Case report. Fractionated Helical Tomotherapy as an alternative to radiosurgery in patients unwilling to undergo additional radiosurgery for recurrent brain metastases

Our clinic routinely treats brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery using a 6 megavoltage (MV) linear accelerator, cones, and a surgically attached head frame. Four patients declined repeat radiosurgery for new lesions due to their previous discomfort and a fifth patient could not complete r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2010-02, Vol.83 (986), p.e25-e30
Hauptverfasser: Sanghera, P, Lightstone, A W, Hyde, D E, Davey, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e30
container_issue 986
container_start_page e25
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 83
creator Sanghera, P
Lightstone, A W
Hyde, D E
Davey, P
description Our clinic routinely treats brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery using a 6 megavoltage (MV) linear accelerator, cones, and a surgically attached head frame. Four patients declined repeat radiosurgery for new lesions due to their previous discomfort and a fifth patient could not complete radiosurgery because of uncontrolled nausea. Instead patients were treated with Helical Tomotherapy (HT). This report discusses the spatial dose distribution of HT as measured in a head phantom and the clinical course of these five patients. The planning target volume (PTV) was a 3 mm geometric expansion of the gross tumour volume (GTV). The prescribed dose to the PTV was 27 Gy in five daily fractions with the distribution optimised to deliver 30 Gy to the GTV. Patients were immobilised with a mask and the lesions were targeted by MV computerised tomography, an inherent feature of the system. One patient died six weeks later from systemic disease; the remaining patients survived eight to 16 months. No patient experienced an exacerbation of neurological symptoms following Helical Tomotherapy. These results suggest that fractionated Helical Tomotherapy for brain metastases may be a viable alternative to radiosurgery in patients unable or unwilling to undergo that procedure.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr/19238690
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733529200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733529200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p553-ad3d39d871f362bce5bc518a15c12649373d95be662a70757bfc1b3bbdf6b683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkDtPJDEQhK2T0C2v7OKTM6Jd_FjPjEO04iUhEUBAtmqPe_aMPOOh7QHtL7q_yRwHAVJLHfRX1aVi7JcUK6mMPXfPdC6t0k1lxQ92KOt1s2wa8bRgRzk_CyFqY8VPtlBCaquMPmR_N5CRE46JyopfEbQlpAEKen6DMbQQ-WPqU_mDBOOeQ-YwcIgFaYbCK_KSOIEPKU-0Q9rzMPBxvuBQMp-GtxBjGHb_qGnwSLvEwfvw8SN-F3aJ5hztRDRruSOYnXoskOfBfMIOOogZTz_3MXu4unzc3Czv7q9vNxd3y9EYvQSvvba-qWWnK-VaNK41sgFpWqmqtdW19tY4rCoF9VxG7bpWOu2c7ypXNfqYnf13HSm9TJjLtg-5xRhhwDTlba21UVYJMZO_P8nJ9ei3I4UeaL_9ala_A-5Afic</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733529200</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Case report. Fractionated Helical Tomotherapy as an alternative to radiosurgery in patients unwilling to undergo additional radiosurgery for recurrent brain metastases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sanghera, P ; Lightstone, A W ; Hyde, D E ; Davey, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanghera, P ; Lightstone, A W ; Hyde, D E ; Davey, P</creatorcontrib><description>Our clinic routinely treats brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery using a 6 megavoltage (MV) linear accelerator, cones, and a surgically attached head frame. Four patients declined repeat radiosurgery for new lesions due to their previous discomfort and a fifth patient could not complete radiosurgery because of uncontrolled nausea. Instead patients were treated with Helical Tomotherapy (HT). This report discusses the spatial dose distribution of HT as measured in a head phantom and the clinical course of these five patients. The planning target volume (PTV) was a 3 mm geometric expansion of the gross tumour volume (GTV). The prescribed dose to the PTV was 27 Gy in five daily fractions with the distribution optimised to deliver 30 Gy to the GTV. Patients were immobilised with a mask and the lesions were targeted by MV computerised tomography, an inherent feature of the system. One patient died six weeks later from systemic disease; the remaining patients survived eight to 16 months. No patient experienced an exacerbation of neurological symptoms following Helical Tomotherapy. These results suggest that fractionated Helical Tomotherapy for brain metastases may be a viable alternative to radiosurgery in patients unable or unwilling to undergo that procedure.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr/19238690</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20139253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Brain Neoplasms - secondary ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - radiotherapy ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Fatal Outcome ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiosurgery - instrumentation ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Tomography, Spiral Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; Treatment Refusal</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2010-02, Vol.83 (986), p.e25-e30</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20139253$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanghera, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lightstone, A W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, D E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, P</creatorcontrib><title>Case report. Fractionated Helical Tomotherapy as an alternative to radiosurgery in patients unwilling to undergo additional radiosurgery for recurrent brain metastases</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>Our clinic routinely treats brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery using a 6 megavoltage (MV) linear accelerator, cones, and a surgically attached head frame. Four patients declined repeat radiosurgery for new lesions due to their previous discomfort and a fifth patient could not complete radiosurgery because of uncontrolled nausea. Instead patients were treated with Helical Tomotherapy (HT). This report discusses the spatial dose distribution of HT as measured in a head phantom and the clinical course of these five patients. The planning target volume (PTV) was a 3 mm geometric expansion of the gross tumour volume (GTV). The prescribed dose to the PTV was 27 Gy in five daily fractions with the distribution optimised to deliver 30 Gy to the GTV. Patients were immobilised with a mask and the lesions were targeted by MV computerised tomography, an inherent feature of the system. One patient died six weeks later from systemic disease; the remaining patients survived eight to 16 months. No patient experienced an exacerbation of neurological symptoms following Helical Tomotherapy. These results suggest that fractionated Helical Tomotherapy for brain metastases may be a viable alternative to radiosurgery in patients unable or unwilling to undergo that procedure.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Fatal Outcome</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, Spiral Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Treatment Refusal</subject><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkDtPJDEQhK2T0C2v7OKTM6Jd_FjPjEO04iUhEUBAtmqPe_aMPOOh7QHtL7q_yRwHAVJLHfRX1aVi7JcUK6mMPXfPdC6t0k1lxQ92KOt1s2wa8bRgRzk_CyFqY8VPtlBCaquMPmR_N5CRE46JyopfEbQlpAEKen6DMbQQ-WPqU_mDBOOeQ-YwcIgFaYbCK_KSOIEPKU-0Q9rzMPBxvuBQMp-GtxBjGHb_qGnwSLvEwfvw8SN-F3aJ5hztRDRruSOYnXoskOfBfMIOOogZTz_3MXu4unzc3Czv7q9vNxd3y9EYvQSvvba-qWWnK-VaNK41sgFpWqmqtdW19tY4rCoF9VxG7bpWOu2c7ypXNfqYnf13HSm9TJjLtg-5xRhhwDTlba21UVYJMZO_P8nJ9ei3I4UeaL_9ala_A-5Afic</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Sanghera, P</creator><creator>Lightstone, A W</creator><creator>Hyde, D E</creator><creator>Davey, P</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Case report. Fractionated Helical Tomotherapy as an alternative to radiosurgery in patients unwilling to undergo additional radiosurgery for recurrent brain metastases</title><author>Sanghera, P ; Lightstone, A W ; Hyde, D E ; Davey, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p553-ad3d39d871f362bce5bc518a15c12649373d95be662a70757bfc1b3bbdf6b683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Fatal Outcome</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, Spiral Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Treatment Refusal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanghera, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lightstone, A W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, D E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanghera, P</au><au>Lightstone, A W</au><au>Hyde, D E</au><au>Davey, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Case report. Fractionated Helical Tomotherapy as an alternative to radiosurgery in patients unwilling to undergo additional radiosurgery for recurrent brain metastases</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>986</issue><spage>e25</spage><epage>e30</epage><pages>e25-e30</pages><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>Our clinic routinely treats brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery using a 6 megavoltage (MV) linear accelerator, cones, and a surgically attached head frame. Four patients declined repeat radiosurgery for new lesions due to their previous discomfort and a fifth patient could not complete radiosurgery because of uncontrolled nausea. Instead patients were treated with Helical Tomotherapy (HT). This report discusses the spatial dose distribution of HT as measured in a head phantom and the clinical course of these five patients. The planning target volume (PTV) was a 3 mm geometric expansion of the gross tumour volume (GTV). The prescribed dose to the PTV was 27 Gy in five daily fractions with the distribution optimised to deliver 30 Gy to the GTV. Patients were immobilised with a mask and the lesions were targeted by MV computerised tomography, an inherent feature of the system. One patient died six weeks later from systemic disease; the remaining patients survived eight to 16 months. No patient experienced an exacerbation of neurological symptoms following Helical Tomotherapy. These results suggest that fractionated Helical Tomotherapy for brain metastases may be a viable alternative to radiosurgery in patients unable or unwilling to undergo that procedure.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>20139253</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr/19238690</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1748-880X
ispartof British journal of radiology, 2010-02, Vol.83 (986), p.e25-e30
issn 1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733529200
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Brain Neoplasms - secondary
Brain Neoplasms - surgery
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - radiotherapy
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - secondary
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery
Combined Modality Therapy
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Fatal Outcome
Female
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms - pathology
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiosurgery - instrumentation
Radiosurgery - methods
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Tomography, Spiral Computed
Treatment Outcome
Treatment Refusal
title Case report. Fractionated Helical Tomotherapy as an alternative to radiosurgery in patients unwilling to undergo additional radiosurgery for recurrent brain metastases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T05%3A59%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Case%20report.%20Fractionated%20Helical%20Tomotherapy%20as%20an%20alternative%20to%20radiosurgery%20in%20patients%20unwilling%20to%20undergo%20additional%20radiosurgery%20for%20recurrent%20brain%20metastases&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Sanghera,%20P&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=986&rft.spage=e25&rft.epage=e30&rft.pages=e25-e30&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr/19238690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733529200%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733529200&rft_id=info:pmid/20139253&rfr_iscdi=true