Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review
Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely used in clinical practice. Objective To provide systematically pooled results on the indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel CE. Design A systematic review. Main Outcome Measurements We searched the PubMed database (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2010-02, Vol.71 (2), p.280-286 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 286 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 280 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Liao, Zhuan, MD Gao, Rui, MD Xu, Can, MD Li, Zhao-Shen, MD |
description | Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely used in clinical practice. Objective To provide systematically pooled results on the indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel CE. Design A systematic review. Main Outcome Measurements We searched the PubMed database (2000-2008) for original articles relevant to small-bowel CE for the evaluation of patients with small-bowel signs and symptoms. Data on the total number of capsule procedures, the distribution of different indications for the procedures, the percentages of procedures with positive detection (detection rate), complete examination (completion rate), or capsule retention (retention rate) were extracted and/or calculated, respectively. In addition, the detection, completion, and retention rates were also extracted and/or calculated in relation to indications such as obscure GI bleeding (OGIB), definite or suspected Crohn's disease (CD), and neoplastic lesions. Results A total of 227 English-language original articles involving 22,840 procedures were included. OGIB was the most common indication (66.0%), followed by the indication of only clinical symptoms reported (10.6%), and definite or suspected CD (10.4%). The pooled detection rates were 59.4%; 60.5%, 55.3%, and 55.9%, respectively, for overall, OGIB, CD, and neoplastic lesions. Angiodysplasia was the most common reason (50.0%) for OGIB. The pooled completion rate was 83.5%, with the rates being 83.6%, 85.4%, and 84.2%, respectively, for the 3 indications. The pooled retention rates were 1.4%, 1.2%, 2.6%, and 2.1%, respectively, for overall and the 3 indications. Limitations Inclusion and exclusion criteria were loosely defined. Conclusions The pooled detection, completion, and retention rates are acceptable for total procedures. OGIB is the most common indication for small-bowel CE, with a high detection rate and low retention rate. In addition, angiodysplasia is the most common finding in patients with OGIB. A relatively high retention rate is associated with definite or suspected CD and neoplasms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733537317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510709025401</els_id><sourcerecordid>733537317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-20ebb79426a78e2fb0d96f2a01fa2f52f03cdcfa419d854fd888c0e2a038ca083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xILuLFHivJ9HS3C4IsfiwseFDPIZ1UJGM6aZNul_n3Jsyo4EEoSIp63qJ4qwh5ymDLgO1fHbbfHG45wLCtIdg9smEwdM2-64b7ZAMFaloG3QV5lPMBAHou2ENywYG1XMCwIfNNME6rxcWQqQqGGlxQ1_Ql1XGaPZ7-tZRKKdSUJrVgptHSPCnvmzHeoadazXn1SDGYmHWcj6-povmYF5xKf13kPx3ePSYPrPIZn5zfS_L1_bsv1x-b208fbq7f3ja6BbE0HHAcu2HH96rrkdsRzLC3XAGzituWWxDaaKt2bDB9u7Om73sNWADRawW9uCQvTn3nFH-smBc5uazRexUwrll2QrSiE6wrJDuROsWcE1o5JzepdJQMZPVZHmTxWVafZQ3BiubZufs6Tmj-KH4bW4DnZ0BlrbxNKmiX_3Jc9ILv65hXJw6LF8WfJLN2GDQal8oepInuv2O8-UetvQtln_47HjEf4ppCMVkymbkE-bkeRL0HGIC3O2DiFwzpsTI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733537317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liao, Zhuan, MD ; Gao, Rui, MD ; Xu, Can, MD ; Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zhuan, MD ; Gao, Rui, MD ; Xu, Can, MD ; Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely used in clinical practice. Objective To provide systematically pooled results on the indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel CE. Design A systematic review. Main Outcome Measurements We searched the PubMed database (2000-2008) for original articles relevant to small-bowel CE for the evaluation of patients with small-bowel signs and symptoms. Data on the total number of capsule procedures, the distribution of different indications for the procedures, the percentages of procedures with positive detection (detection rate), complete examination (completion rate), or capsule retention (retention rate) were extracted and/or calculated, respectively. In addition, the detection, completion, and retention rates were also extracted and/or calculated in relation to indications such as obscure GI bleeding (OGIB), definite or suspected Crohn's disease (CD), and neoplastic lesions. Results A total of 227 English-language original articles involving 22,840 procedures were included. OGIB was the most common indication (66.0%), followed by the indication of only clinical symptoms reported (10.6%), and definite or suspected CD (10.4%). The pooled detection rates were 59.4%; 60.5%, 55.3%, and 55.9%, respectively, for overall, OGIB, CD, and neoplastic lesions. Angiodysplasia was the most common reason (50.0%) for OGIB. The pooled completion rate was 83.5%, with the rates being 83.6%, 85.4%, and 84.2%, respectively, for the 3 indications. The pooled retention rates were 1.4%, 1.2%, 2.6%, and 2.1%, respectively, for overall and the 3 indications. Limitations Inclusion and exclusion criteria were loosely defined. Conclusions The pooled detection, completion, and retention rates are acceptable for total procedures. OGIB is the most common indication for small-bowel CE, with a high detection rate and low retention rate. In addition, angiodysplasia is the most common finding in patients with OGIB. A relatively high retention rate is associated with definite or suspected CD and neoplasms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20152309</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maryland heights, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Capsule Endoscopes ; Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects ; Capsule Endoscopy - methods ; Crohn Disease - diagnosis ; Crohn Disease - surgery ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Equipment Failure ; Equipment Safety ; Female ; Forecasting ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery ; Humans ; Intestinal Diseases - diagnosis ; Intestinal Diseases - surgery ; Intestine, Small - pathology ; Intestine, Small - surgery ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-02, Vol.71 (2), p.280-286</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-20ebb79426a78e2fb0d96f2a01fa2f52f03cdcfa419d854fd888c0e2a038ca083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-20ebb79426a78e2fb0d96f2a01fa2f52f03cdcfa419d854fd888c0e2a038ca083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510709025401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22383268$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20152309$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zhuan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Rui, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Can, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely used in clinical practice. Objective To provide systematically pooled results on the indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel CE. Design A systematic review. Main Outcome Measurements We searched the PubMed database (2000-2008) for original articles relevant to small-bowel CE for the evaluation of patients with small-bowel signs and symptoms. Data on the total number of capsule procedures, the distribution of different indications for the procedures, the percentages of procedures with positive detection (detection rate), complete examination (completion rate), or capsule retention (retention rate) were extracted and/or calculated, respectively. In addition, the detection, completion, and retention rates were also extracted and/or calculated in relation to indications such as obscure GI bleeding (OGIB), definite or suspected Crohn's disease (CD), and neoplastic lesions. Results A total of 227 English-language original articles involving 22,840 procedures were included. OGIB was the most common indication (66.0%), followed by the indication of only clinical symptoms reported (10.6%), and definite or suspected CD (10.4%). The pooled detection rates were 59.4%; 60.5%, 55.3%, and 55.9%, respectively, for overall, OGIB, CD, and neoplastic lesions. Angiodysplasia was the most common reason (50.0%) for OGIB. The pooled completion rate was 83.5%, with the rates being 83.6%, 85.4%, and 84.2%, respectively, for the 3 indications. The pooled retention rates were 1.4%, 1.2%, 2.6%, and 2.1%, respectively, for overall and the 3 indications. Limitations Inclusion and exclusion criteria were loosely defined. Conclusions The pooled detection, completion, and retention rates are acceptable for total procedures. OGIB is the most common indication for small-bowel CE, with a high detection rate and low retention rate. In addition, angiodysplasia is the most common finding in patients with OGIB. A relatively high retention rate is associated with definite or suspected CD and neoplasms.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopes</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Crohn Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Crohn Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Equipment Safety</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intestinal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Intestine, Small - pathology</subject><subject>Intestine, Small - surgery</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xILuLFHivJ9HS3C4IsfiwseFDPIZ1UJGM6aZNul_n3Jsyo4EEoSIp63qJ4qwh5ymDLgO1fHbbfHG45wLCtIdg9smEwdM2-64b7ZAMFaloG3QV5lPMBAHou2ENywYG1XMCwIfNNME6rxcWQqQqGGlxQ1_Ql1XGaPZ7-tZRKKdSUJrVgptHSPCnvmzHeoadazXn1SDGYmHWcj6-povmYF5xKf13kPx3ePSYPrPIZn5zfS_L1_bsv1x-b208fbq7f3ja6BbE0HHAcu2HH96rrkdsRzLC3XAGzituWWxDaaKt2bDB9u7Om73sNWADRawW9uCQvTn3nFH-smBc5uazRexUwrll2QrSiE6wrJDuROsWcE1o5JzepdJQMZPVZHmTxWVafZQ3BiubZufs6Tmj-KH4bW4DnZ0BlrbxNKmiX_3Jc9ILv65hXJw6LF8WfJLN2GDQal8oepInuv2O8-UetvQtln_47HjEf4ppCMVkymbkE-bkeRL0HGIC3O2DiFwzpsTI</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Liao, Zhuan, MD</creator><creator>Gao, Rui, MD</creator><creator>Xu, Can, MD</creator><creator>Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review</title><author>Liao, Zhuan, MD ; Gao, Rui, MD ; Xu, Can, MD ; Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-20ebb79426a78e2fb0d96f2a01fa2f52f03cdcfa419d854fd888c0e2a038ca083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopes</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Crohn Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Crohn Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Equipment Safety</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intestinal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Intestine, Small - pathology</topic><topic>Intestine, Small - surgery</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zhuan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Rui, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Can, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liao, Zhuan, MD</au><au>Gao, Rui, MD</au><au>Xu, Can, MD</au><au>Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>280-286</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely used in clinical practice. Objective To provide systematically pooled results on the indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel CE. Design A systematic review. Main Outcome Measurements We searched the PubMed database (2000-2008) for original articles relevant to small-bowel CE for the evaluation of patients with small-bowel signs and symptoms. Data on the total number of capsule procedures, the distribution of different indications for the procedures, the percentages of procedures with positive detection (detection rate), complete examination (completion rate), or capsule retention (retention rate) were extracted and/or calculated, respectively. In addition, the detection, completion, and retention rates were also extracted and/or calculated in relation to indications such as obscure GI bleeding (OGIB), definite or suspected Crohn's disease (CD), and neoplastic lesions. Results A total of 227 English-language original articles involving 22,840 procedures were included. OGIB was the most common indication (66.0%), followed by the indication of only clinical symptoms reported (10.6%), and definite or suspected CD (10.4%). The pooled detection rates were 59.4%; 60.5%, 55.3%, and 55.9%, respectively, for overall, OGIB, CD, and neoplastic lesions. Angiodysplasia was the most common reason (50.0%) for OGIB. The pooled completion rate was 83.5%, with the rates being 83.6%, 85.4%, and 84.2%, respectively, for the 3 indications. The pooled retention rates were 1.4%, 1.2%, 2.6%, and 2.1%, respectively, for overall and the 3 indications. Limitations Inclusion and exclusion criteria were loosely defined. Conclusions The pooled detection, completion, and retention rates are acceptable for total procedures. OGIB is the most common indication for small-bowel CE, with a high detection rate and low retention rate. In addition, angiodysplasia is the most common finding in patients with OGIB. A relatively high retention rate is associated with definite or suspected CD and neoplasms.</abstract><cop>Maryland heights, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>20152309</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-02, Vol.71 (2), p.280-286 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733537317 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Capsule Endoscopes Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects Capsule Endoscopy - methods Crohn Disease - diagnosis Crohn Disease - surgery Digestive system. Abdomen Endoscopy Equipment Failure Equipment Safety Female Forecasting Gastroenterology and Hepatology Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery Humans Intestinal Diseases - diagnosis Intestinal Diseases - surgery Intestine, Small - pathology Intestine, Small - surgery Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment |
title | Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A46%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indications%20and%20detection,%20completion,%20and%20retention%20rates%20of%20small-bowel%20capsule%20endoscopy:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Liao,%20Zhuan,%20MD&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=280-286&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733537317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733537317&rft_id=info:pmid/20152309&rft_els_id=S0016510709025401&rfr_iscdi=true |