Opioid agonist pharmacotherapy in New South Wales from 1985 to 2006: patient characteristics and patterns and predictors of treatment retention
ABSTRACT Aims The aims of this study were to: examine the number and characteristics of patients entering and re‐entering opioid replacement treatment between 1985 and 2006, to examine select demographic and treatment correlates of leaving treatment between 1985 and 2000, and to compare retention r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 2009-08, Vol.104 (8), p.1363-1372 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1372 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1363 |
container_title | Addiction (Abingdon, England) |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Burns, Lucy Randall, Deborah Hall, Wayne D. Law, Matthew Butler, Tony Bell, James Degenhardt, Louisa |
description | ABSTRACT
Aims The aims of this study were to: examine the number and characteristics of patients entering and re‐entering opioid replacement treatment between 1985 and 2006, to examine select demographic and treatment correlates of leaving treatment between 1985 and 2000, and to compare retention rates in methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatment from 2001 to 2006.
Design A retrospective cohort study using register data from the Pharmaceutical Drugs of Addiction System.
Setting Opioid substitution treatment in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
Participants A total of n = 42 690 individuals prescribed opioid replacement treatment between 1985 and 2006 in NSW.
Measurements Client characteristics over time, retention in days in first treatment episode, number of episodes of treatment and proportion switching medication.
Findings Overall, younger individuals were significantly more likely to leave their first treatment episode than older individuals. In 2001–06, after controlling for age, sex and first administration point, the hazard of leaving treatment was 1.9 times for those on buprenorphine relative to those on methadone. Retention in treatment varied somewhat across historical time, with those entering during 1995–2000 more likely to leave at an earlier stage than those who entered before that time.
Conclusions Retention in treatment appears to fluctuate in inverse proportion to the availability of heroin. Individuals in contemporary treatment are older users with a lengthy treatment history. This study has provided population‐level evidence to suggest that retention in methadone and buprenorphine differ in routine clinical practice. Future work might investigate ways in which patient adherence and retention may be improved. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02633.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733569907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1789446151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5203-8ae68ea69bf476cfd49b95b33ae615f80529ae7abd245dfd2ab95f3113c036e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhi0EokvhFZDFgZ6SjuPYiZE4VC1bilYtEqAiLpaTOKyXJA62o-4-Ba-Mw66KxAGwZI098_2_Zc0ghAmkJK7TTUoohwTynKYZgEgh45Sm2wdocV94iBYgOEsyksMReuL9BgCKUuSP0RERLBfA6AL9uBmNNQ1WX-1gfMDjWrle1TastVPjDpsBX-s7_MFOYY1vVac9bp3tMRElw8Hi-Dp_hUcVjB4CrqNa1UG7aGVqj9XQzLWYGA4XpxtTB-s8ti0OTqvQz0KnQwzGDk_Ro1Z1Xj87xGP0afnm4_nbZHVzeXV-tkpqlgFNSqV5qRUXVZsXvG6bXFSCVZTGPGFtCSwTSheqarKcNW2TqVhuKSG0Bso1p8foZO87Ovt90j7I3vhad50atJ28LChlXAgoIvnyryQtSFFS4P8EM8iAAOQRfPEHuLGTG-J3JRGCFXGLCJV7qHbWe6dbOTrTK7eTBOQ8BHIj517LuddyHgL5awjkNkqfH_ynqtfNb-Gh6xF4vQfuTKd3_20szy4u5lPUJ3t9bLPe3uuV-yZ5QQsmb68v5fLLu2W2_LyS7-lPQaTPwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199579959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opioid agonist pharmacotherapy in New South Wales from 1985 to 2006: patient characteristics and patterns and predictors of treatment retention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Burns, Lucy ; Randall, Deborah ; Hall, Wayne D. ; Law, Matthew ; Butler, Tony ; Bell, James ; Degenhardt, Louisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Burns, Lucy ; Randall, Deborah ; Hall, Wayne D. ; Law, Matthew ; Butler, Tony ; Bell, James ; Degenhardt, Louisa</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Aims The aims of this study were to: examine the number and characteristics of patients entering and re‐entering opioid replacement treatment between 1985 and 2006, to examine select demographic and treatment correlates of leaving treatment between 1985 and 2000, and to compare retention rates in methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatment from 2001 to 2006.
Design A retrospective cohort study using register data from the Pharmaceutical Drugs of Addiction System.
Setting Opioid substitution treatment in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
Participants A total of n = 42 690 individuals prescribed opioid replacement treatment between 1985 and 2006 in NSW.
Measurements Client characteristics over time, retention in days in first treatment episode, number of episodes of treatment and proportion switching medication.
Findings Overall, younger individuals were significantly more likely to leave their first treatment episode than older individuals. In 2001–06, after controlling for age, sex and first administration point, the hazard of leaving treatment was 1.9 times for those on buprenorphine relative to those on methadone. Retention in treatment varied somewhat across historical time, with those entering during 1995–2000 more likely to leave at an earlier stage than those who entered before that time.
Conclusions Retention in treatment appears to fluctuate in inverse proportion to the availability of heroin. Individuals in contemporary treatment are older users with a lengthy treatment history. This study has provided population‐level evidence to suggest that retention in methadone and buprenorphine differ in routine clinical practice. Future work might investigate ways in which patient adherence and retention may be improved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-2140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02633.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19549053</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADICE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Addiction ; Adult ; Australia ; Buprenorphine - therapeutic use ; Buprenorphine maintenance ; Cohort analysis ; cohort studies ; data linkage ; Demographics ; Drug abuse ; Female ; Health ; Heroin ; heroin dependence rehabilitation ; Humans ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Methadone ; methadone maintenance ; Narcotic Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Narcotics ; New South Wales ; Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy ; Opioid-Related Disorders - rehabilitation ; Pharmacology ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Retention ; Retrospective Studies ; Social problems ; Substance abuse treatment ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2009-08, Vol.104 (8), p.1363-1372</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2009 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5203-8ae68ea69bf476cfd49b95b33ae615f80529ae7abd245dfd2ab95f3113c036e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5203-8ae68ea69bf476cfd49b95b33ae615f80529ae7abd245dfd2ab95f3113c036e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1360-0443.2009.02633.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1360-0443.2009.02633.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19549053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burns, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Wayne D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degenhardt, Louisa</creatorcontrib><title>Opioid agonist pharmacotherapy in New South Wales from 1985 to 2006: patient characteristics and patterns and predictors of treatment retention</title><title>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</title><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Aims The aims of this study were to: examine the number and characteristics of patients entering and re‐entering opioid replacement treatment between 1985 and 2006, to examine select demographic and treatment correlates of leaving treatment between 1985 and 2000, and to compare retention rates in methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatment from 2001 to 2006.
Design A retrospective cohort study using register data from the Pharmaceutical Drugs of Addiction System.
Setting Opioid substitution treatment in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
Participants A total of n = 42 690 individuals prescribed opioid replacement treatment between 1985 and 2006 in NSW.
Measurements Client characteristics over time, retention in days in first treatment episode, number of episodes of treatment and proportion switching medication.
Findings Overall, younger individuals were significantly more likely to leave their first treatment episode than older individuals. In 2001–06, after controlling for age, sex and first administration point, the hazard of leaving treatment was 1.9 times for those on buprenorphine relative to those on methadone. Retention in treatment varied somewhat across historical time, with those entering during 1995–2000 more likely to leave at an earlier stage than those who entered before that time.
Conclusions Retention in treatment appears to fluctuate in inverse proportion to the availability of heroin. Individuals in contemporary treatment are older users with a lengthy treatment history. This study has provided population‐level evidence to suggest that retention in methadone and buprenorphine differ in routine clinical practice. Future work might investigate ways in which patient adherence and retention may be improved.</description><subject>Addiction</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Buprenorphine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Buprenorphine maintenance</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>cohort studies</subject><subject>data linkage</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Heroin</subject><subject>heroin dependence rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Methadone</subject><subject>methadone maintenance</subject><subject>Narcotic Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>New South Wales</subject><subject>Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy</subject><subject>Opioid-Related Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0965-2140</issn><issn>1360-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhi0EokvhFZDFgZ6SjuPYiZE4VC1bilYtEqAiLpaTOKyXJA62o-4-Ba-Mw66KxAGwZI098_2_Zc0ghAmkJK7TTUoohwTynKYZgEgh45Sm2wdocV94iBYgOEsyksMReuL9BgCKUuSP0RERLBfA6AL9uBmNNQ1WX-1gfMDjWrle1TastVPjDpsBX-s7_MFOYY1vVac9bp3tMRElw8Hi-Dp_hUcVjB4CrqNa1UG7aGVqj9XQzLWYGA4XpxtTB-s8ti0OTqvQz0KnQwzGDk_Ro1Z1Xj87xGP0afnm4_nbZHVzeXV-tkpqlgFNSqV5qRUXVZsXvG6bXFSCVZTGPGFtCSwTSheqarKcNW2TqVhuKSG0Bso1p8foZO87Ovt90j7I3vhad50atJ28LChlXAgoIvnyryQtSFFS4P8EM8iAAOQRfPEHuLGTG-J3JRGCFXGLCJV7qHbWe6dbOTrTK7eTBOQ8BHIj517LuddyHgL5awjkNkqfH_ynqtfNb-Gh6xF4vQfuTKd3_20szy4u5lPUJ3t9bLPe3uuV-yZ5QQsmb68v5fLLu2W2_LyS7-lPQaTPwA</recordid><startdate>200908</startdate><enddate>200908</enddate><creator>Burns, Lucy</creator><creator>Randall, Deborah</creator><creator>Hall, Wayne D.</creator><creator>Law, Matthew</creator><creator>Butler, Tony</creator><creator>Bell, James</creator><creator>Degenhardt, Louisa</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200908</creationdate><title>Opioid agonist pharmacotherapy in New South Wales from 1985 to 2006: patient characteristics and patterns and predictors of treatment retention</title><author>Burns, Lucy ; Randall, Deborah ; Hall, Wayne D. ; Law, Matthew ; Butler, Tony ; Bell, James ; Degenhardt, Louisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5203-8ae68ea69bf476cfd49b95b33ae615f80529ae7abd245dfd2ab95f3113c036e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Addiction</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Buprenorphine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Buprenorphine maintenance</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>cohort studies</topic><topic>data linkage</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Heroin</topic><topic>heroin dependence rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Methadone</topic><topic>methadone maintenance</topic><topic>Narcotic Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>New South Wales</topic><topic>Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy</topic><topic>Opioid-Related Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burns, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Wayne D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degenhardt, Louisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burns, Lucy</au><au>Randall, Deborah</au><au>Hall, Wayne D.</au><au>Law, Matthew</au><au>Butler, Tony</au><au>Bell, James</au><au>Degenhardt, Louisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opioid agonist pharmacotherapy in New South Wales from 1985 to 2006: patient characteristics and patterns and predictors of treatment retention</atitle><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><date>2009-08</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1363</spage><epage>1372</epage><pages>1363-1372</pages><issn>0965-2140</issn><eissn>1360-0443</eissn><coden>ADICE5</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
Aims The aims of this study were to: examine the number and characteristics of patients entering and re‐entering opioid replacement treatment between 1985 and 2006, to examine select demographic and treatment correlates of leaving treatment between 1985 and 2000, and to compare retention rates in methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatment from 2001 to 2006.
Design A retrospective cohort study using register data from the Pharmaceutical Drugs of Addiction System.
Setting Opioid substitution treatment in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
Participants A total of n = 42 690 individuals prescribed opioid replacement treatment between 1985 and 2006 in NSW.
Measurements Client characteristics over time, retention in days in first treatment episode, number of episodes of treatment and proportion switching medication.
Findings Overall, younger individuals were significantly more likely to leave their first treatment episode than older individuals. In 2001–06, after controlling for age, sex and first administration point, the hazard of leaving treatment was 1.9 times for those on buprenorphine relative to those on methadone. Retention in treatment varied somewhat across historical time, with those entering during 1995–2000 more likely to leave at an earlier stage than those who entered before that time.
Conclusions Retention in treatment appears to fluctuate in inverse proportion to the availability of heroin. Individuals in contemporary treatment are older users with a lengthy treatment history. This study has provided population‐level evidence to suggest that retention in methadone and buprenorphine differ in routine clinical practice. Future work might investigate ways in which patient adherence and retention may be improved.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19549053</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02633.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0965-2140 |
ispartof | Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2009-08, Vol.104 (8), p.1363-1372 |
issn | 0965-2140 1360-0443 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733569907 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Addiction Adult Australia Buprenorphine - therapeutic use Buprenorphine maintenance Cohort analysis cohort studies data linkage Demographics Drug abuse Female Health Heroin heroin dependence rehabilitation Humans Male Medical treatment Methadone methadone maintenance Narcotic Antagonists - therapeutic use Narcotics New South Wales Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy Opioid-Related Disorders - rehabilitation Pharmacology Practice Patterns, Physicians Retention Retrospective Studies Social problems Substance abuse treatment Young Adult |
title | Opioid agonist pharmacotherapy in New South Wales from 1985 to 2006: patient characteristics and patterns and predictors of treatment retention |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A56%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opioid%20agonist%20pharmacotherapy%20in%20New%20South%20Wales%20from%201985%20to%202006:%20patient%20characteristics%20and%20patterns%20and%20predictors%20of%20treatment%20retention&rft.jtitle=Addiction%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Burns,%20Lucy&rft.date=2009-08&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1363&rft.epage=1372&rft.pages=1363-1372&rft.issn=0965-2140&rft.eissn=1360-0443&rft.coden=ADICE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02633.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1789446151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199579959&rft_id=info:pmid/19549053&rfr_iscdi=true |