Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective

This essay traces my engagement with Michèle Grossen’s ideas of a dialogical perspective on interaction analysis (Grossen Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1–22, 2009 ) and highlights a process account of self in interaction. Firstly I draw on Turner’s concept of liminality with resp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Integrative psychological & behavioral science 2010-03, Vol.44 (1), p.30-38
1. Verfasser: Murakami, Kyoko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 38
container_issue 1
container_start_page 30
container_title Integrative psychological & behavioral science
container_volume 44
creator Murakami, Kyoko
description This essay traces my engagement with Michèle Grossen’s ideas of a dialogical perspective on interaction analysis (Grossen Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1–22, 2009 ) and highlights a process account of self in interaction. Firstly I draw on Turner’s concept of liminality with respect to the transformative, temporal significance in interaction. Secondly I explored further the conversation analytic concepts such as formulation and reformulation as a viable analytical tool for a dialogical perspective. Lastly, I addressed the issue of interaction in institutional settings, in particular with interactional asymmetries of interaction, whilst relativising the I-position dialogical perspective. I explore insights from social anthropology as well as revisiting conversation analysis and discursive psychology, concluding that a promising direction would be sought through a cross-fertilisation between dialogism and other sibling perspectives concerning language use, communication, social action and discourse- and narrative-based analyses.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733535071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A383329513</galeid><sourcerecordid>A383329513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-17b8165030cc1e68c2a2e616a6f5f21cb1ef0e5bdb8385e8e8433fefd3f799d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1padK0P6CXIuih9OBUI1m23NuSfmRhIaVJzkKWR46CbW0lu-z--2rrpLBQgkAaNM87MDxZ9hboOVBafYrAgBU5BZrXACLfPctOoeZlzkVZPf9bs7wQlJ1kr2K8p1TIsuYvsxNGoSpkLU8zvXGDG3Xvpj1xI9nosZt1h-Q24mdy7QckN3d-7u6mSPxI1uOEQZvJ-RQhq3Tto4vEBj8QTb443fvOmdT6gSFuMYG_8XX2wuo-4puH9yy7_fb15uIy31x9X1-sNrkpimLKoWoklIJyagxgKQ3TDEsodWmFZWAaQEtRNG0juRQoURacW7Qtt1Vdt5SfZR-Wudvgf80YJzW4aLDv9Yh-jqriXHBBK0jk-4XsdI_KjdZPaakDrVZccs5qATxR5_-h0mlxcMaPaF36Pwp8PAokZsLd1Ok5RrW-_nnMwsKa4GMMaNU2uEGHvQKqDm7V4lYlt-rgVu1S5t3DgnMzYPsv8SgzAWwBYmqNHQZ17-eQJMUnpv4BJ2ytrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733535071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Murakami, Kyoko</creator><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><description>This essay traces my engagement with Michèle Grossen’s ideas of a dialogical perspective on interaction analysis (Grossen Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1–22, 2009 ) and highlights a process account of self in interaction. Firstly I draw on Turner’s concept of liminality with respect to the transformative, temporal significance in interaction. Secondly I explored further the conversation analytic concepts such as formulation and reformulation as a viable analytical tool for a dialogical perspective. Lastly, I addressed the issue of interaction in institutional settings, in particular with interactional asymmetries of interaction, whilst relativising the I-position dialogical perspective. I explore insights from social anthropology as well as revisiting conversation analysis and discursive psychology, concluding that a promising direction would be sought through a cross-fertilisation between dialogism and other sibling perspectives concerning language use, communication, social action and discourse- and narrative-based analyses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-4502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-3567</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20174898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Commentary ; Ego ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Language ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology ; Psychology, Social ; Sociology ; Verbal Behavior</subject><ispartof>Integrative psychological &amp; behavioral science, 2010-03, Vol.44 (1), p.30-38</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-17b8165030cc1e68c2a2e616a6f5f21cb1ef0e5bdb8385e8e8433fefd3f799d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-17b8165030cc1e68c2a2e616a6f5f21cb1ef0e5bdb8385e8e8433fefd3f799d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20174898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><title>Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective</title><title>Integrative psychological &amp; behavioral science</title><addtitle>Integr. psych. behav</addtitle><addtitle>Integr Psychol Behav Sci</addtitle><description>This essay traces my engagement with Michèle Grossen’s ideas of a dialogical perspective on interaction analysis (Grossen Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1–22, 2009 ) and highlights a process account of self in interaction. Firstly I draw on Turner’s concept of liminality with respect to the transformative, temporal significance in interaction. Secondly I explored further the conversation analytic concepts such as formulation and reformulation as a viable analytical tool for a dialogical perspective. Lastly, I addressed the issue of interaction in institutional settings, in particular with interactional asymmetries of interaction, whilst relativising the I-position dialogical perspective. I explore insights from social anthropology as well as revisiting conversation analysis and discursive psychology, concluding that a promising direction would be sought through a cross-fertilisation between dialogism and other sibling perspectives concerning language use, communication, social action and discourse- and narrative-based analyses.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Commentary</subject><subject>Ego</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology, Social</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><issn>1932-4502</issn><issn>1936-3567</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1padK0P6CXIuih9OBUI1m23NuSfmRhIaVJzkKWR46CbW0lu-z--2rrpLBQgkAaNM87MDxZ9hboOVBafYrAgBU5BZrXACLfPctOoeZlzkVZPf9bs7wQlJ1kr2K8p1TIsuYvsxNGoSpkLU8zvXGDG3Xvpj1xI9nosZt1h-Q24mdy7QckN3d-7u6mSPxI1uOEQZvJ-RQhq3Tto4vEBj8QTb443fvOmdT6gSFuMYG_8XX2wuo-4puH9yy7_fb15uIy31x9X1-sNrkpimLKoWoklIJyagxgKQ3TDEsodWmFZWAaQEtRNG0juRQoURacW7Qtt1Vdt5SfZR-Wudvgf80YJzW4aLDv9Yh-jqriXHBBK0jk-4XsdI_KjdZPaakDrVZccs5qATxR5_-h0mlxcMaPaF36Pwp8PAokZsLd1Ok5RrW-_nnMwsKa4GMMaNU2uEGHvQKqDm7V4lYlt-rgVu1S5t3DgnMzYPsv8SgzAWwBYmqNHQZ17-eQJMUnpv4BJ2ytrg</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Murakami, Kyoko</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective</title><author>Murakami, Kyoko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-17b8165030cc1e68c2a2e616a6f5f21cb1ef0e5bdb8385e8e8433fefd3f799d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Commentary</topic><topic>Ego</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology, Social</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Integrative psychological &amp; behavioral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murakami, Kyoko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Integrative psychological &amp; behavioral science</jtitle><stitle>Integr. psych. behav</stitle><addtitle>Integr Psychol Behav Sci</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>30-38</pages><issn>1932-4502</issn><eissn>1936-3567</eissn><abstract>This essay traces my engagement with Michèle Grossen’s ideas of a dialogical perspective on interaction analysis (Grossen Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1–22, 2009 ) and highlights a process account of self in interaction. Firstly I draw on Turner’s concept of liminality with respect to the transformative, temporal significance in interaction. Secondly I explored further the conversation analytic concepts such as formulation and reformulation as a viable analytical tool for a dialogical perspective. Lastly, I addressed the issue of interaction in institutional settings, in particular with interactional asymmetries of interaction, whilst relativising the I-position dialogical perspective. I explore insights from social anthropology as well as revisiting conversation analysis and discursive psychology, concluding that a promising direction would be sought through a cross-fertilisation between dialogism and other sibling perspectives concerning language use, communication, social action and discourse- and narrative-based analyses.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20174898</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-4502
ispartof Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2010-03, Vol.44 (1), p.30-38
issn 1932-4502
1936-3567
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733535071
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Anthropology
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Commentary
Ego
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Language
Psychological Theory
Psychology
Psychology, Social
Sociology
Verbal Behavior
title Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A51%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Liminality%20in%20Language%20Use:%20Some%20Thoughts%20on%20Interactional%20Analysis%20from%20a%20Dialogical%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Integrative%20psychological%20&%20behavioral%20science&rft.au=Murakami,%20Kyoko&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=30-38&rft.issn=1932-4502&rft.eissn=1936-3567&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA383329513%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733535071&rft_id=info:pmid/20174898&rft_galeid=A383329513&rfr_iscdi=true