The use and abuse of abbreviations in orthopaedic literature

Abbreviations are commonly used in medical literature. Their use has been associated with medical errors and they can be a source of irritation and misunderstanding. There are strict guidelines for their use. This study analysed the use of abbreviations in orthopaedic literature and compared adheren...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2010-04, Vol.92 (3), p.250-252
Hauptverfasser: Kilshaw, Michael J, Rooker, Jemma, Harding, Ian J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 252
container_issue 3
container_start_page 250
container_title Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
container_volume 92
creator Kilshaw, Michael J
Rooker, Jemma
Harding, Ian J
description Abbreviations are commonly used in medical literature. Their use has been associated with medical errors and they can be a source of irritation and misunderstanding. There are strict guidelines for their use. This study analysed the use of abbreviations in orthopaedic literature and compared adherence with guidelines in a general orthopaedic and spinal journal. It also examined orthopaedic professionals' understanding of abbreviations. The use of abbreviations in articles over a 3-month period in a general orthopaedic and spinal journal was analysed. The number of abbreviations and adherence with guidelines was recorded. A group of orthopaedic healthcare professionals were tested for their understanding of abbreviations. Almost half of all abbreviations were not properly used and 30% of abbreviations were never defined. Abbreviations were used significantly more often in the spinal journal. Only 40% of abbreviations were correctly defined by the orthopaedic professionals tested. Guidelines regarding the use of abbreviations are not being adhered to by authors or editors. The poor understanding of abbreviations underlines the importance of minimising their use and defining abbreviations when they are used.
doi_str_mv 10.1308/003588410X12628812458211
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733525866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733525866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c189t-5927ab9ef3eb8d6682eb48ceb1501f253f9641dfbb486c9b37a10f02f6299a7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6F6Q3T9VM0iQT8CLiFyx4WcFbSdoJW-m2a9IK_nu77OrN07wMzzsDD2MZ8GuQHG84lwqxAP4OQgtEEIVCAXDE5lAYzA1HeczmOyyfODljZyl9cA7WIJyymeBCSG7UnN2u1pSNiTLX1Znzu9SHKfhIX40bmr5LWdNlfRzW_dZR3VRZ2wwU3TBGOmcnwbWJLg5zwd4eH1b3z_ny9enl_m6ZV4B2yJUVxnlLQZLHWmsU5AusyIPiEISSweoC6uCnra6sl8YBD1wELax1xskFu9rf3cb-c6Q0lJsmVdS2rqN-TKWRUgmFWk8k7skq9ilFCuU2NhsXv0vg5U5d-Z-6qXp5eDL6DdV_xV9X8gfKBGkK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733525866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use and abuse of abbreviations in orthopaedic literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kilshaw, Michael J ; Rooker, Jemma ; Harding, Ian J</creator><creatorcontrib>Kilshaw, Michael J ; Rooker, Jemma ; Harding, Ian J</creatorcontrib><description>Abbreviations are commonly used in medical literature. Their use has been associated with medical errors and they can be a source of irritation and misunderstanding. There are strict guidelines for their use. This study analysed the use of abbreviations in orthopaedic literature and compared adherence with guidelines in a general orthopaedic and spinal journal. It also examined orthopaedic professionals' understanding of abbreviations. The use of abbreviations in articles over a 3-month period in a general orthopaedic and spinal journal was analysed. The number of abbreviations and adherence with guidelines was recorded. A group of orthopaedic healthcare professionals were tested for their understanding of abbreviations. Almost half of all abbreviations were not properly used and 30% of abbreviations were never defined. Abbreviations were used significantly more often in the spinal journal. Only 40% of abbreviations were correctly defined by the orthopaedic professionals tested. Guidelines regarding the use of abbreviations are not being adhered to by authors or editors. The poor understanding of abbreviations underlines the importance of minimising their use and defining abbreviations when they are used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1308/003588410X12628812458211</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20223075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Abbreviations as Topic ; England ; Guideline Adherence ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Medical Staff, Hospital - standards ; Orthopedics - standards ; Orthopedics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Periodicals as Topic - standards ; Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Professional Competence</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2010-04, Vol.92 (3), p.250-252</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20223075$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kilshaw, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooker, Jemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Ian J</creatorcontrib><title>The use and abuse of abbreviations in orthopaedic literature</title><title>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</title><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><description>Abbreviations are commonly used in medical literature. Their use has been associated with medical errors and they can be a source of irritation and misunderstanding. There are strict guidelines for their use. This study analysed the use of abbreviations in orthopaedic literature and compared adherence with guidelines in a general orthopaedic and spinal journal. It also examined orthopaedic professionals' understanding of abbreviations. The use of abbreviations in articles over a 3-month period in a general orthopaedic and spinal journal was analysed. The number of abbreviations and adherence with guidelines was recorded. A group of orthopaedic healthcare professionals were tested for their understanding of abbreviations. Almost half of all abbreviations were not properly used and 30% of abbreviations were never defined. Abbreviations were used significantly more often in the spinal journal. Only 40% of abbreviations were correctly defined by the orthopaedic professionals tested. Guidelines regarding the use of abbreviations are not being adhered to by authors or editors. The poor understanding of abbreviations underlines the importance of minimising their use and defining abbreviations when they are used.</description><subject>Abbreviations as Topic</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Orthopedics - standards</subject><subject>Orthopedics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><issn>0035-8843</issn><issn>1478-7083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6F6Q3T9VM0iQT8CLiFyx4WcFbSdoJW-m2a9IK_nu77OrN07wMzzsDD2MZ8GuQHG84lwqxAP4OQgtEEIVCAXDE5lAYzA1HeczmOyyfODljZyl9cA7WIJyymeBCSG7UnN2u1pSNiTLX1Znzu9SHKfhIX40bmr5LWdNlfRzW_dZR3VRZ2wwU3TBGOmcnwbWJLg5zwd4eH1b3z_ny9enl_m6ZV4B2yJUVxnlLQZLHWmsU5AusyIPiEISSweoC6uCnra6sl8YBD1wELax1xskFu9rf3cb-c6Q0lJsmVdS2rqN-TKWRUgmFWk8k7skq9ilFCuU2NhsXv0vg5U5d-Z-6qXp5eDL6DdV_xV9X8gfKBGkK</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Kilshaw, Michael J</creator><creator>Rooker, Jemma</creator><creator>Harding, Ian J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>The use and abuse of abbreviations in orthopaedic literature</title><author>Kilshaw, Michael J ; Rooker, Jemma ; Harding, Ian J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c189t-5927ab9ef3eb8d6682eb48ceb1501f253f9641dfbb486c9b37a10f02f6299a7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abbreviations as Topic</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Orthopedics - standards</topic><topic>Orthopedics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kilshaw, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooker, Jemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Ian J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kilshaw, Michael J</au><au>Rooker, Jemma</au><au>Harding, Ian J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use and abuse of abbreviations in orthopaedic literature</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>250-252</pages><issn>0035-8843</issn><eissn>1478-7083</eissn><abstract>Abbreviations are commonly used in medical literature. Their use has been associated with medical errors and they can be a source of irritation and misunderstanding. There are strict guidelines for their use. This study analysed the use of abbreviations in orthopaedic literature and compared adherence with guidelines in a general orthopaedic and spinal journal. It also examined orthopaedic professionals' understanding of abbreviations. The use of abbreviations in articles over a 3-month period in a general orthopaedic and spinal journal was analysed. The number of abbreviations and adherence with guidelines was recorded. A group of orthopaedic healthcare professionals were tested for their understanding of abbreviations. Almost half of all abbreviations were not properly used and 30% of abbreviations were never defined. Abbreviations were used significantly more often in the spinal journal. Only 40% of abbreviations were correctly defined by the orthopaedic professionals tested. Guidelines regarding the use of abbreviations are not being adhered to by authors or editors. The poor understanding of abbreviations underlines the importance of minimising their use and defining abbreviations when they are used.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>20223075</pmid><doi>10.1308/003588410X12628812458211</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-8843
ispartof Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2010-04, Vol.92 (3), p.250-252
issn 0035-8843
1478-7083
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733525866
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Abbreviations as Topic
England
Guideline Adherence
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
Medical Staff, Hospital - standards
Orthopedics - standards
Orthopedics - statistics & numerical data
Periodicals as Topic - standards
Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Professional Competence
title The use and abuse of abbreviations in orthopaedic literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T01%3A05%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20and%20abuse%20of%20abbreviations%20in%20orthopaedic%20literature&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20of%20England&rft.au=Kilshaw,%20Michael%20J&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=250-252&rft.issn=0035-8843&rft.eissn=1478-7083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1308/003588410X12628812458211&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733525866%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733525866&rft_id=info:pmid/20223075&rfr_iscdi=true