Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients

PET scanners with an elongated axial field of view intended to increase overall system sensitivity, such as the high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) scanner, have been reported to produce images with decreased signals in the brain stem and cerebellum. The cause of this negative bias of the imag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2010-05, Vol.51 (5), p.753-760
Hauptverfasser: Son, Young-Don, Kim, Hang-Keun, Kim, Sung-Tae, Kim, Nam-Beom, Kim, Young-Bo, Cho, Zang-Hee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 760
container_issue 5
container_start_page 753
container_title Journal of Nuclear Medicine
container_volume 51
creator Son, Young-Don
Kim, Hang-Keun
Kim, Sung-Tae
Kim, Nam-Beom
Kim, Young-Bo
Cho, Zang-Hee
description PET scanners with an elongated axial field of view intended to increase overall system sensitivity, such as the high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) scanner, have been reported to produce images with decreased signals in the brain stem and cerebellum. The cause of this negative bias of the images was analyzed, and the effects of an inaccurate linear attenuation coefficient (mu-value) of tissue and bones were separately examined. A new phantom was manufactured, and 18 human subjects were recruited for the study. (18)F-FDG PET images were reconstructed using attenuation coefficient maps generated by various algorithms. The algorithms included maximum a posteriori reconstruction for transmission data (MAP-TR) with default priors, MAP-TR with adjusted priors for bone (MAP-TR(adj-b)), MAP-TR with adjusted priors for tissue (MAP-TR(adj-t)), and noise-equivalent count TR and CT-TR. With the CT-TR and MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithms, increased intensity in the brain stem and cerebellum was seen, and negative bias was reduced. With the MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithm, however, positive bias increased in the central region. Inappropriate attenuation coefficients of brain tissue increased the positive or negative bias of reconstructed images, especially for the central regions of the volume. Poor representation of the skull or bone also locally increased the bias in the near regions where bone detection had failed. An inaccurate mu-map obtained from the MAP-TR algorithm caused the bias problem for the HRRT system. The CT-TR algorithm provided a relatively more reliable mu-map that demonstrated a small degree of intensity bias. Appropriate priors for mu-values of each tissue compartment and better classification to distinguish bone from tissue are necessary for accurate attenuation correction.
doi_str_mv 10.2967/jnumed.109.070326
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733526537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733526537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a044061753ec55371099a8b59e5372485d85c7f5d2d155920a29cea186eea55c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIHcEEWF04pfmSd-FhV5SEqwaGcLcfZoFRpUuL40L_HVdoLp9Xszo5mhpB7zuZCq-x524YdlnPO9JxlTAp1QaYcJCSgVHZJpowrngAwmJAb77eMMZXn-TWZCCY1SMGm5GPR2ubga0-7iha19VjSr9WG1jv7g546G46b4kDr1joXejsgtcOAbbBD3bXUdVhVtauxHfwtuaps4_HuNGfk-2W1Wb4l68_X9-VinbhUqiGxLE2Z4hlIdAAyi_a1zQvQGIFIcyhzcFkFpSg5gBbMCu3Q8lwhWgAnZ-Rp1N333W9AP5hd7R02jW2xC95kUoJQUSwyH_8xt13oY2JvBNdcRhs6kvhIcn3nfY-V2fcxfn8wnJljz2bsOUJtxp7jz8NJOBTH0_njXKz8A_aFeKs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219130619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Son, Young-Don ; Kim, Hang-Keun ; Kim, Sung-Tae ; Kim, Nam-Beom ; Kim, Young-Bo ; Cho, Zang-Hee</creator><creatorcontrib>Son, Young-Don ; Kim, Hang-Keun ; Kim, Sung-Tae ; Kim, Nam-Beom ; Kim, Young-Bo ; Cho, Zang-Hee</creatorcontrib><description>PET scanners with an elongated axial field of view intended to increase overall system sensitivity, such as the high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) scanner, have been reported to produce images with decreased signals in the brain stem and cerebellum. The cause of this negative bias of the images was analyzed, and the effects of an inaccurate linear attenuation coefficient (mu-value) of tissue and bones were separately examined. A new phantom was manufactured, and 18 human subjects were recruited for the study. (18)F-FDG PET images were reconstructed using attenuation coefficient maps generated by various algorithms. The algorithms included maximum a posteriori reconstruction for transmission data (MAP-TR) with default priors, MAP-TR with adjusted priors for bone (MAP-TR(adj-b)), MAP-TR with adjusted priors for tissue (MAP-TR(adj-t)), and noise-equivalent count TR and CT-TR. With the CT-TR and MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithms, increased intensity in the brain stem and cerebellum was seen, and negative bias was reduced. With the MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithm, however, positive bias increased in the central region. Inappropriate attenuation coefficients of brain tissue increased the positive or negative bias of reconstructed images, especially for the central regions of the volume. Poor representation of the skull or bone also locally increased the bias in the near regions where bone detection had failed. An inaccurate mu-map obtained from the MAP-TR algorithm caused the bias problem for the HRRT system. The CT-TR algorithm provided a relatively more reliable mu-map that demonstrated a small degree of intensity bias. Appropriate priors for mu-values of each tissue compartment and better classification to distinguish bone from tissue are necessary for accurate attenuation correction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-662X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.070326</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20395320</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bias ; Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Human subjects ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical imaging ; Methods ; Noise ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Scanners ; Tomography, Emission-Computed ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2010-05, Vol.51 (5), p.753-760</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine May 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a044061753ec55371099a8b59e5372485d85c7f5d2d155920a29cea186eea55c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a044061753ec55371099a8b59e5372485d85c7f5d2d155920a29cea186eea55c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20395320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Son, Young-Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hang-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nam-Beom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Zang-Hee</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients</title><title>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>PET scanners with an elongated axial field of view intended to increase overall system sensitivity, such as the high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) scanner, have been reported to produce images with decreased signals in the brain stem and cerebellum. The cause of this negative bias of the images was analyzed, and the effects of an inaccurate linear attenuation coefficient (mu-value) of tissue and bones were separately examined. A new phantom was manufactured, and 18 human subjects were recruited for the study. (18)F-FDG PET images were reconstructed using attenuation coefficient maps generated by various algorithms. The algorithms included maximum a posteriori reconstruction for transmission data (MAP-TR) with default priors, MAP-TR with adjusted priors for bone (MAP-TR(adj-b)), MAP-TR with adjusted priors for tissue (MAP-TR(adj-t)), and noise-equivalent count TR and CT-TR. With the CT-TR and MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithms, increased intensity in the brain stem and cerebellum was seen, and negative bias was reduced. With the MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithm, however, positive bias increased in the central region. Inappropriate attenuation coefficients of brain tissue increased the positive or negative bias of reconstructed images, especially for the central regions of the volume. Poor representation of the skull or bone also locally increased the bias in the near regions where bone detection had failed. An inaccurate mu-map obtained from the MAP-TR algorithm caused the bias problem for the HRRT system. The CT-TR algorithm provided a relatively more reliable mu-map that demonstrated a small degree of intensity bias. Appropriate priors for mu-values of each tissue compartment and better classification to distinguish bone from tissue are necessary for accurate attenuation correction.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>2159-662X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIHcEEWF04pfmSd-FhV5SEqwaGcLcfZoFRpUuL40L_HVdoLp9Xszo5mhpB7zuZCq-x524YdlnPO9JxlTAp1QaYcJCSgVHZJpowrngAwmJAb77eMMZXn-TWZCCY1SMGm5GPR2ubga0-7iha19VjSr9WG1jv7g546G46b4kDr1joXejsgtcOAbbBD3bXUdVhVtauxHfwtuaps4_HuNGfk-2W1Wb4l68_X9-VinbhUqiGxLE2Z4hlIdAAyi_a1zQvQGIFIcyhzcFkFpSg5gBbMCu3Q8lwhWgAnZ-Rp1N333W9AP5hd7R02jW2xC95kUoJQUSwyH_8xt13oY2JvBNdcRhs6kvhIcn3nfY-V2fcxfn8wnJljz2bsOUJtxp7jz8NJOBTH0_njXKz8A_aFeKs</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Son, Young-Don</creator><creator>Kim, Hang-Keun</creator><creator>Kim, Sung-Tae</creator><creator>Kim, Nam-Beom</creator><creator>Kim, Young-Bo</creator><creator>Cho, Zang-Hee</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients</title><author>Son, Young-Don ; Kim, Hang-Keun ; Kim, Sung-Tae ; Kim, Nam-Beom ; Kim, Young-Bo ; Cho, Zang-Hee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a044061753ec55371099a8b59e5372485d85c7f5d2d155920a29cea186eea55c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Son, Young-Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hang-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nam-Beom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Zang-Hee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Son, Young-Don</au><au>Kim, Hang-Keun</au><au>Kim, Sung-Tae</au><au>Kim, Nam-Beom</au><au>Kim, Young-Bo</au><au>Cho, Zang-Hee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>753</spage><epage>760</epage><pages>753-760</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><eissn>2159-662X</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>PET scanners with an elongated axial field of view intended to increase overall system sensitivity, such as the high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) scanner, have been reported to produce images with decreased signals in the brain stem and cerebellum. The cause of this negative bias of the images was analyzed, and the effects of an inaccurate linear attenuation coefficient (mu-value) of tissue and bones were separately examined. A new phantom was manufactured, and 18 human subjects were recruited for the study. (18)F-FDG PET images were reconstructed using attenuation coefficient maps generated by various algorithms. The algorithms included maximum a posteriori reconstruction for transmission data (MAP-TR) with default priors, MAP-TR with adjusted priors for bone (MAP-TR(adj-b)), MAP-TR with adjusted priors for tissue (MAP-TR(adj-t)), and noise-equivalent count TR and CT-TR. With the CT-TR and MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithms, increased intensity in the brain stem and cerebellum was seen, and negative bias was reduced. With the MAP-TR(adj-t) algorithm, however, positive bias increased in the central region. Inappropriate attenuation coefficients of brain tissue increased the positive or negative bias of reconstructed images, especially for the central regions of the volume. Poor representation of the skull or bone also locally increased the bias in the near regions where bone detection had failed. An inaccurate mu-map obtained from the MAP-TR algorithm caused the bias problem for the HRRT system. The CT-TR algorithm provided a relatively more reliable mu-map that demonstrated a small degree of intensity bias. Appropriate priors for mu-values of each tissue compartment and better classification to distinguish bone from tissue are necessary for accurate attenuation correction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>20395320</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.109.070326</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2010-05, Vol.51 (5), p.753-760
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
2159-662X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733526537
source MEDLINE; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Algorithms
Bias
Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Human subjects
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data
Medical imaging
Methods
Noise
Phantoms, Imaging
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics & numerical data
Scanners
Tomography, Emission-Computed
Validation studies
title Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A37%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20biased%20PET%20images%20caused%20by%20inaccurate%20attenuation%20coefficients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Son,%20Young-Don&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=753&rft.epage=760&rft.pages=753-760&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.109.070326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733526537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219130619&rft_id=info:pmid/20395320&rfr_iscdi=true