNKK0KAyRoO0CForoFomKDvt7F76Hps-yUeksehxfm3x0AIdt2DjT5nj13sso9d6HGROTTWuYDTEJ_8S_qE9lu7Tv54dx6hu6vLu9lNNb-9_jE7n1cNVzRX1vHabh9tQWqwkjXet3JJBSGNYo7TWlFO29rVS-KF0FZQR0CU3UG1SrMj9HUc-xjD38GnbDZdcn69tr0PQzKSsVpSyqHI03_kKgyxL7sZkAo0JVLKoqajcjGkFH1rHmO3sfHFADHbZk12ZtusGZstF77sxg7Nxi_f-a7KAj6PYJVyiG85lVIrAbzk1Zh3Kfvnt9zGP0bI8i9m8WtmLqD-eS8W9-ai-LPRN5vV_5Z7BRsUldU</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Bondy, S J</creator><creator>Victor, J C</creator><creator>Diemert, L M</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Origin and use of the 100 cigarette criterion in tobacco surveys</title><author>Bondy, S J ; Victor, J C ; Diemert, L M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b482t-ac45a4910f1791a73beef7d2600b83c4258242f5c5d0e669a62c01656318f893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cigar smoking</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Cigars</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Economic indicators</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population Surveillance - methods</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Self reports</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - adverse effects</topic><topic>Smoking - epidemiology</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation</topic><topic>Special communication</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bondy, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victor, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diemert, L M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bondy, S J</au><au>Victor, J C</au><au>Diemert, L M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Origin and use of the 100 cigarette criterion in tobacco surveys</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>317-323</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>Truly global standards and definitions will likely never exist for tobacco control surveillance. One difference across definitions of smoking status is whether or not a lifetime consumption of 100 cigarettes is a necessary criterion for ever and current smoking. Frequently asked questions about this measure demonstrate a need for information on its development and appropriateness in different settings. This commentary attempts to assemble information on the origin and adoption of this measure and provide some critical commentary on its usefulness. The question has been traced to Canadian and American mortality cohort studies from the mid-1950s. From there it has spread to inconsistent use in many settings. To our knowledge, it was not originally (or since) empirically defined as a threshold of exposure related to health consequences or future smoking risk when used in youth. Anecdotal evidence over several decades, however, shows the question has pragmatic utility in self-report data collection. It is a useful, if somewhat arbitrary, screener for “never regular” tobacco use among adults, where never smoking needs to be defined in data collection. Use of the criterion may lower prevalence estimates somewhat. Definitions must always be considered when creating time-trends or international comparisons. There are also circumstances where it is inappropriate to exclude individuals who do not meet this criterion from further data collection, or reports. For research in youth, the criterion typically should be used only with more detailed information about experimentation, but it may be a useful additional indicator of established smoking.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>19491091</pmid><doi>10.1136/tc.2008.027276</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-4563 |
ispartof | Tobacco control, 2009-08, Vol.18 (4), p.317-323 |
issn | 0964-4563 1468-3318 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733572241 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Behavior Cigar smoking Cigarette smoking Cigarettes Cigars Data collection Disease control Economic indicators Epidemiology Health surveillance Health Surveys Humans Polls & surveys Population Surveillance - methods Public health Questionnaires Reference Standards Researchers Self reports Smoking Smoking - adverse effects Smoking - epidemiology Smoking Cessation Special communication Studies Surveillance Surveys and Questionnaires Tobacco Tobacco smoking Trends Validity |
title | Origin and use of the 100 cigarette criterion in tobacco surveys |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A51%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Origin%20and%20use%20of%20the%20100%20cigarette%20criterion%20in%20tobacco%20surveys&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Bondy,%20S%20J&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=317-323&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tc.2008.027276&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27798614%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781920777&rft_id=info:pmid/19491091&rft_jstor_id=27798614&rfr_iscdi=true |