Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon
Secondhand smoke is harmful to smokers and nonsmokers, and smoke-free legislation worldwide improves health status. Lebanon has one of the weakest tobacco control regulatory environments in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, several Lebanese workplaces and hospitality venues have chosen to i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asia-Pacific journal of public health 2010-07, Vol.22 (3), p.168S-174S |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 174S |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 168S |
container_title | Asia-Pacific journal of public health |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Nakkash, Rima T Khalil, Joanna Chaaya, Monique Afifi, Rema A. |
description | Secondhand smoke is harmful to smokers and nonsmokers, and smoke-free legislation worldwide improves health status. Lebanon has one of the weakest tobacco control regulatory environments in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, several Lebanese workplaces and hospitality venues have chosen to implement such policies on their own. The objective of this study was to document their experiences. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with management, employees, and clients. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent themes. Results describe the types of bans implemented; the reasons for adopting a policy; and the barriers and facilitators to implementation, enforcement, and compliance. A main facilitator was management support, whereas a main barrier was prosmoking norms. This analysis provides insight and lessons learned that can aid in scaling up tobacco control efforts in Lebanon and the Eastern Mediterranean region. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1010539510373020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733500648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26723680</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1010539510373020</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26723680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-ef59f2b656c8d259a740f74e630b10cf60959b51c6be49629e98f8916e88bc893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqHyUey9UvvUUGMexY_e2XS0f0krQAufIccbgbTYGO1mx_75ZhYLUQ08z0jzvI81LyBcGp4yV5RkDBoJrwYCXHHL4QA6YLliWF6X-OO7jOdvd98lhSisAoRXoT2Q_ByGlEHBA0o_Bt43vHugvTGiifaSLjW-ws0hdiPQmtN5u6azZBGvs9jud0Z-DaX1ver_BkTXtMK6ho8HRxYtP_c51uw6_MTuPiJPAY6K-o0usTRe6z2TPmTbh8es8Ivfni7v5Zba8vriaz5aZ5UL1GTqhXV5LIa1qcqFNWYArC5QcagbWSdBC14JZWWOhZa5RK6c0k6hUbZXmR-Tb5H2K4XnA1Fdrnyy2rekwDKkqORcAslAjCRNpY0gpoqueol-buK0YVLumq3-bHiNfX-VDvcbmLfC32hHIJiCZB6xWYYjd-Oz_hCcTv0p9iO8-WeZcKuB_AAdLjq8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733500648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Nakkash, Rima T ; Khalil, Joanna ; Chaaya, Monique ; Afifi, Rema A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakkash, Rima T ; Khalil, Joanna ; Chaaya, Monique ; Afifi, Rema A.</creatorcontrib><description>Secondhand smoke is harmful to smokers and nonsmokers, and smoke-free legislation worldwide improves health status. Lebanon has one of the weakest tobacco control regulatory environments in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, several Lebanese workplaces and hospitality venues have chosen to implement such policies on their own. The objective of this study was to document their experiences. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with management, employees, and clients. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent themes. Results describe the types of bans implemented; the reasons for adopting a policy; and the barriers and facilitators to implementation, enforcement, and compliance. A main facilitator was management support, whereas a main barrier was prosmoking norms. This analysis provides insight and lessons learned that can aid in scaling up tobacco control efforts in Lebanon and the Eastern Mediterranean region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1010539510373020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20566550</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Addictions and Mental Health ; Attitude to Health ; Employment - organization & administration ; Focus Groups ; Health Policy ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Lebanon ; Organizational Culture ; Organizational Policy ; Qualitative Research ; Restaurants ; Smoking - psychology ; Smoking Prevention ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Asia-Pacific journal of public health, 2010-07, Vol.22 (3), p.168S-174S</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health</rights><rights>2010 APJPH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-ef59f2b656c8d259a740f74e630b10cf60959b51c6be49629e98f8916e88bc893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-ef59f2b656c8d259a740f74e630b10cf60959b51c6be49629e98f8916e88bc893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26723680$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26723680$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20566550$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakkash, Rima T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaaya, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afifi, Rema A.</creatorcontrib><title>Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon</title><title>Asia-Pacific journal of public health</title><addtitle>Asia Pac J Public Health</addtitle><description>Secondhand smoke is harmful to smokers and nonsmokers, and smoke-free legislation worldwide improves health status. Lebanon has one of the weakest tobacco control regulatory environments in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, several Lebanese workplaces and hospitality venues have chosen to implement such policies on their own. The objective of this study was to document their experiences. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with management, employees, and clients. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent themes. Results describe the types of bans implemented; the reasons for adopting a policy; and the barriers and facilitators to implementation, enforcement, and compliance. A main facilitator was management support, whereas a main barrier was prosmoking norms. This analysis provides insight and lessons learned that can aid in scaling up tobacco control efforts in Lebanon and the Eastern Mediterranean region.</description><subject>Addictions and Mental Health</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Employment - organization & administration</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Lebanon</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Organizational Policy</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Restaurants</subject><subject>Smoking - psychology</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control</subject><issn>1010-5395</issn><issn>1941-2479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqHyUey9UvvUUGMexY_e2XS0f0krQAufIccbgbTYGO1mx_75ZhYLUQ08z0jzvI81LyBcGp4yV5RkDBoJrwYCXHHL4QA6YLliWF6X-OO7jOdvd98lhSisAoRXoT2Q_ByGlEHBA0o_Bt43vHugvTGiifaSLjW-ws0hdiPQmtN5u6azZBGvs9jud0Z-DaX1ver_BkTXtMK6ho8HRxYtP_c51uw6_MTuPiJPAY6K-o0usTRe6z2TPmTbh8es8Ivfni7v5Zba8vriaz5aZ5UL1GTqhXV5LIa1qcqFNWYArC5QcagbWSdBC14JZWWOhZa5RK6c0k6hUbZXmR-Tb5H2K4XnA1Fdrnyy2rekwDKkqORcAslAjCRNpY0gpoqueol-buK0YVLumq3-bHiNfX-VDvcbmLfC32hHIJiCZB6xWYYjd-Oz_hCcTv0p9iO8-WeZcKuB_AAdLjq8</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Nakkash, Rima T</creator><creator>Khalil, Joanna</creator><creator>Chaaya, Monique</creator><creator>Afifi, Rema A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon</title><author>Nakkash, Rima T ; Khalil, Joanna ; Chaaya, Monique ; Afifi, Rema A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-ef59f2b656c8d259a740f74e630b10cf60959b51c6be49629e98f8916e88bc893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Addictions and Mental Health</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Employment - organization & administration</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Lebanon</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Organizational Policy</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Restaurants</topic><topic>Smoking - psychology</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakkash, Rima T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaaya, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afifi, Rema A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakkash, Rima T</au><au>Khalil, Joanna</au><au>Chaaya, Monique</au><au>Afifi, Rema A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon</atitle><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Asia Pac J Public Health</addtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>168S</spage><epage>174S</epage><pages>168S-174S</pages><issn>1010-5395</issn><eissn>1941-2479</eissn><abstract>Secondhand smoke is harmful to smokers and nonsmokers, and smoke-free legislation worldwide improves health status. Lebanon has one of the weakest tobacco control regulatory environments in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, several Lebanese workplaces and hospitality venues have chosen to implement such policies on their own. The objective of this study was to document their experiences. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with management, employees, and clients. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent themes. Results describe the types of bans implemented; the reasons for adopting a policy; and the barriers and facilitators to implementation, enforcement, and compliance. A main facilitator was management support, whereas a main barrier was prosmoking norms. This analysis provides insight and lessons learned that can aid in scaling up tobacco control efforts in Lebanon and the Eastern Mediterranean region.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>20566550</pmid><doi>10.1177/1010539510373020</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-5395 |
ispartof | Asia-Pacific journal of public health, 2010-07, Vol.22 (3), p.168S-174S |
issn | 1010-5395 1941-2479 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733500648 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Addictions and Mental Health Attitude to Health Employment - organization & administration Focus Groups Health Policy Humans Interviews as Topic Lebanon Organizational Culture Organizational Policy Qualitative Research Restaurants Smoking - psychology Smoking Prevention Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control |
title | Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A22%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20Research%20Evidence%20for%20Policy%20Advocacy:%20A%20Qualitative%20Evaluation%20of%20Existing%20Smoke-Free%20Policies%20in%20Lebanon&rft.jtitle=Asia-Pacific%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Nakkash,%20Rima%20T&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=168S&rft.epage=174S&rft.pages=168S-174S&rft.issn=1010-5395&rft.eissn=1941-2479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1010539510373020&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26723680%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733500648&rft_id=info:pmid/20566550&rft_jstor_id=26723680&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1010539510373020&rfr_iscdi=true |