Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients
PET scanners with an elongated axial field of view intended to increase overall system sensitivity, such as the high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) scanner, have been reported to produce images with decreased signals in the brain stem and cerebellum. The cause of this negative bias of the imag...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2010-05, Vol.51 (5), p.753-760 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 760 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 753 |
container_title | Journal of Nuclear Medicine |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Son, Young-Don Kim, Hang-Keun Kim, Sung-Tae Kim, Nam-Beom Kim, Young-Bo Cho, Zang-Hee |
description | PET scanners with an elongated axial field of view intended to increase overall system sensitivity, such as the high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) scanner, have been reported to produce images with decreased signals in the brain stem and cerebellum. The cause of this negative bias of the images was analyzed, and the effects of an inaccurate linear attenuation coefficient (mu-value) of tissue and bones were separately examined.
A new phantom was manufactured, and 18 human subjects were recruited for the study. (18)F-FDG PET images were reconstructed using attenuation coefficient maps generated by various algorithms. The algorithms included maximum a posteriori reconstruction for transmission data (MAP-TR) with default priors, MAP-TR with adjusted priors for bone (MAP-TR(adj-b)), MAP-TR with adjusted priors for tissue (MAP-TR(adj-t)), and noise-equivalent count TR and CT-TR.
With the CT-TR and MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithms, increased intensity in the brain stem and cerebellum was seen, and negative bias was reduced. With the MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithm, however, positive bias increased in the central region. Inappropriate attenuation coefficients of brain tissue increased the positive or negative bias of reconstructed images, especially for the central regions of the volume. Poor representation of the skull or bone also locally increased the bias in the near regions where bone detection had failed.
An inaccurate mu-map obtained from the MAP-TR algorithm caused the bias problem for the HRRT system. The CT-TR algorithm provided a relatively more reliable mu-map that demonstrated a small degree of intensity bias. Appropriate priors for mu-values of each tissue compartment and better classification to distinguish bone from tissue are necessary for accurate attenuation correction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2967/jnumed.109.070326 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733526537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733526537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a044061753ec55371099a8b59e5372485d85c7f5d2d155920a29cea186eea55c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIHcEEWF04pfmSd-FhV5SEqwaGcLcfZoFRpUuL40L_HVdoLp9Xszo5mhpB7zuZCq-x524YdlnPO9JxlTAp1QaYcJCSgVHZJpowrngAwmJAb77eMMZXn-TWZCCY1SMGm5GPR2ubga0-7iha19VjSr9WG1jv7g546G46b4kDr1joXejsgtcOAbbBD3bXUdVhVtauxHfwtuaps4_HuNGfk-2W1Wb4l68_X9-VinbhUqiGxLE2Z4hlIdAAyi_a1zQvQGIFIcyhzcFkFpSg5gBbMCu3Q8lwhWgAnZ-Rp1N333W9AP5hd7R02jW2xC95kUoJQUSwyH_8xt13oY2JvBNdcRhs6kvhIcn3nfY-V2fcxfn8wnJljz2bsOUJtxp7jz8NJOBTH0_njXKz8A_aFeKs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219130619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Son, Young-Don ; Kim, Hang-Keun ; Kim, Sung-Tae ; Kim, Nam-Beom ; Kim, Young-Bo ; Cho, Zang-Hee</creator><creatorcontrib>Son, Young-Don ; Kim, Hang-Keun ; Kim, Sung-Tae ; Kim, Nam-Beom ; Kim, Young-Bo ; Cho, Zang-Hee</creatorcontrib><description>PET scanners with an elongated axial field of view intended to increase overall system sensitivity, such as the high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) scanner, have been reported to produce images with decreased signals in the brain stem and cerebellum. The cause of this negative bias of the images was analyzed, and the effects of an inaccurate linear attenuation coefficient (mu-value) of tissue and bones were separately examined.
A new phantom was manufactured, and 18 human subjects were recruited for the study. (18)F-FDG PET images were reconstructed using attenuation coefficient maps generated by various algorithms. The algorithms included maximum a posteriori reconstruction for transmission data (MAP-TR) with default priors, MAP-TR with adjusted priors for bone (MAP-TR(adj-b)), MAP-TR with adjusted priors for tissue (MAP-TR(adj-t)), and noise-equivalent count TR and CT-TR.
With the CT-TR and MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithms, increased intensity in the brain stem and cerebellum was seen, and negative bias was reduced. With the MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithm, however, positive bias increased in the central region. Inappropriate attenuation coefficients of brain tissue increased the positive or negative bias of reconstructed images, especially for the central regions of the volume. Poor representation of the skull or bone also locally increased the bias in the near regions where bone detection had failed.
An inaccurate mu-map obtained from the MAP-TR algorithm caused the bias problem for the HRRT system. The CT-TR algorithm provided a relatively more reliable mu-map that demonstrated a small degree of intensity bias. Appropriate priors for mu-values of each tissue compartment and better classification to distinguish bone from tissue are necessary for accurate attenuation correction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-662X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.070326</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20395320</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bias ; Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Human subjects ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data ; Medical imaging ; Methods ; Noise ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics & numerical data ; Scanners ; Tomography, Emission-Computed ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2010-05, Vol.51 (5), p.753-760</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine May 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a044061753ec55371099a8b59e5372485d85c7f5d2d155920a29cea186eea55c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a044061753ec55371099a8b59e5372485d85c7f5d2d155920a29cea186eea55c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20395320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Son, Young-Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hang-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nam-Beom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Zang-Hee</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients</title><title>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>PET scanners with an elongated axial field of view intended to increase overall system sensitivity, such as the high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) scanner, have been reported to produce images with decreased signals in the brain stem and cerebellum. The cause of this negative bias of the images was analyzed, and the effects of an inaccurate linear attenuation coefficient (mu-value) of tissue and bones were separately examined.
A new phantom was manufactured, and 18 human subjects were recruited for the study. (18)F-FDG PET images were reconstructed using attenuation coefficient maps generated by various algorithms. The algorithms included maximum a posteriori reconstruction for transmission data (MAP-TR) with default priors, MAP-TR with adjusted priors for bone (MAP-TR(adj-b)), MAP-TR with adjusted priors for tissue (MAP-TR(adj-t)), and noise-equivalent count TR and CT-TR.
With the CT-TR and MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithms, increased intensity in the brain stem and cerebellum was seen, and negative bias was reduced. With the MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithm, however, positive bias increased in the central region. Inappropriate attenuation coefficients of brain tissue increased the positive or negative bias of reconstructed images, especially for the central regions of the volume. Poor representation of the skull or bone also locally increased the bias in the near regions where bone detection had failed.
An inaccurate mu-map obtained from the MAP-TR algorithm caused the bias problem for the HRRT system. The CT-TR algorithm provided a relatively more reliable mu-map that demonstrated a small degree of intensity bias. Appropriate priors for mu-values of each tissue compartment and better classification to distinguish bone from tissue are necessary for accurate attenuation correction.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>2159-662X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIHcEEWF04pfmSd-FhV5SEqwaGcLcfZoFRpUuL40L_HVdoLp9Xszo5mhpB7zuZCq-x524YdlnPO9JxlTAp1QaYcJCSgVHZJpowrngAwmJAb77eMMZXn-TWZCCY1SMGm5GPR2ubga0-7iha19VjSr9WG1jv7g546G46b4kDr1joXejsgtcOAbbBD3bXUdVhVtauxHfwtuaps4_HuNGfk-2W1Wb4l68_X9-VinbhUqiGxLE2Z4hlIdAAyi_a1zQvQGIFIcyhzcFkFpSg5gBbMCu3Q8lwhWgAnZ-Rp1N333W9AP5hd7R02jW2xC95kUoJQUSwyH_8xt13oY2JvBNdcRhs6kvhIcn3nfY-V2fcxfn8wnJljz2bsOUJtxp7jz8NJOBTH0_njXKz8A_aFeKs</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Son, Young-Don</creator><creator>Kim, Hang-Keun</creator><creator>Kim, Sung-Tae</creator><creator>Kim, Nam-Beom</creator><creator>Kim, Young-Bo</creator><creator>Cho, Zang-Hee</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients</title><author>Son, Young-Don ; Kim, Hang-Keun ; Kim, Sung-Tae ; Kim, Nam-Beom ; Kim, Young-Bo ; Cho, Zang-Hee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a044061753ec55371099a8b59e5372485d85c7f5d2d155920a29cea186eea55c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Son, Young-Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hang-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nam-Beom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Zang-Hee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Son, Young-Don</au><au>Kim, Hang-Keun</au><au>Kim, Sung-Tae</au><au>Kim, Nam-Beom</au><au>Kim, Young-Bo</au><au>Cho, Zang-Hee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>753</spage><epage>760</epage><pages>753-760</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><eissn>2159-662X</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>PET scanners with an elongated axial field of view intended to increase overall system sensitivity, such as the high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) scanner, have been reported to produce images with decreased signals in the brain stem and cerebellum. The cause of this negative bias of the images was analyzed, and the effects of an inaccurate linear attenuation coefficient (mu-value) of tissue and bones were separately examined.
A new phantom was manufactured, and 18 human subjects were recruited for the study. (18)F-FDG PET images were reconstructed using attenuation coefficient maps generated by various algorithms. The algorithms included maximum a posteriori reconstruction for transmission data (MAP-TR) with default priors, MAP-TR with adjusted priors for bone (MAP-TR(adj-b)), MAP-TR with adjusted priors for tissue (MAP-TR(adj-t)), and noise-equivalent count TR and CT-TR.
With the CT-TR and MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithms, increased intensity in the brain stem and cerebellum was seen, and negative bias was reduced. With the MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithm, however, positive bias increased in the central region. Inappropriate attenuation coefficients of brain tissue increased the positive or negative bias of reconstructed images, especially for the central regions of the volume. Poor representation of the skull or bone also locally increased the bias in the near regions where bone detection had failed.
An inaccurate mu-map obtained from the MAP-TR algorithm caused the bias problem for the HRRT system. The CT-TR algorithm provided a relatively more reliable mu-map that demonstrated a small degree of intensity bias. Appropriate priors for mu-values of each tissue compartment and better classification to distinguish bone from tissue are necessary for accurate attenuation correction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>20395320</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.109.070326</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-5505 |
ispartof | Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2010-05, Vol.51 (5), p.753-760 |
issn | 0161-5505 1535-5667 2159-662X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733526537 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Algorithms Bias Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging Brain - diagnostic imaging Data Interpretation, Statistical Human subjects Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data Medical imaging Methods Noise Phantoms, Imaging Positron-Emission Tomography - methods Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics & numerical data Scanners Tomography, Emission-Computed Validation studies |
title | Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A37%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20biased%20PET%20images%20caused%20by%20inaccurate%20attenuation%20coefficients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Son,%20Young-Don&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=753&rft.epage=760&rft.pages=753-760&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.109.070326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733526537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219130619&rft_id=info:pmid/20395320&rfr_iscdi=true |