Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review

Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely used in clinical practice. Objective To provide systematically pooled results on the indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel CE. Design A systematic review. Main Outcome Measurements We searched the PubMed database (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2010-02, Vol.71 (2), p.280-286
Hauptverfasser: Liao, Zhuan, MD, Gao, Rui, MD, Xu, Can, MD, Li, Zhao-Shen, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 286
container_issue 2
container_start_page 280
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 71
creator Liao, Zhuan, MD
Gao, Rui, MD
Xu, Can, MD
Li, Zhao-Shen, MD
description Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely used in clinical practice. Objective To provide systematically pooled results on the indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel CE. Design A systematic review. Main Outcome Measurements We searched the PubMed database (2000-2008) for original articles relevant to small-bowel CE for the evaluation of patients with small-bowel signs and symptoms. Data on the total number of capsule procedures, the distribution of different indications for the procedures, the percentages of procedures with positive detection (detection rate), complete examination (completion rate), or capsule retention (retention rate) were extracted and/or calculated, respectively. In addition, the detection, completion, and retention rates were also extracted and/or calculated in relation to indications such as obscure GI bleeding (OGIB), definite or suspected Crohn's disease (CD), and neoplastic lesions. Results A total of 227 English-language original articles involving 22,840 procedures were included. OGIB was the most common indication (66.0%), followed by the indication of only clinical symptoms reported (10.6%), and definite or suspected CD (10.4%). The pooled detection rates were 59.4%; 60.5%, 55.3%, and 55.9%, respectively, for overall, OGIB, CD, and neoplastic lesions. Angiodysplasia was the most common reason (50.0%) for OGIB. The pooled completion rate was 83.5%, with the rates being 83.6%, 85.4%, and 84.2%, respectively, for the 3 indications. The pooled retention rates were 1.4%, 1.2%, 2.6%, and 2.1%, respectively, for overall and the 3 indications. Limitations Inclusion and exclusion criteria were loosely defined. Conclusions The pooled detection, completion, and retention rates are acceptable for total procedures. OGIB is the most common indication for small-bowel CE, with a high detection rate and low retention rate. In addition, angiodysplasia is the most common finding in patients with OGIB. A relatively high retention rate is associated with definite or suspected CD and neoplasms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733537317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510709025401</els_id><sourcerecordid>733537317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-20ebb79426a78e2fb0d96f2a01fa2f52f03cdcfa419d854fd888c0e2a038ca083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xILuLFHivJ9HS3C4IsfiwseFDPIZ1UJGM6aZNul_n3Jsyo4EEoSIp63qJ4qwh5ymDLgO1fHbbfHG45wLCtIdg9smEwdM2-64b7ZAMFaloG3QV5lPMBAHou2ENywYG1XMCwIfNNME6rxcWQqQqGGlxQ1_Ql1XGaPZ7-tZRKKdSUJrVgptHSPCnvmzHeoadazXn1SDGYmHWcj6-povmYF5xKf13kPx3ePSYPrPIZn5zfS_L1_bsv1x-b208fbq7f3ja6BbE0HHAcu2HH96rrkdsRzLC3XAGzituWWxDaaKt2bDB9u7Om73sNWADRawW9uCQvTn3nFH-smBc5uazRexUwrll2QrSiE6wrJDuROsWcE1o5JzepdJQMZPVZHmTxWVafZQ3BiubZufs6Tmj-KH4bW4DnZ0BlrbxNKmiX_3Jc9ILv65hXJw6LF8WfJLN2GDQal8oepInuv2O8-UetvQtln_47HjEf4ppCMVkymbkE-bkeRL0HGIC3O2DiFwzpsTI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733537317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liao, Zhuan, MD ; Gao, Rui, MD ; Xu, Can, MD ; Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zhuan, MD ; Gao, Rui, MD ; Xu, Can, MD ; Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely used in clinical practice. Objective To provide systematically pooled results on the indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel CE. Design A systematic review. Main Outcome Measurements We searched the PubMed database (2000-2008) for original articles relevant to small-bowel CE for the evaluation of patients with small-bowel signs and symptoms. Data on the total number of capsule procedures, the distribution of different indications for the procedures, the percentages of procedures with positive detection (detection rate), complete examination (completion rate), or capsule retention (retention rate) were extracted and/or calculated, respectively. In addition, the detection, completion, and retention rates were also extracted and/or calculated in relation to indications such as obscure GI bleeding (OGIB), definite or suspected Crohn's disease (CD), and neoplastic lesions. Results A total of 227 English-language original articles involving 22,840 procedures were included. OGIB was the most common indication (66.0%), followed by the indication of only clinical symptoms reported (10.6%), and definite or suspected CD (10.4%). The pooled detection rates were 59.4%; 60.5%, 55.3%, and 55.9%, respectively, for overall, OGIB, CD, and neoplastic lesions. Angiodysplasia was the most common reason (50.0%) for OGIB. The pooled completion rate was 83.5%, with the rates being 83.6%, 85.4%, and 84.2%, respectively, for the 3 indications. The pooled retention rates were 1.4%, 1.2%, 2.6%, and 2.1%, respectively, for overall and the 3 indications. Limitations Inclusion and exclusion criteria were loosely defined. Conclusions The pooled detection, completion, and retention rates are acceptable for total procedures. OGIB is the most common indication for small-bowel CE, with a high detection rate and low retention rate. In addition, angiodysplasia is the most common finding in patients with OGIB. A relatively high retention rate is associated with definite or suspected CD and neoplasms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20152309</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maryland heights, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Capsule Endoscopes ; Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects ; Capsule Endoscopy - methods ; Crohn Disease - diagnosis ; Crohn Disease - surgery ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Equipment Failure ; Equipment Safety ; Female ; Forecasting ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery ; Humans ; Intestinal Diseases - diagnosis ; Intestinal Diseases - surgery ; Intestine, Small - pathology ; Intestine, Small - surgery ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-02, Vol.71 (2), p.280-286</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-20ebb79426a78e2fb0d96f2a01fa2f52f03cdcfa419d854fd888c0e2a038ca083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-20ebb79426a78e2fb0d96f2a01fa2f52f03cdcfa419d854fd888c0e2a038ca083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510709025401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22383268$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20152309$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zhuan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Rui, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Can, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely used in clinical practice. Objective To provide systematically pooled results on the indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel CE. Design A systematic review. Main Outcome Measurements We searched the PubMed database (2000-2008) for original articles relevant to small-bowel CE for the evaluation of patients with small-bowel signs and symptoms. Data on the total number of capsule procedures, the distribution of different indications for the procedures, the percentages of procedures with positive detection (detection rate), complete examination (completion rate), or capsule retention (retention rate) were extracted and/or calculated, respectively. In addition, the detection, completion, and retention rates were also extracted and/or calculated in relation to indications such as obscure GI bleeding (OGIB), definite or suspected Crohn's disease (CD), and neoplastic lesions. Results A total of 227 English-language original articles involving 22,840 procedures were included. OGIB was the most common indication (66.0%), followed by the indication of only clinical symptoms reported (10.6%), and definite or suspected CD (10.4%). The pooled detection rates were 59.4%; 60.5%, 55.3%, and 55.9%, respectively, for overall, OGIB, CD, and neoplastic lesions. Angiodysplasia was the most common reason (50.0%) for OGIB. The pooled completion rate was 83.5%, with the rates being 83.6%, 85.4%, and 84.2%, respectively, for the 3 indications. The pooled retention rates were 1.4%, 1.2%, 2.6%, and 2.1%, respectively, for overall and the 3 indications. Limitations Inclusion and exclusion criteria were loosely defined. Conclusions The pooled detection, completion, and retention rates are acceptable for total procedures. OGIB is the most common indication for small-bowel CE, with a high detection rate and low retention rate. In addition, angiodysplasia is the most common finding in patients with OGIB. A relatively high retention rate is associated with definite or suspected CD and neoplasms.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopes</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Crohn Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Crohn Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Equipment Safety</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intestinal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Intestine, Small - pathology</subject><subject>Intestine, Small - surgery</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xILuLFHivJ9HS3C4IsfiwseFDPIZ1UJGM6aZNul_n3Jsyo4EEoSIp63qJ4qwh5ymDLgO1fHbbfHG45wLCtIdg9smEwdM2-64b7ZAMFaloG3QV5lPMBAHou2ENywYG1XMCwIfNNME6rxcWQqQqGGlxQ1_Ql1XGaPZ7-tZRKKdSUJrVgptHSPCnvmzHeoadazXn1SDGYmHWcj6-povmYF5xKf13kPx3ePSYPrPIZn5zfS_L1_bsv1x-b208fbq7f3ja6BbE0HHAcu2HH96rrkdsRzLC3XAGzituWWxDaaKt2bDB9u7Om73sNWADRawW9uCQvTn3nFH-smBc5uazRexUwrll2QrSiE6wrJDuROsWcE1o5JzepdJQMZPVZHmTxWVafZQ3BiubZufs6Tmj-KH4bW4DnZ0BlrbxNKmiX_3Jc9ILv65hXJw6LF8WfJLN2GDQal8oepInuv2O8-UetvQtln_47HjEf4ppCMVkymbkE-bkeRL0HGIC3O2DiFwzpsTI</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Liao, Zhuan, MD</creator><creator>Gao, Rui, MD</creator><creator>Xu, Can, MD</creator><creator>Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review</title><author>Liao, Zhuan, MD ; Gao, Rui, MD ; Xu, Can, MD ; Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-20ebb79426a78e2fb0d96f2a01fa2f52f03cdcfa419d854fd888c0e2a038ca083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopes</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Crohn Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Crohn Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Equipment Safety</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intestinal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Intestine, Small - pathology</topic><topic>Intestine, Small - surgery</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zhuan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Rui, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Can, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liao, Zhuan, MD</au><au>Gao, Rui, MD</au><au>Xu, Can, MD</au><au>Li, Zhao-Shen, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>280-286</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely used in clinical practice. Objective To provide systematically pooled results on the indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel CE. Design A systematic review. Main Outcome Measurements We searched the PubMed database (2000-2008) for original articles relevant to small-bowel CE for the evaluation of patients with small-bowel signs and symptoms. Data on the total number of capsule procedures, the distribution of different indications for the procedures, the percentages of procedures with positive detection (detection rate), complete examination (completion rate), or capsule retention (retention rate) were extracted and/or calculated, respectively. In addition, the detection, completion, and retention rates were also extracted and/or calculated in relation to indications such as obscure GI bleeding (OGIB), definite or suspected Crohn's disease (CD), and neoplastic lesions. Results A total of 227 English-language original articles involving 22,840 procedures were included. OGIB was the most common indication (66.0%), followed by the indication of only clinical symptoms reported (10.6%), and definite or suspected CD (10.4%). The pooled detection rates were 59.4%; 60.5%, 55.3%, and 55.9%, respectively, for overall, OGIB, CD, and neoplastic lesions. Angiodysplasia was the most common reason (50.0%) for OGIB. The pooled completion rate was 83.5%, with the rates being 83.6%, 85.4%, and 84.2%, respectively, for the 3 indications. The pooled retention rates were 1.4%, 1.2%, 2.6%, and 2.1%, respectively, for overall and the 3 indications. Limitations Inclusion and exclusion criteria were loosely defined. Conclusions The pooled detection, completion, and retention rates are acceptable for total procedures. OGIB is the most common indication for small-bowel CE, with a high detection rate and low retention rate. In addition, angiodysplasia is the most common finding in patients with OGIB. A relatively high retention rate is associated with definite or suspected CD and neoplasms.</abstract><cop>Maryland heights, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>20152309</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-02, Vol.71 (2), p.280-286
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733537317
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Capsule Endoscopes
Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects
Capsule Endoscopy - methods
Crohn Disease - diagnosis
Crohn Disease - surgery
Digestive system. Abdomen
Endoscopy
Equipment Failure
Equipment Safety
Female
Forecasting
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - surgery
Humans
Intestinal Diseases - diagnosis
Intestinal Diseases - surgery
Intestine, Small - pathology
Intestine, Small - surgery
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
title Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A46%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indications%20and%20detection,%20completion,%20and%20retention%20rates%20of%20small-bowel%20capsule%20endoscopy:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Liao,%20Zhuan,%20MD&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=280-286&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733537317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733537317&rft_id=info:pmid/20152309&rft_els_id=S0016510709025401&rfr_iscdi=true