The efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review

IntroductionProbiotics may benefit irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms, but randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been conflicting; therefore a systematic review was conducted.MethodsMEDLINE (1966 to May 2008), EMBASE (1988 to May 2008) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (2008) elect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2010-03, Vol.59 (3), p.325-332
Hauptverfasser: Moayyedi, P, Ford, A C, Talley, N J, Cremonini, F, Foxx-Orenstein, A E, Brandt, L J, Quigley, E M M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 332
container_issue 3
container_start_page 325
container_title Gut
container_volume 59
creator Moayyedi, P
Ford, A C
Talley, N J
Cremonini, F
Foxx-Orenstein, A E
Brandt, L J
Quigley, E M M
description IntroductionProbiotics may benefit irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms, but randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been conflicting; therefore a systematic review was conducted.MethodsMEDLINE (1966 to May 2008), EMBASE (1988 to May 2008) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (2008) electronic databases were searched, as were abstracts from DDW (Digestive Diseases Week) and UEGW (United European Gastroenterology Week), and authors were contacted for extra information. Only parallel group RCTs with at least 1 week of treatment comparing probiotics with placebo or no treatment in adults with IBS according to any acceptable definition were included. Studies had to provide improvement in abdominal pain or global IBS symptoms as an outcome. Eligibility assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers. Data were synthesised using relative risk (RR) of symptoms not improving for dichotomous data and standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous data using random effects models.Results19 RCTs (18 papers) in 1650 patients with IBS were identified. Trial quality was generally good, with nine reporting adequate methods of randomisation and six a method of concealment of allocation. There were 10 RCTs involving 918 patients providing outcomes as a dichotomous variable. Probiotics were statistically significantly better than placebo (RR of IBS not improving=0.71; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.88) with a number needed to treat (NNT)=4 (95% CI 3 to 12.5). There was significant heterogeneity (χ2=28.3, p=0.001, I2=68%) and possible funnel plot asymmetry. Fifteen trials assessing 1351 patients reported on improvement in IBS score as a continuous outcome (SMD=−0.34; 95% CI −0.60 to −0.07). There was statistically significant heterogeneity (χ2=67.04, p
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gut.2008.167270
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733538463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733538463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b493t-bc3342932da38500ee0c209c1286a404d4d43772adb10452017f4953a856dcbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0cuLFDEQB-Agijuunr1JQEQQejbPTuJNBl8wO15GT0JIp6s1Yz_WJO06_70ZeljBi-SQQH0VKr8g9JSSNaW8vvo25zUjRK9prZgi99CKilpXnGl9H60IoaqSSpgL9CilAylQG_oQXVBDDNWMr9DX_XfA0HXBO3_EU4dv4tSEKQefcBhxLtUcweUBxnwqhxhDdk0PuJluocfpOLZxGuA1duWcMgyu9OIIvwLcPkYPOtcneHLeL9Hnd2_3mw_V9tP7j5s326oRhueq8ZwLZjhrHdeSEADiGTGeMl07QURbFleKubahREhWXtUJI7nTsm596b5EL5d7y_A_Z0jZDiF56Hs3wjQnqziXXIuaF_n8H3mY5jiW4SxVynAlJKdFXS3KxymlCJ29iWFw8WgpsafcbcndnnK3S-6l49n53rkZoP3rz0EX8OIMXPKu76IbfUh3jrHybaaui6sWF0qWv-_qLv6wteJK2t2XjdXX17v9Vu7svvhXi2-Gw3-n_AP2K6Zn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779374531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Moayyedi, P ; Ford, A C ; Talley, N J ; Cremonini, F ; Foxx-Orenstein, A E ; Brandt, L J ; Quigley, E M M</creator><creatorcontrib>Moayyedi, P ; Ford, A C ; Talley, N J ; Cremonini, F ; Foxx-Orenstein, A E ; Brandt, L J ; Quigley, E M M</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionProbiotics may benefit irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms, but randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been conflicting; therefore a systematic review was conducted.MethodsMEDLINE (1966 to May 2008), EMBASE (1988 to May 2008) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (2008) electronic databases were searched, as were abstracts from DDW (Digestive Diseases Week) and UEGW (United European Gastroenterology Week), and authors were contacted for extra information. Only parallel group RCTs with at least 1 week of treatment comparing probiotics with placebo or no treatment in adults with IBS according to any acceptable definition were included. Studies had to provide improvement in abdominal pain or global IBS symptoms as an outcome. Eligibility assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers. Data were synthesised using relative risk (RR) of symptoms not improving for dichotomous data and standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous data using random effects models.Results19 RCTs (18 papers) in 1650 patients with IBS were identified. Trial quality was generally good, with nine reporting adequate methods of randomisation and six a method of concealment of allocation. There were 10 RCTs involving 918 patients providing outcomes as a dichotomous variable. Probiotics were statistically significantly better than placebo (RR of IBS not improving=0.71; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.88) with a number needed to treat (NNT)=4 (95% CI 3 to 12.5). There was significant heterogeneity (χ2=28.3, p=0.001, I2=68%) and possible funnel plot asymmetry. Fifteen trials assessing 1351 patients reported on improvement in IBS score as a continuous outcome (SMD=−0.34; 95% CI −0.60 to −0.07). There was statistically significant heterogeneity (χ2=67.04, p&lt;0.001, I2=79%), but this was explained by one outlying trial.ConclusionProbiotics appear to be efficacious in IBS, but the magnitude of benefit and the most effective species and strain are uncertain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.167270</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19091823</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GUTTAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Biological and medical sciences ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Irritable bowel syndrome ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome - therapy ; Medical sciences ; Methods ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Pain ; Probiotics ; Probiotics - adverse effects ; Probiotics - therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Researchers ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2010-03, Vol.59 (3), p.325-332</ispartof><rights>2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited For permission to use, (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2010 (c) 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited For permission to use, (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b493t-bc3342932da38500ee0c209c1286a404d4d43772adb10452017f4953a856dcbc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/59/3/325.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/59/3/325.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77343,77374</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22468966$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19091823$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moayyedi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, A C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talley, N J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremonini, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foxx-Orenstein, A E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, L J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quigley, E M M</creatorcontrib><title>The efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>IntroductionProbiotics may benefit irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms, but randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been conflicting; therefore a systematic review was conducted.MethodsMEDLINE (1966 to May 2008), EMBASE (1988 to May 2008) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (2008) electronic databases were searched, as were abstracts from DDW (Digestive Diseases Week) and UEGW (United European Gastroenterology Week), and authors were contacted for extra information. Only parallel group RCTs with at least 1 week of treatment comparing probiotics with placebo or no treatment in adults with IBS according to any acceptable definition were included. Studies had to provide improvement in abdominal pain or global IBS symptoms as an outcome. Eligibility assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers. Data were synthesised using relative risk (RR) of symptoms not improving for dichotomous data and standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous data using random effects models.Results19 RCTs (18 papers) in 1650 patients with IBS were identified. Trial quality was generally good, with nine reporting adequate methods of randomisation and six a method of concealment of allocation. There were 10 RCTs involving 918 patients providing outcomes as a dichotomous variable. Probiotics were statistically significantly better than placebo (RR of IBS not improving=0.71; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.88) with a number needed to treat (NNT)=4 (95% CI 3 to 12.5). There was significant heterogeneity (χ2=28.3, p=0.001, I2=68%) and possible funnel plot asymmetry. Fifteen trials assessing 1351 patients reported on improvement in IBS score as a continuous outcome (SMD=−0.34; 95% CI −0.60 to −0.07). There was statistically significant heterogeneity (χ2=67.04, p&lt;0.001, I2=79%), but this was explained by one outlying trial.ConclusionProbiotics appear to be efficacious in IBS, but the magnitude of benefit and the most effective species and strain are uncertain.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irritable bowel syndrome</subject><subject>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - therapy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Probiotics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Probiotics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0cuLFDEQB-Agijuunr1JQEQQejbPTuJNBl8wO15GT0JIp6s1Yz_WJO06_70ZeljBi-SQQH0VKr8g9JSSNaW8vvo25zUjRK9prZgi99CKilpXnGl9H60IoaqSSpgL9CilAylQG_oQXVBDDNWMr9DX_XfA0HXBO3_EU4dv4tSEKQefcBhxLtUcweUBxnwqhxhDdk0PuJluocfpOLZxGuA1duWcMgyu9OIIvwLcPkYPOtcneHLeL9Hnd2_3mw_V9tP7j5s326oRhueq8ZwLZjhrHdeSEADiGTGeMl07QURbFleKubahREhWXtUJI7nTsm596b5EL5d7y_A_Z0jZDiF56Hs3wjQnqziXXIuaF_n8H3mY5jiW4SxVynAlJKdFXS3KxymlCJ29iWFw8WgpsafcbcndnnK3S-6l49n53rkZoP3rz0EX8OIMXPKu76IbfUh3jrHybaaui6sWF0qWv-_qLv6wteJK2t2XjdXX17v9Vu7svvhXi2-Gw3-n_AP2K6Zn</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Moayyedi, P</creator><creator>Ford, A C</creator><creator>Talley, N J</creator><creator>Cremonini, F</creator><creator>Foxx-Orenstein, A E</creator><creator>Brandt, L J</creator><creator>Quigley, E M M</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>The efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review</title><author>Moayyedi, P ; Ford, A C ; Talley, N J ; Cremonini, F ; Foxx-Orenstein, A E ; Brandt, L J ; Quigley, E M M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b493t-bc3342932da38500ee0c209c1286a404d4d43772adb10452017f4953a856dcbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irritable bowel syndrome</topic><topic>Irritable Bowel Syndrome - therapy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Probiotics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Probiotics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moayyedi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, A C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talley, N J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremonini, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foxx-Orenstein, A E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, L J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quigley, E M M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moayyedi, P</au><au>Ford, A C</au><au>Talley, N J</au><au>Cremonini, F</au><au>Foxx-Orenstein, A E</au><au>Brandt, L J</au><au>Quigley, E M M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>325-332</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><coden>GUTTAK</coden><abstract>IntroductionProbiotics may benefit irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms, but randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been conflicting; therefore a systematic review was conducted.MethodsMEDLINE (1966 to May 2008), EMBASE (1988 to May 2008) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (2008) electronic databases were searched, as were abstracts from DDW (Digestive Diseases Week) and UEGW (United European Gastroenterology Week), and authors were contacted for extra information. Only parallel group RCTs with at least 1 week of treatment comparing probiotics with placebo or no treatment in adults with IBS according to any acceptable definition were included. Studies had to provide improvement in abdominal pain or global IBS symptoms as an outcome. Eligibility assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers. Data were synthesised using relative risk (RR) of symptoms not improving for dichotomous data and standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous data using random effects models.Results19 RCTs (18 papers) in 1650 patients with IBS were identified. Trial quality was generally good, with nine reporting adequate methods of randomisation and six a method of concealment of allocation. There were 10 RCTs involving 918 patients providing outcomes as a dichotomous variable. Probiotics were statistically significantly better than placebo (RR of IBS not improving=0.71; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.88) with a number needed to treat (NNT)=4 (95% CI 3 to 12.5). There was significant heterogeneity (χ2=28.3, p=0.001, I2=68%) and possible funnel plot asymmetry. Fifteen trials assessing 1351 patients reported on improvement in IBS score as a continuous outcome (SMD=−0.34; 95% CI −0.60 to −0.07). There was statistically significant heterogeneity (χ2=67.04, p&lt;0.001, I2=79%), but this was explained by one outlying trial.ConclusionProbiotics appear to be efficacious in IBS, but the magnitude of benefit and the most effective species and strain are uncertain.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><pmid>19091823</pmid><doi>10.1136/gut.2008.167270</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 2010-03, Vol.59 (3), p.325-332
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733538463
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central
subjects Abdomen
Biological and medical sciences
Evidence-Based Medicine
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Irritable bowel syndrome
Irritable Bowel Syndrome - therapy
Medical sciences
Methods
Other diseases. Semiology
Pain
Probiotics
Probiotics - adverse effects
Probiotics - therapeutic use
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Researchers
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Studies
Treatment Outcome
title The efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A39%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20efficacy%20of%20probiotics%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20irritable%20bowel%20syndrome:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Moayyedi,%20P&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=325-332&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft.coden=GUTTAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gut.2008.167270&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733538463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779374531&rft_id=info:pmid/19091823&rfr_iscdi=true