Temporal trends of preservative allergy in Denmark (1985-2008)
Background: Most cosmetics and industrial products contain preservatives. Preservative allergy is common and, historically, changing contact allergy epidemics caused by preservatives have been observed. In 1997, Alan Dillarstone predicted a stable development of preservative allergy following mandat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Contact dermatitis 2010-02, Vol.62 (2), p.102-108 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 108 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 102 |
| container_title | Contact dermatitis |
| container_volume | 62 |
| creator | Thyssen, Jacob P. Engkilde, Kåre Lundov, Michael D. Carlsen, Berit C. Menné, Torkil Johansen, Jeanne D. |
| description | Background: Most cosmetics and industrial products contain preservatives. Preservative allergy is common and, historically, changing contact allergy epidemics caused by preservatives have been observed. In 1997, Alan Dillarstone predicted a stable development of preservative allergy following mandatory ingredient labelling on cosmetic products.
Objectives: To investigate the development in the prevalence of preservative allergy in Denmark over a 24‐year period (1985–2008) and to challenge the prediction made by Dillarstone.
Patients/Methods: A retrospective analysis of patch test data was performed (n = 18179). Comparisons were made using a χ2 test. Logistic regression analyses were used to test for associations.
Results: The development of preservative allergy mirrored those of other European patch test centres. The development was not dependent on sex or age group. The prevalence was higher among women and those aged 41–60 years. Formaldehyde allergy was persistently prevalent over the study years. The overall prevalence of preservative allergy increased significantly (Ptrend = 0.001), mainly because of patch testing with additional preservatives in recent years.
Conclusions: Dillarstone's prediction was confirmed as the prevalence of contact allergy to individual preservatives remained relatively stable. However, the overall burden of preservative allergy seemed to increase. Introduction of new preservatives may add to the burden of contact allergy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01668.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733543630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733543630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4648-945a63de098318708eff16bffa6805d019ffcbaebbcc8d8a85fe0dd1709b9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVFv0zAQxy3ExMrgK6BICAEPCec4duyHIbGObqCJPWwSezs5yRmlpEmx29F-e5y1KxJP-MWW7vf3nX9mLOGQ8bg-zDOuAFKQQmU5gMmAK6WzzRM2ORSesglwkCnXpThmz0OYQ6SKXD9jxzlwobQRE_bxlhbLwdsuWXnqm5AMLll6CuTv7aq9p8R2Hfkf26Ttk3PqF9b_TN5xo2Ua--r3L9iRs12gl_v9hN3MPt9OL9Or64sv009XaV2oQqemkFaJhsBoEecBTc5xVTlnlQbZADfO1ZWlqqpr3WirpSNoGl6CqUwlTtjb3a1LP_xaU1jhog01dZ3taVgHLIWQhVACIvn6H3I-rH0fR0MuC2nKnJcqUnpH1X4IwZPDpW_j07bIAUfBOMfRI44ecRSMD4JxE6Ov9g3W1YKaQ_DRaATe7AEbats5b_u6DX-5vAAjhYzc6Y773Xa0_e8BcHp9Pp5iPt3l27CizSEf_wdVKUqJ379d4N3NbPb17OwOZ-IPqlGi1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545972176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal trends of preservative allergy in Denmark (1985-2008)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Thyssen, Jacob P. ; Engkilde, Kåre ; Lundov, Michael D. ; Carlsen, Berit C. ; Menné, Torkil ; Johansen, Jeanne D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thyssen, Jacob P. ; Engkilde, Kåre ; Lundov, Michael D. ; Carlsen, Berit C. ; Menné, Torkil ; Johansen, Jeanne D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Most cosmetics and industrial products contain preservatives. Preservative allergy is common and, historically, changing contact allergy epidemics caused by preservatives have been observed. In 1997, Alan Dillarstone predicted a stable development of preservative allergy following mandatory ingredient labelling on cosmetic products.
Objectives: To investigate the development in the prevalence of preservative allergy in Denmark over a 24‐year period (1985–2008) and to challenge the prediction made by Dillarstone.
Patients/Methods: A retrospective analysis of patch test data was performed (n = 18179). Comparisons were made using a χ2 test. Logistic regression analyses were used to test for associations.
Results: The development of preservative allergy mirrored those of other European patch test centres. The development was not dependent on sex or age group. The prevalence was higher among women and those aged 41–60 years. Formaldehyde allergy was persistently prevalent over the study years. The overall prevalence of preservative allergy increased significantly (Ptrend = 0.001), mainly because of patch testing with additional preservatives in recent years.
Conclusions: Dillarstone's prediction was confirmed as the prevalence of contact allergy to individual preservatives remained relatively stable. However, the overall burden of preservative allergy seemed to increase. Introduction of new preservatives may add to the burden of contact allergy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01668.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20136893</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CODEDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Allergic diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbamates - adverse effects ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Consumer Product Safety ; contact allergy ; Cosmetics - adverse effects ; Denmark - epidemiology ; dermatitis ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology ; Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology ; epidemiology ; Female ; Formaldehyde - adverse effects ; Humans ; Hydantoins - adverse effects ; Immunopathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methenamine - adverse effects ; Methenamine - analogs & derivatives ; Middle Aged ; Nitriles - adverse effects ; Parabens - adverse effects ; patch testing ; Preservatives ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects ; prevalence ; Retrospective Studies ; Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies ; Trends ; Urea - adverse effects ; Urea - analogs & derivatives ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Contact dermatitis, 2010-02, Vol.62 (2), p.102-108</ispartof><rights>2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4648-945a63de098318708eff16bffa6805d019ffcbaebbcc8d8a85fe0dd1709b9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4648-945a63de098318708eff16bffa6805d019ffcbaebbcc8d8a85fe0dd1709b9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0536.2009.01668.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0536.2009.01668.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22409535$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20136893$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thyssen, Jacob P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engkilde, Kåre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundov, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsen, Berit C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menné, Torkil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Jeanne D.</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal trends of preservative allergy in Denmark (1985-2008)</title><title>Contact dermatitis</title><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><description>Background: Most cosmetics and industrial products contain preservatives. Preservative allergy is common and, historically, changing contact allergy epidemics caused by preservatives have been observed. In 1997, Alan Dillarstone predicted a stable development of preservative allergy following mandatory ingredient labelling on cosmetic products.
Objectives: To investigate the development in the prevalence of preservative allergy in Denmark over a 24‐year period (1985–2008) and to challenge the prediction made by Dillarstone.
Patients/Methods: A retrospective analysis of patch test data was performed (n = 18179). Comparisons were made using a χ2 test. Logistic regression analyses were used to test for associations.
Results: The development of preservative allergy mirrored those of other European patch test centres. The development was not dependent on sex or age group. The prevalence was higher among women and those aged 41–60 years. Formaldehyde allergy was persistently prevalent over the study years. The overall prevalence of preservative allergy increased significantly (Ptrend = 0.001), mainly because of patch testing with additional preservatives in recent years.
Conclusions: Dillarstone's prediction was confirmed as the prevalence of contact allergy to individual preservatives remained relatively stable. However, the overall burden of preservative allergy seemed to increase. Introduction of new preservatives may add to the burden of contact allergy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Allergic diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbamates - adverse effects</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Consumer Product Safety</subject><subject>contact allergy</subject><subject>Cosmetics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Denmark - epidemiology</subject><subject>dermatitis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Formaldehyde - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydantoins - adverse effects</subject><subject>Immunopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methenamine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Methenamine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nitriles - adverse effects</subject><subject>Parabens - adverse effects</subject><subject>patch testing</subject><subject>Preservatives</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects</subject><subject>prevalence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Urea - adverse effects</subject><subject>Urea - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0105-1873</issn><issn>1600-0536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVFv0zAQxy3ExMrgK6BICAEPCec4duyHIbGObqCJPWwSezs5yRmlpEmx29F-e5y1KxJP-MWW7vf3nX9mLOGQ8bg-zDOuAFKQQmU5gMmAK6WzzRM2ORSesglwkCnXpThmz0OYQ6SKXD9jxzlwobQRE_bxlhbLwdsuWXnqm5AMLll6CuTv7aq9p8R2Hfkf26Ttk3PqF9b_TN5xo2Ua--r3L9iRs12gl_v9hN3MPt9OL9Or64sv009XaV2oQqemkFaJhsBoEecBTc5xVTlnlQbZADfO1ZWlqqpr3WirpSNoGl6CqUwlTtjb3a1LP_xaU1jhog01dZ3taVgHLIWQhVACIvn6H3I-rH0fR0MuC2nKnJcqUnpH1X4IwZPDpW_j07bIAUfBOMfRI44ecRSMD4JxE6Ov9g3W1YKaQ_DRaATe7AEbats5b_u6DX-5vAAjhYzc6Y773Xa0_e8BcHp9Pp5iPt3l27CizSEf_wdVKUqJ379d4N3NbPb17OwOZ-IPqlGi1g</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Thyssen, Jacob P.</creator><creator>Engkilde, Kåre</creator><creator>Lundov, Michael D.</creator><creator>Carlsen, Berit C.</creator><creator>Menné, Torkil</creator><creator>Johansen, Jeanne D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Temporal trends of preservative allergy in Denmark (1985-2008)</title><author>Thyssen, Jacob P. ; Engkilde, Kåre ; Lundov, Michael D. ; Carlsen, Berit C. ; Menné, Torkil ; Johansen, Jeanne D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4648-945a63de098318708eff16bffa6805d019ffcbaebbcc8d8a85fe0dd1709b9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Allergic diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbamates - adverse effects</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Consumer Product Safety</topic><topic>contact allergy</topic><topic>Cosmetics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Denmark - epidemiology</topic><topic>dermatitis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Formaldehyde - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydantoins - adverse effects</topic><topic>Immunopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methenamine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Methenamine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nitriles - adverse effects</topic><topic>Parabens - adverse effects</topic><topic>patch testing</topic><topic>Preservatives</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects</topic><topic>prevalence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Urea - adverse effects</topic><topic>Urea - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thyssen, Jacob P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engkilde, Kåre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundov, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsen, Berit C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menné, Torkil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Jeanne D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thyssen, Jacob P.</au><au>Engkilde, Kåre</au><au>Lundov, Michael D.</au><au>Carlsen, Berit C.</au><au>Menné, Torkil</au><au>Johansen, Jeanne D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal trends of preservative allergy in Denmark (1985-2008)</atitle><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>102</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>102-108</pages><issn>0105-1873</issn><eissn>1600-0536</eissn><coden>CODEDG</coden><abstract>Background: Most cosmetics and industrial products contain preservatives. Preservative allergy is common and, historically, changing contact allergy epidemics caused by preservatives have been observed. In 1997, Alan Dillarstone predicted a stable development of preservative allergy following mandatory ingredient labelling on cosmetic products.
Objectives: To investigate the development in the prevalence of preservative allergy in Denmark over a 24‐year period (1985–2008) and to challenge the prediction made by Dillarstone.
Patients/Methods: A retrospective analysis of patch test data was performed (n = 18179). Comparisons were made using a χ2 test. Logistic regression analyses were used to test for associations.
Results: The development of preservative allergy mirrored those of other European patch test centres. The development was not dependent on sex or age group. The prevalence was higher among women and those aged 41–60 years. Formaldehyde allergy was persistently prevalent over the study years. The overall prevalence of preservative allergy increased significantly (Ptrend = 0.001), mainly because of patch testing with additional preservatives in recent years.
Conclusions: Dillarstone's prediction was confirmed as the prevalence of contact allergy to individual preservatives remained relatively stable. However, the overall burden of preservative allergy seemed to increase. Introduction of new preservatives may add to the burden of contact allergy.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20136893</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01668.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0105-1873 |
| ispartof | Contact dermatitis, 2010-02, Vol.62 (2), p.102-108 |
| issn | 0105-1873 1600-0536 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733543630 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Allergic diseases Biological and medical sciences Carbamates - adverse effects Child Child, Preschool Consumer Product Safety contact allergy Cosmetics - adverse effects Denmark - epidemiology dermatitis Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology epidemiology Female Formaldehyde - adverse effects Humans Hydantoins - adverse effects Immunopathology Male Medical sciences Methenamine - adverse effects Methenamine - analogs & derivatives Middle Aged Nitriles - adverse effects Parabens - adverse effects patch testing Preservatives Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects prevalence Retrospective Studies Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies Trends Urea - adverse effects Urea - analogs & derivatives Young Adult |
| title | Temporal trends of preservative allergy in Denmark (1985-2008) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A24%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20trends%20of%20preservative%20allergy%20in%20Denmark%20(1985-2008)&rft.jtitle=Contact%20dermatitis&rft.au=Thyssen,%20Jacob%20P.&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=102-108&rft.issn=0105-1873&rft.eissn=1600-0536&rft.coden=CODEDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01668.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733543630%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545972176&rft_id=info:pmid/20136893&rfr_iscdi=true |