Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon

Secondhand smoke is harmful to smokers and nonsmokers, and smoke-free legislation worldwide improves health status. Lebanon has one of the weakest tobacco control regulatory environments in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, several Lebanese workplaces and hospitality venues have chosen to i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asia-Pacific journal of public health 2010-07, Vol.22 (3), p.168S-174S
Hauptverfasser: Nakkash, Rima T, Khalil, Joanna, Chaaya, Monique, Afifi, Rema A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 174S
container_issue 3
container_start_page 168S
container_title Asia-Pacific journal of public health
container_volume 22
creator Nakkash, Rima T
Khalil, Joanna
Chaaya, Monique
Afifi, Rema A.
description Secondhand smoke is harmful to smokers and nonsmokers, and smoke-free legislation worldwide improves health status. Lebanon has one of the weakest tobacco control regulatory environments in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, several Lebanese workplaces and hospitality venues have chosen to implement such policies on their own. The objective of this study was to document their experiences. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with management, employees, and clients. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent themes. Results describe the types of bans implemented; the reasons for adopting a policy; and the barriers and facilitators to implementation, enforcement, and compliance. A main facilitator was management support, whereas a main barrier was prosmoking norms. This analysis provides insight and lessons learned that can aid in scaling up tobacco control efforts in Lebanon and the Eastern Mediterranean region.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1010539510373020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733500648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26723680</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1010539510373020</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26723680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-ef59f2b656c8d259a740f74e630b10cf60959b51c6be49629e98f8916e88bc893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqHyUey9UvvUUGMexY_e2XS0f0krQAufIccbgbTYGO1mx_75ZhYLUQ08z0jzvI81LyBcGp4yV5RkDBoJrwYCXHHL4QA6YLliWF6X-OO7jOdvd98lhSisAoRXoT2Q_ByGlEHBA0o_Bt43vHugvTGiifaSLjW-ws0hdiPQmtN5u6azZBGvs9jud0Z-DaX1ver_BkTXtMK6ho8HRxYtP_c51uw6_MTuPiJPAY6K-o0usTRe6z2TPmTbh8es8Ivfni7v5Zba8vriaz5aZ5UL1GTqhXV5LIa1qcqFNWYArC5QcagbWSdBC14JZWWOhZa5RK6c0k6hUbZXmR-Tb5H2K4XnA1Fdrnyy2rekwDKkqORcAslAjCRNpY0gpoqueol-buK0YVLumq3-bHiNfX-VDvcbmLfC32hHIJiCZB6xWYYjd-Oz_hCcTv0p9iO8-WeZcKuB_AAdLjq8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733500648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Nakkash, Rima T ; Khalil, Joanna ; Chaaya, Monique ; Afifi, Rema A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakkash, Rima T ; Khalil, Joanna ; Chaaya, Monique ; Afifi, Rema A.</creatorcontrib><description>Secondhand smoke is harmful to smokers and nonsmokers, and smoke-free legislation worldwide improves health status. Lebanon has one of the weakest tobacco control regulatory environments in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, several Lebanese workplaces and hospitality venues have chosen to implement such policies on their own. The objective of this study was to document their experiences. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with management, employees, and clients. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent themes. Results describe the types of bans implemented; the reasons for adopting a policy; and the barriers and facilitators to implementation, enforcement, and compliance. A main facilitator was management support, whereas a main barrier was prosmoking norms. This analysis provides insight and lessons learned that can aid in scaling up tobacco control efforts in Lebanon and the Eastern Mediterranean region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1010539510373020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20566550</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Addictions and Mental Health ; Attitude to Health ; Employment - organization &amp; administration ; Focus Groups ; Health Policy ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Lebanon ; Organizational Culture ; Organizational Policy ; Qualitative Research ; Restaurants ; Smoking - psychology ; Smoking Prevention ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Asia-Pacific journal of public health, 2010-07, Vol.22 (3), p.168S-174S</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health</rights><rights>2010 APJPH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-ef59f2b656c8d259a740f74e630b10cf60959b51c6be49629e98f8916e88bc893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-ef59f2b656c8d259a740f74e630b10cf60959b51c6be49629e98f8916e88bc893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26723680$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26723680$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20566550$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakkash, Rima T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaaya, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afifi, Rema A.</creatorcontrib><title>Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon</title><title>Asia-Pacific journal of public health</title><addtitle>Asia Pac J Public Health</addtitle><description>Secondhand smoke is harmful to smokers and nonsmokers, and smoke-free legislation worldwide improves health status. Lebanon has one of the weakest tobacco control regulatory environments in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, several Lebanese workplaces and hospitality venues have chosen to implement such policies on their own. The objective of this study was to document their experiences. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with management, employees, and clients. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent themes. Results describe the types of bans implemented; the reasons for adopting a policy; and the barriers and facilitators to implementation, enforcement, and compliance. A main facilitator was management support, whereas a main barrier was prosmoking norms. This analysis provides insight and lessons learned that can aid in scaling up tobacco control efforts in Lebanon and the Eastern Mediterranean region.</description><subject>Addictions and Mental Health</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Employment - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Lebanon</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Organizational Policy</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Restaurants</subject><subject>Smoking - psychology</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>1010-5395</issn><issn>1941-2479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqHyUey9UvvUUGMexY_e2XS0f0krQAufIccbgbTYGO1mx_75ZhYLUQ08z0jzvI81LyBcGp4yV5RkDBoJrwYCXHHL4QA6YLliWF6X-OO7jOdvd98lhSisAoRXoT2Q_ByGlEHBA0o_Bt43vHugvTGiifaSLjW-ws0hdiPQmtN5u6azZBGvs9jud0Z-DaX1ver_BkTXtMK6ho8HRxYtP_c51uw6_MTuPiJPAY6K-o0usTRe6z2TPmTbh8es8Ivfni7v5Zba8vriaz5aZ5UL1GTqhXV5LIa1qcqFNWYArC5QcagbWSdBC14JZWWOhZa5RK6c0k6hUbZXmR-Tb5H2K4XnA1Fdrnyy2rekwDKkqORcAslAjCRNpY0gpoqueol-buK0YVLumq3-bHiNfX-VDvcbmLfC32hHIJiCZB6xWYYjd-Oz_hCcTv0p9iO8-WeZcKuB_AAdLjq8</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Nakkash, Rima T</creator><creator>Khalil, Joanna</creator><creator>Chaaya, Monique</creator><creator>Afifi, Rema A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon</title><author>Nakkash, Rima T ; Khalil, Joanna ; Chaaya, Monique ; Afifi, Rema A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-ef59f2b656c8d259a740f74e630b10cf60959b51c6be49629e98f8916e88bc893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Addictions and Mental Health</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Employment - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Lebanon</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Organizational Policy</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Restaurants</topic><topic>Smoking - psychology</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakkash, Rima T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaaya, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afifi, Rema A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakkash, Rima T</au><au>Khalil, Joanna</au><au>Chaaya, Monique</au><au>Afifi, Rema A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon</atitle><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Asia Pac J Public Health</addtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>168S</spage><epage>174S</epage><pages>168S-174S</pages><issn>1010-5395</issn><eissn>1941-2479</eissn><abstract>Secondhand smoke is harmful to smokers and nonsmokers, and smoke-free legislation worldwide improves health status. Lebanon has one of the weakest tobacco control regulatory environments in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, several Lebanese workplaces and hospitality venues have chosen to implement such policies on their own. The objective of this study was to document their experiences. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with management, employees, and clients. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent themes. Results describe the types of bans implemented; the reasons for adopting a policy; and the barriers and facilitators to implementation, enforcement, and compliance. A main facilitator was management support, whereas a main barrier was prosmoking norms. This analysis provides insight and lessons learned that can aid in scaling up tobacco control efforts in Lebanon and the Eastern Mediterranean region.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>20566550</pmid><doi>10.1177/1010539510373020</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-5395
ispartof Asia-Pacific journal of public health, 2010-07, Vol.22 (3), p.168S-174S
issn 1010-5395
1941-2479
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733500648
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Addictions and Mental Health
Attitude to Health
Employment - organization & administration
Focus Groups
Health Policy
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Lebanon
Organizational Culture
Organizational Policy
Qualitative Research
Restaurants
Smoking - psychology
Smoking Prevention
Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control
title Building Research Evidence for Policy Advocacy: A Qualitative Evaluation of Existing Smoke-Free Policies in Lebanon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A22%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20Research%20Evidence%20for%20Policy%20Advocacy:%20A%20Qualitative%20Evaluation%20of%20Existing%20Smoke-Free%20Policies%20in%20Lebanon&rft.jtitle=Asia-Pacific%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Nakkash,%20Rima%20T&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=168S&rft.epage=174S&rft.pages=168S-174S&rft.issn=1010-5395&rft.eissn=1941-2479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1010539510373020&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26723680%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733500648&rft_id=info:pmid/20566550&rft_jstor_id=26723680&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1010539510373020&rfr_iscdi=true