Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses of implants in conventional sockets versus controlled bone defects in vitro

Abstract The primary stability of implants should be high on insertion into fresh extraction sockets. Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses (RFA) are used to assess primary implant anchorage and stability. The torque-fitting and RFA of implants placed in conventional surgical sockets and s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2010-02, Vol.39 (2), p.169-173
Hauptverfasser: Akça, K, Kökat, A.M, Cömert, A, Akkocaoğlu, M, Tekdemir, I, Çehreli, M.C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 173
container_issue 2
container_start_page 169
container_title International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 39
creator Akça, K
Kökat, A.M
Cömert, A
Akkocaoğlu, M
Tekdemir, I
Çehreli, M.C
description Abstract The primary stability of implants should be high on insertion into fresh extraction sockets. Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses (RFA) are used to assess primary implant anchorage and stability. The torque-fitting and RFA of implants placed in conventional surgical sockets and sockets with controlled coronal bone defects was compared. The possible relation between torque-fitting and RFA was explored. Ø 3.3 mm × 12 mm implants were placed in 16 sockets finalized with Ø 2.8 mm surgical pilot drills in the right iliac crests of two fresh cadavers (control). In the test group, implants were placed into sockets prepared by Ø 2.8 mm drill followed by Ø 4.2 mm twist drills to a depth of 6 mm to create circumferential controlled coronal bone defects (50% bone loss). Primary implant stability was assessed using insertion torque values (ITV) followed by RFA. Mean ITV and RFA measurements for test groups (7.83 ± 0.91 N cm and 40.88 ± 3.57) were significantly lower than controls (14.80 ± 1 N cm and 66.31 ± 0.9) ( P < 0.05). Reductions of ITV and RFA measurements in relation to bone defect were 47% and 38%. The existence of controlled bone defects eliminating contact coronally leads to decrease in torque-fitting and primary stability of implants. No relationship was observed between torque-fitting and RFA.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733529559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502709011850</els_id><sourcerecordid>733529559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-331be6bc60fc807d25710ae73e52c8555646ea210ead62930c8bfb6f6f9b8d483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIX8RTt5Wk0x8ggix-wYIH13NIpyuS3p5kTHUPDP5508yo4MFToOp5K8mTMPacQ8WBN6-nyk9xXwmAvuK8At4_YDsu-74EEPCQ7aAHXioQ7RV7QjRBBmXXPmZXOSIbDu2O_byL6ceKpfPL4sP3woSxSEgxmGCxcAlzM9hTrpv5REhFdIXfH2YTFip8KGwMRwyLz4G5oGjvMdePmGilrbekOM84FkMMWIzo0J5jR587T9kjZ2bCZ5f1mn378P7u5lN5--Xj55t3t6Wta1hKKfmAzWAbcLaDdhSq5WCwlaiE7ZRSTd2gERzQjI3oJdhucEPjGtcP3Vh38pq9Os89pJivQ4vee7I450tgXEm3UirRK9VnUpxJmyJRQqcPye9NOmkOenOuJ70515tzzbnOznPoxWX8Ouxx_BP5LTkDLy-AIWtml7JbT385UauadzJzb84cZhlHj0mT9dk-jj5lcXqM_v_nePtP3M4--LzjPZ6Qprim_EikuSahQX_dfsf2ObaVdwrkL7lmty0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733529559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses of implants in conventional sockets versus controlled bone defects in vitro</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Akça, K ; Kökat, A.M ; Cömert, A ; Akkocaoğlu, M ; Tekdemir, I ; Çehreli, M.C</creator><creatorcontrib>Akça, K ; Kökat, A.M ; Cömert, A ; Akkocaoğlu, M ; Tekdemir, I ; Çehreli, M.C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The primary stability of implants should be high on insertion into fresh extraction sockets. Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses (RFA) are used to assess primary implant anchorage and stability. The torque-fitting and RFA of implants placed in conventional surgical sockets and sockets with controlled coronal bone defects was compared. The possible relation between torque-fitting and RFA was explored. Ø 3.3 mm × 12 mm implants were placed in 16 sockets finalized with Ø 2.8 mm surgical pilot drills in the right iliac crests of two fresh cadavers (control). In the test group, implants were placed into sockets prepared by Ø 2.8 mm drill followed by Ø 4.2 mm twist drills to a depth of 6 mm to create circumferential controlled coronal bone defects (50% bone loss). Primary implant stability was assessed using insertion torque values (ITV) followed by RFA. Mean ITV and RFA measurements for test groups (7.83 ± 0.91 N cm and 40.88 ± 3.57) were significantly lower than controls (14.80 ± 1 N cm and 66.31 ± 0.9) ( P &lt; 0.05). Reductions of ITV and RFA measurements in relation to bone defect were 47% and 38%. The existence of controlled bone defects eliminating contact coronally leads to decrease in torque-fitting and primary stability of implants. No relationship was observed between torque-fitting and RFA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20036107</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJOSE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone and Bones - pathology ; Bone and Bones - surgery ; bone defect ; Bone Density - physiology ; Bone Resorption - pathology ; Bone Resorption - surgery ; Cadaver ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - instrumentation ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis Retention ; Dentistry ; Humans ; iliac crest ; Ilium ; implant ; insertion torque ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Osteotomy - instrumentation ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; resonance frequency analysis ; Surface Properties ; Surgery ; Torque ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2010-02, Vol.39 (2), p.169-173</ispartof><rights>International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2009 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2009 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-331be6bc60fc807d25710ae73e52c8555646ea210ead62930c8bfb6f6f9b8d483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-331be6bc60fc807d25710ae73e52c8555646ea210ead62930c8bfb6f6f9b8d483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22454183$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20036107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akça, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kökat, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cömert, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkocaoğlu, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekdemir, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çehreli, M.C</creatorcontrib><title>Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses of implants in conventional sockets versus controlled bone defects in vitro</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract The primary stability of implants should be high on insertion into fresh extraction sockets. Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses (RFA) are used to assess primary implant anchorage and stability. The torque-fitting and RFA of implants placed in conventional surgical sockets and sockets with controlled coronal bone defects was compared. The possible relation between torque-fitting and RFA was explored. Ø 3.3 mm × 12 mm implants were placed in 16 sockets finalized with Ø 2.8 mm surgical pilot drills in the right iliac crests of two fresh cadavers (control). In the test group, implants were placed into sockets prepared by Ø 2.8 mm drill followed by Ø 4.2 mm twist drills to a depth of 6 mm to create circumferential controlled coronal bone defects (50% bone loss). Primary implant stability was assessed using insertion torque values (ITV) followed by RFA. Mean ITV and RFA measurements for test groups (7.83 ± 0.91 N cm and 40.88 ± 3.57) were significantly lower than controls (14.80 ± 1 N cm and 66.31 ± 0.9) ( P &lt; 0.05). Reductions of ITV and RFA measurements in relation to bone defect were 47% and 38%. The existence of controlled bone defects eliminating contact coronally leads to decrease in torque-fitting and primary stability of implants. No relationship was observed between torque-fitting and RFA.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - pathology</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - surgery</subject><subject>bone defect</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Resorption - pathology</subject><subject>Bone Resorption - surgery</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - instrumentation</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Retention</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>iliac crest</subject><subject>Ilium</subject><subject>implant</subject><subject>insertion torque</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Osteotomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>resonance frequency analysis</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIX8RTt5Wk0x8ggix-wYIH13NIpyuS3p5kTHUPDP5508yo4MFToOp5K8mTMPacQ8WBN6-nyk9xXwmAvuK8At4_YDsu-74EEPCQ7aAHXioQ7RV7QjRBBmXXPmZXOSIbDu2O_byL6ceKpfPL4sP3woSxSEgxmGCxcAlzM9hTrpv5REhFdIXfH2YTFip8KGwMRwyLz4G5oGjvMdePmGilrbekOM84FkMMWIzo0J5jR587T9kjZ2bCZ5f1mn378P7u5lN5--Xj55t3t6Wta1hKKfmAzWAbcLaDdhSq5WCwlaiE7ZRSTd2gERzQjI3oJdhucEPjGtcP3Vh38pq9Os89pJivQ4vee7I450tgXEm3UirRK9VnUpxJmyJRQqcPye9NOmkOenOuJ70515tzzbnOznPoxWX8Ouxx_BP5LTkDLy-AIWtml7JbT385UauadzJzb84cZhlHj0mT9dk-jj5lcXqM_v_nePtP3M4--LzjPZ6Qprim_EikuSahQX_dfsf2ObaVdwrkL7lmty0</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Akça, K</creator><creator>Kökat, A.M</creator><creator>Cömert, A</creator><creator>Akkocaoğlu, M</creator><creator>Tekdemir, I</creator><creator>Çehreli, M.C</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses of implants in conventional sockets versus controlled bone defects in vitro</title><author>Akça, K ; Kökat, A.M ; Cömert, A ; Akkocaoğlu, M ; Tekdemir, I ; Çehreli, M.C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-331be6bc60fc807d25710ae73e52c8555646ea210ead62930c8bfb6f6f9b8d483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - pathology</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - surgery</topic><topic>bone defect</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Resorption - pathology</topic><topic>Bone Resorption - surgery</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - instrumentation</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Retention</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>iliac crest</topic><topic>Ilium</topic><topic>implant</topic><topic>insertion torque</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Osteotomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>resonance frequency analysis</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akça, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kökat, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cömert, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkocaoğlu, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekdemir, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çehreli, M.C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akça, K</au><au>Kökat, A.M</au><au>Cömert, A</au><au>Akkocaoğlu, M</au><au>Tekdemir, I</au><au>Çehreli, M.C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses of implants in conventional sockets versus controlled bone defects in vitro</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>169-173</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><coden>IJOSE9</coden><abstract>Abstract The primary stability of implants should be high on insertion into fresh extraction sockets. Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses (RFA) are used to assess primary implant anchorage and stability. The torque-fitting and RFA of implants placed in conventional surgical sockets and sockets with controlled coronal bone defects was compared. The possible relation between torque-fitting and RFA was explored. Ø 3.3 mm × 12 mm implants were placed in 16 sockets finalized with Ø 2.8 mm surgical pilot drills in the right iliac crests of two fresh cadavers (control). In the test group, implants were placed into sockets prepared by Ø 2.8 mm drill followed by Ø 4.2 mm twist drills to a depth of 6 mm to create circumferential controlled coronal bone defects (50% bone loss). Primary implant stability was assessed using insertion torque values (ITV) followed by RFA. Mean ITV and RFA measurements for test groups (7.83 ± 0.91 N cm and 40.88 ± 3.57) were significantly lower than controls (14.80 ± 1 N cm and 66.31 ± 0.9) ( P &lt; 0.05). Reductions of ITV and RFA measurements in relation to bone defect were 47% and 38%. The existence of controlled bone defects eliminating contact coronally leads to decrease in torque-fitting and primary stability of implants. No relationship was observed between torque-fitting and RFA.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20036107</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.019</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0901-5027
ispartof International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2010-02, Vol.39 (2), p.169-173
issn 0901-5027
1399-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733529559
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Bone and Bones - pathology
Bone and Bones - surgery
bone defect
Bone Density - physiology
Bone Resorption - pathology
Bone Resorption - surgery
Cadaver
Dental Implantation, Endosseous - instrumentation
Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods
Dental Implants
Dental Prosthesis Retention
Dentistry
Humans
iliac crest
Ilium
implant
insertion torque
Male
Medical sciences
Osteotomy - instrumentation
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
resonance frequency analysis
Surface Properties
Surgery
Torque
Vibration
title Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses of implants in conventional sockets versus controlled bone defects in vitro
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A03%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Torque-fitting%20and%20resonance%20frequency%20analyses%20of%20implants%20in%20conventional%20sockets%20versus%20controlled%20bone%20defects%20in%20vitro&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Ak%C3%A7a,%20K&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=169-173&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft.coden=IJOSE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733529559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733529559&rft_id=info:pmid/20036107&rft_els_id=S0901502709011850&rfr_iscdi=true